Female Entrepreneurs Targeting Women: Strategic Redirection Under Scientific Decision-Making

References

• Agarwal R, Shah SK (2014) Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Res. Policy 43(7):1109–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Bacco F, Camuffo A, Coali A, Gambardella A, Msangi H, et al. (2023) Does a theory-of-value add value? Evidence from a randomized control trial with Tanzanian entrepreneurs. Preprint, submitted April 20, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4412041.Google Scholar
• Allcott H (2015) Site selection bias in program evaluation. Quart. J. Econom. 130(3):1117–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andriani P, Cattani G (2016) Exaptation as source of creativity, innovation, and diversity: Introduction to the special section. Indust. Corp. Change 25(1):115–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Karlan D, Zinman J (2015) Six randomized evaluations of microcredit: Introduction and further steps. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 7(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna S, Ganco M (2021) Gender gaps in equity crowdfunding: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 67(5):2679–2710.Link, Google Scholar
• Bapna S, Ganco M (2023) Equity crowdfunding and access to capital for user entrepreneurs: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 47(2):585–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Folke O, Persson T, Rickne J (2017) Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: Theory and evidence from Sweden. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(8):2204–2242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, McDonald RM (2022) Mastering Innovation’s Toughest Trade-Offs (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2010) Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? J. Econom. Perspect. 24(1):203–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bojanowski P, Grave E, Joulin A, Mikolov T (2017) Enriching word vectors with subword information. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 5:135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Gambardella A, Messinese D, Novelli E, Paolucci E, Spina C (2024) A scientific approach to innovation management: Evidence from four field experiments. Strategic Management J. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Cao R, Koning R, Nanda R (2023) Sampling bias in entrepreneurial experiments. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print December 14, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.01740.Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce P, Saiz A (2015) Female and power: Unpopular, unwilling, or held back? J. Political Econom. 123(3):641–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TH, Lim SY (2023) The emergence of novel product uses: An investigation of exaptations in IKEA hacks. Management Sci. 69(5):2870–2892.Link, Google Scholar
• Chi MTH, Glaser R, Farr MJ, eds. (1988) The Nature of Expertise (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Coali A, Gambardella A, Novelli E (2024) Scientific decision-making, project selection and longer-term outcomes. Res. Policy 53(6):105022.Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Bingham CB, Hallen BL (2019) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):810–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti R, Kacperczyk O, Valentini G (2022) Institutional protection of minority employees and entrepreneurship: Evidence from the LGBT employment non‐discrimination acts. Strategic Management J. 43(4):758–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Laureiro-Martínez D (2018) Individual and organizational antecedents of strategic foresight: A representational approach. Strategy Sci. 3(3):513–532.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall/Pearson Education, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dutt N, Kaplan S (2018) Acceleration as mitigation: Whether & when processes can address gender bias in entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Proc. 1:16160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einio E, Feng J, Jaravel X (2022) Social push and the direction of innovation. CEP Discussion Papers dp1861, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA (2006) The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 683–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Sci. 2(4):258–271.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Kauffman S, Zenger T (2023) Resource origins and search. Strategic Management J. 44(6):1514–1533.Google Scholar
• Felin T, Gambardella A, Stern S, Zenger T (2020) Lean startup and the business model: Experimentation revisited. Long Range Planning 53(4):101889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Kauffman S, Mastrogiorgio A, Mastrogiorgio M (2016) Factor markets, actors, and affordances. Indust. Corp. Change 25(1):133–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finke RA (1996) Imagery, creativity, and emergent structure. Conscious. Cogn. 5(3):381–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr NR, Cavarretta F, Garg S (2012) Who changes course? The role of domain knowledge and novel framing in making technology changes. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(3):236–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagliardi L, Mariani M (2022) Trained to lead: Evidence from industrial research. Strategic Management J. 43(4):847–871.Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S, Wu J (2019) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management J. 40(5):736–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Porac J (2018) On the origin of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1):352–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Gerber AS, Green DP (2012) Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation (WW Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• Graebner ME, Knott AM, Lieberman MB, Mitchell W (2022) Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question‐driven, phenomenon‐based approach to strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 44(1):3–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Agarwal R, Agarwal R, Gopal A (2019) The role of individual and organizational expertise in the adoption of new practices. Organ. Sci. 30(1):191–213.Link, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Kacperczyk AO (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7):1666–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hebert C (2023) Gender stereotypes and entrepreneur financing. Preprint, submitted January 24, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3318245.Google Scholar
• Heshmati M, Csaszar FA (2024) Learning strategic representations: Exploring the effects of taking a strategy course. Organ. Sci. 35(2):453–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Honoré F (2022) Joining forces: How can founding members’ prior experience variety and shared experience increase startup survival? Acad. Management J. 65(1):248–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Des. Stud. 12(1):3–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A, Goldfarb B, Simcoe T (2021) Learning from testimony on quantitative research in management. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirtley J, O’Mahony S (2023) What is a pivot? Explaining when and how entrepreneurial firms decide to make strategic change and pivot. Strategic Management J. 44(1):197–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koning R, Samila S, Ferguson JP (2021) Who do we invent for? Patents by female focus more on female’s health, but few female get to invent. Science 372(6548):1345–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kowalski AE (2023) How to examine external validity within an experiment. J. Econom. Management Strategy 32(3):491–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krueger J, Clement RW (1997) Estimates of social consensus by majorities and minorities: The case for social projection. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 1:299–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martínez D (2014) Cognitive control capabilities, routinization propensity, and decision-making performance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1111–1133.Link, Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martínez D, Brusoni S (2018) Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision‐making: Evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision makers. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1031–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martínez D, Arrieta JP, Brusoni S (2023) Microfoundations of problem solving: Attentional engagement predicts problem-solving strategies. Organ. Sci. 35(6):2207–2230.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee M, Huang L (2018) Gender bias, social impact framing, and evaluation of entrepreneurial ventures. Organ. Sci. 29(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee E, Karimi F, Wagner C, Jo HH, Strohmaier M, Galesic M (2019) Homophily and minority-group size explain perception biases in social networks. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3(10):1078–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipton P (2017) Inference to the best explanation. Newton-Smith WH, ed. A Companion to the Philosophy of Science (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 184–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyons E, Zhang L (2017) The impact of entrepreneurship programs on minorities. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):303–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Bremmer R (2020) When it’s time to pivot, what’s your story? Harvard Bus. Rev. (September–October) https://hbr.org/2020/09/when-its-time-to-pivot-whats-your-story.Google Scholar
• McDonald RM, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and effective business-model design. Adm. Sci. Q. 65(2):483–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mount MP, Baer M, Lupoli MJ (2021) Quantum leaps or baby steps? Expertise distance, construal level, and the propensity to invest in novel technological ideas. Strategic Management J. 42(8):1490–1515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econom. 67(3):297–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen MW, Andersen JP, Schiebinger L, Schneider JW (2017) One and a half million medical papers reveal a link between author gender and attention to gender and sex analysis. Nature Human Behav. 1(11):791–796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novelli E (2015) An examination of the antecedents and implications of patent scope. Res. Policy. 44(2):493–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novelli E, Spina C (2024) When innovators act like scientists: A field experiment of UK Entrepreneurs. Working paper, University of London, London.Google Scholar
• Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2017) Strategy formation in entrepreneurial settings: Past insights and future directions. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(3):306–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Han S, Graebner ME (2017) Single cases: The what, why, and how. Mir R, Jain S, eds. The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies (Routledge, New York), 92–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce JR, Schott PK (2016) The surprisingly swift decline of US manufacturing employment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(7):1632–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillai SD, Goldfarb B, Kirsch DA (2020) The origins of firm strategy: Learning by economic experimentation and strategic pivots in the early automobile industry. Strategic Management J. 41(3):369–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK, Tripsas M (2007) The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(1–2):123–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah S, Winston Smith S, Reedy EJ (2012) Who are user entrepreneurs? Findings on innovation, founder characteristics, and firm characteristics. Report, The Kauffman Firm Survey, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):9–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson NT (2014) When “scratch your own itch” is dangerous advice for entrepreneurs. Harvard Bus. Rev. (May 19), https://hbr.org/2014/05/when-scratch-your-own-itch-is-dangerous-advice-for-entrepreneurs.Google Scholar
• Valentine J, Novelli E, Agarwal R (2024) The theory-based view and strategic pivots: The effects of theorization and experimentation on the type and nature of pivots. Preprint, submitted February 24, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4730043.Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32(7):791–805.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (2010) Open user innovation. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 411–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2016) Crossroads—Identifying viable “need–solution pairs”: Problem solving without problem formulation. Organ. Sci. 27(1):207–221.Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2011) Difference-in-differences estimation. Lecture notes, 10.Google Scholar
• Yang T, Hughes KD, Zhao W (2020) Resource combination activities and new venture growth: The role of entrepreneurs’ characteristics. Acad. Management Proc. 2020(1):18777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younkin P, Kuppuswamy V (2018) The colorblind crowd? Founder race and performance in crowdfunding. Management Sci. 64(7):3269–3287.Link, Google Scholar
• Zellweger T, Zenger T (2022) Entrepreneurs as scientists: A pragmatist alternative to the creation-discovery debate. Acad. Management Rev. 47(4):696–699.Google Scholar
• Zellweger T, Zenger T (2023) Entrepreneurs as scientists: A pragmatist approach to producing value out of uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 48(3):379–408.Crossref, Google Scholar