Atypicality and Accountability: Evidence from Five Experiments

References

• Askin N, Mauskapf M (2017) What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(5):910–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlow MA, Verhaal JC, Angus RW (2019) Optimal distinctiveness, strategic categorization, and product market entry on the Google Play app platform. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1219–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boulogne R, Durand R (2021) Evaluating ambiguous offerings. Organ. Sci. 32(2):257–272.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowers A (2015) Relative comparison and category membership: The case of equity analysts. Organ. Sci. 26(2):571–583.Link, Google Scholar
• Chae H (2022) Income or education? Community‐level antecedents of firms’ category‐spanning activities. Strategic Management J. 43(1):93–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55(1):591–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cudennec A, Durand R (2023) Valuing spanners: Why category nesting and expertise matter. Acad. Management J. 66(1):335–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cutolo D, Ferriani S (2023) Atypicality: Toward an integrative framework in organizational and market settings. Acad. Management Ann. 18(1):157–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cutolo D, Ferriani S (2024) Now it makes more sense: How narratives can help atypical actors increase market appeal. J. Management 50(5):1599–1642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Haans RF (2022) Optimally distinct? Understanding the motivation and ability of organizations to pursue optimal distinctiveness (or not). Organization Theory 3(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllström A (2017) From categories to categorization: A social perspective on market categorization. Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllström A, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 3–30.Google Scholar
• Glaser VL, Krikorian Atkinson M, Fiss PC (2020) Goal-based categorization: Dynamic classification in the display advertising industry. Organ. Stud. 41(7):921–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Singell MN (2024) The sociology of interpretation. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 50(1):85–105.Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Hannan MT, Kovács B (2016) What does it mean to span cultural boundaries? Variety and atypicality in cultural consumption. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(2):215–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouvard P, Durand R (2023) To be or not to be (typical): Evaluation-mode heterogeneity and its consequences for organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 48(4):659–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouvard P, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2023) Doing organizational identity: Earnings surprises and the performative atypicality premium. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(3):781–823.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haack P, Schilke O, Zucker L (2021) Legitimacy revisited: Disentangling propriety, validity, and consensus. J. Management Stud. 58(3):749–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall AT, Frink DD, Buckley MR (2017) An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability. J. Organ. Behav. 38(2):204–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2007) The Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Le Mens G, Hsu G, Kovács B, Negro G, Polos L, Pontikes E, Sharkey A (2019) Concepts and Categories: Foundations for Sociological and Cultural Analysis (Columbia University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser D, Paolacci G, Chandler J (2018) Common concerns with MTurk as a participant pool: Evidence and solutions. Kardes F, Herr P, Schwarz N, eds. Handbook in Research Methods in Consumer Psychology (Routledge, New York), 319–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helms WS, Patterson KD (2014) Eliciting acceptance for “illicit” organizations: The positive implications of stigma for MMA organizations. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1453–1484.Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jack of all trades and master of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT, Koçak O (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Negro G, Perretti F (2012) Hybrids in Hollywood: A study of the production and performance of genre-spanning films. Indust. Corporate Change 21(6):1427–1450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keuschnigg M, Wimmer T (2017) Is category spanning truly disadvantageous? New evidence from primary and secondary movie markets. Soc. Forces 96(1):449–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khessina OM, Reis S, Verhaal JC (2021) Stepping out of the shadows: Identity exposure as a remedy for stigma transfer concerns in the medical marijuana market. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(3):569–611.Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Hannan MT (2015) Conceptual spaces and the consequences of category spanning. Sociol. Sci. 2:252–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Carnabuci G, Wezel FC (2021) Categories, attention, and the impact of inventions. Strategic Management J. 42(5):992–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langhe BD, van Osselaer SM, Wierenga B (2011) The effects of process and outcome accountability on judgment process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(2):238–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner JS, Tetlock PE (1999) Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psych. Bull. 125(2):255–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montauti M, Wezel FC (2016) Charting the territory: Recombination as a source of uncertainty for potential entrants. Organ. Sci. 27(4):954–971.Link, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Leung MD (2013) “Actual” and perceptual effects of category spanning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):684–696.Link, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Koçak O, Hsu G (2010) Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. Negro G, Koçak O, Hsu G, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 31 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 3–35.Google Scholar
• Negro G, Kovács B, Carroll GR (2022) What’s next? Artists’ music after Grammy awards. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 87(4):644–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nolan JM, Schultz PW, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2008) Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(7):913–923.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolella L, Durand R (2016) Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Acad. Management J. 59(1):330–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal W, McCool C, Park S (2005) Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. J. Experiment. Psych. General 134(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(4):795–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Patterson K (2009) Credit and classification: The impact of industry boundaries in nineteenth-century America. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):486–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Y (2023) A change of tune: The democratization of market mediation and crossover production in the US commercial music industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(2):319–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel-Jacobs K, Yates JF (1996) Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 65(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver D, Lee M, Childress CC (2016) Genre complexes in popular music. PLoS One 11(5):e0155471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I (1989) Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. 16(2):158–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB (2011) Identities as lenses: How organizational identity affects audiences’ evaluation of organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):61–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Chae H (2017) The effect of organizational atypicality on reference group selection and performance evaluation. Organ. Sci. 28(6):1134–1149.Link, Google Scholar
• Soublière JF, Lo JY, Rhee EY (2024) Coherence within and across categories: The dynamic viability of product categories on Kickstarter. Acad. Management J. 67(1):61–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (1983a) Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Soc. Psych. Quart. 46(4):285–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (1983b) Accountability and complexity of thought. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(1):74–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (1985) Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Res. Organ. Behav. 7(1):297–332.Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (1992) The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25 (Academic Press, San Diego), 331–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE, Kim JI (1987) Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(4):700–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE, Skitka L, Boettger R (1989) Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(4):632–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trautmann ST, Vieider FM, Wakker PP (2008) Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known vs. unknown preferences. J. Risk Uncertainty 36:225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner CW (2001) Accountability demands and the auditor’s evidence search strategy: The influence of reviewer preferences and the nature of the response (belief vs. action). J. Accounting Res. 39(3):683–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang T, Wezel FC, Forgues B (2016) Protecting market identity: When and how do organizations respond to consumers’ devaluations? Acad. Management J. 59(1):135–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weigold MF, Schlenker BR (1991) Accountability and risk taking. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(1):25–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younkin P, Kashkooli K (2020) Stay true to your roots? Category distance, hierarchy, and the performance of new entrants in the music industry. Organ. Sci. 31(3):604–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Jennings PD, Lounsbury M (2018) Optimal distinctiveness in the console video game industry: An exemplar-based model of proto-category evolution. Organ. Sci. 29(4):588–611.Link, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the legitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar