Moral Foundations, Himpathy, and Punishment Following Organizational Sexual Misconduct Allegations

References

• Aguinis H, Villamor I, Ramani RS (2021) MTurk research: Review and recommendations. J. Management 47(4):823–837.Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Amit Aharon A, Ruban A, Dubovi I (2021) Knowledge and information credibility evaluation strategies regarding COVID-19: A cross-sectional study. Nursing Outlook 69(1):22–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Tripp TM, Bies RJ (2006) Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 91(3):653–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atari M, Haidt J, Graham J, Koleva S, Stevens ST, Dehghani M (2022) Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. Preprint, submitted March 4, https://psyarxiv.com/q6c9r/.Google Scholar
• Atwater LE, Tringale AM, Sturm RE, Taylor SN, Braddy PW (2018) Looking ahead: How what we know about sexual harassment now informs us of the future. Organ. Dynam. 48(4):100677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldner C, Pierro A (2019) The trials of women leaders in the workforce: How a need for cognitive closure can influence acceptance of harmful gender stereotypes. Sex Roles 80(9):565–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldner C, Santo DD, Talamo A, Pierro A (2020) Sympathy as knowledge of the other in need: An investigation into the roles of need for closure and the moral foundations on sympathy toward immigrants. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 50(4):240–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balogh DW, Kite ME, Pickel KL, Canel D, Schroeder J (2003) The effects of delayed report and motive for reporting on perceptions of sexual harassment. Sex Roles 48(7–8):337–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsky A, Kaplan SA, Beal DJ (2011) Just feelings? The role of affect in the formation of organizational fairness judgments. J. Management 37(1):248–279.Google Scholar
• Bastian LD, Lancaster AR, Reyst HE (1996) 1995 sexual harassment survey. Report, U.S. Department of Defense, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Belknap J (2010) Rape: Too hard to report and too easy to discredit victims. Violence Against Women 16(12):1335–1344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berdahl JL (2007) Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):641–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergman ME, Langhout RD, Palmieri PA, Cortina LM, Fitzgerald LF (2002) The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. J. Appl. Psych. 87(2):230–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bies RJ, Tripp TM (2002) “Hot flashes, open wounds”: Injustice and the tyranny of its emotions. Gilliland SW, Steiner DD, Skarlicki DP, eds. Emerging Perspectives on Managing Organizational Justice (Information Age, Greenwich, CT), 203–221.Google Scholar
• Birnbaum MH, Stegner SE (1979) Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge’s point of view. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(1):48–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Wiesenfeld BM, Fortin M, Wheeler-Smith SL (2013) Fairness lies in the heart of the beholder: How the social emotions of third parties influence reactions to injustice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121(1):62–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Wiesenfeld BM, Rothman NB, Wheeler-Smith SL (2010) Social emotions and justice: How the emotional fabric of groups determines justice enactment and reactions. Mannix EA, Neale MA, Mullen E, eds. Fairness and Groups (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 29–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom P (2017) Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen G, Sheppard L, Kramer G (1994) Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 24(1):45–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowes-Sperry L, O’Leary-Kelly AM (2005) To act or not to act: The dilemma faced by sexual harassment observers. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):288–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brescoll VL, Okimoto TG, Vial AC (2018) You’ve come a long way . . . maybe: How moral emotions trigger backlash against women leaders: Moral emotions in backlash. J. Soc. Issues 74(1):144–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson G (2017) How to encourage more women to report sexual harassment. New York Times (October 10), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/10/opinion/women-reporting-sexual-harassment.html.Google Scholar
• Chaiken S, Maheswaran D (1994) Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(3):460–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen F, Curran PJ, Bollen KA, Kirby J, Paxton P (2008) An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociol. Methods Res. 36(4):462–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connolly DA, Gordon HM (2011) He-said–she-said: Contrast effects in credibility assessments and possible threats to fundamental principles of criminal law. Legal Criminological Psych. 16(2):227–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortina LM, Berdahl JL (2008) Sexual harassment in organizations: A decade of research in review. Barling J, Cooper CL, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 469–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano RS, Goldman B, Folger R (2003) Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. J. Organ. Behav. 