The Indirect Effect of Entrepreneurship on Pay Dispersion: Entry Cost Reduction, Mobility Threat, and Wage Redistribution Within Incumbent Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16201

References

  • Armanios DE, Eesley CE, Li J, Eisenhardt KM (2017) How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1373–1390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Åstebro T, Chen J, Thompson P (2011) Stars and misfits: Self-employment and labor market frictions. Management Sci. 57(11):1999–2017.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Babina T (2020) Destructive creation at work: How financial distress spurs entrepreneurship. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(9):4061–4101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker GS (1962) Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. 70:7–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Kramarz F (2002) Does entry regulation hinder job creation? Evidence from the French retail industry. Quart. J. Econom. 117(4):1369–1413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Binmore K, Morgan P, Snaked A, Sutton J (1991) Do people exploit their bargaining power? An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. 3(3):295–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bode C, Singh J, Rogan M (2015) Corporate social initiatives and employee retention. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1702–1720.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borjas GJ, Bronars SG (1989) Consumer discrimination and self-employment. J. Political Econom. 97(3):581–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borusyak K, Jaravel X, Spiess J (2021) Revisiting event study designs: Robust and efficient estimation. Preprint, submitted August 27, https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12419.Google Scholar
  • Branstetter L, Lima F, Taylor LJ, Venâncio A (2014) Do entry regulations deter entrepreneurship and job creation? Evidence from recent reforms in Portugal. Econom. J. (London) 124(577):805–832.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruhn M (2011) License to sell: The effect of business registration reform on entrepreneurial activity in Mexico. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(1):382–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Beckman CM (2002) Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Social Structure and Organizations Revisited (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 229–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Dobrev SD (2016) A careers perspective on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 40(2):237–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caldwell S, Danieli O (2024) Outside options in the labor market. Rev. Econom. Stud., ePub ahead of print January 22, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae006.Google Scholar
  • Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco AM, Agarwal R, Campbll B, Ganco M (2012) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):65–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card D, De La Rica S (2006) Firm-level contracting and the structure of wages in Spain. ILR Rev. 59(4):573–592.Google Scholar
  • Card D, Devicienti F, Maida A (2014) Rent-sharing, holdup, and wages: Evidence from matched panel data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(1):84–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnahan S, Agarwal R, Campbell BA (2012) Heterogeneity in turnover: The effect of relative compensation dispersion of firms on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performers. Strategic Management J. 33(12):1411–1430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carrington WJ, Zaman A (1994) Interindustry variation in the costs of job displacement. J. Labor Econom. 12(2):243–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Mosakowski E (1987) The career dynamics of self-employment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 570–589.Google Scholar
  • Castellaneta F, Conti R, Kacperczyk A (2020) The (Un) intended consequences of institutions lowering barriers to entrepreneurship: The impact on female workers. Strategic Management J. 41(7):1274–1304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chadwick C, Guthrie JP, Xing X (2016) The HR executive effect on firm performance and survival. Strategic Management J. 37(11):2346–2361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chamberlain NW, Kuhn JW (1965) Collective Bargaining (McGraw, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chatterji AK, Seamans RC (2012) Entrepreneurial finance, credit cards, and race. J. Financial Econom. 106(1):182–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chava S, Oettl A, Subramanian A, Subramanian KV (2013) Banking deregulation and innovation. J. Financial Econom. 109(3):759–774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cobb JA, Lin KH (2017) Growing apart: The changing firm-size wage premium and its inequality consequences. Organ. Sci. 28(3):429–446.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cobb JA, Stevens FG (2017) These unequal states: Corporate organization and income inequality in the United States. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):304–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen SL, Bingham CB, Hallen BL (2018) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):810–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conti R (2014) Do non-competition agreements lead firms to pursue risky R&D projects? Strategic Management J. 35(8):1230–1248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cutcher-Gershenfeld J, Kochan T (2004) Taking stock: Collective bargaining at the turn of the century. Industry Labor Related Rev. 58(1):3–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis J (2013) Persistent inequality: A neurosociological perspective. Handbook of Neurosociology (Springer, Berlin), 333–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Cobb JA (2010) Corporations and economic inequality around the world: The paradox of hierarchy. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:35–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2002) The regulation of entry. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doeringer PB, Piore MJ (1971) Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis (D. C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
  • Eberhart RN, Eesley CE, Eisenhardt KM (2017) Failure is an option: Institutional change, entrepreneurial risk, and new firm growth. Organ. Sci. 28(1):93–112.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley C (2016) Institutional barriers to growth: Entrepreneurship, human capital and institutional change. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1290–1306.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley CE, Eberhart RN, Skousen BR, Cheng JL (2018) Institutions and entrepreneurial activity: The interactive influence of misaligned formal and informal institutions. Strategy Sci. 3(2):393–407.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Estrin S, Mickiewicz T, Stephan U (2016) Human capital in social and commercial entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Venturing 31(4):449–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fallick B, Fleischman CA, Rebitzer JB (2006) Job-hopping in Silicon Valley: Some evidence concerning the microfoundations of a high-technology cluster. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(3):472–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farber HS (2008) Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1069–1082.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feliz S, Maggi C (2019) What is the impact of increased business competition? Preprint, submitted January 22, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3523149.Google Scholar
  • Fernandes AP, Ferreira P, Alan Winters L (2014) Firm entry deregulation, competition and returns to education and skill. Eur. Econom. Rev. 70:210–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flammer C, Kacperczyk A (2019) Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers: Evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1243–1267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gambardella A, Giarratana MS (2010) Organizational attributes and the distribution of rewards in a region: Managerial firms vs. knowledge clusters. Organ. Sci. 21(2):573–586.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garmaise MJ (2011) Ties that truly bind: Noncompetition agreements, executive compensation, and firm investment. J. Law Econom. Organ. 27(2):376–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guadalupe M (2007) Product market competition, returns to skill, and wage inequality. J. Labor Econom. 25(3):439–474.Google Scholar
  • Hall PA, Soskice DW (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haltiwanger J, Jarmin RS, Miranda J (2013) Who creates jobs? Small vs. large vs. young. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(2):347–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halvarsson D, Korpi M, Wennberg K (2018) Entrepreneurship and income inequality. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 145:275–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S (1995) The effects of ownership structure on conditions at the top: The case of CEO pay raises. Strategic Management J. 16(3):175–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton BH (2000) Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. J. Political Econom. 108(3):604–631.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hietaniemi L (2022) When do high performers join startups? Preprint, submitted August 9, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4158639.Google Scholar
  • Hochberg YV, Fehder DC (2015) Accelerators and ecosystems. Science 348(6240):1202–1203.Google Scholar
  • Hollister MN (2004) Does firm size matter anymore? The new economy and firm size wage effects. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(5):659–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B (1979) Firm-specific capital and turnover. J. Political Econom. 87(6):1246–1260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk AJ (2012) Opportunity structures in established firms: Entrepreneurship vs. intrapreneurship in mutual funds. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):484–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk AO, Guzman J (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7):1666–1680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk A, Marx M (2016) Revisiting the small-firm effect on entrepreneurship: Evidence from firm dissolutions. Organ. Sci. 27(4):893–910.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kang H, Fleming L (2020) Non‐competes, business dynamism, and concentration: Evidence from a Florida case study. J. Econom. Management Strategy 29(3):663–685.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kini O, Williams R, Yin S (2021) CEO noncompete agreements, job risk, and compensation. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(10):4701–4744.Google Scholar
  • Kletzer LG (1989) Returns to seniority after permanent job loss. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(3):536–543.Google Scholar
  • Kochan TA, Wheeler HN (1975) Municipal collective bargaining: A model and analysis of bargaining outcomes. Industry Labor Related Rev. 29(1):46–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kryscynski D, Coff R, Campbell B (2021) Charting a path between firm‐specific incentives and human capital‐based competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 42(2):386–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lanahan L, Armanios D (2018) Does more certification always benefit a venture? Organ. Sci. 29(5):931–947.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lanahan L, Feldman MP (2015) Multilevel innovation policy mix: A closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program. Res. Policy 44(7):1387–1402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP, Oyer P (2012) Personnel Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Levine R, Rubinstein Y (2017) Smart and illicit: Who becomes an entrepreneur and do they earn more? Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):963–1018.Google Scholar
