The Fundamental Recruitment Error: Candidate-Recruiter Discrepancy in Their Relative Valuation of Innate Talent vs. Hard Work

References

• Acharya AG, Pollock TG (2013) Shoot for the stars? Predicting the recruitment of prestigious directors at newly public firms. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1396–1419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acker J (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender Soc. 4(2):139–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldag RJ, Brief AP (1975) Some correlates of work values. J. Appl. Psych. 60(6):757–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Pierret CR (2001) Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):313–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (2001) Beyond talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. Amer. Psych. 56(4):333–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avis JM, Kudisch JD, Fortunato VJ (2002) Examining the incremental validity and adverse impact of cognitive ability and conscientiousness on job performance. J. Bus. Psych. 17:87–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailyn L (2006) Breaking the Mold: Redesigning Work for Productive and Satisfying Lives (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK (1991) The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta–analysis. Personality Psych. 44(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK, Strauss JP (1993) Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. J. Appl. Psych. 78(5):715–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron JM, Bishop J, Dunkelberg WC (1985) Employer search: The interviewing and hiring of new employees. Rev. Econom. Statist. 67:43–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF (1982) A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psych. Bull. 91(1):3–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behling O (1998) Employee selection: Will intelligence and conscientiousness do the job? Acad. Management Perspective 12(1):77–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson A, Li D, Shue K (2019) Promotions and the Peter principle. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):2085–2134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein BO, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2019) Psychological constellations assessed at age 13 predict distinct forms of eminence 35 years later. Psych. Sci. 30(3):444–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Keller JR (2014) Within or without? How firms combine internal and external labor markets to fill jobs. Acad. Management J. 57(4):1035–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bills DB (1992) The mutability of educational credentials as hiring criteria: How employers evaluate atypically highly credentialed job candidates. Sociol. Work Occupation 19(1):79–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blood MR (1969) Work values and job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psych. 53(6):456–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bretz RD, Rynes SL, Gerhart B (1993) Recruiter perceptions of applicant fit: Implications for individual career preparation and job search behavior. J. Vocation Behav. 43:310–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown CM, Troy NS, Jobson KR, Link JK (2018) Contextual and personal determinants of preferring success attributed to natural talent or striving. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 78:134–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buehler R, Griffin D, Ross M (1994) Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(3):366–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Judge TA (1997) Interviewers’ perceptions of person–organization fit and organizational selection decisions. J. Appl. Psych. 82:546–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Managers’ political beliefs and gender inequality among subordinates: Does his ideology matter more than hers? Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):287–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll JB (1992) Cognitive abilities: The state of the art. Psych. Sci. 3(5):266–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter NT, Dalal DK, Boyce AS, O’Connell MS, Kung MC, Delgado KM (2014) Uncovering curvilinear relationships between conscientiousness and job performance: How theoretically appropriate measurement makes an empirical difference. J. Appl. Psych. 99(4):564–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA (1989) Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person–organization fit. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook MF, McClelland DC, Spence LM Jr (1992) The AMA Handbook for Employee Recruitment and Retention (AMACOM, New York).Google Scholar
• Digman JM (1990) Personality structure: Emergence of the five–factor model. Annu. Rev. Psych. 41:417–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Stasio VD (2017) Who is ahead in the labor queue? Institutions’ and employers’ perspective on overeducation, undereducation, and horizontal mismatches. Sociol. Edu. 90(2):109–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dries N (2013) The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resources Management Rev. 23(4):272–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duckworth AL, Peterson C, Matthews MD, Kelly DR (2007) Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(6):1087–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duckworth AL, Kirby TA, Tsukayama E, Berstein H, Ericsson KA (2011) Deliberate practice spells success: Why grittier competitors triumph at the National Spelling Bee. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 2(2):174–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duckworth AL, Quirk A, Gallop R, Hoyle RH, Kelly DR, Matthews MD (2019) Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of success. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 116:23499–23504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunnette MD (1966) Personnel Selection and Placement (Wadsworth Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
