Learning from Inconsistent Performance Feedback

References

• Aceves P, Evans JA (2024) Mobilizing conceptual spaces: How word embedding models can inform measurement and theory within organization science. Organ. Sci. 35(3):788–814.Link, Google Scholar
• Anseel F, Lievens F, Schollaert E (2009) Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 110(1):23–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (2012) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Argote L, Greve HR (2007) A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. 18(3):337–349.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Cummings LL (1985) Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment. J. Occupational Psych. 58(1):67–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Blatt R, VandeWalle D (2003) Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. J. Management 29(6):773–799.Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Brion S (2007) Reluctant to change: Self-enhancing responses to diverging performance measures. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(2):255–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Brion S (2023) A Carnegie plus self-enhancement (CSE) model of organizational decision making under ambiguity. Res. Organ. Behav. 43:100194.Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Greve HR (2006) Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. 52(1):83–94.Link, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Greve HR (2021) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Multiple Goals: A Multiple Goals Perspective, Elements in Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Brion S, Greve HR (2015) Self-assessment, self-enhancement, and the choice of comparison organizations for evaluating organizational performance. Adv. Strategic Management 32:89–118.Google Scholar
• Bana SH (2022) job2vec: Using language models to understand wage premia. Working paper, Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1971) Social Learning Theory (General Learning Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Barney J, Felin T (2013) What are microfoundations? Acad. Management Perspect. 27(2):138–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173.Google Scholar
• Barrios JM, Gallemore J (2023) Tax planning knowledge diffusion via the labor market. Management Sci. 70(2):1194–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JA, Rowley TJ, Shipilov AV, Chuang YT (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):536–575.Google Scholar
• Bell BS, Kozlowski SWJ (2008) Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. J. Appl. Psych. 93(2):296–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blagoeva RR, Mom TJM, Jansen JJP, George G (2020) Problem-solving or self-enhancement? A power perspective on how CEOs affect R&D search in the face of inconsistent feedback. Acad. Management J. 63(2):332–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, He Q, Hong Y, Lee D (2021) How do peer awards motivate creative content? Experimental evidence from Reddit. Management Sci. 68(5):3488–3506.Link, Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PHC (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Google Scholar
• Carlson NA (2023) Differentiation in microenterprises. Strategic Management J. 44(5):1141–1167.Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ, Ranganathan A (2020) The production of merit: How managers understand and apply merit in the workplace. Organ. Sci. 31(4):909–935.Link, Google Scholar
• Chambers CR (2024) Nonmonetary reward systems, counterproductive behavior, and responses to sanctions in open collaboration environments. Organ. Sci. 35(3):928–947.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi J, Levinthal D (2023) Wisdom in the wild: Generalization and adaptive dynamics. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1073–1089.Link, Google Scholar
• Correia S (2016) REGHDFE: Estimating linear models with multi-way fixed effects. In 2016 Stata Conference (No. 24). Stata Users Group.Google Scholar
• Corritore M, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2020) Duality in diversity: How intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crans S, Aksentieva P, Beausaert S, Segers M (2022) Learning leadership and feedback seeking behavior: Leadership that spurs feedback seeking. Frontiers Psych. 13:890861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Wiley Blackwell, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Piezunka H (2014) Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention. Res. Policy 43(5):812–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis SM, Lawrence PR (1977) Matrix (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Dunning DG, Lange BM, Shea GD (1989) A study of staff member perceptions of performance appraisals: Tendencies and implications. J. Dental Practice Admin. 6(2):77–83.Google Scholar
• Dutt N, Mitchell W (2020) Searching for knowledge in response to proximate and remote problem sources: Evidence from the U.S. renewable electricity industry. Strategic Management J. 41(8):1412–1449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dweck CS (1999) Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Working paper, Taylor and Francis/Psychology Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Mapes RR (2005) Approach-avoidance motivation and self-concept evaluation. Tesser A, ed. On Building, Defending and Regulating the Self: A Psychological Perspective (Psychology Press, New York), 171–196.Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiol CM, Lyles MA (1985) Organizational learning. Acad. Management Rev. 10(4):803–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frake J (2016) Selling out: The inauthenticity discount in the craft beer industry. Management Sci. 63(11):3930–3943.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Bhattacharya S (2012) Aspirations, innovation, and corporate venture capital: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(2):178–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Greve HR (2019) Safe or profitable? The pursuit of conflicting goals. Organ. Sci. 30(4):647–667.Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Lee S, Meyer-Doyle P, Zhao-Ding A (2023) Prior experience of managers and maladaptive responses to performance feedback: Evidence from mutual funds. Organ. Sci. 34(2):894–915.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Ann. Roy. College Physicians Surgeons Canada 6(1):1–40.Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.Google Scholar
• Gornall W, Strebulaev IA (2024) Gender, race, and entrepreneurship: A randomized field experiment on venture capitalists and angels. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print September 30, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.4990.Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1995) Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):444–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003a) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003b) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2008) Multimarket contact and sales growth: Evidence from insurance. Strategic Management J. 29(3):229–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Gaba V (2020) Performance feedback in organizations and groups: Common themes. Argote L, Levine J, eds. Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 315–336.Google Scholar
• Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L (2016) Motivational spillovers from awards: Crowding out in a multitasking environment. Organ. Sci. 27(2):286–303.Google Scholar
• Guimarães P (2008) The fixed effects negative binomial model revisited. Econom. Lett. 99(1):63–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Li A (2023) Measuring founding strategy. Management Sci. 69(1):101–118.Google Scholar
• Hall AT, Frink DD, Buckley MR (2017) An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability. J. Organ. Behav. 38(2):204–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hicks R, Tingley D (2011) Causal mediation analysis. Stata J. 11(4):605–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Stetzer A (1998) The role of safety climate and communication in accident interpretation: Implications for learning from negative events. Acad. Management J. 41(6):644–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstra B, Kulkarni VV, Munoz-Najar Galvez S, He B, Jurafsky D, McFarland DA (2020) The diversity-innovation paradox in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(17):9284–9291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM, Gibbs BJ, McKenzie CR, Marquis MA (1991) Learning from feedback: Exactingness and incentives. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 17(4):734–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D, Yamamoto T (2011) Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 105(4):765–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordan AH, Audia PG (2012) Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):211–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2015) The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels. Strategic Management J. 36(13):1960–1978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2020) Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Ann. Roy. College Physicians Surgeons Canada 14(1):267–302.Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Beckman CM, Moliterno TP (2015) Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):228–262.Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz-Navon T, Naveh E, Stern Z (2009) Active learning: When is more better? The case of resident physicians’ medical errors. J. Appl. Psych. 94(5):1200–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil T, Syrigos E, Kostopoulos KCD, Meissner FG, Audia P (2024) (In)consistent performance feedback and the locus of search. J. Management 50(7):2927–2954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konlechner S, Ambrosini V (2019) Issues and trends in causal ambiguity research: A review and assessment. J. Management 45(6):2352–2386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostopoulos K, Syrigos E, Kuusela P (2023) Responding to inconsistent performance feedback on multiple goals: The contingency role of decision maker’s status in introducing changes. Long Range Planning 56(1):102269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krieger JL (2021) Trials and terminations: Learning from competitors’ R&D failures. Management Sci. 67(9):5525–5548.Link, Google Scholar
• Lawson MA, Martin AE, Huda I, Matz SC (2022) Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(9):e2026443119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee M, Huang L (2018) Gender bias, social impact framing, and evaluation of entrepreneurial ventures. Organ. Sci. 29(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee YJ, Hosanagar K, Tan Y (2015) Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Sci. 61(9):2241–2258.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Rerup C (2021) The plural of goal: Learning in a world of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 32(3):527–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim E, Audia PG (2020) Problem-solving or self-enhancing? Influences of diversification and bright spot on corporate resource allocation responses to performance shortfalls. Strategy Sci. 5(4):348–368.Link, Google Scholar
• Lix K, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2022) Aligning differences: Discursive diversity and team performance. Management Sci. 68(11):8430–8448.Link, Google Scholar
• Lucas GJM, Knoben J, Meeus MTH (2018) Contradictory yet coherent? Inconsistency in performance feedback and R&D investment change. J. Management 44(2):658–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Maula M, Heimeriks KH, Keil T (2023) Organizational experience and performance: A systematic review and contingency framework. Acad. Management Ann. 17(2):546–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGahan AM, Pongeluppe LS (2023) There is no planet B: Aligning stakeholder interests to preserve the Amazon rainforest. Management Sci. 69(12):7860–7881.Link, Google Scholar
• Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 26 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Rhee L, Milner D (2020) Attention, knowledge, and organizational learning. Group and organizational learning. The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 81–94. Google Scholar
• Park B, Lehman DW, Ramanujam R (2023) Driven to distraction: The unintended consequences of organizational learning from failure caused by human error. Organ. Sci. 34(1):283–302.Link, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.Link, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2019) Idea rejected, tie formed: Organizations’ feedback on crowdsourced ideas. Acad. Management J. 62(2):503–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner FD (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search—A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C (2006) Success, failure and the gray zone: How organizations learn or don’t from ambiguous experience. Proc. AMIA Annual Fall Sympos. (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), BB1–BB6.Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Spencer B (2021) Carnegie school experiential learning and routine dynamics. Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Dittrich D, Rerup C, Seidl D, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 445–459.Google Scholar
• Riedl C, Seidel VP (2018) Learning from mixed signals in online innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1010–1032.Link, Google Scholar
• Safadi H, Johnson SL, Faraj S (2021) Who contributes knowledge? Core-periphery tension in online innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 32(3):752–775.Link, Google Scholar
• Saraf N, Dasgupta S, Blettner DP (2022) How do managerial perceptions of performance feedback affect innovation? Strategic Organ. 20(3):451–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Espeland WN (2009) The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):63–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Lynn F, Podolny JM (2012) Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38(1):267–283.Google Scholar
• Schippers MC (2014) Social loafing tendencies and team performance: The compensating effect of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 13(1):62–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider SL (1992) Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 18(5):1040–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumacher C, Keck S, Tang W (2020) Biased interpretation of performance feedback: The role of CEO overconfidence. Strategic Management J. 41(6):1139–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sedikides C, Hepper EGD (2009) Self-improvement. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 3(6):899–917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sedikides C, Herbst KC, Hardin DP, Dardis GJ (2002) Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: The search for mechanisms. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(3):592–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharkey A, Kovács B, Hsu G (2023) Expert critics, rankings, and review aggregators: The changing nature of intermediation and the rise of markets with multiple intermediaries. Ann. Roy. College Physicians Surgeons Canada 17(1):1–36.Google Scholar
• Shinkle GA (2012) Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals: Building on the past and aiming for the future. J. Management 38(1):415–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smirnova I, Reitzig M, Sorenson O (2022) Building status in an online community. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2519–2540.Link, Google Scholar
• Sytch M, Wohlgezogen F, Zajac EJ (2018) Collaborative by design? How matrix organizations see/do alliances. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1130–1148.Link, Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D, Ganesan S, Challagalla GN, Brown SP (2000) An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: Disposition, context, and cognition. J. Appl. Psych. 85(6):996–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Prooijen JW, van Dijk E (2014) When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 55:63–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vicinanza P, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2023) A deep-learning model of prescient ideas demonstrates that they emerge from the periphery. PNAS Nexus 2(1):pgac275.Google Scholar
• Waller I, Anderson A (2021) Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms. Nature 600(7888):264–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Washburn M, Bromiley P (2012) Comparing aspiration models: The role of selective attention. J. Management Stud. 49(5):896–917.Google Scholar
• Weick KE (2015) Ambiguity as grasp: The reworking of sense. J. Contingencies Crisis Management 23(2):117–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2011) Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty (John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Whalen R, Lungeanu A, DeChurch L, Contractor N (2020) Patent similarity data and innovation metrics. J. Empirical Legal Stud. 17(3):615–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.Link, Google Scholar