The Motherhood Wage Penalty and Female Entrepreneurship

References

• Aldrich HE (2012) The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: A personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 41(7):1240–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H, Herker D (1977) Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Acad. Management Rev. 2:217–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H, Ruef M (2006) Organizations Evolving (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H, Zimmer C (1986) Entrepreneurship through social networks. Sexton DL, Smilor RW, eds. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA), 3–24.Google Scholar
• Allison PD (2009) Fixed Effects Regression Models, vol. 160 (Sage Publications, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD (2014) Event History and Survival Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data, vol. 46 (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arum R, Müller W (2004) The Reemergence of Self-Employment: A Comparative Study of Self-Employment Dynamics and Social Inequality (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Assenova VA, Sorenson O (2017) Legitimacy and the benefits of firm formalization. Organ. Sci. 28(5):804–818.Link, Google Scholar
• Åstebro T, Chen J, Thompson P (2011) Stars and misfits: Self-employment and labor market frictions. Management Sci. 57(11):1999–2017.Link, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Petrongolo B (2014) Gender and the labor market: What have we learned from field and lab experiments? Labour Econom. 30(C):32–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Baron JN, Stuart Toby E (2000) Avenues of attainment: Occupational demography and organizational careers in the California civil service. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(1):88–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JR, Locke EA (2004) The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. J. Appl. Psych. 89(4):587–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1971) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhidé A (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell MJ, Briscoe F (2009) Who contracts? Determinants of the decision to work as an independent contractor among information technology workers. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1148–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Mollick E (2015) Shifts and ladders: Comparing the role of internal and external mobility in managerial careers. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1629–1645.Link, Google Scholar
• Blair-Loy M (2003) Competing Devotions: Career and Family Among Women Executives (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2017) The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. J. Econom. Literature 55(3):789–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blossfeld H-P, Huinink J (1991) Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(1):143–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewster KL, Rindfuss RR (2000) Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized nations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 26(1):271–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budig MJ (2006a) Intersections on the road to self-employment: Gender, family and occupational class. Soc. Forces 84(4):2223–2239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budig MJ (2006b) Gender, self-employment, and earnings: The interlocking structures of family and professional status. Gender Soc. 20(6):725–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budig MJ, England P (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(2):204–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budig MJ, Misra J, Boeckmann I (2012) The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective: The importance of work–family policies and cultural attitudes. Soc. Politics 19(2):163–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Dahl MS, Sorenson O (2017) Do start-ups pay less? Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 71(5):1179–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Fairlie RW, Siegel D (2019) Introduction to a special issue on entrepreneurship and employment: Connecting labor market institutions, corporate demography, and human resource management practices. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 72(5):1050–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Beckman CM (2002) Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Ventresca MLMJ, ed. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 19, 229–262.Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Dobrev SD (2016) A careers perspective on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 40(2):237–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA (2013) Earnings effects of entrepreneurial experience: Evidence from the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. 59(2):286–304.Link, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Agarwal R, Campbell BA (2012) Heterogeneity in turnover: The effect of relative compensation dispersion of firms on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performers. Strategic Management J. 33(12):1411–1430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr D (1996) Two paths to self-employment? Women’s and men’s self-employment in the United States, 1980. Work Occupations 23(1):26–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Mosakowski E (1987) The career dynamics of self-employment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 32(4):570–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2015) Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organ. Sci. 26:311–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Charles M (1992) Cross-national variation in occupational sex segregation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57:483–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellaneta F, Kacperczyk A, Conti R (2020) The (un)intended consequences of lowering entry barriers: Evidence from entry deregulation reform in Portugal. Strategic Management J. 41(7):1274–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen LE, Broschak JP, Haveman HA (1998) And then there were more? The effect of organizational sex composition on the hiring and promotion of managers. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(5):711–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti R, Kacperczyk A, Valentini G (2021) Institutional protection of minority employees and entrepreneurship: Evidence from the LGBT employment non-discrimination acts. Strategic Management J. 43(4):758–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5):1297–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elam A, Terjesen S (2010) Gendered institutions and cross-national patterns of business creation for men and women. Eur. J. Development Res. 22(3):331–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Hamilton BH, Zenger TR (2010) The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Sci. 56(4):659–681.Link, Google Scholar
• El-Muzaini H, Akhtar S, Alroughani R (2020) A matched case-control study of risk factors associated with multiple sclerosis in Kuwait. BMC Neurology 20(1):64–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Padavic I (2020) What’s really holding women back? It’s not what people think. Harvard Bus Rev. 98(2):58–67.Google Scholar
• England P, Bearak J, Budig MJ, Hodges MJ (2016) Do highly paid, highly skilled women experience the largest motherhood penalty? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1161–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evertsson M, Nermo M (2004) Dependence within families and the division of labor: Comparing Sweden and the United States. J. Marriage Family 66(5):1272–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fairlie RW, Fossen FM (2018) Opportunity versus necessity entrepreneurship: Two components of business creation. Preprint, submitted March 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140340.Google Scholar
• Ferber MA, Waldfogel J (1998) The long-term consequences of nontraditional employment. Monthly Labor Rev. 121(5):3–12.Google Scholar
• Firth M (1982) Sex discrimination in job opportunities for women. Sex Roles 8(8):891–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folta TB, Delmar F, Wennberg K (2010) Hybrid entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 56(2):253–269.Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman J (1986) Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth, vol. 1 (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK), 33–52.Google Scholar
• Goldin C (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1091–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldscheider F, Bernhardt E, Brandén M (2013) Domestic gender equality and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Res. 29:1097–1126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorman EH (2005) Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(4):702–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta ND, Smith N, Stratton LS (2007) Is marriage poisonous? Are relationships taxing? An analysis of the male marital wage differential in Denmark. Southern Econom. J. 74:412–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Stern S (2015) Where is Silicon Valley? Science 347(6222):606–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Kacperczyk A (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 9(48):1666–1680.Google Scholar
• Haas L (1986) Wives’ orientation toward breadwinning: Sweden and the United States. J. Family Issues 7(4):358–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RE, Woodward SE (2010) The burden of the nondiversifiable risk of entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:1163–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH (2000) Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. J. Political Econom. 108(3):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MN (1995) The vicious circle of the welfare state? Women’s labor market situation in Norway and Great Britain. Comparative Soc. Res. 15:1–34.Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1998) Detecting discrimination. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(2):101–116.Google Scholar
• Hellmann T (2007) Entrepreneurs and the process of obtaining resources. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(1):81–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochschild A, Anne M (2012) The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Jacobs JA, Gerson K (2004) The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Jennings JE, Brush CG (2013) Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):663–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jennings JE, McDougald MS (2007) Work-family interface experiences and coping strategies: Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):747–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansson G (2002) Work-life balance: The case of Sweden in the 1990s. Soc. Sci. Inform. 41(2):303–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansson Sevä I, Öun I (2015) Self-employment as a strategy for dealing with the competing demands of work and family? The importance of family/lifestyle motives: Self-employment and work-family conflict. Gender Work Organ. 22(3):256–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Higgins CA (1999) The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personality Psych. 52(3):621–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung HJ, Vissa B, Pich M (2015) How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions? Acad. Management J. 60(1):264–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung H, Vissa B, Pich M (2017) How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions? Acad. Management J. 60(1):264–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk AJ (2012) Opportunity structures in established firms entrepreneurship versus intrapreneurship in mutual funds. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):484–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Marx M (2016) Revisiting the small-firm effect on entrepreneurship: Evidence from firm dissolutions. Organ. Sci. 27(4):893–910.Link, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Younkin P (2017) The paradox of breadth: The tension between experience and legitimacy in the transition to entrepreneurship. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):731–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Younkin P, Rocha V (2023) Do employees work less for female leaders? A multi-method study of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelly EL, Moen P, Oakes JM, Fan W, Okechukwu C, Davis KD, Hammer LB, et al. (2014) Changing work and work-family conflict: Evidence from the work, family, and health network. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(3):485–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korek S, Sobiraj S, Weseler D, Rigotti T, Mohr G (2014) The gender role self‐concept of men in female‐dominated occupations: Does it depend on how they see their jobs? J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 44(4):241–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2004) Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):208–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2005) Entrepreneurship. J. Labor Econom. 23(4):649–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine R, Rubinstein Y (2017) Smart and illicit: Who becomes an entrepreneur and do they earn more? Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):963–1018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine R, Rubinstein Y (2018) Selection into entrepreneurship and self-employment. NBER Working Paper No. 25350, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lincoln AE (2010) The shifting supply of men and women to occupations: Feminization in veterinary education. Soc. Forces 88(5):1969–1998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loscocco KA (1997) Work–family linkages among self-employed women and men. J. Vocational Behav. 50(2):204–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magnusson C (2015) The gender wage gap in highly prestigious occupations: A case study of Swedish medical doctors. Work Employment Soc. 30(1):0950017015590760.Google Scholar
• Mandel H, Semyonov M (2005) Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: Sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):949–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandel H, Semyonov M (2006) A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(6):1910–1949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manso G (2016) Experimentation and the returns to entrepreneurship. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(9):2319–2340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Sørensen J (2010) Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 56(7):1116–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Ozbek OV (2016) The right people in the wrong places: The paradox of entrepreneurial entry and successful opportunity realization. Acad. Management Rev. 41(1):109–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nermo M (1996) Occupational sex segregation in Sweden, 1968–1991. Work Occupation 23(3):319–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumark D, Bank RJ, Van Nort KD (1996) Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: An audit study. Quart. J. Econom. 111(3):915–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pager D, Pedulla DS (2015) Race, self-selection, and the job search process. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(4):1005–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Saporta I (2004) The opportunity structure for discrimination. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(4):852–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Penner AM, Høgsnes G (2014) From motherhood penalties to husband premia: The new challenge for gender equality and family policy, lessons from Norway. Amer. J. Sociol. 119(5):1434–1472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reskin BF (2003) Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(1):75–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rider C, Thomspon P, Kacperczyk A, Tag J (2019) Experience and entrepreneurship: A career transition perspective. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 72(5):1149–1181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld RA (1992) Job mobility and career processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. 18:39–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosti L, Chelli F (2005) Gender discrimination, entrepreneurial talent and self-employment. Small Bus. Econom. 24(2):131–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M (2010) The Entrepreneurial Group: Social Identities, Relations, and Collective Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane SA (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB (2007) Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Fassiotto MA (2011) Organizations as fonts of entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1322–1331.Link, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Sharkey AJ (2014) Entrepreneurship as a mobility process. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):328–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Dahl MS, Canales R, Burton MD (2021) Do startup employees earn more in the long run? Organ. Sci. 32(3):587–604.Link, Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden (2021) Inflation rate was 2.5 percent in April 2021. (May 12), https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/prices-and-consumption/consumer-price-index/consumer-price-index-cpi/pong/statistical-news/consumer-price-index-cpi-april-2021/.Google Scholar
• Stone P (2007) Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Sorenson O (2005) Social networks and entrepreneurship. Alvarez SA, Agarwal R, Sorenson O eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research (Springer, New York), 233–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundström M, Duvander AZE (2002) Gender division of childcare and the sharing of parental leave among new parents in Sweden. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 18(4):433–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terjesen S, Hessels J, Li D (2016) Comparative international entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. J. Management 42(1):299–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2015) Business as plan B: Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):671–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2016) Passing up the job: The role of gendered organizations and families in the entrepreneurial career process. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 40(2):1042–2587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS (1996) Occupations, organizations, and boundaryless careers. Arthur MB, Rousseau DM, eds. The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era (Oxford University Press, New York), 331–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonoyan V, Budig M, Strohmeyer R (2010) Exploring the heterogeneity of women’s entrepreneurship: The impact of family structure and family policies in Europe and the US. Brush CG, De Bruin A, Gatewood EJ, Henry C, eds. Women Entrepreneurs and the Global Environment for Growth (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turco CJ (2010) Cultural foundations of tokenism. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(6):894–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (1995) The price of motherhood: Family status and women’s pay in young British cohort. Oxford Econom. Papers 47(4):584–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wells MB, Bergnéhr D (2014) Families and family policies in Sweden. Robila M, ed. Handbook of Family Policies Across the Globe (Springer, New York), 91–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Aldrich HE (2014) Who’s the boss? Explaining gender inequality in entrepreneurial teams. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):303–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Aldrich HE (2017) “The liability of newness” revisited: Theoretical restatement and empirical testing in emergent organizations. Soc. Sci. Res. 63:36–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Bao J, Aldrich H (2020) The paradox of resource provision in entrepreneurial teams: Between self-interest and the collective enterprise. Organ. Sci. 31(6):1336–1358.Link, Google Scholar
• Yavorsky JE, Keister LA, Qian Y, Nau M (2019) Women in the one percent: Gender dynamics in top income positions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 84(1):54–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu W, Kuo JC-L (2017) The motherhood wage penalty by work conditions: How do occupational characteristics hinder or empower mothers? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(4):744–769.Crossref, Google Scholar