What’s Race Got to Do with It? The Interactive Effect of Race and Gender on Negotiation Offers and Outcomes

References

• Acolin A, Bostic R, Painter G (2016) A field study of rental market discrimination across origins in France. J. Urban Econom. 95:49–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Gootfredson R (2010) Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression. J. Organ. Behav. 31(6):776–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Villamor I, Ramani RS (2021) MTurk research: Review and recommendations. J. Management 47(4):823–837.Google Scholar
• Allport GW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Amanatullah ET, Morris MW (2010) Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(2):256–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amanatullah ET, Tinsley CH (2013) Ask and ye shall receive? How gender and status moderate negotiation success. Negotiation Conflict Management Res. 6(4):253–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Laschever S, Gelfand M, Small DA (2003) Nice girls don’t ask. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(10):14–16.Google Scholar
• Bear JB, Babcock L (2012) Negotiation topic as a moderator of gender differences in negotiation. Psych. Sci. 23(7):743–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell EL, Nkomo S (2001) Our Separate Ways: Black and White Women and the Struggle for Professional Identity (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Best D, Williams J (1990) Sex and Psyche: Gender and Self Viewed Cross Culturally (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Biernat M, Sesko AK (2013) Evaluating the contributions of members of mixed-sex work teams: Race and gender matter. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(3):471–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, McGinn KL (2005) Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):951–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown-Iannuzzi JL, Cooley E, McKee SE, Hyden C (2019) Wealthy Whites and poor Blacks: Implicit associations between racial groups and wealth predict explicit opposition toward helping the poor. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 82(December 2018):26–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Henrich J (2010) Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution Human Behav. 31(5):334–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Foulsham T, Kingstone A, Henrich J (2013) Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(1):103–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins PH (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Collins PH (2004) Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins PH (2015) Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Rev. Sociol. 41(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook SW (1985) Experimenting on social issues: The case of school desegregation. Amer. Psych. 40(4):452–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5):12971339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox T, Nkomo SM (1990) Invisible men and women: A status report on race as a variable in organization behavior research. J. Organ. Behav. 11(6):419–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craigslist.org Craigslist|about|mission and history. https://www.craigslist.org/about/mission_and_history#:~:text=craigslist%20is%20about%3A&text=restoring%20the%20human%20voice%20to,the%20disenfranchised%2C%20democratizing%20.Google Scholar
• Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist policies. Univ. Chicago Legal Forum 1989(1):139–167.Google Scholar
• Cui R, Li J, Zhang DJ (2017) Discrimination with incomplete information in the sharing economy: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 1–35.Google Scholar
• Davenport D, Yurich J (1991) Multicultural gender issues. J. Counseling Development 70(1):64–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donovan RA (2011) Tough or tender: (Dis)similarities in White college students’ perceptions of Black and White women. Psych. Women Quart. 35(3):458–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dupree CH, Torrez B, Obioha O, Fiske ST (2020) Race-status associations: Distinct effects of three novel measures among White and Black perceivers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 120(3):601–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Wood W (1999) The origins of sex differences in human behavior. Amer. Psych. 54(6):408–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Wood W (2012) Social role theory. van Lange P, Kruglanski A, Higgins T, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, vol. 2 (Sage Publications Ltd., Los Angeles), 458–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6):878–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fragale AR (2006) The power of powerless speech: The effects of speech style and task interdependence on status conferral. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2):243–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Mussweiler T (2001) First offers and anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(4):657–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Hall EV, Cuddy AJC (2013) Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psych. Sci. 24(4):498–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghavami N, Peplau LA (2012) An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psych. Women Quart. 37(1):113–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy N, Chou EY, Cohen TR, Livingston RW (2012) Status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas: Behavioral antecedents and consequences of prestige and dominance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(2):351–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall EV, Galinsky AD, Phillips KW (2015) Gender profiling: A gendered race perspective on person–position fit. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 41(6):853–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall EV, Hall AV, Galinsky AD, Phillips KW (2019) Mosaic: A model of stereotyping through associated and intersectional categories. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):643–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris-Perry MV (2011) Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes, and Black Women in America (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Hegewisch A, Williams-Baron E (2017) The gender wage gap and work-family supports: Women’s choices or policy choices? Public Law Review (Saint Louis University, St. Louis), 36(1):Article 4.Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Okimoto TG (2007) Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. J. Appl. Psych. 92(1):81–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Gil-White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution Human Behav. 22(3):165–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernandez M, Avery DR, Volpone SD, Kaiser CR (2018) Bargaining while Black: The role of race in salary negotiations. J. Appl. Psych. 104(4):581–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilty J, Carnevale P (1993) Black-hat/white-hat strategy in bilateral negotiation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 55(3):444–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1):1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang K, Yeomans M, Wood Brooks A, Minson J, Gino F, Mair P, Zhang D, et al. (2017) It doesn’t hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 113(3):430–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kakkar H, Sivanathan N (2017) When the appeal of a dominant leader is greater than a prestige leader. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(26):6734–6739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kakkar H, Sivanathan N, Gobel MS (2020) Fall from grace: The role of dominance and prestige in the punishment of high-status actors. Acad. Management J. 63(2):530–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang SK, DeCelles KA, Tilcsik A, Jun S (2016) Whitened resumes: Race and self-presentation in the labor market. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):469–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz D, Kahn R (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Kennedy JA, Kray LJ (2015) A pawn in someone else’s game? The cognitive, motivational, and paradigmatic barriers to women’s excelling in negotiation. Res. Organ. Behav. 35:3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Babcock L (2006) Gender in negotiations: A motivated social cognitive analysis. Thompson L, ed. Negotiation Theory and Research (Taylor & Francis Group, New York), 203–224.Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Thompson L (2005) Gender stereotypes and negotiation performance: An examination of theory and research. Res. Organ. Behav. 26(4):103–182.Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Galinsky AD, Thompson L (2002) Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: An exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 87(2):386–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Kennedy JA, van Zant AB (2014) Not competent enough to know the difference? Gender stereotypes about women’s ease of being misled predict negotiator deception. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 125(2):61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Thompson L, Galinsky A (2001) Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(6):942–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litman L, Robinson J, Abberbock T (2017) TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 49(2):433–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livingston RW, Pearce NA (2009) The teddy-bear effect: Does having a baby face benefit Black chief executive officers? Psych. Sci. 20(10):1229–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livingston RW, Rosette AS, Washington EF (2012) Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psych. Sci. 23(4):354–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma DS, Correll J, Wittenbrink B (2015) The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behav. Res. Methods 47(4):1122–1135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magee J, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maner JK, Case CR (2016) Dominance and Prestige: Dual Strategies for Navigating Social Hierarchies, Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA), 54:129–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazei J, Hüffmeier J, Freund PA, Stuhlmacher AF, Bilke L, Hertel G (2015) A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators. Psych. Bull. 141(1):85–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Taylor B, Buck ML (1991) Gender gaps: Who needs to be explained? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 61(1):5–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Motro D, Evans J, Ellis APJ, Benson L (2022) Race and reactions to negative feedback: Examining the effects of the “Angry Black Woman” stereotype. J. Appl. Psychol. 107(1):142–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1987) Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39(1):84–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patten E (2016) Racial, gender wage gaps persist in U.S. despite some progress. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/01/racial-gender-wage-gaps-persist-in-u-s-despite-some-progress/.Google Scholar
• Pettit NC, Sivanathan N, Gladstone E, Marr JC (2013) Rising stars and sinking ships: Consequences of status momentum. Psych. Sci. 24(3):1579–1584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ponce de Leon R, Rosette AS (2022) “Invisible” discrimination: Divergent outcomes for the non-prototypicality of Black women. Acad. Management J. 65(3):784–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns V, Eibach RP (2008) Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles 59(5):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffia H (1982) The Art and Science of Negotiation (Belknap, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rawley J, Stephen S (2005) The Transatlantic Slave Trade: A History (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE).Google Scholar
• Romero RE (2000) The icon of the strong Black woman: The paradox of strength. Jackson LC, Greene B, eds. Psychotherapy with African American Women: Innovations in Psychodynamic Perspectives and Practice (Guilford, New York), 225–238.Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Livingston RW (2012) Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects of organizational performance on leaders with single vs. dual-subordinate identities. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(5):1162–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Koval CZ, Ma A, Livingston R (2016) Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties. Leadership Quart. 27(3):429–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Statist. Software 48(2):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (1999) Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(5):1004–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shirako A, Kilduff GJ, Kray LJ (2015) Is there a place for sympathy in negotiation? Finding strength in weakness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 131:95–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psych. Sci. 22(11):1359–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuhlmacher AF, Linnabery E (2013) Gender and negotiation: A social role analysis. Olekalns M, Adair W, eds. Handbook of Negotiation Research (Edward Elgar, London), 221–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuhlmacher AF, Walters AE (1999) Gender differences in negotiation outcome: A meta-analysis. Personality Psych. 52(3):653–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson L (1990) Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psych. Bull. 108(3):515–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiedens LZ, Fragale AR (2003) Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(3):558–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toosi NR, Mor S, Semnani-Azad Z, Phillips KW, Amanatullah ET (2019) Who can lean in? The intersecting role of race and gender in negotiations. Psych. Women Quart. 43(1):7–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2015) Census of population and housing.Google Scholar
• van Kleef G, Cote S (2007) Expressing anger in conflict: When it helps and when it hurts. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1557–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Kleef G, De Dreu C, Manstead A (2004a) The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Kleef G, De Dreu C, Manstead A (2004b) The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: A motivated information processing approach. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(4):510–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White DG (1985) Ar’n’t I a Woman: Female Slaves in the Plantation South (Norton and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Wingfield AH (2007) The modern mammy and the angry Black man: African American professionals’ experiences with gendered racism in the workplace. Race Gender Class 14(1):196–212.Google Scholar
• Wolf EB, Lee JJ, Sah S, Brooks AW (2016) Managing perceptions of distress at work: Reframing emotion as passion. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 137:1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Worthen MGF (2014) An invitation to use Craigslist ads to recruit respondents from stigmatized groups for qualitative interviews. Qualitative Res. 14(3):371–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zitek EM, Tiedens LZ (2012) The fluency of social hierarchy: The ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(1):98–115.Crossref, Google Scholar