Contract Frames and Supplier Learning

References

• Ahn S, Cho CK, Cho TS (2020) Performance feedback and organizational learning: The role of regulatory focus. Management Decision 59(3):616–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadi HB, Kusi-Sarpong S, Rezaei J (2017) Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method. Resources Conserv. Recycl. 126:99–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Hora M (2017) Organizational learning and management of technology. Production Oper. Management 26(4):579–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Lee S, Park J (2021) Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions. Management Sci. 67(9):5399–5429.Link, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K (2005) Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. J. Marketing 69(4):61–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azadegan A, Dooley KJ (2010) Supplier innovativeness, organizational learning styles and manufacturer performance: An empirical assessment. J. Oper. Management 28(6):488–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azadegan A, Dooley KJ, Carter PL, Carter JR (2008) Supplier innovativeness and the role of interorganizational learning in enhancing manufacturer capabilities. J. Supply Chain Management 44(4):14–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barthélemy J, Quélin BV (2006) Complexity of outsourcing contracts and ex post transaction costs: An empirical investigation. J. Management Stud. 43(8):1775–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bittner JV, Heidemeier H (2013) Competitive mindsets, creativity, and the role of regulatory focus. Think. Skills Creat. 9:59–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen KA (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung MS, Myers MB, Mentzer JT (2011) The value of relational learning in global buyer‐supplier exchanges: A dyadic perspective and test of the pie‐sharing premise. Strategic Management J. 32(10):1061–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiva R, Alegre J, Lapiedra R (2007) Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce. Internat. J. Manpow. 28(3):4):224–242.Google Scholar
• Chi Y, Zeng F, Dong MC, Song Y (2020) Promotion and prevention contracts in distributor–Supplier relationship using matched dyadic data. J. Bus. Bus. Marketing 27(2):111–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi K, Jean RJB, Kim D (2019) The impacts of organizational learning capacities on relationship-specific innovations: Evidence from the global buyer–Supplier relationship. Internat. Marketing Rev. 36(6):1042–1066.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):522–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowe E, Higgins ET (1997) Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 69(2):117–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das TK, Kumar R (2011) Regulatory focus and opportunism in the alliance development process. J. Management 37(3):682–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodgson M (1993) Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organ. Stud. 14(3):375–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doz YL (1996) The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management J. 17(S1):55–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Parry ME (1993) On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1577–1613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Förster J, Higgins ET, Bianco AT (2003) Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 90(1):148–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman RS, Förster J (2001) The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1001–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydlinger D, Hart O, Vitasek K (2019) A new approach to contracts: How to build better long-term strategic partnerships. Harvard Bus. Rev. 97(5):116–126.Google Scholar
• Garen J (1984) The returns to schooling: A selectivity bias approach with a continuous choice variable. Econometrica 52(5):1199–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2007) Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Indust. Corporate Change 16(5):945–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad Management J. 49(4):693–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2013) Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plan. 46(1–2):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan RL, Hoffman VB, Moser DV (2005) Bonus versus penalty: Does contract Frame affect employee effort? Rapoport A, Zwick R, eds. Experimental Business Research (Springer, Boston), 151–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He ZL, Wong PK (2004) Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ Sci. 15(4):481–495.Link, Google Scholar
• Heide JB, Miner AS (1992) The shadow of the: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buy-seller cooperation. Acad. Management J. 35(2):265–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain. Amer. Psych. 52(12):1280–1300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (1998) Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 30(C):1–46.Google Scholar
• Holmqvist M (2003) A dynamic model of intra-and interorganizational learning. Organ. Stud. 24(1):95–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyundai Mobis (2023) Mobis received a large-scale order for EV components from a major global automaker. PR Newswire (August 9), https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mobis-received-a-large-scale-order-for-ev-components-from-a-major-global-automaker-301896521.html.Google Scholar
• Idson LC, Liberman N, Higgins ET (2000) Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 36(3):252–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im G, Rai A (2008) Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Sci. 54(7):1281–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Jansen JJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Jap SD, Anderson E (2007) Testing a life-cycle theory of cooperative interorganizational relationships: Movement across stages and performance. Management Sci. 53(2):260–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson PD, Smith MB, Wallace JC, Hill AD, Baron RA (2015) A review of multilevel regulatory focus in organizations. J. Management 41(5):1501–1529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabadayi S, Eyuboglu N, Thomas GP (2007) The performance implications of designing multiple channels to fit with strategy and environment. J. Marketing 71(4):195–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Choi TY (2015) Deep, sticky, transient, and gracious: An expanded buyer–Supplier relationship typology. J. Supply Chain Management 51(3):61–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YS, Ribbink D, Eckerd S (2018) Effectiveness of bonus and penalty incentive contracts in supply chain exchanges: Does national culture matter? J. Oper. Management 62:59–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemon M, Sahota PS (2004) Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity. Technovation 24(6):483–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ Sci. 17(4):502–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Liu Y, Zhao Y (2006) The role of market and entrepreneurship orientation and internal control in the new product development activities of Chinese firms. Indust. Marketing Management 35(3):336–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Huang Y, Luo Y, Zhao Y (2012) How does justice matter in achieving buyer-supplier relationship performance? J. Oper. Management 30(5):355–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Henderson JE (2012) The influence of relational experience and contractual governance on the negotiation strategy in buyer-supplier disputes. J. Oper. Management 30(5):382–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Malhotra D (2011) Shadow of the contract: How contract structure shapes interfirm dispute resolution. Strategic Management J. 32(5):532–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Fréchet M, Puthod D (2011) An organizational learning perspective on the contracting process. Strategic Organ. 9(1):8–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusch RF, Brown JR (1996) Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. J. Marketing 60(4):19–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madsen PM, Desai V (2010) Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad. Management J. 53(3):451–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Martínez-Noya A, García-Canal E (2016) The framing of knowledge transfers to shared R&D suppliers and its impact on innovation performance: A regulatory focus perspective. R&D Management 46(2):354–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Argyres NS (2004) Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ Sci. 15(4):394–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Xing Z(A), Mondal P (2022) Contracting for innovation: Designing contracts that account for exchange hazards and the need for innovation. Strategic Management J. 43(11):2253–2278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mom TJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2007) Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top‐down, bottom‐up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. J. Management Stud. 44(6):910–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mooi E, Wang Q, Seggie S, Jap SD (2024) The show must go on: The role of contract frames in safeguarding relationship continuity. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 52:1842–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neuendorf KA (2002) The Content Analysis Guidebook (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Nijssen EJ, Hillebrand B, De Jong JPJ, Kemp RGM (2012) Strategic value assessment and explorative learning opportunities with customers. J. Product Innovation Management 29(s1):91–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad. Management J. 36(4):794–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillai KG, Sharma A (2003) Mature relationships: Why does relational orientation turn into transaction orientation? Indust. Marketing Management 32(8):643–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zhou KZ (2014) Managing contracts for fairness in buyer-supplier exchanges. Strategic Management J. 35(10):1508–1527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Ariño A (2007) Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management J. 28(3):313–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rokkan AI, Heide JB, Wathne KH (2003) Specific investments in marketing relationships: Expropriation and bonding effects. J. Marketing Res. 40(2):210–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryall MD, Sampson RC (2009) Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects. Management Sci. 55(6):906–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Schepker DJ, Oh WY, Martynov A, Poppo L (2014) The many futures of contracts: Moving beyond structure and safeguarding to coordination and adaptation. J. Management 40(1):193–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schildt HA, Maula MVJ, Keil T (2005) Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrep. Theory Pract. 29(4):493–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilke O, Lumineau F (2018) The double-edged effect of contracts on alliance performance. J. Management 44(7):2827–2858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott JE (2000) Facilitating interorganizational learning with information technology. J. Management Inform. Systems 17(2):81–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selnes F, Sallis J (2003) Promoting relationship learning. J. Marketing 67(3):80–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selviaridis K, Spring M (2018) Supply chain alignment as process: Contracting, learning and pay-for-performance. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 38(3):732–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selviaridis K, van der Valk W (2019) Framing contractual performance incentives: Effects on supplier behaviour. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 39(2):190–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selviaridis K, Wynstra F (2015) Performance-based contracting: A literature review and future research directions. Internat. J. Production Res. 53(12):3505–3540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shamsollahi A, Chmielewski-Raimondo DA, Bell SJ, Kachouie R (2021) Buyer–Supplier relationship dynamics: A systematic review. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 49(2):418–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S (1995) Uncertainty avoidance and the preference for innovation championing roles. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 26(1):47–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinkula JM, Baker WE, Noordewier T (1997) A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 25(4):305–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skarmeas D, Katsikeas CS, Schlegelmilch BB (2002) Drivers of commitment and its impact on performance in cross-cultural buyer-seller relationships: The importer’s perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 33:757–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spanjol J, Tam L (2010) To change or not to change: How regulatory focus affects change in dyadic decision-making. Creat. Innov. Management 19(4):346–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sumo R, van der Valk W, van Weele A, Bode C (2016) Fostering incremental and radical innovation through performance-based contracting in buyer-supplier relationships. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 36(11):1482–1503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuncdogan A, Van Den Bosch F, Volberda H (2015) Regulatory focus as a psychological micro-foundation of leaders’ exploration and exploitation activities. Leadersh. Quart. 26(5):838–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Valk W, Lumineau F, Wang W (2020) Research on contracting in supply chain management and related disciplines: A synthesis of scholarly recommendations and a discussion of future opportunities. The Oxford Handbook of Supply Chain Management, 506–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vorhies DW, Orr LM, Bush VD (2011) Improving customer-focused marketing capabilities and firm financial performance via marketing exploration and exploitation. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 39(5):736–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Voss GB, Sirdeshmukh D, Voss ZG (2008) The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 51(1):147–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang M, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Sheng S (2016) Governing local supplier opportunism in China: Moderating role of institutional forces. J. Oper. Management 46:84–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber L (2017) A sociocognitive view of repeated interfirm exchanges: How the coevolution of trust and learning impacts subsequent contracts. Organ. Sci. 28(4):744–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber L, Bauman CW (2019) The cognitive and behavioral impact of promotion and prevention contracts on trust in repeated exchanges. Acad Management J. 62(2):361–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber L, Mayer KJ (2011) Designing effective contracts: Exploring the influence of framing and expectations. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):53–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber L, Mayer KJ, MacHer JT (2011) An analysis of extendibility and early termination provisions: The importance of framing duration safeguards. Acad. Management J. 54(1):182–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams LJ, Hartman N, Cavazotte F (2010) Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):477–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) Assessing contract. J. Law Econom. Organ. 1(1):177–208.Google Scholar
• Xing Z, Mayer KJ, Xie X, Reuer JJ, Klijn E (2021) The effects of contract detail and prior ties on contract change: A learning perspective. Organ. Sci. 32(2):480–499.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu L, Cui N, Qualls W, Zhang L (2017) How socialization tactics affect supplier-buyer co-development performance in exploratory and exploitative projects: The mediating effects of cooperation and collaboration. J. Bus. Res. 78:242–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellner A (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 57(298):348–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zsidisin GA, Smith ME (2005) Managing supply risk with early supplier involvement: A case study and research propositions. J. Supply Chain Management 41(4):44–57.Crossref, Google Scholar