24(8):1019–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasborough MT, Hannah ST, Zhu W (2020) The generation and function of moral emotions in teams: An integrative review. J. Appl. Psych. 105(5):433–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeScioli P, Kurzban R (2013) A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psych. Bull. 139(2):477–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diekmann KA, Walker SDS, Galinsky AD, Tenbrunsel AE (2013) Double victimization in the workplace: Why observers condemn passive victims of sexual harassment. Organ. Sci. 24(2):614–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Kalev A (2019) The promise and peril of sexual harassment programs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(25):12255–12260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dockterman E (2018) Survivors used #MeToo to speak up. A year later, they’re still fighting for meaningful change. New York Times (September 20), https://time.com/5401638/silence-breakers-one-year-later-2/.Google Scholar
• Dungan J, Waytz A, Young L (2015) The psychology of whistleblowing. Current Opinion Psych. 6:129–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dungan JA, Young L, Waytz A (2019) The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 85:103848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Morse A, Zingales L (2010) Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? J. Finance 65(6):2213–2253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Miller PA, Fultz J, Shell R, Mathy RM, Reno RR (1989) Relation of sympathy and personal distress to prosocial behavior: A multimethod study. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(1):55–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliott J, Tobin A (2018) The Red Cross helped an executive get a job at Save the Children after forcing him out for sexual harassment. ProPublica (January 25), https://www.propublica.org/article/the-red-cross-sexual-harassment-executive?token=66qLWQOC8-aKmhz5ZMZX7A6VtNhdKyrS.Google Scholar
• Fehr R, Yam KC, Dang C (2015) Moralized leadership: The construction and consequences of ethical leader perceptions. Acad. Management Rev. 40(2):182–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psych. Sci. 24(1):56–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg M, Willer R (2015) From gulf to bridge: When do moral arguments facilitate political influence? Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 41(12):1665–1681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg M, Willer R (2019) Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 13(12):e12501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psych. Bull. 51(4):327–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folger R (1998) Fairness as a moral virtue. Schminke M, ed. Managerial Ethics: Moral Management of People and Processes (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 13–34.Google Scholar
• Folger R (2001) Fairness as deonance. Gilliland SW, Steiner DD, Skarlicki DP, eds. Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives on Organizational Justice (IAP, Greenwich, CT), 3–33.Google Scholar
• Folger R, Glerum DR (2015) Justice and deonance: “You ought to be fair.” Cropanzano R, Ambrose ML, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 331–350.Google Scholar
• Folger R, Skarlicki DP (2008) The evolutionary bases of deontic justice. Gilliland SW, Steiner DD, Skarlicki DP, eds. Justice, Morality, and Social Responsibility (IAP, Greenwich, CT), 29–62.Google Scholar
• Folger R, Stein C (2017) Deonance: Expanding the concept. Moliner C, Cropanzano RS, Martínez-Tur V, eds. Organizational Justice: International Perspectives and Conceptual Advances (Routledge, London), 29–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folger R, Whiting SW (2020) HR research and practice from a deonance perspective. Buckley MR, Wheeler AR, Baur JE, Halbesleben JRB, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 259–283.Google Scholar
• Goldberg CB, Rawski SL, Perry EL (2019) The direct and indirect effects of organizational tolerance for sexual harassment on the effectiveness of sexual harassment investigation training for HR managers. Human Resource Development Quart. 30(1):81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin RD, Chambers MK, Dodson SJ, Davani AM, Dehghani M, Graham J, Diekmann KA (2020) Alleged harassers’ response affects third parties’ reactions to sexual harassment victims. Acad. Management Proc. (1).Google Scholar
• Goodwin RD, Graham J, Diekmann KA (2020) Good intentions aren’t good enough: Moral courage in opposing sexual harassment. J. Experiment. Soc Psych. 86:1–14.Google Scholar
• de Graaff MC, Schut M, Verweij DEM, Vermetten E, Giebels E (2016) Emotional reactions and moral judgment: The effects of morally challenging interactions in military operations. Ethics Behav. 26(1):14–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J, Haidt J (2010) Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 14(1):140–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J, Haidt J, Koleva S, Motyl M, Iyer R, Wojcik SP, Ditto PH (2013) Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Devine P, Plant A, eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA), 55–130.Google Scholar
• Graham J, Haidt J, Motyl M, Meindl P, Iskiwitch C, Mooijman M (2018) Moral foundations theory: On the advantages of moral pluralism over moral monism. Gray K, Graham J, eds. Atlas of Moral Psychology (Guilford Publications, New York), 211–222.Google Scholar
• Graham J, Haidt J, Nosek BA (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(5):1029–1046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J, Nosek BA, Haidt J, Iyer R, Koleva S, Ditto PH (2011) Mapping the moral domain. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(2):366–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham S, Weiner B, Zucker GS (1997) An attributional analysis of punishment goals and public reactions to O. J. Simpson. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 23(4):331–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray K, Wegner DM (2011) Dimensions of moral emotions. Emotion Rev. 3(3):258–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green DW, McClelland A, Muckli L, Simmons C (1999) Arguments and deontic decisions. Acta Psych. 101(1):27–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenbaum RL, Bonner J, Gray T, Mawritz M (2020) Moral emotions: A review and research agenda for management scholarship. J. Organ. Behav. 41(2):95–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenbaum RL, Mawritz MB, Mayer DM, Priesemuth M (2013) To act out, to withdraw, or to constructively resist? Employee reactions to supervisor abuse of customers and the moderating role of employee moral identity. Human Relations 66(7):925–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1988) Cultivating an image of justice: Looking fair on the job. Acad. Management Perspect. 2(2):155–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Bies RJ, Eskew DE (1991) Establishing fairness in the eye of the beholder: Managing impressions of organizational justice. Giacalone RA, Rosenfeld P, eds. Applied Impression Management: How Image-Making Affects Managerial Decisions. Sage Focus Editions (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 111–132.Google Scholar
• Greene J, Haidt J (2002) How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cognitive Sci. 6(12):517–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutek BA, Koss MP (1993) Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. J. Vocational Behav. 42(1):28–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutek BA, O’Connor M (1995) The empirical basis for the reasonable woman standard. J. Soc. Issues 51(1):151–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadarics M, Kende A (2018) The dimensions of generalized prejudice within the dual-process model: The mediating role of moral foundations. Current Psych. 37:731–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psych. Rev. 108(4):814–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haidt J (2003) The moral emotions. Davidson R, Scherer KR, Goldsmith HH, eds. Handbook of Affective Sciences (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 852–870.Google Scholar
• Haidt J (2008) Morality. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 3(1):65–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haidt J, Graham J (2009) Planet of the Durkheimians: Where community, authority, and sacredness are foundations of morality. Jost JT, Kay AC, Thorisdottir H, eds. Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 371–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannah ST, Jennings PL, Bluhm D, Peng AC, Schaubroeck JM (2014) Duty orientation: Theoretical development and preliminary construct testing. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 123(2):220–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harper CA, Harris AJ (2017) Applying moral foundations theory to understanding public views of sexual offending. J. Sexual Aggression 23(2):111–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsey S, Freyd JJ (2020) Deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender (DARVO): What is the influence on perceived perpetrator and victim credibility? J. Aggression 29(8):897–916.Google Scholar
• Hart CG (2019) The penalties for self-reporting sexual harassment. Gender Soc. 33(4):534–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatvany N, Strack F (1980) The impact of a discredited key witness. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 10(6):490–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Hersch J, Moran B (2012) He said, she said, let’s hear what the data say: Sexual harassment in the media, courts, EEOC, and social science. Kentucky Law J. 101(4):753–788.Google Scholar
• Hershcovis MS, Vranjes I, Berdahl JL, Cortina LM (2021) See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: Theorizing network silence around sexual harassment. J. Appl. Psych. 106(12):1834–1847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland K, Rabelo V, Gustafson A, Seabrook R, Cortina L (2016) Sexual harassment against men: Examining the roles of feminist activism, sexuality, and organizational context. Psych. Men Masculinity 17(1):17–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hopp FR, Fisher JT, Cornell D, Huskey R, Weber R (2021) The extended Moral Foundations Dictionary (eMFD): Development and applications of a crowd-sourced approach to extracting moral intuitions from text. Behav. Res. Methods 53:232–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Structural Equation Model. 6(1):1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer A, Ryan MK (2009) Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination in the workplace? The role of group status and in‐group identification in predicting pathways to collective action. J. Soc. Issues 65(4):791–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jennings PL, Mitchell MS, Hannah ST (2015) The moral self: A review and integration of the literature. J. Organ. Behav. 36(1):104–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin Y (2014) Examining publics’ crisis responses according to different shades of anger and sympathy. J. Public Relations Res. 26(1):79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones DA, Skarlicki DP (2005) The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority’s fairness reputation on reactions to subsequent treatment. J. Appl. Psych. 90(2):363–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordan J (2004) Beyond belief?: Police, rape and women’s credibility. Criminal Justice 4(1):29–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost JT, Kay AC (2005) Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(3):498–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaufman DQ, Stasson MF, Hart JW (1999) Are the tabloids always wrong or is that just what we think? Need for cognition and perceptions of articles in print media. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 29(9):1984–2000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Cameron GT (2011) Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Comm. Res. 38(6):826–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kline RB (2011) Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. Williams M, Vogt W, eds. The Sage Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods (Sage Publications Limited, London), 562–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kline RB (2015) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed. (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Koleva SP, Graham J, Iyer R, Ditto PH, Haidt J (2012) Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. J. Res. Personality 46(2):184–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konrad AM, Gutek BA (1986) Impact of work experiences on attitudes toward sexual harassment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):422–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopmann-Holm B, Sze J, Jinpa T, Tsai JL (2020) Compassion meditation increases optimism toward a transgressor. Cognitive Emotion 34(5):1028–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kundro TG, Nurmohamed S (2020) Understanding when and why cover-ups are punished less severely. Acad. Management J. 64(3):873–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landmann H, Hess U (2018) Testing moral foundation theory: Are specific moral emotions elicited by specific moral transgressions? J. Moral Ed. 47(1):34–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langhout RD, Bergman ME, Cortina LM, Fitzgerald LF, Drasgow F, Williams JH (2005) Sexual harassment severity: Assessing situational and personal determinants and outcomes. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 35(5):975–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Barnes CM (2021) An attributional process model of workplace gossip. J. Appl. Psych. 106(2):300–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H, Elkins T (2013) Sympathy and anger: The role of attributions in emotional responses to abusive supervision. Härtel CEJ, ed. Individual Sources, Dynamics and Expressions of Emotions (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 53–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lengnick‐Hall ML (1995) Sexual harassment research: A methodological critique. Personnel Psych. 48(4):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Park TY, Mehng SA (2012) Flexible work practices: A source of career premiums or penalties? Acad. Management J. 55(6):1407–1428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, McAllister DJ, Ilies R, Gloor JL (2017) Schadenfreude: A counternormative observer response to workplace mistreatment. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):360–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas T, Alexander S, Firestone I, LeBreton JM (2007) Development and initial validation of a procedural and distributive just world measure. Personality Individual Differences 43(1):71–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoy AF, Farhi P (2022) Five years on, what happened to the men of #MeToo? Huffington Post (October 16), https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/10/16/metoo-men-what-happened/.Google Scholar
• Manne K (2018a) Brett Kavanaugh and America’s ‘himpathy’ reckoning. New York Times (September 26), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/opinion/brett-kavanaugh-hearing-himpathy.html.Google Scholar
• Manne K (2018b) Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Manne K (2020) Entitled: How Male Privilege Hurts Women (Crown, New York).Google Scholar
• Martini M, De Piccoli N (2020) Predicting bystander intention to intervene: The role of gender-specific system justification and rape myth acceptance for men and women. Frontiers Psych. 11:326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martinko MJ (1995) Attribution Theory: An Organizational Perspective (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Milesi P, Süssenbach P, Bohner G, Megías JL (2020) The interplay of modern myths about sexual aggression and moral foundations in the blaming of rape victims. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 50(1):111–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell MS, Vogel RM, Folger R (2015) Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. J. Appl. Psych. 100(4):1040–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monin B, Sawyer PJ, Marquez MJ (2008) The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(1):76–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monroe AE, Plant EA (2019) The dark side of morality: Prioritizing sanctity over care motivates denial of mind and prejudice toward sexual outgroups. J. Experiment. Psych. General 148(2):342–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monroe AE, Wyngaarden JB, Plant EA (2021) “They should have followed the rules”: Trade-offs between fairness and authority values predict judgments of social justice protests. Soc. Psych. Personality. Sci. 12(4):471–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murry WD, Sivasubramaniam N, Jacques PH (2001) Supervisory support, social exchange relationships, and sexual harassment consequences: A test of competing models. Leadership Quart. 12(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Napier JL, Luguri JB (2013) Moral mind-sets: Abstract thinking increases a preference for “individualizing” over “binding” moral foundations. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(6):754–759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Near JP, Miceli MP (1985) Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. J. Bus. Ethics 4(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nejat P, Bagherian F, Hatami J (2020) Do perceptions of warmth and competence explain moral norms regarding different social roles? Anal. Soc. Issues Public 20(1):613–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niemi L, Young L (2016) When and why we see victims as responsible: The impact of ideology on attitudes toward victims. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 42(9):1227–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Offermann LR, Malamut AB (2002) When leaders harass: The impact of target perceptions of organizational leadership and climate on harassment reporting and outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 87(5):885–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly J, Aquino K (2011) A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):526–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly J, Aquino K, Skarlicki DP (2016) The lives of others: Third parties’ responses to others’ injustice. J. Appl. Psych. 101(2):171–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Precopio RF, Ramsey LR (2017) Dude looks like a feminist!: Moral concerns and feminism among men. Psych. Men Masculinity 18(1):78–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priesemuth M, Schminke M (2019) Helping thy neighbor? Prosocial reactions to observed abusive supervision in the workplace. J. Management 45(3):1225–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai TS, Diermeier D (2015) Corporations are cyborgs: Organizations elicit anger but not sympathy when they can think but cannot feel. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 126:18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reich TC, Hershcovis MS (2015) Observing workplace incivility. J. Appl. Psych. 100(1):203–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rieh SY, Danielson DR (2007) Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. Annual Rev. Inform. Sci. Tech. 41(1):307–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. J. Statist. Software 48(2):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothschild J, Miethe TD (1999) Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation: The battle to control information about organization corruption. Work Occupations 26(1):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rupp DE, Aquino KF (2009) Nothing so practical as a good justice theory. Indust. Organ. Psych. 2(2):205–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rupp DE, Bell CM (2010) Extending the deontic model of justice: Moral self-regulation in third-party responses to injustice. Bus. Ethics Quart. 20(1):89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salerno JM (2021) The impact of experienced and expressed emotion on legal factfinding. Annual Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 17:181–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sbraga TP, O’Donohue W (2000) Sexual harassment. Annual Rev. Sex Res. 11(1):258–285.Google Scholar
• Silver JR (2017) Moral foundations, intuitions of justice, and the intricacies of punitive sentiment. Law Soc. Rev. 51(2):413–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U (2014) No-way interactions. Data Colada (March 12), http://datacolada.org/17.Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, Kulik CT (2005) Third-party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective. Res. Organ. Behav. 26:183–229.Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, Rupp DE (2010) Dual processing and organizational justice: The role of rational vs. experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment. J. Appl. Psych. 95(5):944–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, O’Reilly J, Kulik CT (2015) The third-party perspective of (in)justice. Cropanzano RS, Ambrose ML, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 235–255.Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, Kay AA, Aquino K, Fushtey D (2017) Must heads roll? A critique of and alternative approaches to swift blame. Acad. Management Perspect. 31(3):222–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sleath E, Bull R (2017) Police perceptions of rape victims and the impact on case decision making: A systematic review. Aggression Violent Behav. 34:102–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith IH, Aquino K, Koleva S, Graham J (2014) The moral ties that bind . . . even to out-groups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations. Psych. Sci. 25(8):1554–1562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spoelma TM, Chawla N, Ellis APJ (2021) If you can’t join ‘em, report ‘em: A model of ostracism and whistleblowing in teams. J. Bus. Ethics 173(2):345–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Streatfeild J, Creelman D, Doherty N (2019) The economic costs of sexual harassment in the workplace. Report, Deloitte, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
• Sunstein CR (2005) Moral heuristics. Behav. Brain Sci. 28(4):531–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunstein CR (2019) In politics, apologies are for losers. New York Times (July 27), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/27/opinion/sunday/when-should-a-politician-apologize.html.Google Scholar
• Thielmann I, Böhm R, Hilbig BE (2021) Buying unethical loyalty: A behavioral paradigm and empirical test. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 12(3):363–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treviño LK (1992) The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 17(4):647–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Twohey M, Kantor J (2019) Weinstein and his accusers reach tentative $25 million deal. New York Times (December 11), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/11/us/harvey-weinstein-settlement.html.Google Scholar
• Twohey M, Kantor J, Dominus S, Rutenberg J, Eder S (2017) Weinstein’s complicity machine. New York Times (December 5), https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/05/us/harvey-weinstein-complicity.html.Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Simmons AL, Folger R, Ren R, Bobocel R (2013) Observer reactions to interpersonal injustice: The roles of perpetrator intent and victim perception. J. Organ. Behav. 34(3):327–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallano JP, Pickel KL, Shambaugh LJ (2020) Legal perspectives on historical misconduct cases. Pozzulo J, Pica E, Sheahan C, eds. Memory and Sexual Misconduct (Routledge, New York), 175–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vecina ML, Piñuela R (2017) Relationships between ambivalent sexism and the five moral foundations in domestic violence: Is it a matter of fairness and authority? J. Psych. 151(3):334–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Voelkel JG, Feinberg M (2018) Morally reframed arguments can affect support for political candidates. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 9(8):917–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Hernandez I, Newman DA, He J, Bian J (2016) Twitter analysis: Studying US weekly trends in work stress and emotion. Appl. Psych. 65(2):355–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waytz A, Dungan J, Young L (2013) The whistleblower’s dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(6):1027–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weaver GR, Reynolds SJ, Brown ME (2014) Moral intuition: Connecting current knowledge to future organizational research and practice. J. Management 40(1):100–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman N, Mayer DM, Ong M, DeRue DS (2016) When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 101(6):793–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilhelm C, Joeckel S (2019) Gendered morality and backlash effects in online discussions: An experimental study on how users respond to hate speech comments against women and sexual minorities. Sex Roles 80(7):381–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams J, Fitzgerald L, Drasgow F (1999) The effects of organizational practices on sexual harassment and individual outcomes in the military. Military Psych. 11:303–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams CW, Brown RS, Lees-Haley PR, Price JR (1995) An attributional (causal dimensional) analysis of perceptions of sexual harassment. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 25(13):1169–1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Worline MC, Dutton JE (2017) How leaders shape compassion processes in organizations. Seppälä EM, Simon-Thomas E, Brown SL, Worline MC, Cameron CD, Doty JR, eds. Oxford Handbook on Compassion Science (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 435–456.Google Scholar
• Yalçındağ B, Özkan T, Cesur S, Yilmaz O, Tepe B, Piyale ZE, Biten AF, Sunar D (2019) An investigation of moral foundations theory in Turkey using different measures. Current Psych. 38(2):440–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young L, Saxe R (2009) An fMRI investigation of spontaneous mental state inference for moral judgment. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 21(7):1396–1405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelikova J, Ramirez K, Lipps J (2018) Harassment charges: Enough himpathy. Science 361(6403):655–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Shah D, Foley J, Abhishek A, Lukito J, Suk J, Kim SJ, Sun Z, Pevehouse J, Garlough C (2019) Whose lives matter? Mass shootings and social media discourses of sympathy and policy, 2012–2014. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 24(4):182–202.Crossref, Google Scholar