Migration and Global Network Formation: Evidence from Female Scientists in Developing Countries

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1683

References

  • Abraham M (2020) Gender-role incongruity and audience-based gender bias: An examination of networking among entrepreneurs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):151–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adams JD, Black GC, Clemmons JR, Stephan PE (2005) Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981–1999. Res. Policy 34(3):259–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Kapur D, McHale J, Oettl A (2011) Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation. J. Urban Econom. 69(1):43–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Ganguli I, Zivin JG (2017) The mobility of elite life scientists: Professional and personal determinants. Res. Policy 46(3):573–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balachandran S, Hernandez E (2021) Mi casa es tu casa: Immigrant entrepreneurs as pathways to foreign venture capital investments. Strategic Management J. 42(11):2047–2083.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Brady T, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Hollenberg A, Lakhan KR (2017) A field experiment on search costs and the formation of scientific collaborations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(4):565–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brands RA, Kilduff M (2014) Just like a woman? Effects of gender-biased perceptions of friendship network brokerage on attributions and performance. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1530–1548.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brands RA, Mehra A (2019) Gender, brokerage, and performance: A construal approach. Acad. Management J. 62(1):196–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass DJ (1985) Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Acad. Management J. 28(2):327–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (1998) The gender of social capital. Rationality Soc. 10(1):5–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callaway B, Pedro HC Sant’Anna (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Google Scholar
  • Catalini C (2018) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chai S, Freeman RB (2019) Temporary colocation and collaborative discovery: Who confers at conferences. Strategic Management J. 40(13):2138–2164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P (2016) Return migration and geography of innovation in MNEs: A natural experiment of knowledge production by local workers reporting to return migrants. J. Econom. Geogr. 16(3):585–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P, Kim DY (2019) The ethnic migrant inventor effect: Codification and recombination of knowledge across borders. Strategic Management J. 40(2):203–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coffman KB (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Q. J. Econom. 129(4):1625–1660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Curran SR, Garip F, Chung CY, Tangchonlatip K (2005) Gendered migrant social capital: Evidence from Thailand. Soc. Forces. 84(1):225–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Chaisemartin C, d’Haultfoeuille X (2020) Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2964–2996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumont JC, Martin JP, Spielvogel G (2007) Women on the move: The neglected gender dimension of the brain drain.Google Scholar
  • Eden L, Gupta SF (2017) Culture and context matter: Gender in international business and management. Cross Cult. Strategic Management 24(2):194–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N (2018) Gender stereotypes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 69:275–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely RJ (1995) The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Acad. Management J. 38(3):589–634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Etzkowitz H, Carol K, Brian U (2000) Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Fafchamps M, Van der Leij MJ, Goyal S (2010) Matching and network effects. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 8(1):203–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernandez R (2007) Women, work and culture. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(2–3):305–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernández-Zubieta A, Geuna A, Lawson C (2016) Productivity pay-offs from academic mobility: Should I stay or should I go? Indust. Corp. Change 25(1):91–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fortin N (2005) Gender role attitudes and the labour market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxf. Rev. Econom. Policy 21:416–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fry C (2023) Bridging the gap: Evidence from the return migration of African scientists. Organ. Sci. 34(1):404–432.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Funk K (2019) If the shoe fits: Gender role congruity and evaluations of public managers. J. Behav. Public Admin. 2(1).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ganguli I (2015) Immigration and ideas: What did Russian scientists “bring” to the United States? J. Labor Econom. 33(S1):S257–S288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gaule P, Piacentini M (2018) An advisor like me? Advisor gender and post-graduate careers in science. Research Policy 47(4):805–813.Google Scholar
  • Ginther DK, Kahn S (2009) “Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001,” Chapter 5 in Richard B. Freeman and Daniel L. Goroff (ed.), Science and Engineering Careers in the United States: An Analysis of Markets and Employment (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 163–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Imbens GW (2013) Social networks and the identification of peer effects. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 31(3):253–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood MJ (1969) The determinants of labor migration in Egypt. J. Reg. Sci. 9(2):283–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagan JM (1998) Social networks, gender, and immigrant incorporation: Resources and constraints. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63(1):55–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hernandez E (2014) Finding a home away from home: Effects of immigrants on firms’ foreign location choice and performance. Admin. Sci. Q. 59(1):73–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G (1980) Culture and organizations. Int. Stud. Manage. Organ. 10(4):15–41.Google Scholar
  • Hoisl K (2007) “Tracing mobile inventors—The causality between inventor mobility and inventor productivity.” A study of inventors (Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden, Germany), 65–119.Google Scholar
  • Ibarra H (1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Adm. Sci. Quart. 37(3):422–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H (1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Acad. Management Rev. 18(1):56–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson MO, Wolinsky A (1996) A strategic model of social and economic networks. J. Econom. Theory 71(1):44–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobs JA (2004) Presidential address: The faculty time divide. Sociological Forum. Vol. 19. No. 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  • Kahn S, MacGarvie M (2016) Do return requirements increase international knowledge diffusion? Evidence from the Fulbright program. Res. Policy. 45(6):1304–1322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter RM (1977) Some effects of proportions on group life. In: The Gender Gap in Psychotherapy. (Springer, Boston, MA), 53–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr WR (2008) Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion. Rev. Econ. Stat. 90(3):518–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin SG, Stephan PE (1991) Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(1):114–132.Google Scholar
  • Lockheed, Marlaine E (1985) Women, girls, and computers: A first look at the evidence. Sex Roles 13.3-4 115-122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econ. Stud. 60(3):531–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Munshi K (2020) Social networks and migration. Annu. Rev. Econom. 12:503–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nanda R, Khanna T (2010) Diasporas and domestic entrepreneurs: Evidence from the Indian software industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy 19(4):991–1012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Science Foundation (NSF) (2004a) Gender Differences in the Careers of Academic Scientists and Engineers. (NSF 04-323, Project Officer, Alan I. Rapoport. Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
  • National Science Foundation (NSF) (2004b) Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Sciences and Engineering (NSF 00-327, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
  • Newman MEJ (2001) The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(2):404–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolaou N, Kilduff M (2023) Empowerment mitigates gender differences in tertius iungens brokering. Organ. Sci.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oettl A, Agrawal A (2008) International labor mobility and knowledge flow externalities. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(8):1242–1260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfau‐Effinger B (2012) Women’s employment in the institutional and cultural context. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy. 32(9/10):530–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quadrio-Curzio A, Blowers T, Thomson J (2020) Women, science and development: The leading role of OWSD. Econom. Polit. 37:1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins BR, Cotton JL (1993) Gender and willingness to mentor in organizations. J. Management 19(1):97–111.Google Scholar
  • Rudman LA, Glick P (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues. 57(4):743–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian AL (2002) Silicon Valley’s new immigrant high-growth entrepreneurs. Econom. Dev. Q. 16(1):20–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian AL (2005) From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Stud. Comp. Internat. Dev. 40(2):35–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian AL (2006) International Mobility of Engineers and the Rise of Entrepreneurship in the Periphery. WIDER Research Paper No. 2006/142.Google Scholar
  • Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations (Sage, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sczesny S, Bosak J, Neff D, Schyns B (2004) Gender stereotypes and the attribution of leadership traits: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles 51(11):631–645.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shukla P, Cantwell J (2018) Migrants and multinational firms: The role of institutional affinity and connectedness in FDI. J. World Business 53(6):835–849.Google Scholar
  • Smith RA (2002) Race, gender, and authority in the workplace: Theory and research. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28(1):509–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Adm. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart, Toby E, Olav Sorenson (2007) Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(3‐4):211–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vasudeva G, Zaheer A, Hernandez E (2013) The embeddedness of networks: Institutions, structural holes, and innovativeness in the fuel cell industry. Organ. Sci. 24(3):645–663.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner CS, Whetsell TA, Leydesdorff L (2017) Growth of international collaboration in science: Revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics 110(3):1633–1652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang D (2015) Activating cross-border brokerage: Interorganizational knowledge transfer through skilled return migration. Adm. Sci. Quart. 60(1):133–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science. 316(5827):1036–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao Z, Tsui AS (2007) When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Adm. Sci. Quart. 52(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yount KM (2005) Women’s family power and gender preference in Minya, Egypt. J. Marriage Fam. 67:410–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.