• Dweck CS, Leggett EL (1988) A social–cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psych. Rev. 95(2):256–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckardt R, Skaggs BC, Lepak DP (2018) An examination of the firm–level performance impact of cluster hiring in knowledge–intensive firms. Acad. Management J. 61(3):919–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericsson AK, Charness N (1994) Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. Amer. Psych. 49(8):725–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericsson AK, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psych. Rev. 100(3):363–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Castilla EJ, Moore P (2000) Social capital at work: Networks and employment at a phone center. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(5):1288–1356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furnham A (1984) The Protestant work ethic: A review of the psychological literature. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 14(1):87–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallardo–Gallardo E, Dries N, González–Cruz TF (2013) What is the meaning of “talent” in the world of work? Human Resources Management Rev. 23(4):290–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galperin RV, Hahl O, Sterling AD, Guo J (2020) Too good to hire? Capability and inferences about commitment in labor markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):275–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner TM (2005) Interfirm competition for human resources: Evidence from the software industry. Acad. Management J. 48(2):237–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilmore DC, Ferris GR (1989) The effects of applicant impression management tactics on interviewer judgments. J. Management 15(4):557–564.Google Scholar
• Glick P, Zion C, Nelson C (1988) What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 55(2):178–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg LR (1993) The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Amer. Psych. 48(1):26–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1977) The Protestant work ethic and reactions to negative performance evaluations on a laboratory task. J. Appl. Psych. 62(6):682–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee LE (2009) Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):740–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall DT (2002) Careers in and out Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DZ, Meinz EJ (2011) Limits on the predictive power of domain–specific experience and knowledge in skilled performance. Current Directives Psych. Sci. 20(5):275–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis (The Guiford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Helzer EG, Dunning D (2012) Why and when peer prediction is superior to self-prediction: The weight given to future aspiration vs. past achievement. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 103(1):38–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins CA, Judge TA (2004) The effect of applicant influence tactics on recruiter perceptions of fit and hiring recommendations: A field study. J. Appl. Psych. 89(4):622–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe MJ, Davidson JW, Sloboda JA (1998) Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behav. Brain Sci. 21:399–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huffcutt AI, Conway JM, Stone NJ (2001) Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. J. Appl. Psych. 86(5):897–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunter JE (1986) Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitude, job knowledge, and job performance. J. Vocational Behav. 29(3):340–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janoff-Bulman R, Wade MB (1996) The dilemma of self-advocacy for women: Another case of blaming the victim? J. Soc. Clinical Psych. 15(2):143–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones DA, Willness CR, Madey S (2014) Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal–based mechanisms. Acad. Management J. 57(2):383–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones HB Jr (1997) The protestant ethic: Weber’s model and the empirical literature. Human Relations 50:757–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juvonen J, Murdock TB (1995) Grade–level differences in the social value of effort: Implications for self–presentation tactics of early adolescents. Child Development 66(6):1694–1705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang SK, DeCelles KA, Tilcsik A, Jun S (2016) Whitened résumés: Race and self–presentation in the labor market. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):469–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kell HJ, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2013) Who rises to the top? Early indicators. Psych. Sci. 24(5):648–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller JR (2018) Posting and Slotting: How hiring processes shape the quality of hire and compensation in internal labor markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):848–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kidron A (1978) Work values and organizational commitment. Acad. Management J. 21(2):239–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinicki AJ, Lockwood CA, Hom PW, Griffeth RW (1990) Interviewer predictions of applicant qualifications and interviewer validity: Aggregate and individual analyses. J. Appl. Psych. 75:477–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koehler DJ, Poon CSK (2006) Self-predictions overweight strength of current intentions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42(4):517–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koppman S (2016) Different like me: Why cultural omnivores get creative jobs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(2):291–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL (2000) Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters’ perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Personality Psych. 53:643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Barrick MR, Franke M (2002) Applicant impression management: Dispositional influences and consequences for recruiter perceptions of fit and similarity. J. Management 28(1):27–46.Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Gilovich T (2004) Actions, intentions, and self-assessment: The road to self-enhancement is paved with good intentions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(3):328–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leary MR, Kowalski RM (1990) Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psych. Bull. 107(1):34–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Pitesa M, Pillutla M, Thau S (2015) When beauty helps and when it hurts: An organizational context model of attractiveness discrimination in selection decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 128:15–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung FF, Kim S, Tse CH (2020) Highlighting effort vs. talent in service employee performance: Customer attributions and responses. J. Marketing 84:106–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung MD (2014) Dilettante or renaissance person? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):136–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RE, Heckman RJ (2006) Talent management: A critical review. Human Resources Management Rev. 16(2):139–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockhart KL, Keil FC, Aw J (2013) A bias for the natural? Children’s beliefs about traits acquired through effort, bribes, or medicine. Developmental Psych. 49(9):1669–1682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lubinski D, Benbow CP, Kell HJ (2014) Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psych. Sci. 25(12):2217–2232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lubinski D, Benbow CP, Webb RM, Bleske-Rechek A (2006) Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psych. Sci. 17(3):194–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lubinski D, Webb RM, Morelock MJ, Benbow CP (2001) Top 1 in 10,000: A 10–year follow–up of the profoundly gifted. J. Appl. Psych. 86(4):718–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macnamara BN, Hambrick DZ, Oswald FL (2014) Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta–analysis. Psych. Sci. 25(8):1608–1618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macnamara BN, Moreau D, Hambrick DZ (2016) The relationship between deliberate practice and performance in sports: A meta–analysis. Perspective Psych. Sci. 11(3):333–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makel MC, Kell HJ, Lubinski D, Putallaz M, Benbow CP (2016) When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psych. Sci. 27(7):1004–1018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus H (1983) Self‐knowledge: An expanded view. J. Personality 51(3):543–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus H, Nurius P (1986) Possible selves. Amer. Psych. 41(9):954–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT (1987) Validation of the five–factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(1):81–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merluzzi J, Phillips DJ (2016) The specialist discount: Negative returns for MBAs with focused profiles in investment banking. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61:87–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merrens MR, Garrett JB (1975) The Protestant Ethic Scale as a predictor of repetitive work performance. J. Appl. Psych. 60(1):125–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers MC, Van Woerkom M, Dries N (2013) Talent—Innate or acquired? Theoretical considerations and their implications for talent management. Human Resources Management Rev. 23(4):305–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mirels HL, Garrett JB (1971) The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. J. Consulting Clinical Psych. 36(1):40–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mosing MA, Madison G, Pedersen NL, Kuja–Halkola R, Ullén F (2014) Practice does not make perfect: No casual effect of music practice on music ability. Psych. Sci. 25(9):1795–1803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mount MK, Barrick MR, Strauss JP (1999) The joint relationship of conscientiousness and ability with performance: Test of the interaction hypothesis. J. Management 25(5):707–721.Google Scholar
• Ng ESW, Burke RJ, Fiksenbaum L (2008) Career choice in management: Findings from US MBA students. Career Developement Internat. 13(4):346–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peter LJ, Hull R (1969) The Peter Principle (William Morrow, New York).Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A (2018) Train them to retain them: Work readiness and the retention of first–time women workers in India. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):879–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Drazin R (2002) Overcoming resource constraints on product innovation by recruiting talent from rivals: A study of the mutual fund industry, 1986–1994. Acad. Management J. 45(3):491–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ree MJ, Earles JA, Teachout MS (1994) Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. J. Appl. Psych. 79(4):518–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renzulli JS (1978) What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan 60(3):180–184.Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2011) Ivies, extracurriculars, and exclusion: Elite employers’ use of educational credentials. Res. Soc. Stratification Mobility 29(1):71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2012) Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(6):999–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robertson KF, Smeets S, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2010) Beyond the threshold hypothesis: Even among the gifted and top math/science graduate students, cognitive abilities, vocational interests, and lifestyle preferences matter for career choice, performance, and persistence. Current Directives Psych. Sci. 19(6):346–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA (1998) Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter stereotypical impression management. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(3):629–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruthsatz J, Ruthsatz K, Stephens KR (2014) Putting practice into perspective: Child prodigies as evidence of innate talent. Intelligence 45:60–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruthsatz J, Detterman D, Griscom WS, Cirullo BA (2008) Becoming an expert in the musical domain: It takes more than just practice. Intelligence 36(4):330–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rynes S, Gerhart B (1990) Interviewer assessments of applicant fit: An exploratory investigation. Personality Psych. 43(1):13–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt FL, Hunter JE (1992) Development of a causal model of processes determining job performance. Current Directives Psych. Sci. 1(3):89–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt FL, Hunter JE (1998) The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psych. Bull. 124(2):262–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt FL, Hunter JE, Outerbridge AN (1986) Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 71(3):432–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegle D, Rubenstein LDV, Pollard E, Romey E (2010) Exploring the relationship of college freshmen honors students’ effort and ability attribution, interest, and implicit theory of intelligence with perceived ability. Gifted Child Quart. 54(2):92–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silzer RF, Church AH (2009) The pearls and perils of identifying potential. Industrial Organ. Psych. 2(4):377–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silzer RF, Church AH (2010) Identifying and assessing high-potential talent. Current organizational practices. Silzer RF, Dowell BE, eds. Strategy-Driven Talent Management: A Leadership Imperative (JosseyBass, San Francisco, CA), 213–279.Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (2001) Talent development as a multidimensional, multiplicative, and dynamic process. Current Directives Psych. Sci. 10(2):39–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spearman C (1904) ‘General intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured. Amer. J. Psych. 15(2):201–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence AM (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stross RE (1996) Microsoft’s big advantage: Hiring only the supersmart. Fortune 134:159–162.Google Scholar
• Sullivan SE, Baruch Y (2009) Advances in career theory and research: A critical review and agenda for future exploration. J. Management 35(6):1542–1571.Google Scholar
• Tansley C (2011) What do we mean by the term “talent” in talent management? Industry Commercial Training 43(5):266–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorne K, Pellant A (2006) The Essential Guide to Managing Talent: How Top Companies Recruit, Train and Retain the Best Employees (Kogan Page, London).Google Scholar
• Tsay CJ (2016) Privileging naturals over strivers: The costs of the naturalness bias. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 42(1):40–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsay CJ, Banaji MR (2011) Naturals and strivers: Preferences and beliefs about sources of achievement. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(2):460–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot E, Grimland S (2008) Values and career choice at the beginning of the MBA educational process. Career Development Internat. 13(4):333–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Baeyer CL, Sherk DL, Zanna MP (1981) Impression management in the job interview: When the female applicant meets the male (chauvinist) interviewer. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 7(1):45–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wanous JP (1974) Individual differences and reactions to job characteristics. J. Appl. Psych. 59(5):616–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M (1958) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (T. Parsons Trans, NY).Google Scholar
• Weiss A (1995) Human capital vs. signalling explanations of wages. J. Econom. Perspective 9(4):133–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams EF, Gilovich T (2008) Conceptions of the self and others across time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(8):1037–1046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams EF, Gilovich T, Dunning D (2012) Being all that you can be: The weighting of potential in assessments of self and others. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 38(2):143–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams JC, Blair‐Loy M, Berdahl JL (2013) Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. J. Soc. Issues 69(2):209–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley K, Fishbach A (2018) Underestimating the importance of expressing intrinsic motivation in job interviews. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 148:1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar