The (Bounded) Role of Stated-Lived Value Congruence and Authenticity in Employee Evaluations of Organizations

References

• Aaker J, Vohs KD, Mogilner C (2010) Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. J. Consumer Res. 37(2):224–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abele AE, Bruckmüller S (2011) The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(5):935–948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert S, Whetten DA (1985) Organizational identity. Cummings LL, Staw MM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 7 (JAI, Greenwich, CT), 263–295.Google Scholar
• Amos EA, Weathington BL (2008) An analysis of the relation between employee-organization value congruence and employee attitudes. J. Psych. 142:615–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P (2003) From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organ. Sci. 14(5):510–527.Link, Google Scholar
• Bedeian AG, Ferris GR, Kacmar KM (1992) Age, tenure, and job satisfaction: A tale of two perspectives. J. Vocational Behav. 40(1):33–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharov ML (2014) The relational ecology of identification: How organizational identification emerges when individuals hold divergent values. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1485–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beverland MB (2005) Crafting brand authenticity: The case of luxury wines. J. Management Stud. 42(5):1003–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beverland MN (2009) Building Brand Authenticity: 7 Habits of Iconic Brands (Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beverland MB, Luxton S (2005) Managing integrated marketing communication (IMC) through strategic decoupling: How luxury wine firms retain brand leadership while appearing to be wedded to the past. J. Advertising 34(4):103–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitektine A, Lucas J, Schilke O (2018) Institutions under a microscope: Experimental methods in institutional theory. Bryman A, Buchanan DA, eds. Unconventional Methodology in Organization and Management Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 147–167.Google Scholar
• Brambilla M, Sacchi S, Rusconi P, Goodwin GP (2021) The primacy of morality in impression development: Theory, research, and future directions. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 64:187–262.Google Scholar
• Bourne H, Jenkins M (2013) Organizational values: A dynamic perspective. Organ. Stud. 34(4):495–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourne H, Jenkins M, Parry E (2019) Mapping espoused organizational values. J. Bus. Ethics 159(1):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27(4):1010–1028.Link, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, DeRue DS (2002) The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. J. Appl. Psych. 87(5):875–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Edwards JR (2004) Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. J. Appl. Psych. 89(5):822–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Judge TA (1996) Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(3):294–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the US brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Wheaton DR (2009) The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the U.S. Brief AP, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 29 (Elsevier/JAI, New York), 255–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carton AM, Murphy C, Clark JR (2014) A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1544–1570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Dunbar RL, Shapira Z (2017) How commitment to craftsmanship leads to unique value: Steinway & Sons’ differentiation strategy. Strategy Sci. 2(1):13–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Cha SE, Edmondson AC (2006) When values backfire: Leadership, attribution, and disenchantment in a values-driven organization. Leadership Quart. 17(1):57–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha SE, Hewlin PF, Roberts LM, Buckman BR, Leroy H, Steckler EL, Ostermeier K, et al. (2019) Being your true self at work: Integrating the fragmented research on authenticity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):633–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA (1989) Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Borden RJ, Thorne A, Walker MR, Freeman S, Sloan LR (1976) Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 34(3):366–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collier J, Esteban R (2007) Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 16(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Comer DR (1991) Organizational newcomers’ acquisition of information from peers. Management Comm. Quart. 5(1):64–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cording M, Harrison JS, Hoskisson RE, Jonsen K (2014) Walking the talk: A multistakeholder exploration of organizational authenticity, employee productivity, and post-merger performance. Acad. Management Perspective 28(1):38–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corritore M, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2020) Duality in diversity: How intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demetry D (2019) How organizations claim authenticity: The coproduction of illusions in underground restaurants. Organ. Sci. 30(5):937–960.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM (1991) Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Acad. Management J. 34(3):517–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV (1994) Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):239–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (1994) The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 58(1):51–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Devine PG (1994) On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(3):382–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11(2):77–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frake J (2017) Selling out: The inauthenticity discount in the craft beer industry. Management Sci. 63(11):3930–3943.Link, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Treviño LK, Garud R (2013) Values work: A process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Acad. Management J. 56(1):84–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Kouchaki M, Galinsky AD (2015) The moral virtue of authenticity: How inauthenticity produces feelings of immorality and impurity. Psych. Sci. 26(7):983–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Norton MI, Ariely D (2010) The counterfeit self: The deceptive costs of faking it. Psych. Sci. 21(5):712–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Price KN, Hamilton AL, Thomas JB (2010) Forging an identity: An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Hannan MT, Kovács B (2016) What does it mean to span cultural boundaries? Variety and atypicality in cultural consumption. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(2):215–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin GP (2015) Moral character in person perception. Current Directive Psych. Sci. 24(1):38–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin GP, Piazza J, Rozin P (2014) Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 106(1):148–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grauel J (2016) Being authentic or being responsible? Food consumption, morality and the presentation of self. J. Consumer Culture 16(3):852–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grazian D (2005) Blue Chicago: The Search for Authenticity in Urban Blues Clubs (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Green TC, Huang R, Wen Q, Zhou D (2019) Crowdsourced employer reviews and stock returns. J. Financial Econom. 134(1):236–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O (2016) Turning back the clock in baseball: The increased prominence of extrinsic rewards and demand for authenticity. Organ. Sci. 27(4):929–953.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Ha J (2020) Committed diversification: Why authenticity insulates against penalties for diversification. Organ. Sci. 31(1):1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW (2015) The denigration of heroes? How the status attainment process shapes attributions of considerateness and authenticity. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(2):504–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW, Kim M (2017) Why elites love authentic lowbrow culture: Overcoming high-status denigration with outsider art. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(4):828–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidegger M (1962) Being and Time (SCM Press, London).Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Battle WS, Keller CE, Lee RA (1998) Type of affirmative action policy: A determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection? J. Appl. Psych. 83(2):190–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitlin S, Piliavin JA (2004) Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30:359–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitlin S, Vaisey S, eds. (2010) Handbook of the Sociology of Morality (Springer S&B Media, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang M, Li P, Meschke F, Guthrie JP (2015) Family firms, employee satisfaction, and corporate performance. J. Corporate Finance 34:108–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsen K, Galunic C, Weeks J, Braga T (2015) Evaluating espoused values: Does articulating values pay off? Eur. Management J. 33(5):332–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd CM, James-Hawkins L, Yzerbyt V, Kashima Y (2005) Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):899–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Piccolo RF, Podsakoff NP, Shaw JC, Rich BL (2010) The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the literature. J. Vocational Behav. 77(2):157–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabanoff B, Waldersee R, Cohen M (1995) Espoused values and organizational change themes. Acad. Management J. 38(4):1075–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang SK, DeCelles KA, Tilcsik A, Jun S (2016) Whitened résumés: Race and self-presentation in the labor market. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):469–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG (2015) Organizational actors, character, and selznick’s theory of organizations. Kraatz MM, ed. Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick’s Legacy for Organizational Studies. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 44 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, London), 149–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkman BL, Shapiro DL (2001) The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Acad. Management J. 44(3):557–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B (2019) Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: The exploration of audiences’ lay associations to authenticity across five domains. Rev. General Psych. 23(1):32–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Carroll GR, Lehman DW (2014) Authenticity and consumer value ratings: Empirical tests from the restaurant domain. Organ. Sci. 25(2):458–478.Link, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Carroll GR, Lehman DW (2017) The perils of proclaiming an authentic organizational identity. Sociol. Sci. 4:80–106.Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Flores R (2015) Reinfusing values. Kraatz MM, ed. Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick’s Legacy for Organizational Studies. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 44 (Emerald Group, London), 353–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristof AL (1996) Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personality Psych. 49(1):1–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakens D, Caldwell AR (2021) Simulation-based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Adv. Methods Practices Psych. Sci. 4(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landers RN, Brusso RC, Auer EM (2019) Crowdsourcing job satisfaction data: Examining the construct validity of Glassdoor.com ratings. Personnel Assessment Decisions 5(3):45–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landy JF, Piazza J, Goodwin GP (2016) When it’s bad to be friendly and smart: The desirability of sociability and competence depends on morality. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 42(9):1272–1290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leach CW, Ellemers N, Barreto M (2007) Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(2):234–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehman DW, Kovács B, Carroll GR (2014) Conflicting social codes and organizations: Hygiene and authenticity in consumer evaluations of restaurants. Management Sci. 60(10):2602–2617.Link, Google Scholar
• Lehman DW, O’Connor K, Carroll GR (2019b) Acting on authenticity: Individual interpretations and behavioral responses. Rev. General Psych. 23(1):19–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehman DW, O’Connor K, Kovács B, Newman GE (2019a) Authenticity. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lencioni PM (2002) Make your values mean something. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(7):113–117.Google Scholar
• Levine G, Parkinson S (2014) Experimental Methods in Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litman L, Robinson J, Abberbock T (2017) TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 49(2):433–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu S, Fine GA (1995) The presentation of ethnic authenticity: Chinese food as a social accomplishment. Sociol. Quart. 36(3):535–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mael FA, Ashforth BE (1995) Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personality Psych. 48(2):309–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meglino BM, Ravlin EC (1998) Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. J. Management 24(3):351–389.Google Scholar
• Mobley WH (1977) Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 62(2):237–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (1993) Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 36(3):557–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2011) Category reinterpretation and defection: Modernism and tradition in Italian winemaking. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1449–1463.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Connor K, Carroll GR, Kovács B (2017) Disambiguating authenticity: Interpretations of value and appeal. PLoS One 12(6):e0179187.Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Chatman JA, Caldwell DF (1991) People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad. Management J. 34(3):487–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Francis ME, Booth RJ (2001) Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2001 (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Spicer A (2014) How emerging organizations take form: The role of imprinting and values in organizational bricolage. Organ. Sci. 25(6):785–1806.Link, Google Scholar
• Peterson RA (2005) In search of authenticity. J. Management Stud. 42(5):1083–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piasentin KA, Chapman DS (2006) Subjective person–organization fit: Bridging the gap between conceptualization and measurement. J. Vocational Behav. 69(2):202–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF (1994) Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(4):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Press M, Arnould EJ (2011) How does organizational identification form? A consumer behavior perspective. J. Consumer Res. 38(4):650–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radoynovska N, King BG (2019) To whom are you true? Audience perceptions of authenticity in nascent crowdfunding ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(4):781–802.Link, Google Scholar
• Ravasi D, Schultz M (2006) Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Acad. Management J. 49(3):433–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rokeach M (1973) The Nature of Human Values, vol. 438 (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ruttan RL, Nordgren LF (2016) The strength to face the facts: Self-regulation defends against defensive information processing. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 137:86–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruttan RL, Lin J, Nordgren LF (2021) Stating aspirational values reduces organizational trust. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
• Sartre JP (1943) Being and Nothingness: Phenomenological Essay on Ontology (Gallimard, Paris).Google Scholar
• Schein EH (1985) Defining organizational culture. Classics Organ. Theory 3:490–502.Google Scholar
• Schifeling T, Demetry D (2021) The new food truck in town: Geographic communities and authenticity-based entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 32(1):133–155.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmader T, Sedikides C (2018) State authenticity as fit to environment: The implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and self-segregation. Pers. Soc. Psych. Rev. 22(3):228–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 25(1):1–65.Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH (2012) An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Reading Psych. Culture 2(1):2307–0919.Google Scholar
• Sedikides C, Slabu L, Lenton A, Thomaes S (2017) State authenticity. Current Directives Psych. Sci. 26(6):521–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sekiguchi T, Huber VL (2011) The use of person–organization fit and person–job fit information in making selection decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(2):203–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Sirgy MJ (1982) Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. J. Consumer Res. 9(3):287–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirianni NJ, Bitner MJ, Brown SW, Mandel N (2013) Branded service encounters: Strategically aligning employee behavior with the brand positioning. J. Marketing 77(6):108–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith RK, Newman GE, Dhar R (2016) Closer to the creator: Temporal contagion explains the preference for earlier serial numbers. J. Consumer Res. 42(5):653–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swann WB Jr, Jetten J, Gómez Á, Whitehouse H, Bastian B (2012) When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psych. Rev. 119(3):441–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Language Soc. Psych. 29(1):24–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treviño LK, Butterfield KD, McCabe DL (1998) The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Bus. Ethics Quart. 8(03):447–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trilling L (1972) Sincerity and Authenticity (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
• Verhaal JC, Dobrev SD (2022) The authenticity paradox: Why the returns to authenticity on audience appeal decrease in popularity and iconicity. J. Management 48(2):251–280.Google Scholar
• Verhaal JC, Hoskins JD, Lundmark LW (2017) Little fish in a big pond: Legitimacy transfer, authenticity, and factors of peripheral firm entry and growth in the market center. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2532–2552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhaal JC, Khessina OM, Dobrev SD (2015) Oppositional product names, organizational identities, and product appeal. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1466–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• Voronov M, De Clercq D, Hinings CR (2013) Institutional complexity and logic engagement: An investigation of Ontario fine wine. Human Relations 66(12):1563–1596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilton LS, Bell AN, Vahradyan M, Kaiser CR (2020) Show don’t tell: Diversity dishonesty harms racial/ethnic minorities at work. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 46(8):1171–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar