Location Matters: Everyday Gender Discrimination in Remote and On-site Work

References

• Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2023) When should you adjust Standard errors for clustering? Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):1–35.Google Scholar
• Acker J (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender Soc. 4(2):139–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajunwa I, Crawford K, Schultz J (2017) Limitless worker surveillance. California Law Rev. 105(3):735–776.Google Scholar
• Allison P (2009) Fixed Effects Regression Models (SAGE, Los Angeles).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Liu CC, Stuart TE (2017) Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(4):1223–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrero JM, Bloom N, Davis SJ (2023) The evolution of work from home. J. Econom. Perspect. 37(4):23–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett AE (2022) Centering age inequality: Developing a sociology-of-age framework. Annual Rev. Sociol. 48:213–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battiston D, Blanes i Vidal J, Kirchmaier T (2021) Face-to-face communication in organizations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(2):574–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby WT (2000) Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias. Contemporary Sociol. 29(1):120–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Han R, Liang J (2022) How hybrid working from home works out. NBER Working Paper No. 30292, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bobbitt-Zeher D (2011) Gender discrimination at work: Connecting gender stereotypes, institutional policies, and gender composition of workplace. Gender Soc. 25(6):764–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bommer WH, Schmidtke JM (2022) Virtual meetings: Increasing equity, exacerbating the inequities, or just ‘meh? Stone DL, Murray B, Dulebohn JH, Lukaszewski KM, eds. Managing Team Centricity in Modern Organizations, Research in Human Resource Management (Information Age Publishing, Inc., Charlotte, NC), 293–322.Google Scholar
• Botelho TL, Abraham M (2017) Pursuing quality: How search costs and uncertainty magnify gender-based double standards in a multistage evaluation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):698–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boussalis C, Coan TG, Holman MR, Müller S (2021) Gender, candidate emotional expression, and voter reactions during televised debates. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 115(4):1242–1257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1988) A dual process model of impression formation. Wyer RS, Srull TK, eds. Advances in Social Cognition, vol. I (Psychology Press, UK), 1–36.Google Scholar
• Brewer MB, Lui LN (1989) The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Soc. Cognition 7(3):262–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucher S, Langley A (2016) The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(3):594–613.Link, Google Scholar
• Burstein P (1989) Attacking sex discrimination in the labor market: A study in law and politics. Soc. Forces 67(3):641–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne A, Barling J (2017) When she brings home the job status: Wives’ job status, status leakage, and marital instability. Organ. Sci. 28:177–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Canedo JC, Stone Dianna L, Lukaszewski KM (2022) The moderating effect of electronic communication on the relations between diversity and virtual team processes. Stone DL, Dulebohn JH, Murray B, Lukaszewski KM, eds. Managing Team Centricity in Modern Organizations, Research in Human Resource Management (Information Age Publishing, Inc., Charlotte, NC), 257–292.Google Scholar
• Cappelli P (2021) The Future of the Office: Work from Home, Remote Work, and the Hard Choices We All Face (Wharton School Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Brueller D, Dutton JE (2009) Learning behaviours in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Res. Behav. Sci. 26(1):81–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2015) Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organ. Sci. 26(2):311–333.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen S (2018) The Open Office: Google and the Modern Penitentiary (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Chudacoff HP (1989) How Old Are You? Age Consciousness in American Culture (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB, Exley CL, Niederle M (2021) The role of beliefs in driving gender discrimination. Management Sci. 67(6):3551–3569.Link, Google Scholar
• Collins TA, Dumas TL, Moyer LP (2017) Intersecting disadvantages: Race, gender, and age discrimination among attorneys. Soc. Sci. Quart. 98(5):1642–1658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coltrane S (2004) Elite careers and family commitment: It’s (still) about gender. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 596(1):214–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conger K (2019) Uber settles federal investigation into workplace culture. The New York Times Online (December 18), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/18/technology/uber-settles-eeoc-investigation-workplace-culture.html.Google Scholar
• Conzon VM (2023) The equality policy paradox: Gender differences in how managers implement gender equality–related policies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(3):648–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2017) Reducing gender biases in modern workplaces: A small wins approach to organizational change. Gender Soc. 31(6):725–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S (2006) Biased estimators? Comparing status and statistical theories of gender discrimination. Thye SR, Lawler EJ, eds. Advances in Group Processes (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 89–116.Google Scholar
• Cortina LM, Magley VJ, Williams JH, Langhout RD (2001) Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. J. Occupational Health Psych. 6(1):64–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daldrop C, Buengeler C, Homan AC (2023) An intersectional lens on young leaders: Bias toward young women and young men in leadership positions. Frontiers Psych. 14:1204547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• del Carmen Triana M, Kirkman BL, Wagstaff MF (2012) Does the order of face-to-face and computer-mediated communication matter in diverse project teams? An investigation of communication order effects on minority inclusion and participation. J. Bus. Psych. 27(1):57–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AC (2021) Those left behind: Socioeconomic predictors and social mediators of psychological distress among working-age African Americans in a post-industrial city. Du Bois Rev. 18(1):119–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Kalev A, Kelly E (2007) Diversity management in corporate America. Contexts 6(4):21–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Schrage D, Kalev A (2015) Rage against the iron cage: The varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):1014–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doering L, Doering J, Tilcsik A (2023) “Was it me or was it gender discrimination?” How women respond to ambiguous incidents at work. Sociol. Sci. 10(18):501–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubrovsky VJ, Kiesler S, Sethna BN (1991) The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Comput. Interaction 6(2):119–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan C, Loretto W (2004) Never the right age? Gender and age-based discrimination in employment. Gender Work Organ. 11(1):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emanuel N, Harrington E, Pallais A (2023) The power of proximity to coworkers: Training for tomorrow or productivity today? NBER Working Paper No. 31880, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• England P, Burstein P, eds. (1994) Neoclassical economists’ theories of discrimination. Equal Employment Opportunity (Aldine De Gruyter, New York), 59–70.Google Scholar
• England P, Bearak J, Budig MJ, Hodges MJ (2016) Do highly paid, highly skilled women experience the largest motherhood penalty? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1161–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ensher EA, Grant-Vallone EJ, Donaldson SI (2001) Effects of perceived discrimination on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, and grievances. Human Resource Development Quart. 12(1):53–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felstiner WLF, Abel RL, Sarat A (1981) The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming… Law Soc. Rev. 15(3/4):631–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Kaplan S (2018) Gender and organization science: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1229–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisk SR, Ridgeway CL (2018) Framing gender. Risman BJ, Froyum CM, Scarborough WJ, eds. Handbook of the Sociology of Gender (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 157–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flanagin AJ, Tiyaamornwong V, O’Connor J, Seibold DR (2002) Computer-mediated group work: The interaction of sex and anonymity. Comm. Res. 29(1):66–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman JB, Johnson KL, Ambady N, Rule NO (2010) Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 36(10):1318–1331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gander M (2014) The intersection of gender and age: An exploration. Perspect. Policy Practice Higher Ed. 18(1):9–13.Google Scholar
• Gangl M, Ziefle A (2015) The making of a good woman: Extended parental leave entitlements and mothers’ work commitment in Germany. Amer. J. Sociol. 121(2):511–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garrote Sanchez D, Gomez Parra N, Ozden C, Rijkers B, Viollaz M, Winkler H (2021) Who on Earth can work from home? World Bank Res. Observer 36(1):67–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• General Social Survey (2018) MDDtoDOC - GSS2018 Ballot 1 - English (National Opinion Research Center, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Gibbs M, Mengel F, Siemroth C (2021) Work from home & productivity: Evidence from personnel & analytics data on IT professionals. Preprint, submitted May 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3843197.Google Scholar
• Glebbeek AC, Bax EH (2004) Is high employee turnover really harmful? An empirical test using company records. Acad. Management J. 47(2):277–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST (2007) Sex discrimination: The psychological approach. Crosby FJ, Stockdale M, Ropp SA, eds. Sex Discrimination in the Workplace: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA), 155–187.Google Scholar
• Goldman BM, Gutek BA, Stein JH, Lewis K (2006) Employment discrimination in organizations: Antecedents and consequences. J. Management 32(6):786–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonsalves L (2020) From face time to flex time: The role of physical space in worker temporal flexibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(4):1058–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorman EH (2005) Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(4):702–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green TK (2021) I’ll see you at work: Spatial features and discrimination. UC Davis Law Rev. 55(1):141–208.Google Scholar
