The Double-Edged Sword of Exemplar Similarity

References

• Angrist JD, Krueger AB (2001) Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. J. Econom. Perspective 15(4):69–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony C, Nelson AJ, Tripsas M (2016) “Who are you?… I really wanna know”: Product meaning and competitive positioning in the nascent synthesizer industry. Strategy Sci. 1(3):163–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Asquith P, Mikhail MB, Au AS (2005) Information content of equity analyst reports. J. Financial Econom. 75(2):245–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bancel F, Mittoo UR (2014) The gap between the theory and practice of corporate valuation: Survey of European experts. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 26(4):106–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B, Lehavy R, McNichols M, Trueman B (2001) Can investors profit from the prophets? Security analyst recommendations and stock returns. J. Finance 56(2):531–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlow MA, Verhaal JC, Angus RW (2019) Optimal distinctiveness, strategic categorization, and product market entry on the Google Play app platform. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1219–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth ME, Kasznik R, McNichols MF (2001) Analyst coverage and intangible assets. J. Accounting Res. 39(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2010) Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and Internet telephony. Organ. Sci. 21(1):42–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Ranganathan R (2012) Offsetting illegitimacy? How pressures from securities analysts influence incumbents in the face of new technologies. Acad. Management J. 55(1):213–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Ranganathan R (2017) Measuring up? Persistence and change in analysts’ evaluative schemas following technological change. Organ. Sci. 28(4):760–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhojraj S, Lee CM (2002) Who is my peer? A valuation‐based approach to the selection of comparable firms. J. Accounting Res. 40(2):407–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhushan R (1989) Firm characteristics and analyst following. J. Accounting Econom. 11(2–3):255–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blettner DP, He ZL, Hu S, Bettis RA (2015) Adaptive aspirations and performance heterogeneity: Attention allocation among multiple reference points. Strategic Management J. 36(7):987–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowers A (2015) Relative comparison and category membership: The case of equity analysts. Organ. Sci. 26(2):571–583.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowers A, Prato M (2019) The role of third-party rankings in status dynamics: How does the stability of rankings induce status changes? Organ. Sci. 30(6):1146–1164.Link, Google Scholar
• Brauer M, Wiersema M (2018) Analyzing analyst research: A review of past coverage and recommendations for future research. J. Management 44(1):218–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradshaw MT (2011) Analysts’ forecasts: What do we know after decades of work? Preprint, submitted July 8, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1880339.Google Scholar
• Bu J, Zhao EY, Li KJ, Li JM (2022) Multilevel optimal distinctiveness: Examining the impact of within‐and between‐organization distinctiveness of product design on market performance. Strategic Management J. 43(9):1793–1822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Semadeni M, Arrfelt M, Withers MC (2022) Corporate‐level influences on internal capital allocation: The role of financial analyst performance projections. Strategic Management J. 43(1):180–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2013) Regression Analysis of Count Data, vol. 53 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chreim S (2005) The continuity–change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity. J. Management Stud. 42(3):567–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung KH, Jo H (1996) The impact of security analysts’ monitoring and marketing functions on the market value of firms. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 31(4):493–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark SM, Gioia DA, Ketchen DJ Jr, Thomas JB (2010) Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):397–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen JB, Basu K (1987) Alternative models of categorization: Toward a contingent processing framework. J. Consumer Res. 13(4):455–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper I, Lambertides N (2023) Optimal equity valuation using multiples: The number of comparable firms. Eur. Financial Management 29(4):1025–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Hansen M, Zollo M (2016) The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Acad. Management J. 59(2):705–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Franco G, Hope OK, Larocque S (2015) Analysts’ choice of peer companies. Rev. Accounting Stud. 20:82–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechow PM, Hutton AP, Sloan RG (1999) An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. J. Accounting Econom. 26(1–3):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2):147–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diggle P (2002) Analysis of Longitudinal Data (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du Q, Shen R (2018) Peer performance and earnings management. J. Bank. Finance 89:125–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R (2012) Advancing strategy and organization research in concert: Toward an integrated model? Strategic Organ. 10(3):297–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Jourdan J (2012) Jules or Jim: Alternative conformity to minority logics. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1295–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Paolella L (2013) Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1100–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Paugam L, Stolowy H (2019) Do investors actually value sustainability indices? Replication, development, and new evidence on CSR visibility. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1471–1490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaton GW, Guo F, Liu T, Officer MS (2022) Peer selection and valuation in mergers and acquisitions. J. Financial Econom. 146(1):230–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falchetti D, Cattani G, Ferriani S (2022) Start with “Why,” but only if you have to: The strategic framing of novel ideas across different audiences. Strategic Management J. 43(1):130–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman ER (2016) Corporate spinoffs and analysts’ coverage decisions: The implications for diversified firms. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1196–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G, Kotha S, Lahiri A (2016) Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Acad. Management Rev. 41(3):383–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social Cognition (McGraw-Hill Book Company).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2007) A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1180–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T (1981) Seeing the past in the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgments and decisions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 40(5):797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Navis C (2013) Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1124–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouvard P, Durand R (2023) To be or not to be (typical): Evaluation-mode heterogeneity and its consequences for organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 48(4):659–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haans RF (2019) What’s the value of being different when everyone is? The effects of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous vs. heterogeneous categories. Strategic Management J. 40(1):3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Häubl G, Trifts V (2000) Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Sci. 19(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Healy PM, Palepu KG (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. J. Accounting Econom. 31(1–3):405–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2010) Product market synergies and competition in mergers and acquisitions: A text-based analysis. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(10):3773–3811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2016) Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1423–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips GM (2018) Text-based industry momentum. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 53(6):2355–2388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kubik JD (2003) Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biased earnings forecasts. J. Finance 58(1):313–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kubik JD, Solomon A (2000) Security analysts’ career concerns and herding of earnings forecasts. RAND J. Econom. 31(1):121–144.Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Roberts PW, Swaminathan A (2012) Evaluative schemas and the mediating role of critics. Organ. Sci. 23(1):83–97.Link, Google Scholar
• Jacab S (2023) Cava, ‘the next chipotle’, faces a tall order. Wall Street Journal (July 17), https://www.wsj.com/articles/cavathe-next-chipotlefaces-a-tall-order-fbaa8ec2.Google Scholar
• Janda K (2019) Earnings stability and peer company selection for multiple based indirect valuation. Finance a Uver 69(1):37–75.Google Scholar
• Janisch J, Vossen A (2022) Categorically right? How firm-level distinctiveness affects performance across product categories. J. Bus. Venturing 37(4):106228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2004) Who gets Wall Street’s attention? How alliance announcements and alliance density affect analyst coverage. Strategic Organ. 2(3):293–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kantchev G (2022) Volkswagen says EV shift will continue under new CEO. Wall Street Journal (July 28), https://www.wsj.com/articles/volkswagen-says-ev-shift-will-continue-under-new-ceo-11659002663.Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Fiss PC (2013) An ontological turn in categories research: From standards of legitimacy to evidence of actuality. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1138–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Lo J, Lounsbury M (2010) Category currency: A framework for analyzing the effects of meaning construction process. Res. Sociol. Organ. 31:369–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim EH, Youm YN (2017) How do social media affect analyst stock recommendations? Evidence from S&P 500 electric power companies’ Twitter accounts. Strategic Management J. 38(13):2599–2622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen JO, Kold S, Plenborg T (2017) Stick to the fundamentals and discover your peers. Financial Anal. J. 73(3):85–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee CM, Ma P, Wang CC (2015) Search-based peer firms: Aggregating investor perceptions through Internet co-searches. J. Financial Econom. 116(2):410–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehavy R, Li F, Merkley K (2011) The effect of annual report readability on analyst following and the properties of their earnings forecasts. Accounting Rev. 86(3):1087–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22.Google Scholar
• Litov LP, Moreton P, Zenger TR (2012) Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox. Management Sci. 58(10):1797–1815.Link, Google Scholar
• Lo JY, Fiss PC, Rhee EY, Kennedy MT (2020) Category viability: Balanced levels of coherence and distinctiveness. Acad. Management Rev. 45(1):85–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran T, Schultz P (2005) Liquidity: Urban vs. rural firms. J. Financial Econom. 78(2):341–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Wang H, Raithel S, Zheng Q (2015) Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations, and firm future returns. Strategic Management J. 36(1):123–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majzoubi M, Zhao EY (2023) Going beyond optimal distinctiveness: Strategic positioning for gaining an audience composition premium. Strategic Management J. 44(3):737–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meitner M (2006) The Market Approach to Comparable Company Valuation, vol. 35 (Springer Science and Business Media, Boston).Google Scholar
• Mervis CB, Rosch E (1981) Categorization of natural objects. Annu. Rev. Psych. 32(1):89–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):479–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nissim D (2013) Relative valuation of US insurance companies. Rev. Accounting Stud. 18:324–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosofsky RM, Johansen MK (2000) Exemplar-based accounts of “multiple-system” phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psych. Bull. Rev. 7(3):375–402.Google Scholar
• Paolella L, Durand R (2016) Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Acad. Management J. 59(1):330–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park SH, Chung SH, Rajagopalan N (2021) Be careful what you wish for: CEO and analyst firm performance attributions and CEO dismissal. Strategic Management J. 42(10):1880–1908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1992) Selected Philosophical Writings (1893–1913), vol. 2. The Essential Peirce (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
• Philippe D, Durand R (2011) The impact of norm‐conforming behaviors on firm reputation. Strategic Management J. 32(9):969–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinto JE, Robinson TR, Stowe JD (2019) Equity valuation: A survey of professional practice. Rev. Financial Econom. 37(2):219–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial Anal. J. 36(4):30–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.Google Scholar
• Qian C, Lu LY, Yu Y (2019) Financial analyst coverage and corporate social performance: Evidence from natural experiments. Strategic Management J. 40(13):2271–2286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quigley TJ, Hambrick DC (2012) When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management J. 33(7):834–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Greve HR, Davis GF (2001) Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):502–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1978) Principles of categorization. Rosch E, Lloyd BB, eds. Cognition and Categorization (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 27–48.Google Scholar
• Rosch E, Mervis CB (1975) Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognition Psych. 7(4):573–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sensoy BA (2009) Performance evaluation and self-designated benchmark indexes in the mutual fund industry. J. Financial Econom. 92(1):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shocker AD, Ben-Akiva M, Boccara B, Nedungadi P (1991) Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions. Marketing Lett. 2:181–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Chae H (2017) The effect of organizational atypicality on reference group selection and performance evaluation. Organ. Sci. 28(6):1134–1149.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith JD, Kemler DG (1984) Overall similarity in adults’ classification: The child in all of us. J. Experiment. Psych. General 113(1):137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EE, Medin DL (1981) Categories and Concepts (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith ER, Zarate MA (1992) Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psych. Rev. 99(1):3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soublière JF, Gehman J (2020) The legitimacy threshold revisited: How prior successes and failures spill over to other endeavors on Kickstarter. Acad. Management J. 63(2):472–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soublière JF, Lo JY, Rhee EY (2024) Coherence within and across categories: The dynamic viability of product categories on Kickstarter. Acad. Management J. 67(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stickney CP, Brown PR, Wahlen JM (2007) Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis, and Valuation: A Strategic Perspective (Thomson/South-Western, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Taeuscher K, Bouncken R, Pesch R (2021) Gaining legitimacy by being different: Optimal distinctiveness in crowdfunding platforms. Acad. Management J. 64(1):149–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taeuscher K, Zhao EY, Lounsbury M (2022) Categories and narratives as sources of distinctiveness: Cultural entrepreneurship within and across categories. Strategic Management J. 43(10):2101–2134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanaka JW, Taylor M (1991) Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psych. 23(3):457–482.Google Scholar
• Theeke M, Polidoro F Jr, Fredrickson JW (2018) Path-dependent routines in the evaluation of novelty: The effects of innovators’ new knowledge use on brokerage firms’ coverage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):910–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. Guyon I, Von Luxburg U, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, Garnett R, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
• Vergne JP, Wry T (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Clement MB (2008) Sociopolitical dynamics in relations between top managers and security analysts: Favor rendering, reciprocity, and analyst stock recommendations. Acad. Management J. 51(5):873–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Zhang Y (2011) CEO dismissal: The role of investment analysts. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1161–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Womack KL (1996) Do brokerage analysts’ recommendations have investment value? J. Finance 51(1):137–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.Link, Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Peasnell K, Hunt HG III (2018) How do sell-side analysts obtain price-earnings multiples to value firms? Accounting Bus. Res. 48(1):108–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young S, Zeng Y (2015) Accounting comparability and the accuracy of peer-based valuation models. Accounting Rev. 90(6):2571–2601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younger S, Fisher G (2020) The exemplar enigma: New venture image formation in an emergent organizational category. J. Bus. Venturing 35(1):105897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhou X (2020) Dare to be different? Conformity vs. differentiation in corporate social activities of Chinese firms and market responses. Acad. Management J. 63(3):717–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY (2022) Optimal Distinctiveness: A New Agenda for the Study of Competitive Positioning of Organizations and Markets (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Fisher G, Lounsbury M, Miller D (2017) Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 38(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Jennings PD, Lounsbury M (2018) Optimal distinctiveness in the console video game industry: An exemplar-based model of proto-category evolution. Organ. Sci. 29(4):588–611.Link, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2000) Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2004) Structural incoherence and stock market activity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):405–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2017) The categorical imperative revisited: Implications of categorization as a theoretical tool. From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads, vol. 51 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 31–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Edmondson AC (2017) The advocacy trap: When legitimacy building inhibits organizational learning. Acad. Management Discovery 3(3):302–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia vs. flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Crossref, Google Scholar