Just Diverse Among Themselves: How Does Negative Performance Feedback Affect Boards’ Expertise vs. Ascriptive Diversity?

References

• Abrams D, Hogg MA (2006) Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB (2017) Boards, and the directors who sit on them. Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS, eds. The Handbook of the Economics of Corporate Governance (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 291–382.Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94(2):291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahern KR, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Greve HR (2007) A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. 18(3):337–349.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrfelt M, Wiseman RM, Hult GTM (2013) Looking backward instead of forward: Aspiration-driven influences on the efficiency of the capital allocation process. Acad. Management J. 56(4):1081–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1998) What has economics to say about racial discrimination? J. Econom. Perspect. 12(2):91–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Askin N, Mauskapf M (2017) What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(5):910–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Greve HR (2006) Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. 52(1):83–94.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Chuang Y-T (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):536–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Haunschild PR (2002) Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):92–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernile G, Bhagwat V, Yonker S (2018) Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies. J. Financial Econom. 127(3):588–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettencourt BA, Dorr N, Charlton K, Hume DL (2001) Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psych. Bull. 127(4):520–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Withers MC, Graffin SD, Corley KG (2021) Corporate directors’ implicit theories of the roles and duties of boards. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1662–1695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braiotta L, Sommer AA (1987) The Essential Guide to Effective Corporate Board Committees (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Beckman CM (2007) Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(2):239–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Management 30(6):749–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter DA, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG (2003) Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Rev. 38(1):33–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang EH, Milkman KL, Chugh D, Akinola M (2019) Diversity thresholds: How social norms, visibility, and scrutiny relate to group composition. Acad. Management J. 62(1):144–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen WR, Miller KD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management J. 28(4):369–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu JSG, Davis GF (2016) Who killed the inner circle? The decline of the American corporate interlock network. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(3):714–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Borden RJ, Thorne A, Walker MR, Freeman S, Sloan LR (1976) Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 34(3):366–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Creary SJ, McDonnell M-HM, Ghai S, Scruggs J (2019) When and why diversity improves your board’s performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. (March 27), https://hbr.org/2019/03/when-and-why-diversity-improves-your-boards-performance.Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Daily CM, Dalton DR (1994) Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Acad. Management J. 37(6):1603–1617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dearborn DC, Simon HA (1958) Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry 21(2):140–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deloitte (2019) Missing pieces report: The 2018 board diversity census of women and minorities on Fortune 500 boards. Accessed March 19, 2022, https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/center-for-board-effectiveness/articles/missing-pieces-report-board-diversity.html.Google Scholar
• Desai VM (2016) The behavioral theory of the (governed) firm: Corporate board influences on organizations’ responses to performance shortfalls. Acad. Management J. 59(3):860–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Døjbak Ha˚konsson D, Eskildsen JK, Argote L, Mønster D, Burton RM, Obel B (2016) Exploration vs. exploitation: Emotions and performance as antecedents and consequences of team decisions. Strategic Management J. 37(6):985–1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Kahwajy JL, Bourgeois L (1997) Taming interpersonal conflict in strategic choice: How top management teams argue, but still get along. Papadakis V, Barwie P, eds. Strategic Decisions (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston), 65–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erhardt NL, Werbel JD, Shrader CB (2003) Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance 11(2):102–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertimur Y, Ferri F, Stubben SR (2010) Board of directors’ responsiveness to shareholders: Evidence from shareholder proposals. J. Corporate Finance 16(1):53–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich EM, Shivdasani A (2007) Financial fraud, director reputation, and shareholder wealth. J. Financial Econom. 86(2):306–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Cannella SFB, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York, NY).Google Scholar
• Fiol CM, O’Connor EJ, Aguinis H (2001) All for one and one for all? The development and transfer of power across organizational levels. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):224–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forbes DP, Milliken FJ (1999) Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):489–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fryxell GE, Lerner LD (1989) Contrasting corporate profiles: Women and minority representation in top management positions. J. Bus. Ethics 8(5):341–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Joseph J (2013) Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1102–1119.Link, Google Scholar
• Garg S, Li Q, Shaw JD (2018) Undervaluation of directors in the board hierarchy: Impact on turnover of directors (and CEOs) in newly public firms. Strategic Management J. 39(2):429–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden BR, Zajac EJ (2001) When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × power = strategic change. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1087–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodstein J, Gautam K, Boeker W (1994) The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management J. 15(3):241–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2008) A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Acad. Management J. 51(3):476–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Gaba V (2017) Performance feedback in organizations and groups: Common themes. Argote L, Levine J, eds. Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 1–45.Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Bell D (2013) Dysfunction in the boardroom. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(6):89–97.Google Scholar
• Gryta T, Lublin JS (2018) GE overhauls board, dumps longest-serving directors, names outsiders. Wall Street J. (February 28), https://www.wsj.com/articles/ge-revamps-board-adds-accounting-expert-former-ceos-of-danaher-american-airlines-1519647911.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (1981) Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(2):253–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Cho TS, Chen M-J (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):659–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton DL, Stroessner SJ, Driscoll DM (1994) Social cognition and the study of stereotyping. Devine P, Hamilton D, Ostrom T, eds. Social Cognition: Impact on Social Psychology (Academic Press, San Diego), 291–321.Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Boivie S, Sharp NY, Gentry RJ (2018) Saving face: How exit in response to negative press and star analyst downgrades reflects reputation maintenance by directors. Acad. Management J. 61(3):1131–1157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haynes KT, Hillman A (2010) The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management J. 31(11):1145–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Cannella AA, Harris IC (2002) Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? J. Management 28(6):747–763.Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Cannella AA Jr, Paetzold RL (2000) The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. J. Management Stud. 37(2):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA (2014) From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 23(5):338–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DI (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer DN, Miller KD (2008) Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 51(4):808–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson SG, Schnatterly K, Hill AD (2013) Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. J. Management 39(1):232–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Roh H (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Acad. Management J. 52(3):599–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung H, Vissa B, Pich M (2017) How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions? Acad. Management J. 60(1):264–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Beckman CM, Moliterno TP (2015) Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):228–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesner IF (1988) Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. Acad. Management J. 31(1):66–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khurana R (2004) Searching for a Corporate Savior: The Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kurzban R, Tooby J, Cosmides L (2001) Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(26):15387–15392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuusela P, Keil T, Maula M (2017) Driven by aspirations, but in what direction? Performance shortfalls, slack resources, and resource‐consuming vs. resource‐freeing organizational change. Strategic Management J. 38(5):1101–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YG, Gargiulo M (2021) Escaping the survival trap: Network transition among early-career freelance songwriters. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print October 29, https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211055198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leigh A, Melwani S (2019) #BlackEmployeesMatter: Mega-threats, identity fusion, and enacting positive deviance in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):564–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Hambrick DC (2005) Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad. Management J. 48(5):794–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorsch JW, Maclver EA (1989) Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Mannix E, Neale MA (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 6(2):31–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGregor J (2018) Why GE is making a dramatic overhaul to its board of directors. Washington Post (February 27), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2018/02/27/why-ge-is-making-a-dramatic-overhaul-to-its-board-of-directors/.Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Megaw N (2020) Michael Sherwood joins Revolut board. Financial Times (March 4), https://www.ft.com/content/b21616a6-5e35-11ea-8033-fa40a0d65a98.Google Scholar
• Merton RK, Kendall PL (1946) The focused interview. Amer. J. Sociol. 51(6):541–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Messick DM, Mackie DM (1989) Intergroup relations. Annual Rev. Psych. 40(1):45–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikulincer M, Shaver PR (2001) Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out-groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(1):97–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller T, Triana MDC (2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. J. Management Stud. 46(5):755–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moliterno TP, Wiersema MF (2007) Firm performance, rent appropriation, and the strategic resource divestment capability. Strategic Management J. 28(11):1065–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park SH, Westphal JD (2013) Social discrimination in the corporate elite: How status affects the propensity for minority CEOs to receive blame for low firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(4):542–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1973) Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 18(3):349–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1981) Power in Organizations (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Pitcher P, Smith AD (2001) Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organ. Sci. 12(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner FD (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search—A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post C, Byron K (2015) Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1546–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2):367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Greve HR (2017) Board reform vs. profits: The impact of ratings on the adoption of governance practices. Strategic Management J. 38(4):815–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandefur RL (2015) Elements of professional expertise: Understanding relational and substantive expertise through lawyers’ impact. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):909–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santamaria L, Mihaljevic H (2018) Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 4:e156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solal I, Snellman K (2019) Women don’t mean business? Gender penalty in board composition. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1270–1288.Link, Google Scholar
• Stephan WG, Stephan CW (2000) An integrated threat theory of prejudice. Oskamp S, ed. Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 23–45.Google Scholar
• Tajfel H (1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci. Amer. 223:96–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Rev. Psych. 33(1):1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triana MDC, Miller TL, Trzebiatowski TM (2014) The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organ. Sci. 25(2):609–632.Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Tajfel H (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psych. Intergroup Relations 5:7–24.Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt GS, De Jong SB, Bunderson JS, Molleman E (2010) Power asymmetry and learning in teams: The moderating role of performance feedback. Organ. Sci. 21(2):347–361.Link, Google Scholar
• Waller MJ, Huber GP, Glick WH (1995) Functional background as a determinant of executives’ selective perception. Acad. Management J. 38(4):943–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1988) Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers’ belief structures and information processing. Acad. Management J. 31(4):873–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Weiss RS (1995) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies (Free Press, New York, NY).Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Fredrickson JW (2001) Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1113–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Khanna P (2003) Keeping directors in line: Social distancing as a control mechanism in the corporate elite. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):361–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O’Reilly CA III (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 77–140.Google Scholar
• Withers MC, Corley KG, Hillman AJ (2012a) Stay or leave: Director identities and voluntary exit from the board during organizational crisis. Organ. Sci. 23(3):835–850.Link, Google Scholar
• Withers MC, Hillman AJ, Cannella AA Jr (2012b) A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. J. Management 38(1):243–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yermack D (2004) Remuneration, retention, and reputation incentives for outside directors. J. Finance 59(5):2281–2308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2019) Who loses when a team wins? Better performance increases racial bias. Organ. Sci. 30(1):40–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2020) An institutional approach to gender diversity and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 31(2):439–457.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang CM, Greve HR (2019) Dominant coalitions directing acquisitions: Different decision makers, different decisions. Acad. Management J. 62(1):44–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu DH, Shen W, Hillman AJ (2014) Recategorization into the in-group: The appointment of demographically different new directors and their subsequent positions on corporate boards. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):240–270.Crossref, Google Scholar