The Fundamental Recruitment Error: Candidate-Recruiter Discrepancy in Their Relative Valuation of Innate Talent vs. Hard Work

Xianchi Dai
Xianchi Dai
[email protected]
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9758-4679
Department of Marketing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China;
Search for more papers by this author
,
Kao Si
Corresponding Author
Kao Si
[email protected]
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8251-3771
Department of Management and Marketing, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China
Search for more papers by this author

Department of Marketing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China;

Search for more papers by this author

Kao Si

Corresponding Author

Kao Si

[email protected]

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8251-3771

Department of Management and Marketing, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China

Search for more papers by this author

Published Online:28 Mar 2023https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1667

Supplemental Material

orsc.2023.1667.sm1.pdf

Volume 35, Issue 1

January-February 2024

Pages 1-386, C2-C3

Article Information

Supplemental Material

Metrics

Information

Received:July 05, 2022
Accepted:February 11, 2023
Published Online:March 28, 2023

Cite as

Xianchi Dai, Kao Si (2023) The Fundamental Recruitment Error: Candidate-Recruiter Discrepancy in Their Relative Valuation of Innate Talent vs. Hard Work. Organization Science 35(1):215-231.

https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1667

Keywords

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ayelet Fishbach for valuable feedback on an earlier version of this paper. The two authors contributed equally to this paper.

PDF download

Available Issues

Available Issues

Available Issues

Available Issues

Available Issues

The Fundamental Recruitment Error: Candidate-Recruiter Discrepancy in Their Relative Valuation of Innate Talent vs. Hard Work

Supplemental Material

Volume 35, Issue 1

Article Information

Supplemental Material

Metrics

Information

Cite as

Keywords

Sign Up for INFORMS Publications Updates and News