• Harnois CE (2015) Age and gender discrimination: Intersecting inequalities across the lifecourse. At the Center: Feminism, Social Science and Knowledge, Advances in Gender Research (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 85–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart CG (2021) Trajectory guarding: Managing unwanted, ambiguously sexual interactions at work. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(2):256–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He AS, Park IY, Rienks SL (2023) Everyday workplace discrimination: Differential perceptions and psychological well-being among child welfare caseworkers. J. Soc. Social Work Res. 14(4):785–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2001) Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):657–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellevik O (2009) Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Quality Quantity 43(1):59–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsh CE, Kornrich S (2008) The context of discrimination: Workplace conditions, institutional environments, and sex and race discrimination charges. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(5):1394–1432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsh E, Lyons CJ (2010) Perceiving discrimination on the job: Legal consciousness, workplace context, and the construction of race discrimination. Law Soc. Rev. 44(2):269–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochschild AR (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1950) The Human Group (Harcourt, New York).Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Pao E, Sinders C, Mack M (2021) Project include remote work report. Accessed July 27, 2021, https://projectinclude.org/assets/pdf/Project-Include-Harassment-Report-0321-F3.pdf.Google Scholar
• Hu YY, Ellis RJ, Hewitt DB, Yang AD, Cheung EO, Moskowitz JT, Potts JR, et al. (2019) Discrimination, abuse, harassment, and burnout in surgical residency training. New England J. Medicine 381(18):1741–1752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Itzin C, Phillipson C (1995) Gendered ageism: A double jeopardy for women in organizations. Gender, Culture and Organizational Change (Routledge, London, New York), 84–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johfre S, Saperstein A (2023) The social construction of age: Concepts and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. 49:339–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi AA, Oh S, Desjardine M (2024) A new perspective on gender bias in the upper echelons: Why stakeholder variability matters. Acad. Management Rev. 49(2):322–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jyrkinen M, McKie L (2012) Gender, age and ageism: Experiences of women managers in Finland and Scotland. Work Employment Soc. 26(1):61–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E (2006) Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(4):589–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Karunakaran A (2022) Status–authority asymmetry between professions: The case of 911 dispatchers and police officers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(2):423–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler-Harris A (2003) Out to Work: A History of Wage-Earning Women in the United States, 20th anniversary edition (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klonoff EA, Landrine H (1995) The schedule of sexist events. Psych. Women Quart. 19(4):439–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kloth N, Damm M, Schweinberger SR, Wiese H (2015) Aging affects sex categorization of male and female faces in opposite ways. Acta Psychologica 158:78–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamont M, Silva GM, Welburn JS, Guetzkow J, Mizrachi N, Herzog H, Reis E (2016) Getting Respect: Responding to Stigma and Discrimination in the United States, Brazil, and Israel (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laurence GA, Fried Y, Slowik LH (2013) “My space”: A moderated mediation model of the effect of architectural and experienced privacy and workspace personalization on emotional exhaustion at work. J. Environ. Psych. 36:144–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lea M, Spears R, Watt SE (2007) Visibility and anonymity effects on attraction and group cohesiveness. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 37(4):761–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S (2019) Learning-by-moving: Can reconfiguring spatial proximity between organizational members promote individual-level exploration? Organ. Sci. 30(3):467–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Leidner R (1993) Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2021) COVID-19 and the new technologies of organizing: Digital exhaust, digital footprints, and artificial intelligence in the wake of remote work. J. Management Stud. 58(1):249–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung MD, Koppman S (2018) Taking a pass: How proportional prejudice and decisions not to hire reproduce gender segregation. Amer. J. Sociol. 124(3):762–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao S (2021) Riot Games agrees to pay $100 million in settlement of class-action gender discrimination lawsuit. Washington Post Online (December 28), https://www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/2021/12/27/riot-discrimination-100-million-settlement/.Google Scholar
• Lick DJ, Johnson KL (2014) “You can’t tell just by looking!” Beliefs in the diagnosticity of visual cues explain response biases in social categorization. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 40(11):1494–1506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim C (2024) Beyond fatiguing virtual meetings: How should virtual meetings for workplaces be supported? Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction 40(18):5103–5118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind MR (1999) The gender impact of temporary virtual work groups. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. 42(4):276–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madera JM, King EB, Hebl MR (2012) Bringing social identity to work: The influence of manifestation and suppression on perceived discrimination, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions. Cultural Diversity Ethnic Minority Psych. 