The Returns to Nonmarket Strategies During Institutional Transitions: Investor Reactions to Actor and Tie Characteristics

References

• Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Kwak J, Mitton T (2016) The value of connections in turbulent times: Evidence from the United States. J. Financial Econom. 121(2):368–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV (2009) A comparative analysis of corporate governance systems in Latin America: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Venezuela. McGee RW, ed. Corporate Governance in Developing Economies (Springer, Boston), 151–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, de Figueiredo JM, Snyder JMJ (2003) Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antunes MA, Procianoy JL (2003) Os efeitos das decisões de investimentos das empresas sobre os preços de suas ações no mercado de capitais. Rev. ADM 38(1):5–14.Google Scholar
• Arnaboldi F, Casu B, Gallo A, Kalotychou E, Sarkisyan A (2021) Gender diversity and bank misconduct. J. Corporate Finance 71:101834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ballesteros L, Gatignon A (2019) The relative value of firm and nonprofit experience: Tackling large‐scale social issues across institutional contexts. Strategic Management J. 40(4):631–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ballesteros L, Useem M, Wry T (2017) Masters of disasters? An empirical analysis of how societies benefit from corporate disaster aid. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1682–1708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML, King AA (2008) Good fences make good neighbors: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1150–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechara FR, Goldschmidt PC (2020) Lessons of Operation Car Wash. Report, Wilson Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Fisman R, Trebbi F (2020) Tax-exempt lobbying: Corporate philanthropy as a tool for political influence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(7):2065–2102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Fisman R, Hackinen B, Trebbi F (2018) Hall of mirrors: Corporate philanthropy and strategic advocacy. NBER Working Paper No. 25329, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya U, Daouk H, Jorgenson B, Kehr C (2000) When an event is not an event: The curious case of an emerging market. J. Financial Econom. 55(1):69–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birhanu AG, Gambardella A, Valentini G (2016) Bribery and investment: Firm‐level evidence from Africa and Latin America. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1865–1877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SJ, Warner JB (1980) Measuring security price performance. J. Financial Econom. 8(3):205–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SJ, Warner JB (1985) Using daily stock returns. The case of event studies. J. Financial Econom. 14(1):3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carvalho LF, Malaquias RF, Ribeiro KCDS (2008) Reação dos preços das ações de companhias que compõem o IGC à divulgação das ITRs e IANs. Bornia AC, ed. XV Congresso Brasileiro de Custos (Congresso Brasileiro de Custos, Curitiba-Paraná, Brazil), 1–16.Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Semadeni M (2006) Strategy research and panel data: Evidence and implications. J. Management 32(3):449–471.Google Scholar
• Claessens S, Feijen E, Laeven L (2008) Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. J. Financial Econom. 88(3):554–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darendeli IS, Hill TL (2016) Uncovering the complex relationships between political risk and MNE firm legitimacy: Insights from Libya. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 47(1):68–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Sousa Barros T, Cárdenas J, Mendes-Da-Silva W (2021) The effect of interlocking directorates on mergers and acquisitions in Brazil. J. Management Governance 25(3):811–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doh JP, Littell B, Quigley NR (2015) CSR and sustainability in emerging markets: Societal, institutional, and organizational influences. Organ. Dynam. 44(2)112–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorobantu S, Kaul A, Zelner B (2017) Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions. Strategic Management J. 38(1):114–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorobantu S, Zelner BA (2015) States, markets, and the undulating governance of the global electric power supply industry. Lawton TC, Rajwani TS, eds. The Routledge Companion to Non-Market Strategy (Routledge, London), 301–314.Google Scholar
• Dutt N, Hawn O, Vidal E, Chatterji A, McGahan A, Mitchell W (2015) How open system intermediaries address institutional failures: The case of business incubators in emerging-market countries. Acad. Management J. 59(3):818–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman Trust Barometer (2020) 2020 Edelman Trust barometer. Accessed July 1, 2022, https://www.edelman.com/trustbarometer.Google Scholar
• El Nayal O, van Oosterhout J, van Essen M (2021) Ties that bind and grind? Investor reactions to politician appointments to corporate boards. J. Management 47(2):456–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E (1970) Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. J. Finance 25(2):383–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, Fisher L, Jensen M, Roll R (1969) The adjustment of stock prices to new information. Internat. Econom. Rev. 10(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Boateng A, King T, Macrae C (2019) Board-CEO friendship ties and firm value: Evidence from US firms. Internat. Rev. Financial Anal. 65(July):101373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg S, Hill TL, Darendeli IS (2015) An institutional perspective on non-market strategies for a world in flux. Lawton TC, Rajwani TS, eds. The Routledge Companion to Non-Market Strategy (Routledge, London), 29–46.Google Scholar
• Fisman R (2001) Estimating the value of political connections. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(4):1095–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2004) The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(4):501–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2013) Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Acad. Management J. 56(3):758–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2018) Competing for government procurement contracts: The role of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management J. 39(5):1299–1324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (2001) Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociol. Theory 19(2):105–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folha de São Paulo (2015a) Atos criticam governo, mas defendem Dilma e rebatem impeachment. Folha de São Paulo, A. Accessed July 1, 2021, https://m.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2015/03/1602392-atos-criticam-governo-mas-defendem-dilma-e-rebatem-impeachment.shtml.Google Scholar
• Folha de São Paulo (2015b) Protestos contra o governo reúnem quase 1 milhão pelo país. Folha de S. Paulo. Accessed July 1, 2022, http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2015/03/1603286-protestos-contra-o-governo-reune-quase-1-milhao-pelo-pais.shtml.Google Scholar
• Frynas JG, Yamahaki C (2016) Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Bus. Ethics 25(3):258–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaspar M, ed. (2020) A Organização: A Odebrecht e o Esquema de Corrupção Que Chocou o Mundo (Companhia das Letras, São Paulo, Brazil).Google Scholar
• Gatignon A, Capron L (2021) The firm as an architect of polycentric governance: Building open institutional infrastructure in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3124.Google Scholar
• Gelos RG, Werner AM (2002) Financial liberalization, credit constraints, and collateral: Investment in the Mexican manufacturing sector. J. Development Econom. 67(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giorgi S, Maoret M, Zajac EJ (2019) On the relationship between firms and their legal environment: The role of cultural consonance. Organ. Sci. 30(4):803–830.Link, Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle K, Rao H (1997) Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organ. Sci. 8(6):593–612.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldman E, Rocholl J, So J (2009). Do politically connected boards affect firm value? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(6):2331–2360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RL, Deardorff AV (2006) Lobbying as legislative subsidy. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 100(1):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA, Jia N, Shi J, Wang Y (2017) The dynamics of political embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(1):67–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawn O, Chatterji KA, Mitchell W (2018) Do investors actually value sustainability? New evidence from investor reactions to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI). Strategic Management J. 39(4):949–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Dorobantu S, Nartey L (2014) Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1727–1748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henry PB (2000) Stock market liberalization, economic reform, and emerging market equity prices. J. Finance 55(2):529–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt S, Park S (2013) Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Acad. Management J. 56(4):923–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A (2005) Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? J. Management 31(3):464–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Hitt M (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management J. 22(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Withers MC, Collins BJ (2009) Resource dependence theory: A review. J. Management 35(6):1404–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Zardkoohi A, Bierman L (1999) Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management J. 20(1):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoitash U (2011) Should independent board members with social ties to management disqualify themselves from serving on the board? J. Bus. Ethics 99(3):399–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Powell WW (2009) The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):268–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Yue LQ, Rao H (2010) Trouble in store: Probes, protests, and store openings by Wal-Mart, 1998–2007. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(1):53–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2015) The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1053–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson DJ, Engel ST (2003) Friends don’t let friends vote for free trade: The dynamics of the labor PAC punishment strategy over PNTR. Political Res. Quart. 56(4):441–448.Google Scholar
• Jain A, Kansal M, Joshi M (2020) New development: Corporate philanthropy to mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR)—A new law for India. Public Money Management 41(3):276–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia N, Shi J, Wang Y (2018) Value creation and value capture in governing shareholder relationships: Evidence from a policy experiment in an emerging market. Strategic Management J. 39(9):2466–2488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Jia N, Bai T, Bruton G (2020) Riding the storm or going ashore: Corporate political strategy in a turbulent political environment. Working paper, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Jia N, Bai T, Bruton GD (2021) Cleaning house before hosting new guests: A political path dependence model of political connection adaptation in the aftermath of anticorruption shocks. Strategic Management J. 42(10):1793–1821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John A, Rajwani TS, Lawton TC (2015) Corporate political activity. Lawton TC, Rajwani TS, eds. The Routledge Companion to Non-Market Strategy (Routledge, London), 115–140.Google Scholar
• Johnson S, Mitton T (2003) Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia. J. Financial Econom. 67(2):351–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordi B, Draca M, Fons-rosen C (2018) American Economic Association revolving door lobbyists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3731–3748.Google Scholar
• Kalla JL, Broockman DE (2016) Campaign contributions facilitate access to congressional officials: A randomized field experiment. Amer. J. Political Sci. 60(3):545–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaul A, Luo J (2018) An economic case for CSR : The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1650–1677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krammer SMS (2019) Greasing the wheels of change: Bribery, institutions, and new product introductions in emerging markets. J. Management 45(5):1889–1926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krause R, Zhiyan WU, Bruton GD, Carter SM (2019) The coercive isomorphism ripple effect: An investigation of nonprofit interlocks on corporate boards. Acad. Management J. 62(1):283–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lagunes P (2021) Corrupção e o Escândalo da Lava Jato na América Latina. 1st ed. (FGV Editora, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).Google Scholar
• Lambe B (2012) Is insider trading regulation effective? Evidence from UK takeover activity. J. Governance Regulation 1(2):24–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, Ormazabal G, Taylor DJ (2011) The market reaction to corporate governance regulation. J. Financial Econom. 101(2):431–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazzarini SG (2011) Capitalismo de Laços: Os donos do Brasil e suas conexões. 1st ed. (Elsevier Editora Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).Google Scholar
• Lazzarini SG, Musacchio A, Bandeira-de-Mello R, Marcon R (2015) What do state-owned development banks do? Evidence from BNDES, 2002–09. World Development, 66, 237–253.Google Scholar
• Lee S-H, Weng DH (2013) Does bribery in the home country promote or dampen firm exports? Strategic Management J. 34(2):1472–1487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leite CM, De Macedo MF (2017) Corrupção política : A colonização do Brasil. Periódico Científico Outras Palavras 13(1):108–120.Google Scholar
• Lester RH, Hillman A, Zardkoohi A, Cannella AA (2008) Former government officials as outside directors: The role of human and social capital. Acad. Management J. 51(5):999–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuz C, Oberholzer-Gee F (2006) Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. J. Financial Econom. 81(2):411–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin C, Morck R, Yeung BY, Zhao X (2016) Anti-corruption reforms and shareholder valuations: Event study evidence from China. Preprint, submitted February 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2729087.Google Scholar
• Luechinger S, Moser C (2014) The value of the revolving door: Political appointees and the stock market. J. Public Econom. 119:93–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinlay AC (1997) Event studies in economics and finance. J. Econom. Literature 35(1):13–39.Google Scholar
• Mair J, Martí I, Ventresca MJ (2012) Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Acad. Management J. 55(4):819–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makino S, Isobe T, Chan CM (2004) Does country matter? Strategic Management J. 25(10):1027–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Raynard M (2015) Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):291–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masulis RW (1980) The effects of capital structure change on security prices. A study of exchange offers. J. Financial Econom. 8(2):139–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mbanyele W, Wang F (2021) Board interlocks and stock liquidity: New evidence from an emerging market. Emerging Markets Finance Trade 58(5):1415–1429.Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H, Werner T (2016) Blacklisted businesses: Social activists’ challenges and the disruption of corporate political activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):584–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendes-da-Silva W (2011) Small worlds e board interlocking no Brasil: Estudo longitudinal das Redes Corporativas, 1997–2007. Revista Brasileira de Finanças 9(4):521–548.Google Scholar
• Merz M, Riepe J (2021) SMEs with legally restricted banking access: Evidence from the US marijuana industry. J. Bus. Econom. 91(6):797–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mészáros G (2020) Caught in an authoritarian trap of its own making? Brazil’s ‘Lava Jato’ anti-corruption investigation and the politics of prosecutorial overreach. J. Law Soc. 47(S1):S54–S73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milyo J, Primo D, Groseclose T (2000) Corporate PAC campaign contributions in perspective. Bus. Politics 2(1):75–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minefee I, McDonnell M-H, Werner T (2021) Reexamining investor reaction to covert corporate political activity: A replication and extension of Werner (2017). Strategic Management J. 42(6):1139–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitnick BM (1993) Choosing agency & competition. Mitnick BM, ed. Corporate Political Agency: The Construction of Competition in Public Affairs (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 1–12.Google Scholar
• Monteiro LF, Kertesz S (2021) Doing business in Brazil after Operation Car Wash (B) (No. 6404). INSEAD, 1–30.Google Scholar
• Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. J. Financial Econom. 20(1–2):293–315.Google Scholar
• Morck R, Stangeland DA, Yeung B (2000) Inherited wealth, corporate control and economic growth: The Canadian disease. Concentrated Corporate Ownership (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA), 319–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhmatovskiy I (2010) Performance implications of ties to the government and SOEs: A political embeddedness perspective. J. Management Stud. 47(6):1020–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oler DK, Harrison JS, Allen MR (2008) The danger of misinterpreting short-window event study findings in strategic management research: An empirical illustration using horizontal acquisitions. Strategic Organ. 6(2):151–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padula AJA, Albuquerque PHM (2018) Corrupção governamental no mercado de capitais : Um estudo. Revista de Administração de Empresas 58(4):405–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkins SE, Minefee I (2015) Jeitinho Brasileiro: Adopting non-market strategy in Brazil. Lawton TC, Rajwani TS, eds. The Routledge Companion to Non-Market Strategy (Routledge, London), 390–411.Google Scholar
• Perkins S, Zajac EJ (2020) On the polylithic nature of family-owned businesses: Heterogeneous responses to—and from—Brazilian financial market reform. Preprint, submitted June 11, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3625167.Google Scholar
• Previ (2011) Investimentos responsáveis: Incorporação de práticas nas políticas de investimentos. ABRAPP Seminar Sustainability and Role of Pension Funds, 1–128.Google Scholar
• Rajan RG, Zingales L (1998) Power in a theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 113(2):387–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Regan KO, Oster SM (2005) Does the structure and composition of the board matter? The case of nonprofit organizations. J. Law Econom. Organ. 21(1):205–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rehbein K, Schuler DA (2015) Linking corporate community programs and political strategies: A resource-based view. Bus. Soc. 54(6):794–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rehbein K, den Hond F, Bakker FGA (2018) Aligning adverse activities? Corporate social responsibility and political activity. Bus. Soc. 360(2):295–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roll R (1977) A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests. J. Financial Econom. 4(4):223–256.Google Scholar
• Rondinelli DA, London T (2003) How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Acad. Management Executive 17(1):61–76.Google Scholar
• Schertler A (2021) Listing of classical options and the pricing of discount certificates. J. Banking Finance 123:106011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seitanidi MM, Crane A (2009) Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. J. Bus. Ethics 85(S2):413–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seo H, Luo J, Kaul A (2021) Giving a little to many or a lot to a few? The returns to variety in corporate philanthropy. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1734–1764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shiu Y, Yang S (2017) Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance‐like effects? Strategic Management J. 38(2):455–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny R (1994) Politicians and firms. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):995–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel J (2007) Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):621–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Speck B (2016) To influence elections or ensure access to the elected politicians? The dilemma of the companies that fund election campaigns. Novos Estud. CEBRAP 35(1):39–59.Google Scholar
• Sun P, Mellahi K, Wright M (2012) The contingent value of corporate political ties. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(3):68–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun P, Mellahi K, Wright M, Xu H (2015) Political tie heterogeneity and the impact of adverse shocks on firm value. J. Management Inquiry 52(8):1036–1063.Google Scholar
• Tabakovic H, Wollmann TG (2018) From revolving doors to regulatory capture? Evidence from patent examiners. NBER Working Paper No. 24638, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Tesler LE, Malone RE (2008) Corporate philanthropy, lobbying, and public health policy. Amer. J. Public Health 98(12):2123–2133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uhlenbruck K, Rodriguez P, Doh J, Eden L (2006) The impact of corruption on entry strategy: Evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging economies. Organ. Sci. 17(3):402–414.Link, Google Scholar
• Walker ET, Rea CM (2014) The political mobilization of firms and industries. Annual Rev. Sociol. 40:281–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton GW (2015) Defining corruption where the state is weak: The case of Papua New Guinea. J. Development Stud. 51(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Werner T (2015) Gaining access by doing good: The effect of sociopolitical reputation on firm participation in public policymaking. Management Sci. 61(8):1989–2011.Link, Google Scholar
• Werner T (2017) Investor reaction to covert corporate political activity. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2424–2443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1998) The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):127–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (2004) The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):433–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Marquis C, Qiao K (2016) Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1065–1341.Link, Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Ni N, Crilly D (2019) Non-profit organizations as a nexus between government and business: Evidence from Chinese charities. Strategic Management J. 40(4):658–684.Crossref, Google Scholar