Collective Attention and Collective Intelligence: The Role of Hierarchy and Team Gender Composition

References

• Ancona DG, Chong C (1999) Cycles and synchrony: The temporal role of context in team behavior. Mannix E, Neale MA, eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, vol. 2 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 33–38.Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Brown CE (2010) The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:55–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Srivastava S, Beer JS, Spataro SE, Chatman JA (2006) Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(6):1094–1110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Azmat G, Iriberri N (2012) The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Sci. 58(1):78–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Vadera AK, Leenders RTAJ, Oldham GR (2013) Intergroup competition as a double-edged sword: How sex composition regulates the effects of competition on group creativity. Organ. Sci. 25(3):892–908.Link, Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Albrecht SL, Leiter MP (2011) Key questions regarding work engagement. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 20(1):4–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkow JH, Akiwowo AA, Barua TK, Chance MRA, Chapple ED, Chattopadhyay GP, Freedman DG, Geddes WR, Goswami BB, Isichei PAC (1975) Prestige and culture: A biosocial interpretation. Current Anthropology 16(4):553–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I (2001) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J. Child Psych. Psychiatry Allied Disciplines 42(2):241–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behfar KJ, Peterson RS, Mannix EA, Trochim WM (2008) The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):170–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernieri FJ, Rosenthal R (1991) Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. Feldman RS, Rimé B, eds. Fundamentals of Nonverbal Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England), 401–432.Google Scholar
• Bernieri FJ, Reznick JS, Rosenthal R (1988) Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother-infant interactions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(2):243–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernieri FJ, Davis JM, Rosenthal R, Knee CR (1994) Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 20(3):303–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bollen KA (2005) Structural Equation Models (Wiley Online Library, New York).Google Scholar
• Bresnahan MI, Cai DH (1996) Gender and aggression in the recognition of interruption. Discourse Processes 21(2):171–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brownell CA, Ramani GB, Zerwas S (2006) Becoming a social partner with peers: Cooperation and social understanding in one- and two-year-olds. Child Development 77(4):803–821.Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Poire BA, Rosenthal R (1995) Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 31(4):287–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butterworth G, Jarrett N (1991) What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. British J. Developmental Psych. 9(1):55–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpendale JI, Lewis C (2004) Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children’s social understanding within social interaction. Behav. Brain Sci. 27(1):79–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Case CR, Maner JK (2014) Divide and conquer: When and why leaders undermine the cohesive fabric of their group. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. 107(6):1033–1050.Google Scholar
• Caza BB, Tiedens L, Lee F (2011) Power becomes you: The effects of implicit and explicit power on the self. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 114(1):15–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Chartrand TL, Lakin JL (2013) The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Rev. Psych. 64(1):285–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, O’Reilly CA (2004) Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Acad. Management J. 47(2):193–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung GW, Lau RS (2008) Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organ. Res. Methods 11(2):296–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chikersal P, Tomprou M, Kim YJ, Woolley AW, Dabbish L (2017) Deep structures of collaboration: Physiological correlates of collective intelligence and group satisfaction. Proc. 20th ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Soc. Comput. 873–888.Google Scholar
• Conti R, Collins MA, Picariello ML (2001) The impact of competition on intrinsic motivation and creativity: Considering gender, gender segregation and gender role orientation. Personality and Individual Differences 31(8):1273–1289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortes Barragan R, Dweck CS (2014) Rethinking natural altruism: Simple reciprocal interactions trigger children’s benevolence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(48):17071–17074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Domenico M, Altmann EG (2020) Unraveling the origin of social bursts in collective attention. Sci. Rep. 10(1):4629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decety J, Jackson PL, Sommerville JA, Chaminade T, Meltzoff AN(2004) The neural bases of cooperation and competition: An fMRI investigation. Neuroimage 23(2):744–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Betley G, Kahle J, Abrams L, Porac J (1981) When trying to win: Competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 7(1):79–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Kwaadsteniet EW, van Dijk E (2010) Social status as a cue for tacit coordination. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(3):515–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delaherche E, Chetouani M, Mahdhaoui A, Saint-Georges C, Viaux S, Cohen D (2012) Interpersonal synchrony: A survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. IEEE Trans. Affective Comput. 3(3):349–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Engel D, Woolley AW, Jing L, Chabris CF, Malone TW (2014) Reading the mind in the eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of mind predicts team collective intelligence online and face-to-face. PLoS One 9(12):e115212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engel D, Woolley AW, Aggarwal I, Chabris CF, Takahashi M, Nemoto K, Kaiser C, Kim YJ, Malone TW (2015) Collective intelligence in computer-mediated collaboration emerges in different contexts and cultures. Proc. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems 3769–3778.Google Scholar