  • Lin KH, Tomaskovic-Devey D (2013) Financialization and US income inequality, 1970–2008. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(5):1284–1329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin Z, Picot G, Compton J (2000) The entry and exit dynamics of self-employment in Canada. Small Bus. Econom. 15(2):105–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lippmann S, Davis A, Aldrich HE (2005) Entrepreneurship and inequality. Entrepreneurship (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 3–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipsitz M, Starr E (2022) Low-wage workers and the enforceability of noncompete agreements. Management Sci. 68(1):143–170.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Magee JC, Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH (2007) Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(2):200–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra D, Gino F (2011) The pursuit of power corrupts: How investing in outside options motivates opportunism in relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(4):559–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manning A (2013) Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L (2009) Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. 55(6):875–889.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Masters B, Thiel P (2014) Zero to One: Notes on Start Ups, or How to Build the Future (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
  • McKersie RB, Perry CR, Walton RE (1965) Intraorganizational bargaining in labor negotiations. J. Conflict Resolution 9(4):463–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molloy JC, Barney JB (2015) Who captures the value created with human capital? A market-based view. Acad. Management Perspective 29(3):309–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moskowitz TJ, Vissing-Jørgensen A (2002) The returns to entrepreneurial investment: A private equity premium puzzle? Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):745–778.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips DJ (2001) The promotion paradox: Organizational mortality and employee promotion chances in Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(4):1058–1098.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips DJ (2002) A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):474–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinkley RL, Northcraft GB (1994) Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute processes and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 37(1):193–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plasman R, Rusinek M, Rycx F (2007) Wages and the bargaining regime under multi-level bargaining: Belgium, Denmark and Spain. Eur. J. Industry Relations 13(2):161–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schubert G, Stansbury A, Taska B (2022) Employer concentration and outside options. Preprint, submitted June 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3599454.Google Scholar
  • Sevcenko V, Ethiraj S (2018) How do firms appropriate value from employees with transferable skills? A study of the appropriation puzzle in actively managed mutual funds. Organ. Sci. 29(5):775–795.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shepherd DA, Ettenson R, Crouch A (2000) New venture strategy and profitability: A venture capitalist’s assessment. J. Bus. Venturing 15(5):449–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shin T (2014) Explaining pay disparities between top executives and nonexecutive employees: A relative bargaining power approach. Soc. Forces 92(4):1339–1372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine WD, David RJ (2003) Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Res. Policy 32(2):185–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine WD, Haveman HA, Tolbert PS (2005) Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):200–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sondak H, Bazerman MH (1991) Power balance and the rationality of outcomes in matching markets. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen JB, Sharkey AJ (2014) Entrepreneurship as a mobility process. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):328–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorensen JB, Sorenson O (2007) Corporate demography and income inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(5):766–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O, Dahl MS, Canales R, Burton MD (2021) Do startup employees earn more in the long run? Organ. Sci. 32(3):587–604.Google Scholar
  • Starr E, Ganco M, Campbell BA (2018) Strategic human capital management in the context of cross‐industry and within‐industry mobility frictions. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2226–2254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T, Sorenson O (2003) The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Res. Policy 32(2):229–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thébaud S (2015) Business as plan B: Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):671–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wezel FC, Cattani G, Pennings JM (2006) Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organ. Sci. 17(6):691–709.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • World Bank (2006) Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs (World Bank, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Yanadori Y, Cui V (2013) Creating incentives for innovation? The relationship between pay dispersion in R&D groups and firm innovation performance. Strategic Management J. 34(12):1502–1511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.