Reject and Resubmit: A Formal Analysis of Gender Differences in Reapplication and Their Contribution to Women’s Presence in Talent Pipelines

References

• Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astegiano J, Sebastián-González E, Castanho CDT (2019) Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: A meta-analytical review. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 6(6):181566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Scarborough D (2008) Does job testing harm minority workers? Evidence from retail establishments. Quart. J. Econom. 123(1):219–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna S, Benson A, Funk R (2021) Rejection communication and women’s job-search persistence. Preprint, submitted November 2, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3953695.Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis RA, Ethiraj S, Gambardella A, Helfat C, Mitchell W (2016) Creating repeatable cumulative knowledge in strategic management. Strategic Management J. 37:257–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilimoria D, Buch KK (2010) The search is on: Engendering faculty diversity through more effective search and recruitment. Change 42(4):27–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Brinton MC, Grusky DB, eds. (2006) The Declining Significance of Gender? (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Bosquet C, Combes P, García‐Peñalosa C (2019) Gender and promotions: Evidence from academic economists in France. Scandinavian J. Econom. 121(3):1020–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Fernandez-Mateo I (2017) Leaning out: How negative recruitment experiences shape women’s decisions to compete for executive roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):405–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Huang L, Kearney SW, Murray FE (2014) Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4427–4431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B (1995) The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 1(1):57–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campero S, Fernandez RM (2019) Gender composition of labor queues and gender disparities in hiring. Soc. Forces 97(4):1487–1516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carli LL, Eagly AH (2001) Gender, hierarchy, and leadership: An introduction. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):629–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2005) Social networks and employee performance in a call center. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(5):1243–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2018) Women in the workforce: Global (Quick Take). Retrieved January 8, 2020, from https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-the-workforce-global/.Google Scholar
• Coen C (2009) Simple but not simpler. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 15(1):1–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2020) Certum quod factum: How formal models contribute to the theoretical and empirical robustness of organization theory. J. Management 46(7):1289–1301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deming DJ, Yuchtman N, Abulafi A, Goldin C, Katz LF (2016) The value of postsecondary credentials in the labor market: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(3):778–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Paola M, Ponzo M, Scoppa V (2015) Gender differences in attitudes toward competition: Evidence from the Italian Scientific Qualification. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8859, Institute for Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Dezsö CL, Ross DG (2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1072–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1511.Link, Google Scholar
• Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE (2006) Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science 313(5787):665–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE (2013) From bench to board: Gender differences in university scientists’ participation in corporate scientific advisory boards. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1443–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dlugos K, Keller JR (2021) Turned down and taking off? Rejection and turnover in internal talent markets. Acad. Management J. 64(1):63–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutt N, Kaplan S (2018) Acceleration as mitigation: Whether & when processes can address gender bias in entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Proc. 2018(1):16160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrlinger J, Dunning D (2003) How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(1):5–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• England P, Levine A, Mishel E (2020) Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(13):6990–6997.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Campero S (2017) Gender sorting and the glass ceiling in high-tech firms. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 70(1):73–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Fernandez-Mateo I (2006) Networks, race, and hiring. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(1):42–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Galperin RV (2014) The causal status of social capital in labor markets. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 445–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Mors ML (2008) Competing for jobs: Labor queues and gender sorting in the hiring process. Soc. Sci. Res. 37(4):1061–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Sosa ML (2005) Gendering the job: Networks and recruitment at a call center. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(3):859–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Coh M (2015) Coming with baggage: Past rejections and the evolution of market relationships. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1381–1399.Link, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez RM (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Kaplan S (2018) Gender and organization science: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1229–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, King Z (2011) Anticipatory sorting and gender segregation in temporary employment. Management Sci. 57(6):989–1008.Link, Google Scholar
• Forrester JW (1971) Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Tech. Rev. 73(3):52–68.Google Scholar
• Gafni H, Marom D, Robb A, Sade O (2021) Gender dynamics in crowdfunding (Kickstarter): Evidence on entrepreneurs, investors, deals and taste-based discrimination. Rev. Finance 25(2):235–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Mollick E (2017) Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):341–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Kuppuswamy V, Mollick ER (2020) Gender, hubris, and the interpretation of signals in crowdfunding. Presentation, Proc. 2020 Academy of Management Annual Meeting. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.17893symposium.Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Kacperczyk AO (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7):1666–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannah DP, Tidhar R, Eisenhardt KM (2021) Analytic models in strategy, organizations, and management research: A guide for consumers. Strategic Management J. 42(2):329–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JR, Lin Z, Carroll GR, Carley KM (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1229–1245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He JC, Kang SK, Lacetera N (2021) Opt-out choice framing attenuates gender differences in the decision to compete in the laboratory and in the field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 118(42):e2108337118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Harris D, Wolfson PJ (2006) The pipeline to the top: Women and men in the top executive ranks of U.S. corporations. Acad. Management Perspect. 20(4):42–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsch MW, Smale S, Devaney RL (2012) Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and an Introduction to Chaos (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar
• Huang J, Gates AJ, Sinatra R, Barabási AL (2020) Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(9):4609–4616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyde JS, Bigler RS, Joel D, Tate CC, van Anders SM (2019) The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. Amer. Psychologist 74(2):171–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen KL, Kovács B, Sorenson O (2018) Gender differences in obtaining and maintaining patent rights. Nature Biotech. 36(4):307–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk O, Younkin P (2022) A founding penalty: Evidence from an audit study on gender, entrepreneurship, and future employment. Organ. Sci. 33(2):716–745.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E (2006) Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(4):589–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller JR (2018) Posting and slotting: How hiring processes shape the quality of hire and compensation in internal labor markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):848–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Colomer J, Belinky M (2014) Structural equality at the top of the corporation: Mandated quotas for women directors. Strategic Management J. 35(6):891–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolev J, Fuentes-Medel Y, Murray F (2019) Is blinded review enough? How gendered outcomes arise even under anonymous evaluation. NBER Working Paper No. 25759, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kuppuswamy V, Bayus BL (2018) Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers. Cumming D, Hornuf L, eds. The Economics of Crowdfunding (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 151–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerchenmueller MJ, Sorenson O (2018) The gender gap in early career transitions in the life sciences. Res. Policy 47(6):1007–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levins R (1966) The strategy of model building in population biology. Amer. Sci. 54(4):421–431.Google Scholar
• Leung MD, Koppman S (2018) Taking a pass: How proportional prejudice and decisions not to hire reproduce gender segregation. Amer. J. Sociol. 124(3):762–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy D (1994) Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implications. Strategic Management J. 15(S2):167–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meglino BM, Ravlin EC, DeNisi AS (1997) When does it hurt to tell the truth? The effect of realistic job reviews on employee recruiting. Public Personnel Management 26(3):413–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr TS (2014) Why women don’t apply for jobs unless they’re 100% qualified. Harvard Bus. Rev. (August 25), https://hbr.org/2014/08/why-women-dont-apply-for-jobs-unless-theyre-100-qualified.Google Scholar
• Mollick E, Kuppuswamy V (2016) Crowdfunding: Evidence on the democratization of startup funding. Harhoff D, Lakhani KR, eds. Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities, and Open Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 537–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neher DV (1999) Staged financing: An agency perspective. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(2):255–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obukhova E, Kleinbaum AM (2022) Scouting and schmoozing: A gender difference in networking during job search. Acad. Management Discoveries 8(2):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pager D, Pedulla DS (2015) Race, self-selection, and the job search process. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(4):1005–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pager D, Quillian L (2005) Walking the talk? What employers say vs. what they do. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(3):355–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parasurama P, Anindya G, Ipeirotis PG (2020) Role of online sourcing in occupational gender segregation in IT. Preprint, submitted August 27, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3672484.Google Scholar
• Penner A, Willer R (2019) Men’s overpersistence and the gender gap in science and mathematics. Socius 5:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2019) Idea rejected, tie formed: Organizations’ feedback on crowdsourced ideas. Acad. Management J. 62(2):503–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post C, Byron K (2014) A theoretical expansion and meta-analysis of the women on boards–firm performance relationship. Acad. Management Proc. 2014(1):10172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preston AE (1994) Why have all the women gone? A study of exit of women from the science and engineering professions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(5):1446–1462.Google Scholar
• Rahmandad H, Repenning N (2016) Capability erosion dynamics. Strategic Management J. 37(4):649–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahmandad H, Sterman J (2008) Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: Comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Management Sci. 54(5):998–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2012) Diversity within reach: Recruitment versus hiring in elite firms. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 639(1):71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum JE (1979) Tournament mobility: Career patterns in a corporation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24:220–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubineau B, Fernandez RM (2013) Missing links: Referrer behavior and job segregation. Management Sci. 59(11):2470–2489.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubineau B, Fernandez RM (2015) Tipping points: The gender segregating and desegregating effects of network recruitment. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1646–1664.Link, Google Scholar
• Schwienbacher A, Larralde B (2012) Alternative types of entrepreneurial finance. Cumming D, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 369–391.Google Scholar
• Shahriar AZM (2018) Gender differences in entrepreneurial propensity: Evidence from matrilineal and patriarchal societies. J. Bus. Venturing 33(6):762–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada (2022) Canada is the first country to provide census data on transgender and non-binary people. The Daily (April 27), https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/220427/dq220427b-eng.htm.Google Scholar
• Sterling AD, Fernandez RM (2018) Once in the door: Gender, tryouts, and the initial salaries of managers. Management Sci. 64(11):5444–5460.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (2001) System dynamics modeling: tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Rev. 43(4):8–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2015) Business as plan B: Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):671–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tian X (2011) The causes and consequences of venture capital stage financing. J. Financial Econom. 101(1):132–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valian V (1999) Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams WM, Ceci SJ (2015) National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(17):5360–5365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams DA, Wade-Golden KC (2013) The Chief Diversity Officer (Stylus, Sterling, VA).Google Scholar
• Witteman HO, Hendricks M, Straus S, Tannenbaum C (2019) Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency. Lancet 393(10171):531–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Shauman KA (2003) Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Yang T, Leung MD, Bao J (2019) Approaching or avoiding: Gender asymmetry in reactions to prior job search. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar