Learning in Temporally Complex Problems: The Role of External Knowledge

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16469

References

  • Allison GT (1971) Essence of Decision (Little, Brown and Company, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Amo R, Matias S, Yamanaka A, Tanaka KF, Uchida N, Watabe-Uchida M (2022) A gradual temporal shift of dopamine responses mirrors the progression of temporal difference error in machine learning. Nature Neurosci. 25(8):1082–1092.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Norwell, Kluwer, MA).Google Scholar
  • Barto AG (2019) Reinforcement learning: Connections, surprises, and challenges. AI Magazine 40(1):3–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellman R (1957) Dynamic Programming (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Bilalić M, McLeod P, Gobet F (2008) Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition 108(3):652–661.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois LJ, Eisenhardt KM (1988) Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Sci. 34(7):816–835.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brehmer B (1980) In one word: Not from experience. Acta Psych. 45(1–3):223–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brehmer B (1992) Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems. Acta Psych. (Amsterdam) 81(3):211–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crites RH, Barto AG (1998) Elevator group control using multiple reinforcement learning agents. Machine Learn. 33:235–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategic representations. Strategy Sci. 3(4):606–619.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar F, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37:2031–2049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Ostler J (2020) A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1198–1219.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Siggelkow N (2010) How much to copy? Determinants of effective imitation breadth. Organ. Sci. 21(3):661–676.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Hinrichs N, Heshmati M (2024) External representations in strategic decision‐making: Understanding strategy’s reliance on visuals. Strategic Management J. 45(11):2191–2226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, Fang C, Levinthal DA (2004) From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning from model-based feedback. Management Sci. 50(10):1366–1378.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Diehl E, Sterman JD (1995) Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 62(2):198–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drenik G (2023) How real-world data is shaping the future of pharmaceutical marketing. Forbes (November 14), https://www.forbes.com/sites/garydrenik/2023/11/14/how-real-world-data-is-shaping-the-future-of-pharmaceutical-marketing/.Google Scholar
  • Dunne DD, Dougherty D (2016) Abductive reasoning: How innovators navigate in the labyrinth of complex product innovation. Organ. Stud. 37(2):131–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang C (2012) Organizational learning as credit assignment: A model and two experiments. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1717–1732.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fang C, Levinthal D (2009) Near-term liability of exploitation: Exploration and exploitation in multistage problems. Organ. Sci. 20(3):538–551.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fu WT, Anderson JR (2008) Solving the credit assignment problem: Explicit and implicit learning of action sequences with probabilistic outcomes. Psych. Res. 72(3):321–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gary MS, Wood RE (2011) Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strategic Management J. 32(6):569–594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick CJ, Hackman JR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P (1991) Commitment (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gonzalez C (2004) Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: Effects of time constraints and cognitive abilities. Human Factors 46(3):449–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gonzalez C (2005) Decision support for real-time, dynamic decision-making tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(2):142–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gonzalez C, Fakhari P, Busemeyer J (2017) Dynamic decision making: Learning processes and new research directions. Human Factors 59(5):713–721.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herriott SR, Levinthal D, March JG (1985) Learning from experience in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(2):298–302.Google Scholar
  • Kaelbling LP, Littman ML, Moore AW (1996) Reinforcement learning: A survey. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 4:237–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R, Allen TJ (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D Project Groups. R&D Management 12(1):7–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Kulatilaka N (2001) Capabilities as real options. Organ. Sci. 12(6):744–758.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lant TK, Mezias SJ (1992) An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organ. Sci. 3(1):47–71.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lave CA, James M (1975) An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Leiblein MJ, Reuer JJ, Zenger T (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategy Sci. 3(4):558–573.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (2021) Evolutionary Processes and Organizational Adaptation: A Mendelian Perspective on Strategic Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March J (1981) A model of adaptive organizational learning. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14:95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, Marino A (2015) Three facets of organizational adaptation: Selection, variety, and plasticity. Organ. Sci. 26(3):743–755.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luce R (1959) Individual Choice Behavior (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Luoma J, Ruutu S, King AW, Tikkanen H (2017) Time delays, competitive interdependence, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 38(3):506–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Martignoni D, Menon A, Siggelkow N (2016) Consequences of misspecified mental models: Contrasting effects and the role of cognitive fit. Strategic Management J. 37:2545–2568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKelvey B (1999) Avoiding Complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: Strategies for rugged landscapes. Organ. Sci. 10(3):294–321.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McNish J, Silcoff S (2015) Losing the Signal: The Untold Story behind the Extraordinary Rise and Spectacular Fall of BlackBerry (Macmillan).Google Scholar
  • Minsky M (1961) Steps toward artificial intelligence. Proc. IRE 49(1):8–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human Problem Solving (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Niv Y (2009) Reinforcement learning in the brain. J. Math. Psych. 53(3):139–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oldroyd JB, Morris SS, Dotson JP (2019) Principles or templates? The antecedents and performance effects of cross-border knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 40(13):2191–2213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orr JE (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Pagnoni G, Zink CF, Montague PR, Berns GS (2002) Activity in human ventral striatum locked to errors of reward prediction. Nature Neurosci. 5(2):97–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G (2006) Can science be a business. Harvard Bus. Rev. 10:1–12.Google Scholar
  • Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmandad H (2008) Effect of delays on complexity of organizational learning. Management Sci. 54(7):1297–1312.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmandad H, Gary MS (2023) Delays impair learning and can drive convergence to inefficient strategies. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2392–2414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmandad H, Denrell J, Prelec D (2021) What makes dynamic strategic problems difficult? Evidence from an experimental study. Strategic Management J. 42(5):865–897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmandad H, Repenning N, Sterman J (2009) Effects of feedback delay on learning. System Dynamics Rev. 25(4):309–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2002) Organizational sticking points on NK landscapes. Complexity 7(5):31–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE, Erev I (1995) Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games Econom. Behav. 8(1):164–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salvato C (2009) Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ. Sci. 20(2):384–409.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR (1997) A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275(5306):1593–1599.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2002) Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Sci. 48(7):900–916.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philosophical Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
  • Starkweather CK, Uchida N (2021) Dopamine signals as temporal difference errors: Recent advances. Current Opinion Neurobiology 67:95–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman JD (1994) Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Rev. 10(2–3):291–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman JD (2006) Operational and behavioral causes of supply chain instability. The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains: A Review of Methods, Components and Cases, 17–56.Google Scholar
  • Sutton RS (1988) Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences. Machine Learn. 3(1):9–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton RS, Barto AG (2018) Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Tesauro G (1994) TD-Gammon, a self-teaching backgammon program, achieves master-level play. Neural Comput. 6(2):215–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson JE (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Walsh MM, Anderson JR (2014) Navigating complex decision spaces: Problems and paradigms in sequential choice. Psych. Bull. 140(2):466–486.Google Scholar
  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Winter SG, Cattani G, Dorsch A (2007) The value of moderate obsession: Insights from a new model of organizational search. Organ. Sci. 18(3):403–419.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J, Norman DA (1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Sci. 18(1):87–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.