Anchored Inferential Learning: Platform-Specific Uncertainty, Venture Capital Investments by the Platform Owner, and the Impact on Complementors

References

• Alvarez-Garrido E, Dushnitsky G (2016) Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs. Strategic Management J. 37(3):819–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1993) Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system, and environmental components. British J. Soc. Psych. 32(1):31–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Lee S, Park J (2020) Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions. Management Sci. 67(9):5399–5429.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Woodard CJ (2009) The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 19–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.Link, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Haunschild PR, Philips DJ (2004) Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. 15(3):259–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Benson D, Ziedonis RH (2009) Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: Implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organ. Sci. 20(2):329–351.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Regulation of an ecosystem by a private actor. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191.Google Scholar
• CB Insights (2015) The 2014 U.S. corporate venture capital year. Report, CB Insights, New York. https://www.cbinsights.com/venture-capital-2014.Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Ozalp H, Kretschmer T (2018) Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):461–478.Link, Google Scholar
• Chandler D, Hwang H (2015) Learning from learning theory: A model of organizational adoption strategies at the microfoundation of institutional theory. J. Management 41(5):1446–1476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW (2002) Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(3):90–99.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorbtive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Covin JG, Miles MP (2007) Strategic use of corporate venturing. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 31(2):183–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cutolo D, Kenney M (2021) Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy. Acad. Management Perspective 35(4):584–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diestre L, Rajagopolan N (2012) Are all “sharks” dangerous? New biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1115–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drover W, Busenitz L, Matusik S, Townsend D, Anglin A, Dushnitsky G (2017) A review and road map of entrepreneurial equity financing research: Venture capital, corporate venture capital, angel investment, crowdfunding, and accelerators. J. Management 43(6):1820–1853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G (2012) Corporate venture capital in the twenty-first century: An integratal part of firms’ innovation toolkit. Cumming D, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Venture Capital (Oxford University Press, New York), 156–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Kang SS (2018) Seeding a star or constructing a constellation? Corporate venturing as an ecosystem strategy. Acad. Management Proc., ePub ahead of print July 8, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.11361abstract.Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005) When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res. Policy 34(5):615–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Shaver JM (2009) Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1045–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flanagan J (1954) The critical incident technique. Psych. Bull. 51(4):327–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Lueker N, Heinzl A (2021) And the winner is…? The desirable and undesirable effects of platform awards. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1155–1172.Link, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Kude T, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2018) Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google photos. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):444–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Terlaak A (2013) Decomposing uncertainty and its effects on imitation in firm exit decisions. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1847–1869.Link, Google Scholar
• Gartner (2014) Market share analysis: Customer relationship management software, worldwide, 2013. Report, Gartner, Stamford, CT. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2711518.Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2009) Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Henderson R (2007) Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1995) Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):444–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallen B, Katila R, Rosenberger JD (2014) How do social defenses work? A resource-dependence lens on technology ventures, venture capital investors, and corporate relationships. Acad. Management J. 57(4):1078–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He S, Peng J, Li J, Xu L (2020) Impact of platform owner’s entry on third-party sellers. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1467–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• Horrace WC, Oaxaca RL (2006) Results on the bias and inconsistency of ordinary least squares for the linear probability model. Econom. Lett. 90(3):321–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative research: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Agarwal S (2017) Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and android smartphone ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 28(3):531–551.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Rosenberger JD, Eisenhardt KM (2008) Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):295–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koo WW, Eesley CE (2021) Platform governance and the rural-urban seller divide: Sellers’ responses to design change. Strategic Management J. 42(5):941–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Asaba S (2006) Why do firms imitate each other? Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):366–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long JS (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• March JG (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Sproull LS, Tamuz M (1991) Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. 2(1):1–13.Google Scholar
• Maula MVJ, Autio E, Murray G (2005) Corporate venture capitalists and independent venture capitalists: What do they know, who do they know and should entrepreneurs care? Venture Capital 7(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maula MVJ (2007) Corporate venture capital as a strategic tool for organizations. Landstrom H, ed. Handbook of Research on Venture Capital (Edward Elgar, Northamption, MA), 371–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIntyre DP, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management. J. 38(1):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman A (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)Google Scholar
• Miller CC, Cardinal LB, Glock WH (1997) Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Acad. Management J. 40(1):189–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner AS, Haunschild PR (1995) Population level learning. Staw B, Cummings L eds. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 115–166.Google Scholar
• Miner AS, Mezias SJ (1996) Ugly duckling no more: Past and futures of organizational learning research. Organ. Sci. 7(1):88–99.Link, Google Scholar
• Nahata R (2008) Venture capital reputation and investment performance. J. Financial Econom. 90(2):127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldroyd JB, Gulati R (2010) A learning perspective on organizational knowledge spill-ins. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 4(4):356–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozalp H, Kretschmer T (2019) Follow the crowd or follow the trailblazer? The differential role of experience in product entry decisions in the US video game industry. J. Management Stud. 56(7):1452–1481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Patton M (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaliuation Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Eggers JP (2018) Demand heterogeneity in platform markets: Implications for complementors. Organ. Sci. 29(2):304–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling MA (2021) Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. J. Management 47(6):1528–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling MA, Bellavitis C (2019) Platform strategy: Managing ecosystem value through selective promotion of complements. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1232–1251.Link, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Seamans R, Meggiorin K (2021) Market orchestrators: The effects of certification on platforms and their complementors. Strategy Sci. 6(3):244–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultze U, Avital M (2011) Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Inform. Organ. 21(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon DH, Lieberman MB (2010) Internal and external influences in adoption decisions in multi-unit firms: The moderating effect of experience. Strategic Organ. 8(2):132–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Haunschild PR, Grewal R (2007) Vicarious learning in new product introductions in the early years of a converging market. Management Sci. 53(1):16–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Souitaris V, Zerbinati S (2014) How do corporate venture capitalists do deals? An exploration of corporate investment practices. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 8(4):321–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tae CJ, Luo X, Lin Z (2020) Capacity-constrainted entrepreneurs and their product portfolio size: The response to a platform design change on a Chinese sharing economy platform. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 14(3):302–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terlaak A, Gong Y (2008) Vicarious learning and inferential accuracy in adoption processes. Acad. Management Rev. 33(4):846–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatchenkery S, Katila R (2022) Innovation and profitability following antitrust intervention against a dominant platform: The wild, wild west? Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Ter Wal ALJ, Alexy O, Block J, Sandner PG (2016) The best of both worlds: The benefits of open-specialized and closed-diverse syndication networks for new ventures’ success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):393–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2015) Platform desertion by app developers. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(4):40–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Tong TW, Guo Y, Chen L (2021) How Xiaomi redefined what it means to be a platform. Harvard Bus. Rev. https://hbr.org/2021/09/how-xiaomi-redefined-what-it-means-to-be-a-platform.Google Scholar
• Wang RD, Miller CD (2020) Complementors’ engagement in an ecosystem: A study of publishers’ e-book offerings on Amazon Kindle. Strategic Management J. 41(1):3–26.Google Scholar
• Wang D, Cox Pahnke E, McDonald R (2022) The past is prologue? Venture capital syndicates’ collaborative experience and start-up exits. Acad. Management J. 65(2):371–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Weiblen T, Chesbrough HW (2015) Engaging with startups to enhance corporate innovation. California Management Rev. 57(2):66–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wen W, Zhu F (2019) Threat of platform‐owner entry and complementor responses: Evidence from the mobile app market. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1336–1367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Liu Q (2018) Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2618–2642.Crossref, Google Scholar