18(2):165–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor MS (2000) Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad. Management J. 43(4):738–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Bradley L, Brown K (2009) “Full-time is a given here”: Part-time versus full-time job quality. British J. Management 20(2):143–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melin JL, Correll SJ (2022) Preventing soft skill decay among early-career women in STEM during COVID-19: Evidence from a longitudinal intervention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(32):e2123105119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mengel F, Sauermann J, Zölitz U (2019) Gender bias in teaching evaluations. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 17(2):535–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merluzzi J, Phillips DJ (2022) Early career leadership advancement: Evidence of incongruity penalties toward young, single women professionals. Organ. Stud. 43(11):1719–1743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mong SN, Roscigno VJ (2010) African American men and the experience of employment discrimination. Qualitative Sociol. 33(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neeley T (2021) Remote Work Revolution: Succeeding from Anywhere (Harvard Business School Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ochsner KN (2000) Are affective events richly recollected or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past. J. Experiment. Psych. General 129(2):242–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owens J (2022) Double jeopardy: Teacher biases, racialized organizations, and the production of racial/ethnic disparities in school discipline. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 87(6):1007–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özgümüs A, Rau HA, Trautmann ST, König-Kersting C (2020) Gender bias in the evaluation of teaching materials. Frontiers Psych. 11:1–9.Google Scholar
• Pager D, Shepherd H (2008) The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Rev. Sociol. 34:181–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pager D, Bonikowski B, Western B (2009) Discrimination in a low-wage labor market: A field experiment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(5):777–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palan S, Schitter C (2018) Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 17:22–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker K, Funk C (2017) Gender Discrimination Comes in Many Forms for Today’s Working Women (Pew Research Center, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Parker K, Horowitz JM, Stepler R (2017) On Gender Differences, No Consensus on Nature vs. Nurture (Pew Research Center, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 70:153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Carranza E (2002) What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psych. Women Quart. 26(4):269–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purvanova RK, Charlier SD, Reeves CJ, Greco LM (2021) Who emerges into virtual team leadership roles? The role of achievement and ascription antecedents for leadership emergence across the virtuality spectrum. J. Bus. Psych. 36(4):713–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Fan W (2019) Men and women at work: Occupational gender composition and affective well-being in the United States. J. Happiness Stud. 20(7):2077–2099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quadlin N (2018) The mark of a woman’s record: Gender and academic performance in hiring. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(2):331–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quillian L, Midtbøen AH (2021) Comparative perspectives on racial discrimination in hiring: The rise of field experiments. Annual Rev. Sociol. 47:391–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rains SA (2005) Leveling the organizational playing field—Virtually: A meta-analysis of experimental research assessing the impact of group support system use on member influence behaviors. Comm. Res. 32(2):193–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rasmussen B (2005) Gut feeling, back-slapping—Gendered embodiment on the exchange. Brandth B, Morgan D, eds. Gender, Bodies and Work (Routledge, London), 61–73.Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (1997) Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(2):218–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Correll S (2004) Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender Soc. 18(4):510–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Smith-Lovin L (1999) The gender system and interaction. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:191–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2020) Employer decision making. Annual Rev. Sociol. 46:215–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson B (2018) Conditional families and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth homelessness: Gender, sexuality, family instability, and rejection. J. Marriage Family 80(2):383–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson B (2021) Gender discrimination is still alive and well in the workplace in 2021. Forbes Online (February 15), https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2021/02/15/gender-discrimination-is-still-alive-and-well-in-the-workplace-in-2021/.Google Scholar
• Robinson A, Gutierrez L, Scroggins L, Smith A, Whitson J (2018) Microaggressions at school: Negative consequences for psychological safety. Preprint, submitted June 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3185119.Google Scholar
• Rockmann KW, Pratt MG (2015) Contagious offsite work and the lonely office: The unintended consequences of distributed work. Acad. Management Discoveries 1(2):150–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roscigno VJ (2007) The Face of Discrimination: How Race and Gender Impact Work and Home Lives (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
• Roscigno VJ, Yavorsky JE, Quadlin N (2021) Gendered dignity at work. Amer. J. Sociol. 127(2):562–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):743–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz J (2016) Gender-wage discrimination by marital status in Canada: 2006 to 2016. Working paper, University of Ottawa, ON.Google Scholar
• Simmel G, Levine DN, eds. (1971) On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Small ML, Pager D (2020) Sociological perspectives on racial discrimination. J. Econom. Perspect. 34(2):49–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith IA, Griffiths A (2022) Microaggressions, everyday discrimination, workplace incivilities, and other subtle slights at work: A meta-synthesis. Human Resource Development Rev. 21(3):275–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spears R (2017) Social identity model of deindividuation effects. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ), 1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spears R, Lea M, Postmes T (2012) Computer-mediated communication and social identity. Joinson A, McKenna KYA, Postems T, Reips UD, eds. Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 253–270.Google Scholar
• Stanton JM (2000) Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance 13(1):85–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephenson KA, Kuismin A, Putnam LL, Sivunen A (2020) Process studies of organizational space. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):797–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sterling A, Merluzzi J (2019) A longer way in: Tryouts as alternative hiring arrangements in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 39:100122.Google Scholar
• Stewart QT (2008) Swimming upstream: Theory and methods in race research. Zuberi T, Bonilla-Silva E, eds. White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD), 111–126.Google Scholar
• Stuhlmacher AF, Citera M, Willis T (2007) Gender differences in virtual negotiation: Theory and research. Sex Roles 57(5–6):329–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sue DW (2010) Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Tak E, Correll SJ, Soule SA (2019) Gender inequality in product markets: When and how status beliefs transfer to products. Soc. Forces 98(2):548–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Cooper M, Urban KM, Cardazone G, Noble-Tolla M, Mahajan S, Edwards B, et al. (2022) Women in the Workplace 2022 (LeanIn.Org, San Francisco, CA and McKinsey & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A (2014) Imprint–environment fit and performance: How organizational munificence at the time of hire affects subsequent job performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(4):639–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomlinson J (2006) Part-time occupational mobility in the service industries: Regulation, work commitment and occupational closure. Sociol. Rev. 54(1):66–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trethewey A (1999) Disciplined bodies: Women’s embodied identities at work. Organ. Stud. 20(3):423–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trzebiatowski T, McCluney C, Hernandez M (2023) Managing the double bind: Women directors’ participation tactics in the gendered boardroom. Organ. Sci. 34(2):801–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Tulshyan R (2021) Return to office? Some women of color aren’t ready. The New York Times Online (June 23), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/23/us/return-to-office-anxiety.html.Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023) Number of Business Establishments by Size of Establishment in Selected Private Industries (U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Villamor I, Hill NS, Ernst Kossek E, Foley K (2023) Virtuality at work: A doubled-edged sword for women’s career equality? Acad. Management Ann. 17(1):113–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vlahos J (2012) The department of pre-crime. Sci. Amer. 306(1):62–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker RV, Zelin AI (2021) “You’re too young/old for this”: The intersection of ageism and sexism in the workplace. Cole E, Hollis-Sawyer L, eds. Older Women Who Work: Resilience, Choice, and Change, Psychology of Women Book Series (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 161–187.Google Scholar
• Walther JB (2008) Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives. Schrodt P, Scharp KM, Braithwaite DO, eds. Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives (SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA), 391–404.Google Scholar
• Wareham JD, Overbeck JR (2020) The Unspoken Language of Power: Interpersonal Dynamics of Nonverbal Behavior in Mixed-Gender Negotiations. Research Handbook on Gender and Negotiation, Research Handbooks in Business and Management (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 207–241.Google Scholar
• Weber M (1923) General Economic History (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• West C, Zimmerman DH (1987) Doing gender. Gender Soc. 1(2):125–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilborn SE (1997) Revisiting the public/private distinction: Employee monitoring in the workplace. Georgia Law Rev. 32(3):825–888.Google Scholar
• Williams DR, Neighbors HW, Jackson JS (2008) Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: Findings from community studies. Amer. J. Public Health 98:S29–S37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams DR, Yu Y, Jackson JS, Anderson NB (1997) Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. J. Health Psych. 2(3):335–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Kacperczyk AO, Naldi L (2023) The motherhood wage penalty and female entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 35(1):27–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang L, Holtz D, Jaffe S, Suri S, Sinha S, Weston J, Joyce C, et al. (2022) The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behav. 6(1):43–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar