We Are All Theorists of Technology Now: A Relational Perspective on Emerging Technology and Organizing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1562

References

  • Agrawal A, Gans JS, Goldfarb A (2019) Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. J. Econom. Perspect. 33(2):31–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajunwa I, Crawford K, Schultz J (2017) Limitless worker surveillance. California Law Rev. 105(3):735–776.Google Scholar
  • Alaimo C, Kallinikos J (2022) Organizations decentered: Data objects, technology and knowledge. Organ. Sci. 33(1):19–37.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari S, Garud R (2016) The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1829–1853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M, Chan CK, DiBenigno J (2016) Three lenses on occupations and professions in organizations: Becoming, doing, and relating. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):183–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arthur WB (2009) The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Baldwin CY (2019) Setting the stage for corporate headquarters: A technological explanation for the rise of modern industrial corporations. J. Organ. Design 8(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):61–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2012) Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1448–1466.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bijker WE, Law J, eds. (1994) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bodrožić Z, Adler P (2022) Alternative futures for the digital transformation: A macro-level Schumpeterian perspective. Organ. Sci. 33(1):105–125.Google Scholar
  • Boudreau MC, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16(1):3–18.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bradbury H, Lichtenstein BMB (2000) Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organ. Sci. 11(5):551–564.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Butts CT (2008) A relational event framework for social action. Sociol. Methodology 38(1):155–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callon M (1986) The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. Callon M, Law J, Rip A, eds. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 19–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron L (2022) “Making out” while driving: Relational and efficiency games in the gig economy. Organ. Sci. 33(1):231–252.Google Scholar
  • Cameron L, Rahman H (2022) Expanding the locus of resistance: Understanding the co-constitution of control and resistance in the gig economy. Organ. Sci. 33(1):38–58.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cassidy FG (1943) Apple-picking terms from Wisconsin. Amer. Speech 18(1):74–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cecez-Kecmanovic D, Galliers RD, Henfridsson O, Newell S, Vidgen R (2014) The sociomateriality of information systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(3):809–830.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P, Allen D (2022) Algorithm-augmented work and domain experience: The countervailing forces of ability and aversion. Organ. Sci. 33(1):149–169.Google Scholar
  • Cohendet PS, Simon LO (2016) Always playable: Recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s video game studio. Organ. Sci. 27(3):614–632.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Contractor NS, Monge PR, Leonardi PM (2011) Multidimensional networks and the dynamics of sociomateriality: Bringing technology inside the network. Internat. J. Comm. 5:682–720.Google Scholar
  • Davis GF, Sinha A (2021) Varieties of uberization: How technology and institutions change the organization(s) of late capitalism. Organ. Theory 2(1):2631787721995198.Google Scholar
  • Durkheim E (1947) The Division of Labor in Society (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Elias N (1991) The Society of Individuals (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Emirbayer M (1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(2):281–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Pachidi S (2021) Beyond Uberization: The co-constitution of technology and organizing. Organ. Theory 2(1).Google Scholar
  • Faraj S, Pachidi S, Sayegh K (2018) Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Inform. Organ. 28(1):62–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, von Krogh G, Monteiro E, Lakhani KR (2016) Online community as space for knowledge flows. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):668–684.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faulkner P, Runde J (2009) On the identity of technological objects and user innovations in function. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):442–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Lazaric N (2016) Beyond routines as things. Organ. Sci. 27(3):505–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson CB, Dunlop PD, Majchrzak A, Chia T (2022) Sustaining effectiveness in global teams: The coevolution of knowledge management activities and technology affordances. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Grandori A, Soda G (1995) Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms, and forms. Organ. Stud. 16(2):183–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He VF, Puranam P, Shrestha YR, Von Krogh G (2020) Resolving governance disputes in communities: A study of software license decisions. Strategic Management J. 41(10):1837–1868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jasanoff S (2016) The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kallinikos J (2012) Form, function, and matter: Crossing the border of materiality. Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 67–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kane G, Ngu A, Copulsky J, Andrus G (2019) The Technology Fallacy: How People Are the Real Key to Digital Transformation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karunakaran A, Orlikowski W, Scott S (2022) Crowd-based accountability: Examining how social media commentary reconfigures organizational accountability. Organ. Sci. 33(1):170–193.Google Scholar
  • Lanzolla G, Lorenz A, Miron-Spektor E, Schilling M, Solinas G, Tucci CL (2020) Digital transformation: What is new of anything? Emerging patterns and management research. Acad. Management Discoveries 6(3):341–350.Google Scholar
  • Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Lazer D, Radford J (2017) Data ex machina: Introduction to big data. Annual Rev. Sociol. 43:19–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lebovitz S, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Levina N (2022) To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis. Organ. Sci. 33(1):126–148.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2007) Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organ. Sci. 18(5):813–831.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(1):147–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2021) COVID-19 and the new technologies of organizing: Digital exhaust, digital footprints, and artificial intelligence in the wake of remote work. J. Management Stud. 51(1):247–251.Google Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Treem JW (2020) Behavioral visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication. Organ. Stud. 41(12):1601–1625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Bailey DE, Pierce CS (2019) The co-evolution of objects and boundaries over time: Materiality, affordances, and boundary salience. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):665–686.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levy K (2015) The contexts of control: Information, power, and truck driving work. Inform. Soc. 31:160–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin Y, Maruping X (2022) Open source collaboration in digital entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 33(1):212–230.Google Scholar
  • Luhmann N (1995) Social Systems (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Malhotra A, Zaggl MA (2021) How open crowds self-organize. Acad. Management Discoveries 7(1):104–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T (2004) The Future of Work (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Menz M, Kunisch S, Birkinshaw J, Collis DJ, Foss NJ, Hoskisson RE, Prescott JE (2021) Corporate strategy and the theory of the firm in the digital age. J. Management Stud. 58(7):1695–1720.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mutch A (2013) Technology, organization, and structure—A morphogenetic approach. Organ. Sci. 21(2):507–520.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oezbilgin M, Tatli A (2005) Book review essay: Understanding Bordieu’s contribution to organization and management studies. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):855–877.Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1):63–92.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):433–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Parsons T (2013) The Social System (Routledge, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B, Yoo Y, Recker K, Kim I (2022) From lock-in to transformation: A path-centric theory of emerging technology and organizing. Organ. Sci. 33(1):194–211.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rahman H (2021) The invisible cage: Workers’ reactivity to opaque algorithmic evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):945–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rauch M, Ansari S (2022) Waging war from remote cubicles: How workers cope with technologies that disrupt the meaning and morality of their work. Organ. Sci. 33(1):83–104.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Rescher N (1996) Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy (SUNY Press, Albany, NY).Google Scholar
  • Rodriguez‐Lluesma C, García‐Ruiz P, Pinto‐Garay J (2021) The digital transformation of work: A relational view. Business Ethics Environ. Responsibility 30(1):157–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schecter A, Pilny A, Leung A, Poole MS, Contractor N (2018) Step by step: Capturing the dynamics of work team process through relational event sequences. J. Organ. Behav. 39(9):1163–1181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schnore LF (1958) Social morphology and human ecology. Amer. J. Sociol. 63(6):620–634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shrestha YR, He VF, Puranam P, von Krogh G (2021) Algorithm supported induction for building theory: How can we use prediction models to theorize? Organ. Sci. 32(3):856–880.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simmel G (1906) The sociology of secrecy and of secret societies. Amer. J. Sociol. 11(4):441–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith MR, Marx L, eds. (1994) Does Technology Drive History?: The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (MIT Press).Google Scholar
  • Thompson JD (1967) Organization in Action (McGraw-Hill, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Tilly C (1998) Durable Inequality (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaast E, Pinsonneault A (2021) When digital technologies enable and threaten occupational identity: The delicate balancing act of data scientists. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 46(3):1087–1112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G (2018) Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Acad. Management Discoveries 4(4):402–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G, von Hippel E (2006) The promise of research on open source software. Management Sci. 52(7):975–983.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy 32(7):1217–1241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waardenburg L, Huysman M, Sergeeva AV (2022) In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king: Knowledge brokerage in the age of learning algorithms. Organ. Sci. 33(1):59–82.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winner L (1986) The Whale and the Reactor (University of Chicago Press). Google Scholar
  • Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S(2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zuboff S (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (Public Affairs, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.