• Farley SD (2008) Attaining status at the expense of likeability: Pilfering power through conversational interruption. J. Nonverbal Behav. 32(4):241–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farley SD, Ashcraft AM, Stasson MF, Nusbaum RL (2010) Nonverbal reactions to conversational interruption: A test of complementarity theory and the status/gender parallel. J. Nonverbal Behav. 34(4):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST (2002) What we know now about bias and intergroup conflict, the problem of the century. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 11(4):123–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons GM, Finkel EJ (2018) Transactive-goal-dynamics theory: A discipline-wide perspective. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 27(5):332–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forsyth DR (2006) Group Dynamics (Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• French JR, Raven B (1959) The bases of social power. Cartwright DP, ed. Studies in Social Power (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI), 150–167.Google Scholar
• French P, Local J (1983) Turn-competitive incomings. J. Pragmatics 7(1):17–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia SM, Tor A (2007) Rankings, standards, and competition: Task vs. scale comparisons. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(1):95–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giles H, Coupland N, Coupland J (1991) Accomodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. Giles H, Coupland J, Coupland N, eds. Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England), 1–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gnisci A, Sergi I, De Luca E, Errico V (2012) Does frequency of interruptions amplify the effect of various types of interruptions? Experimental evidence. J. Nonverbal Behav. 36(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouhier TC, Guichard F (2014) Synchrony: Quantifying variability in space and time. Methods Ecology Evolution 5(6):524–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greer LL, de Jong BA, Schouten ME, Dannals JE (2018) Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration. J. Appl. Psych. 103(6):591–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Polzer JT, Elfenbein HA (2011) Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 22(3):722–737.Link, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld D, Tiedens L (2010) Organizational preferences and their consequences. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ), 1252–1287.Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Woolley AW (2020) The emergence of collective intelligence behavior. Proc. Collective Intelligence.Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Woolley AW (2021) Articulating the role of artificial intelligence in collective intelligence: A transactive systems framework. Proc. Human Factors Ergonomics Soc. (Sage Publications, Los Angeles), 65(1):670–674.Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1987) The design of work teams. Lorsch J, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 315–342.Google Scholar
• Halevy N, Chou EY, Galinsky AD (2011) A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organ. Psych. Rev. 1(1):32–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy N, Chou EY, Galinsky AD, Murnighan JK (2012) When hierarchy wins: Evidence from the National Basketball Association. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 3(4):398–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn S, Oosterbeek H, van Praag M (2013) The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 59(7):1514–1528.Link, Google Scholar
• Iani C, Anelli F, Nicoletti R, Rubichi S (2014) The carry-over effect of competition in task-sharing: Evidence from the joint Simon task. PLoS One 9(6):e97991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D (2005) Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Rev. Psych. 56:517–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasnow M, Crown CL, Feldstein S, Taylor L, Beebe B, Jaffe J (1988) Coordinated interpersonal timing of Down-Syndrome and nondelayed infants with their mothers: Evidence for a buffered mechanism of social interaction. Biological Bull. 175(3):355–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin X, Li P, He J, Shen M (2017) Cooperation, but not competition, improves 4-year-old children’s reasoning about others’ diverse desires. J. Experiment. Child Psych. 157:81–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan F, Hafner VV (2006) The challenges of joint attention. Interaction Stud. 7(2):135–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly JR (1988) Entrainment in individual and group behavior. McGrath JE, ed. The Social Psychology of Time: New Perspectives (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA), 89–110.Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Kleef GA, Chen S, Kraus MW (2008) A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40:151–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy CW, Camden CT (1983) A new look at interruptions. Western J. Speech Comm. 47(1):45–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Engel D, Woolley AW, Lin JY, McArthur N, Malone TW (2017) What makes a strong team? Using collective intelligence to predict performance of teams in League of Legends. Proc. ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Soc. Comput.Google Scholar
• Kirschner S, Tomasello M (2010) Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children. Evolution Human Behav. 31(5):354–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La France M (1974) Nonverbal cues to conversational turn taking between Black speakers. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 1(1):240–242.Google Scholar
• Lakens D (2010) Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(5):701–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakin JL, Chartrand TL (2003) Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psych. Sci. 14(4):334–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JR (2010) In Search of Synergy in Small Group Performance (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Kesebir S, Pillutla MM (2016) Gender differences in response to competition with same-gender coworkers: A relational perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 110(6):869–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner GH (2002) Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. Ford CE, Fox BA, Thompson SA, eds. The Language of Turn and Sequence (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 225–256.Google Scholar
• Levitan R, Hirschberg J (2011) Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. 12th Annual Conf. Internat. Speech Comm. Assoc.Google Scholar
• Lissek S, Peters S, Fuchs N, Witthaus H, Nicolas V, Tegenthoff M, Juckel G, Brüne M (2008) Cooperation and deception recruit different subsets of the theory-of-mind network. PLoS One 3(4):e2023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorenz-Spreen P, Mønsted BM, Hövel P, Lehmann S (2019) Accelerating dynamics of collective attention. Nature Comm. 10(1):1759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makri-Tsilipakou M (1994) Interruption revisited: Affiliative vs. disaffiliative intervention. J. Pragmatics 21(4):401–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maloney MM, Bresman H, Zellmer-Bruhn ME, Beaver GR (2016) Contextualization and context theorizing in teams research: A look back and a path forward. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):891–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maner JK, Mead NL (2010) The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(3):482–497.Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Mayo AT, Woolley AW (2021) Variance in group ability to transform resources into performance, and the role of coordinated attention. Acad. Management Discoveries 7(2):225–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• McLaughlin ML (1984) Conversation: How Talk Is Organized (Sage Publications, Inc., Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Moscovici S, Nemeth C (1974) Social influence II: Minority influence. Nemeth C, ed. Social Psychology: Classic and Contemporary Integrations (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
• Mulac A, Erlandson KT, Farrar WJ, Hallett JS, Molloy JL, Prescott ME (1998) “Uh-huh. What’s that all about?” Differing interpretations of conversational backchannels and questions as sources of miscommunication across gender boundaries. Comm. Res. 25(6):641–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murata K (1994) Intrusive or co-operative? A cross-cultural study of interruption. J. Pragmatics 21(4):385–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):601–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oullier O, de Guzman GC, Jantzen KJ, Lagarde J, Kelso JAS (2008) Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Soc. Neuroscience 3(2):178–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfänder S, Couper-Kuhlen E (2019) Turn-sharing revisited: An exploration of simultaneous speech in interactions between couples. J. Pragmatics 147:22–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Argote L (2011) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):189–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richardson MJ, Marsh KL, Isenhower RW, Goodman JR, Schmidt RC (2007) Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Sci. 26(6):867–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2001) Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):637–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedl C, Kim YJ, Gupta P, Malone TW, Woolley AW (2021) Quantifying collective intelligence in human groups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(21):e2005737118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedl C, Woolley AW (2017) Teams vs. crowds: A field test of the relative contribution of incentives, member ability, and emergent collaboration to crowd-based problem solving performance. Acad. Management Discoveries 3(4):382–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ronay R, Greenaway K, Anicich EM, Galinsky AD (2012) The path to glory is paved with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psych. Sci. 23(6):669–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Statist. Software 48(2):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmid-Mast M (2001) Gender differences and similarities in dominance hierarchies in same-gender groups based on speaking time. Sex Roles 44(9–10):537–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt RC, Richardson MJ (2008) Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. Fuchs A, Jirsa VK, eds. Coordination: Neural, Behavioral and Social Dynamics (Springer, Berlin), 281–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shannon CE (1998) Communication in the presence of noise. Proc. IEEE 86(2):447–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shteynberg G (2015) Shared attention. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 10(5):579–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Gelfand M, Babcock L, Gettman H (2007) Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(4):600–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swingle PG (1984) Temporal measures of vocalization: Some methodological considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47(6):1263–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tickle-Degnen L, Rosenthal R (1990) The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psych. Inquiry 1(4):285–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiedens LZ, Unzueta MM, Young MJ (2007) An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(3):402–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 28(5):675–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomprou M, Kim YJ, Chikersal P, Woolley AW, Dabbish LA(2021) Speaking out of turn: How video conferencing reduces vocal synchrony and collective intelligence. PLoS One 16(3):e0247655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trevarthen C, Aitken KJ (2001) Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. J. Child Psych. Psychiatry 42(1):3–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoi L, Dungan J, Waytz A, Young L (2016) Distinct neural patterns of social cognition for cooperation versus competition. Neuroimage 137:86–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valdesolo P, Ouyang J, DeSteno D (2010) The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(4):693–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Zimmermann J, Richardson DC (2016) Verbal synchrony and action dynamics in large groups. Frontiers Psych. 7:2034.Google Scholar
• Walker HA, Ilardi BC, McMahon AM, Fennell ML (1996) Gender, interaction, and leadership. Soc. Psych. Quart. 59(3):255–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization(Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1987) Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer, New York), 185–208.Google Scholar
• Weinberg RS, Ragan J (1979) Effects of competition, success/failure, and sex on intrinsic motivation. Res. Quart. 50(3):503–510.Google Scholar
• Wilson M, Wilson TP (2005) An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 12(6):957–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiltermuth SS, Heath C (2009) Synchrony and cooperation. Psych. Sci. 20(1):1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Aggarwal I (2020) Collective intelligence and group learning. Argote L, Levine JM, eds. Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, London), 491–506.Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Sci. 330(6004):686–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wynn CJ, Borrie SA (2020) Classifying conversational entrainment of speech behavior: An updated framework and review. Preprint, submitted September 28, https://psyarxiv.com/nrj2z/.Google Scholar
• Zellmer-Bruhn ME, Waller MJ, Ancona DG (2004) The effect of temporal entrainment on the ability of teams to change their routines. Blount S, ed. Time in Groups Research on Managing Groups and Teams, vol. 6 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 135–158.Google Scholar
• Zimmerman DH, West C (1975) Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. Thorne B, Henley N, eds. Language and Sex Difference and Dominance (Newbury House, Rawley, MA), 105–129.Google Scholar
• Zitek EM, Tiedens LZ (2012) The fluency of social hierarchy: The ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(1):98–115.Crossref, Google Scholar