Setting Gendered Expectations? Recruiter Outreach Bias in Online Tech Training Programs

References

• Abraham M (2017) Pay formalization revisited: Considering the effects of manager gender and discretion on closing the gender wage gap. Acad. Management J. 60(1):29–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ammerman C, Groysberg B (2022) 3 workplace biases that derail mid-career women. Harvard Bus. Rev. Accessed May 10, 2023, https://hbr.org/2022/09/3-workplace-biases-that-derail-mid-career-women.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bannon L, Smith R (2022) That fancy university course? It might actually come from an education company. Wall Street Journal (July 6). Accessed May 10, 2023, https://www.wsj.com/articles/that-fancy-university-course-it-might-actually-come-from-an-education-company-11657126489.Google Scholar
• Bapna S, Ganco M (2021) Gender gaps in equity crowdfunding: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 67(5):2679–2710.Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1993) The economic way of looking at life. Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 12.Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Fernandez-Mateo I (2008) Three’s a crowd? Understanding triadic employment relationships. Cappelli P, ed. Employment Relationships: New Models of White Collar Work (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 142–178.Google Scholar
• Biernat M, Kobrynowicz D (1997) Gender-and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(3):544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biernat M, Tocci MJ, Williams JC (2012) The language of performance evaluations: Gender-based shifts in content and consistency of judgment. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 3(2):186–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bills DB, Di Stasio V, Gërxhani K (2017) The demand side of hiring: Employers in the labor market. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 43:291–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blevins C, Mullen L (2015) Jane, John… Leslie? A historical method for algorithmic gender prediction. DHQ Digital Humanity Quart. 9(3). Accessed May 10, 2023, http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/3/000223/000223.html.Google Scholar
• Bonet R, Cappelli P, Hamori M (2013) Labor market intermediaries and the new paradigm for human resources. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):341–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botelho TL, Abraham M (2017) Pursuing quality: How search costs and uncertainty magnify gender-based double standards in a multistage evaluation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):698–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Fernandez-Mateo I (2017) Leaning out: How negative recruitment experiences shape women’s decisions to compete for executive roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):405–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1986) Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. J. Appl. Econometrics 1(1):29–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell EL, Hahl O (2022) He’s overqualified, she’s highly committed: Qualification signals and gendered assumptions about job candidate commitment. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2451–2476.Link, Google Scholar
• Card D, DellaVigna S, Funk P, Iriberri N (2020) Are referees and editors in economics gender neutral? Quart. J. Econom. 135(1):269–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Page ME, West JE (2010) Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quart. J. Econom. 125(3):1101–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2022) Gender, race, and network advantage in organizations. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2364–2403.Link, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ, Rho HJ (2023) The gendering of job postings in the online recruitment process. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Cech E, Rubineau B, Silbey S, Seron C (2011) Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(5):641–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ceci SJ, Williams WM, Barnett SM (2009) Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psych. Bull. 135(2):218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan J, Wang J (2017) Hiring preferences in online labor markets: Evidence of a female hiring bias. Management Sci. 64(7):2973–2994.Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2001) Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1691–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2004) Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5):1297–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Dahlander L, Grohsjean T, Salter A (2017) Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Acad. Management J. 60(2):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cutter C (2019) Amazon to retrain a third of its US workforce. Wall Street Joural (July 11). Accessed May 10, 2023, https://www.wsj.com/articles/amazon-to-retrain-a-third-of-its-u-s-workforce-11562841120.Google Scholar
• Deming DJ, Noray K (2020) Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and STEM careers. Quart. J. Econom. 135(4):1965–2005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Makhijani MG, Klonsky BG (1992) Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 111(1):3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Mors ML (2008) Competing for jobs: Labor queues and gender sorting in the hiring process. Soc. Sci. Res. 37(4):1061–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Sosa ML (2005) Gendering the job: Networks and recruitment at a call center. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(3):859–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez RM (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, King Z (2011) Anticipatory sorting and gender segregation in temporary employment. Management Sci. 57(6):989–1008.Link, Google Scholar
• Foschi M (1996) Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Soc. Psych. Quart. 59(3):237–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foschi M (2000) Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 26(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foschi M, Lai L, Sigerson K (1994) Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Soc. Psych. Quart. 57(4):326–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaucher D, Friesen J, Kay AC (2011) Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(1):109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annu. Rev. Psych. 62:451–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of” blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorman EH (2005) Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(4):702–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Mollick E (2017) Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):341–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne Y, Lakhani KR (2020) 2U: Higher education rewired. Harvard Business School Case 620–044.Google Scholar
• Hall S, Dudley T (2019) Dear Colleges: Take Control of Your Online Courses (Century Foundation).Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (1983) Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Res. Organ. Behav. 5:269–298.Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Eagly AH (2008) Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Industry Organ. Psych. 1(4):393–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Haynes MC (2005) No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male-female teams. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Block CJ, Martell RF, Simon MC (1989) Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. J. Appl. Psych. 74(6):935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill P (2018) Online program management: Spring 2018 view of the market landscape. Accessed May 10, 2023, https://eliterate.us/online-programmanagement.Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk O, Younkin P (2021) A founding penalty: Evidence from an audit study on gender, entrepreneurship, and future employment. Organ. Sci. 33(2):716–745.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Kanze D, Conley MA, Higgins ET (2021) The motivation of mission statements: How regulatory mode influences workplace discrimination. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 166:84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanze D, Huang L, Conley MA, Higgins ET (2018) We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Acad. Management J. 61(2):586–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanze D, Conley MA, Okimoto TG, Phillips DJ, Merluzzi J (2020) Evidence that investors penalize female founders for lack of industry fit. Sci. Adv. 6(48):eabd7664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim M, DellaPosta D (2021) The fickle crowd: Reinforcement and contradiction of quality evaluations in cultural markets. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2496–2518.Google Scholar
• King Z, Burke S, Pemberton J (2005) The ‘bounded’career: An empirical study of human capital, career mobility and employment outcomes in a mediated labour market. Human Relations 58(8):981–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2019) Algorithmic bias? An empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of STEM career ads. Management Sci. 65(7):2966–2981.Link, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Dahm PC (2017) Why and when does the gender gap reverse? Diversity goals and the pay premium for high potential women. Acad. Management J. 60(2):402–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manoff K (2019) How they (online graduate programs) get you. Accessed May 10, 2023, https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2019/08/online-graduate-programs-recruitment/596077/.Google Scholar
• Marinescu I, Wolthoff R (2020) Opening the black box of the matching function: The power of words. J. Labor Econom. 38(2):535–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks MJ, Fraley RC (2006) Confirmation bias and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles 54(1):19–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J (2012) Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 109(41):16474–16479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. 2(2):175–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pager D, Western B (2005) Race at work: Realities of race and criminal record in the NYC job market (December). Reiman J, Leighton P, eds. The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison: A Reader (Taylor & Francis Group, London).Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Acad. Management J. 58(3):856–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piskorski MJ (2014) A Social Strategy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quadlin N (2018) The mark of a woman’s record: Gender and academic performance in hiring. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(2):331–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rainie L, Anderson J (2017) The Future of Jobs and Jobs Training (Pew Research Center).Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2014) How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4403–4408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (1997) Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62:218–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Correll SJ (2004) Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender Soc. 18(4):510–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubineau B, Fernandez RM (2015) How do labor market networks work? Scott R, Kosslyn S, eds. Emerging Trends Soc. Behav. Sci. Interdisciplinary Searchable Linkable Resources (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ), 1–15.Google Scholar
• Sarsons H, Gërxhani K, Reuben E, Schram A (2021) Gender differences in recognition for group work. J. Political Econom. 129(1):101–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seron C, Silbey SS, Cech E, Rubineau B (2016) Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work Occupations 43(2):178–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Sherman EL (2015) Agents of change or cogs in the machine? Reexamining the influence of female managers on the gender wage gap. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(6):1778–1808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner MA, Edwards JG, Mikelsons M (1991) Housing discrimination study: Analyzing racial and ethnic steering. (US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Vasquez M (2022) Online program management firms are thriving and these Democrats want answers. Accessed May 10, 2023, https://www.chronicle.com/article/online-program-management-firms-are-thriving-and-these-democrats-want-answers?cid=gen_sign_in.Google Scholar
• Williams WM, Ceci SJ (2015) National hiring experiments reveal 2: 1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 112(17):5360–5365.Crossref, Google Scholar