Learning from Failures: Differentiating Between Slip-ups and Knowledge Gaps

References

• Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Cole RE (1993) Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants. Sloan Management Rev. 34(3):85–94.Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility vs. efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Anand G, Gray J, Siemsen E (2012) Decay, shock, and renewal: Operational routines and process entropy in the pharmaceutical industry. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1700–1716.Link, Google Scholar
• Anand J, Mulotte L, Ren CR (2016) Does experience imply learning? Strategic Management J. 37(7):1395–1412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JC, Rungtusanatham M, Schroeder RG (1994) A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Acad. Management Rev. 19(3):472–509.Google Scholar
• Argote L (2013) Organization learning: A theoretical framework. Organizational Learning (Springer, Boston), 31–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Greve HR (2007) A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. 18(3):337–349.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Guo JM (2016) Routines and transactive memory systems: Creating, coordinating, retaining, and transferring knowledge in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:65–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Guo J, Park SS, Hahl O (2022) The mechanisms and components of knowledge transfer: The virtual special issue on knowledge transfer within organizations. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1232–1249.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyris C (1977) Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Bus. Rev. 55(5):115–125.Google Scholar
• Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Argyris C, Schön D (1996) Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Astvansh V, Ball GP, Josefy M (2022a) The recall decision exposed: Automobile recall timing and process data set. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(3):1457–1473.Link, Google Scholar
• Astvansh V, Wang YY, Shi W (2022b) The effects of the news media on a firm’s voluntary product recalls. Production Oper. Management 31(11):4223–4244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attewell P (1992) Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organ. Sci. 3(1):1–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Bailey J, Hora M, Gaimon C (2014) The ambidexterity paradox: Balancing exploration, exploitation and learning from failure. Acad. Management Proc. 2014(1):15132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball GP, Shah R, Wowak KD (2018) Product competition, managerial discretion, and manufacturing recalls in the US pharmaceutical industry. J. Oper. Management 58:59–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Freeman J (2001) Too much of a good thing? Product proliferation and organizational failure. Organ. Sci. 12(5):539–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon MD, Edmondson AC (2001) Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 22(2):161–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon MD, Edmondson AC (2005) Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning 38(3):299–319.Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran A, Linderman K, Schroeder R (2012) Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high technology organizations. J. Oper. Management 30(1–2):134–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ganesan S, Liu Y (2009) Does a firm’s product-recall strategy affect its financial value? An examination of strategic alternatives during product-harm crises. J. Marketing, 73(6):214–226.Google Scholar
• Choo AS, Linderman KW, Schroeder RG (2007) Method and psychological effects on learning behaviors and knowledge creation in quality improvement projects. Management Sci. 53(3):437–450.Link, Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM, Henderson RM (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craig SN, Thomas RJ (1996) A strategic approach to managing product recalls. Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(5):102–112.Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dahlin KB, Chuang YT, Roulet TJ (2018) Opportunity, motivation, and ability to learn from failures and errors: Review, synthesis, and ways to move forward. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):252–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darby JL, Ketchen DJ Jr, Ball GP, Mukherjee U (2023) CEO stock ownership, recall timing, and stock market penalties. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(5):1909–1930.Link, Google Scholar
• DeCarolis DM, Deeds DL (1999) The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management J. 20(10):953–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deichmann D, Ende JVD (2014) Rising from failure and learning from success: The role of past experience in radical initiative taking. Organ. Sci. 25(3):670–690.Link, Google Scholar
• Denning S (2022) Forbes.com. Accessed December 1, 2023, https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2022/07/31/how-novartis-is-finding-the-path-to-be-a-digital-winner/?sh=38352584bec5.Google Scholar
• Desai V, Madsen P (2022) Take your time? How activity timing affects organizational learning and performance outcomes. Organ. Sci. 33(5):1707–1723.Link, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Bruyaka O, Mangematin V (2008) Do science and money go together? The case of the French biotech industry. Strategic Management J. 29(12):1281–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edison H, Smørsgård NM, Wang X, Abrahamsson P (2018) Lean internal startups for software product innovation in large companies: Enablers and inhibitors. J. Systems Software 135:69–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2011) Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(4):48–55.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2023) Right Kind of Wrong: The Science of Failing Well (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Eggers JP (2012a) All experience is not created equal: Learning, adapting, and focusing in product portfolio management. Strategic Management J. 33(3):315–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP (2012b) Falling flat: Failed technologies and investment under uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):47–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Suh JH (2019) Experience and behavior: How negative feedback in new vs. experienced domains affects firm action and subsequent performance. Acad. Management J. 62(2):309–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• FDA (2014) Distinguishing medical device recalls from medical device enhancements. Accessed August 5, 2021, https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/distinguishing-medical-device-recalls-medical-device-enhancements.Google Scholar
• FDA (2019) Resources for information|approved drugs. Accessed October 1, 2020, https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/resources-information-approved-drugs.Google Scholar
• FDA (2020a) Mandatory reporting requirements: Manufacturers, importers and device user facilities. Accessed August 5, 2021, https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/postmarket-requirements-devices/mandatory-reporting-requirements-manufacturers-importers-and-device-user-facilities.Google Scholar
• FDA (2020b) Product recalls, including removals and corrections. Accessed August 5, 2021, https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/product-recalls-including-removals-and-corrections.Google Scholar
• Frese M, Keith N (2015) Action errors, error management, and learning in organizations. Annu. Rev. Psych. 66(1):661–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Duan W, Rui H (2022) Does social media accelerate product recalls? Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):954–977.Link, Google Scholar
• Goodman PS, Ramanujam R, Carroll JS, Edmondson AC, Hofmann DA, Sutcliffe KM (2011) Organizational errors: Directions for future research. Res. Organ. Behav. 31:151–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Taylor A (2000) Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):54–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Polidoro Jr, F, Chandler D (2015) Organizational oscillation between learning and forgetting: The dual role of serious errors. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1682–1701.Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Rhee M (2004) The role of volition in organizational learning: The case of automotive product recalls. Management Sci. 50(11):1545–1560.Link, Google Scholar
• Hora M, Bapuji H, Roth AV (2011) Safety hazard and time to recall: The role of recall strategy, product defect type, and supply chain player in the US toy industry. J. Oper. Management 29(7–8):766–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen JJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2005) Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Management J. 48(6):999–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen JJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen RJ, Szulanski G (2007) Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 53(11):1716–1730.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalaignanam K, Kushwaha T, Eilert M (2013) The impact of product recalls on future product reliability and future accidents: Evidence from the automobile industry. J. Marketing 77(2):41–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Alavi M (2007) Information technology and organizational learning: An investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organ. Sci. 18(5):796–812.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, McIntosh CN (2017) Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: Theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations. J. Oper. Management 52:1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna R, Guler I, Nerkar A (2016) Fail often, fail big, and fail fast? Learning from small failures and R&D performance in the pharmaceutical industry. Acad. Management J. 59(2):436–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Nti KO (1998) Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: A process and outcome discrepancy model. Organ. Sci. 9(3):356–367.Link, Google Scholar
• Lane PJ, Koka BR, Pathak S (2006) The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):833–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lugovoi I, Andritsos DA, Senot C (2022) Novelty and scope of process innovation: The role of related and unrelated manufacturing experience. Production Oper. Management 31(10):3877–3895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madsen PM, Desai V (2010) Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad. Management J. 53(3):451–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martini A, Neirotti P, Appio FP (2017) Knowledge searching, integrating and performing: Always a tuned trio for innovation? Long Range Planning 50(2):200–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maslach D (2016) Change and persistence with failed technological innovation. Strategic Management J. 37(4):714–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maslach D, Branzei O, Rerup C, Zbaracki MJ (2018) Noise as signal in learning from rare events. Organ. Sci. 29(2):225–246.Link, Google Scholar
• Muehlfeld K, Rao Sahib P, Van Witteloostuijn A (2012) A contextual theory of organizational learning from failures and successes: A study of acquisition completion in the global newspaper industry, 1981–2008. Strategic Management J. 33(8):938–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukherjee UK, Sinha KK (2018) Product recall decisions in medical device supply chains: A big data analytic approach to evaluating judgment bias. Production Oper. Management 27(10):1816–1833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler DA, Tushman M (1999) The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organ. Dynamics 27(1):45–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagaich U, Sadhna D (2015) Drug recall: An incubus for pharmaceutical companies and most serious drug recall of history. Internat. J. Pharmaceutical Investigation 5(1):13–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natof T, Pellegrini MV (2023) Food and Drug Administration Recalls (StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL).Google Scholar
• O’Brien JP (2003) The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management J. 24(5):415–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Wohlgezogen F (2010) Attention and control. Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 191–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Rhee L, Milner D (2020) Attention, knowledge, and organizational learning. Argote L, Levine JM, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 81–94.Google Scholar
• Park B, Lehman DW, Ramanujam R (2023) Driven to distraction: The unintended consequences of organizational learning from failure caused by human error. Organ. Sci. 34(1):283–302.Link, Google Scholar
• Pederson A (2022) Mddionline.com. Accessed December 1, 2023, https://www.mddionline.com/design-engineering/how-medtronic-is-fostering-innovation-in-2022.Google Scholar
• Pennetier C, Girotra K, Mihm J (2019) R&D spending: Dynamic or persistent? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):636–657.Link, Google Scholar
• Popper M, Lipshitz R (1998) Organizational learning mechanisms: A structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 34(2):161–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qin J, van der Rhee B (2021) From trash to treasure: A checklist to identify high-potential NPD projects from previously rejected projects. Technovation 104:102259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics 3:257–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reason J (2016) Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents (Routledge, Oxfordshire, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repenning NP, Sterman JD (2001) Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: Creating and sustaining process improvement. California Management Rev. 43(4):64–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2004) Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. 25(3):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider P, Sting FJ (2020) Employees’ perspectives on digitalization-induced change: Exploring frames of industry 4.0. Acad. Management Discovery 6(3):406–435.Google Scholar
• Sears J, Hoetker G (2014) Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 35(1):48–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Setia P, Patel PC (2013) How information systems help create OM capabilities: Consequents and antecedents of operational absorptive capacity. J. Oper. Management 31(6):409–431.Google Scholar
• Shah R, Ball GP, Netessine S (2017) Plant operations and product recalls in the automotive industry: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 63(8):2439–2459.Link, Google Scholar
• Sitkin SB (1992) Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Res. Organ. Behav. 14:231–266.Google Scholar
• Sitkin SB, Sutcliffe KM, Schroeder RG (1994) Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 19(3):537–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spear S, Bowen HK (1999) Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77:96–108.Google Scholar
• Tatikonda MV, Montoya-Weiss MM (2001) Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Sci. 47(1):151–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor KT (2021) Innovators must be powerful storytellers. Res. Tech. Management 64(3):43–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1999) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Zack MH, ed. Knowledge and Strategy (Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, MA), 77–115.Google Scholar
• Thirumalai S, Sinha KK (2011) Product recalls in the medical device industry: An empirical exploration of the sources and financial consequences. Management Sci. 57(2):376–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Ton Z, Huckman RS (2008) Managing the impact of employee turnover on performance: The role of process conformance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):56–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. 44(5):996–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker AL, Edmondson AC (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Rev. 45(2):55–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW, De Boer M (1999) Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ. Sci. 10(5):551–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G, Anand J (2011) Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios. Acad. Management J. 54(3):611–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Voelpel SC, Dous M, Davenport TH (2005) Five steps to creating a global knowledge-sharing system: Siemens’ ShareNet. Acad. Management Perspective 19(2):9–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volberda HW, Foss NJ, Lyles MA (2010) Perspective—Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organ. Sci. 21(4):931–951.Link, Google Scholar
• Wienroth M, McCormack P, Joyce TJ (2014) Precaution, governance and the failure of medical implants: The ASR (TM) hip in the UK. Life Sci. Soc. Policy 10(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams ED (2010) The medical device approval process and related legislative issues (RL32826). Congressional Research Service. Accessed August 5, 2021, https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL32826.html.Google Scholar
• Wowak KD, Boone CA (2015) So many recalls, so little research: A review of the literature and road map for future research. J. Supply Chain Management 51(4):54–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wowak KD, Ball GP, Post C, Ketchen DJJ (2021) The influence of female directors on product recall decisions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(4):895–913.Link, Google Scholar
• Zacharia ZG, Nix NW, Lusch RF (2011) Capabilities that enhance outcomes of an episodic supply chain collaboration. J. Oper. Management 29(6):591–603.Google Scholar
• Zavyalova A, Pfarrer MD, Reger RK, Shapiro DL (2012) Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1079–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zou F, Dong Y, Song S, Rungtusanatham M (2023) Product recalls and supply base innovation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Managemment. 25(5):1931–1946.Link, Google Scholar