When Less Is More: How Statistical Discrimination Can Decrease Predictive Accuracy

References

• Aigner DJ, Cain GG (1977) Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 30(2):175–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allport GW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Pierret CR (2001) Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):313–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1973) The theory of discrimination. Ashenfelter O, Rees A, eds. Discrimination in Labor Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 3–33.Google Scholar
• Artinger F, Petersen M, Gigerenzer G, Weibler J (2015) Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management. J. Organ. Behav. 36(S1):S33–S52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E (2017) Field experiments on discrimination. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, Handbook of Field Experiments (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 309–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby WT, Baron JN (1986) Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(4):759–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Haggag K, Imas A, Pope DG (2019) Inaccurate Statistical Discrimination: An Identification Problem (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Stereotypes. Quart. J. Econom. 131(4):1753–1794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):739–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borjas GJ, Goldberg MS (1978) Biased screening and discrimination in the labor market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 68(5):918–922.Google Scholar
• Brehmer B (1981) Models of diagnostic judgments. Rasmussen J, Rouse WB, eds. Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures, NATO Conference Series (Plenum Press, New York), 231–239.Google Scholar
• Brehmer B (1994) The psychology of linear judgement models. Acta Psych. (Amsterdam) 87(2–3):137–154.Google Scholar
• Brehmer B, Hagafors R, Johansson R (1980) Cognitive skills in judgment: Subjects’ ability to use information about weights, function forms, and organizing principles. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 26(3):373–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brighton H, Gigerenzer G (2012) How heuristics handle uncertainty. Todd PM, Gigerenzer G, ABC Research Group, eds. Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunswik E (1952) The Conceptual Framework of Psychology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Coffman KB, Exley CL, Niederle M (2021) The role of beliefs in driving gender discrimination. Management Sci. 67(6):3551–3569.Link, Google Scholar
• Conger AJ, Jackson DN (1972) Suppressor variables, prediction, and the interpretation of psychological relationships. Ed. Psych. Measurement 32(3):579–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S (2006) Biased estimators? Comparing status and statistical theories of gender discrimination. Thye SR, Lawler EJ, eds. Social Psychology of the Workplace, Advances in Group Processes (JAI Press, Oxford, UK), 89–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Ostler J (2020) A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1198–1219.Link, Google Scholar
• Dawes RM (1979) The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psych. 34(7):571–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Liu C (2012) Top performers are not the most impressive when extreme performance indicates unreliability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(24):9331–9336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn HJ (1971) Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 6(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Greenberg J (2013) Race, network hiring, and statistical discrimination. McDonald S, ed. Networks, Work, and Inequality, Research in the Sociology of Work (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 81–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST (1998) Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, New York), 357–411.Google Scholar
• Freedle R (2003) Correcting the SAT’s ethnic and social-class bias: A method for reestimating SAT scores. Harvard Ed. Rev. 73(1):1–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Brighton H (2009) Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics Cognitive Sci. 1(1):107–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annual Rev. Psych. 62:451–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. 103(4):650–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1999) Betting on one good reason: The take the best heuristic. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, ABC Research Group, eds. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 75–95.Google Scholar
• Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G (2002) Models of ecological rationality: The recognition hypothesis. Psych. Rev. 109(1):75–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammond KR, Summers DA (1972) Cognitive control. Psych. Rev. 79(1):58–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris PM (2001) The Guide to National Professional Certification Programs (Human Resource Development Press, Inc., Amherst, MA).Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (2006) Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Sci. 312(5782):1900–1902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilton JL, von Hippel W (1996) Stereotypes. Annual Rev. Psych. 47:237–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM, Karelaia N (2007) Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments. Psych. Rev. 114(3):733–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim BK, Kim H (2011) The importance of status in markets: A market identity perspective. Pearce JL, ed. Status in Management and Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 87–117.Google Scholar
• Judd C, Park B (1993) Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psych. Rev. 100(1):109–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Sibony O, Sunstein CR (2021) Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment (Little, Brown Spark, New York).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Rosenfield AM, Gandhi L, Blaser T (2016) Noise: How to overcome the hidden cost of inconsistent decision making. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94(10):38–46.Google Scholar
• Karelaia N, Hogarth RM (2008) Determinants of linear judgment: A meta-analysis of lens model studies. Psych. Bull. 134(3):404–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamont M, Molnár V (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28:167–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu C (2021) Why do firms fail to engage diversity? A behavioral strategy perspective. Organ. Sci. 32(5):1193–1209.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Mitchell JR, Shepherd DA, Sharfman MP (2011) Erratic strategic decisions: When and why managers are inconsistent in strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. 32(7):683–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monk EP (2014) Skin tone stratification among black Americans, 2001–2003. Soc. Forces 92(4):1313–1337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pager D, Karafin D (2009) Bayesian bigot? Statistical discrimination, stereotypes, and employer decision making. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 621(1):70–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pager D, Shepherd H (2008) The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Rev. Sociol. 34:181–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park B, Judd CM (2005) Rethinking the link between categorization and prejudice within the social cognition perspective. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 9(2):108–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearl J (2009) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):659–661.Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reichenbach H (1956) The Direction of Time (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2014) How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4403–4408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rissing BA, Castilla EJ (2014) House of green cards: Statistical or preference-based inequality in the employment of foreign nationals. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(6):1226–1255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roemer JE (1998) Equality of Opportunity (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogan M, Sorenson O (2014) Picking a (poor) partner: A relational perspective on acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):301–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santelices MV, Wilson M (2010) Unfair treatment? The case of Freedle, the SAT, and the standardization approach to differential item functioning. Harvard Ed. Rev. 80(1):106–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schott JR (2017) Matrix Analysis for Statistics, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Shao J (2003) Mathematical Statistics, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shmueli G (2010) To explain or to predict? Statist. Sci. 25(3):289–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A (2021) Statistical discrimination and the rationalization of stereotypes. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(1):93–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu S, Harris TJ, Mcauley KB (2007) The use of simplified or misspecified models: Linear case. Canadian J. Chemical Engrg. 85(4):386–398.Crossref, Google Scholar