Inverted Apprenticeship: How Senior Occupational Members Develop Practical Expertise and Preserve Their Position When New Technologies Arrive

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1688

References

  • Abbott AD (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M, Holm AL (2021) Translating expertise across work contexts: US puppeteers move from stage to screen. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(2):310–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M, Chan CK, DiBenigno J (2016) Three lenses on occupations and professions in organizations: Becoming, doing, and relating. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):183–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anthony C (2018) To question or accept? How status differences influence responses to new epistemic technologies in knowledge work. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):661–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anthony C (2021) When knowledge work and analytical technologies collide: The practices and consequences of black boxing algorithmic technologies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):1173–1212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anthony C, Tripsas M (2016) Innovation and organizational identity. Pratt M, Schultz M, Ashforth B, Ravasi D, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 417–435.Google Scholar
  • Anthony C, Bechky BA, Fayard AL (2023) “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a system view to explore the future of work. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print January 9, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1651.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anthony C, Nelson AJ, Tripsas M (2016) “Who are you?… I really wanna know”: Product meaning and competitive positioning in the nascent synthesizer industry. Statist. Sci. 1(3):163–183.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey DE, Barley SR (2011) Teaching-learning ecologies: Mapping the environment to structure through action. Organ. Sci. 22(1):262–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey DE, Leonardi PM (2015) Technology Choices: Why Occupations Differ in Their Embrace of New Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1485–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1988) Technology, power, and the social organization of work: Toward a pragmatic theory of skilling and deskilling. Res. Sociol. Organ. 6:33–80.Google Scholar
  • Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1996) Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR, Kunda G (1992) Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):363–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beane M (2019) Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):87–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beane M (2023) Resourcing a technological portfolio: How Fairtown Hospital preserved results while degrading its older surgical robot. Admin. Sci. Quart. Forthcoming. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00018392231174450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beane M, Orlikowski WJ (2015) What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1553–1573.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2020) Evaluative spillovers from technological change: The effects of “DNA envy” on occupational practices in forensic science. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):606–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2021) Blood, Powder, and Residue: How Crime Labs Translate Evidence into Proof (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Bechky BA, O’Mahony S (2016) Leveraging comparative field data for theory generation. Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods (Routledge, New York), 168–176.Google Scholar
  • Becker HS (1972) A school is a lousy place to learn anything in. Amer. Behav. Sci. 16(1):85–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker HS, Geer B, Hughes EC, Strauss AL (1976) Boys in White (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Bendersky C, Hays NA (2012) Status conflict in groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2):323–340.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, King JL (2016) Routines as shock absorbers during organizational transformation: Integration, control, and NASA’s enterprise information system. Organ. Sci. 27(3):551–572.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beunza D, Stark D (2004) Tools of the trade: The socio-technology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room. Industrial Corporate Change 13(2):369–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blasi GL (1995) What lawyers know: Lawyering expertise, cognitive science, and the functions of theory. J. Legal Ed. 45:313.Google Scholar
  • Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brint S (1994) In an Age of Experts, 1st ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2):198–213.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bulliet RW (1990) The Camel and the Wheel (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson JS, Reagans RE (2011) Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1182–1194.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chan CK, Anteby M (2016) Task segregation as a mechanism for within-job inequality: Women and men of the transportation security administration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(2):184–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan CK, Hedden LN (2021) The role of discernment and modulation in enacting occupational values: How career advising professionals navigate tensions with clients. Acad. Management J. 66(1):276–305.Google Scholar
  • Choi Y, Thummadi BV, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2011) Analyzing complex design processes: The effects of task automation and integration on process structure in microprocessor design. Proc. Eur. Des. Sci. Sympos. (Berlin, Heidelberg), 38–49.Google Scholar
  • Chown J (2020) Financial incentives and professionals’ work tasks: The moderating effects of jurisdictional dominance and prominence. Organ. Sci. 31(4):887–908.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen LE (2013) Assembling jobs: A model of how tasks are bundled into and across jobs. Organ. Sci. 24(2):432–454.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen LE (2016) Jobs as Gordian knots: A new perspective linking individuals, tasks, organizations and institutions. Cohen LE, Burton MD, Lounsbury M, eds. The Structuring of Work in Organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 47 (Emerald Insight, Bingley, UK), 25–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins HM (2017) Interactional expertise and embodiment. Sandberg J, Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. Skillful Performance: Enacting Capabilities, Knowledge, Competence, and Expertise in Organizations, vol. 7 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 125–146.Google Scholar
  • Collins HM, Evans R (2002) The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Soc. Stud. Sci. 32(2):235–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Contu A, Willmott H (2003) Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organ. Sci. 14(3):283–296.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Decker MR, Bronson NW, Greenberg CC, Dolan JP, Kent KC, Hunter JG (2013) The general surgery job market: Analysis of current demand for general surgeons and their specialized skills. J. Amer. College Surgeons 217(6):1133–1139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiBenigno J (2020) Rapid relationality: How peripheral experts build a foundation for influence with line managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):20–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dill MJ, Salsberg ES (2008) The Complexities of Physician Supply and Demand: Projections Through 2025 (Association of American Medical Colleges).Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D, Dunne DD (2012) Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1467–1484.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doyle J (2008) The spectre of the scalpel: The historical role of surgery and anatomy in conceptions of embodiment. Body Soc. 14(1):9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein S (1995) The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Sci. Tech. Human Values 20(4):408–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ericsson KA (2002) Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. Ferrari M, ed. The Pursuit of Excellence Through Education (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ), 21–55.Google Scholar
  • Eyal G (2013) For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):863–907.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang R, Gulig S, Meeks W, Goldman H, Donat S, Anger J, Shore N, et al. (2016) Projecting the supply of practicing urologists in the United States through 2030. Proc. 85th Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  • Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fayard AL, Gkeredakis E, Levina N (2016) Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):302–323.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Freidson E (1994) Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Gehman J, Glaser VL, Eisenhardt KM, Gioia D, Langley A, Corley KG (2018) Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. J. Management Inquiry 27(3):284–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goody E (1989) Learning and the division of labor. Coy M, ed. Apprenticeship: From Theory to Method and Back Again (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY), 233–256.Google Scholar
  • Gorman EH, Sandefur RL (2011) “Golden age,” quiescence, and revival: How the sociology of professions became the study of knowledge-based work. Work Occupation 38(3):275–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harper DA (1987) Working Knowledge: Skill and Community in a Small Shop (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville J, Nelson AJ, Earle AG, Haack JA, Young DM (2017) “If chemists don’t do it, who is going to?” Peer-driven occupational change and the emergence of green chemistry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):524–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huising R (2014) The erosion of expert control through censure episodes. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1633–1661.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huising R (2015) To hive or to hold? Producing professional authority through scut work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):263–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchins E (1995a) Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchins E (1995b) How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Sci. 19(3):265–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahl SJ, King BG, Liegel G (2016) Occupational survival through field-level task integration: Systems men, production planners, and the computer, 1940s–1990s. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1084–1107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Milde J, Cowan RS (2017) Symbiont practices in boundary spanning: Bridging the cognitive and political divides in interdisciplinary research. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1387–1414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller EF (1983) A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock (WH Freeman & Co, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2011) Hot lights and cold steel: Cultural and political toolkits for practice change in surgery. Organ. Sci. 22(2):482–502.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2014) Brokerage professions and implementing reform in an age of experts. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(5):912–941.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC, Myers JE, Gainer L, Singer SJ (2021) Moving violations: Pairing an illegitimate learning hierarchy with trainee status mobility for acquiring new skills when traditional expertise erodes. Organ. Sci. 32(1):181–209.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knorr Cetina KD (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lamb R, Davidson E (2005) Information and communication technology challenges to scientific professional identity. Inform. Soc. 21(1):1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lathan SR (2010) Caroline Hampton Halsted: The first to use rubber gloves in the operating room. Proc. Baylor University Medical Center 23(4):389–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2007) Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organ. Sci. 18(5):813–831.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2011) Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organ. Sci. 22(2):347–369.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N, Orlikowski WJ (2009) Understanding shifting power relations within and across organizations: A critical genre analysis. Acad. Management J. Archives 52(4):672–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(2):335–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin-Caughey A (2021) What’s in an occupation? Investigating within-occupation variation and gender segregation using job titles and task descriptions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(5):960–999.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazmanian M (2013) Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogeneous practices. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1225–1250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (SAGE).Google Scholar
  • Nelson AJ, Irwin J (2014) “Defining what we do—All over again”: Occupational identity, technological change, and the librarian/Internet-search relationship. Acad. Management J. 57(3):892–928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson AJ, Anthony C, Tripsas M (2023) “If I Could Turn Back Time”: Occupational dynamics, technology trajectories, and the reemergence of the analog music synthesizer. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(2):551–599.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolini D, Pyrko I, Omidvar O, Spanellis A (2022) Understanding communities of practice: Taking stock and moving forward. Acad. Management Ann. 16(2):680–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Mahony S, Bechky BA (2006) Stretchwork: Managing the career progression paradox in external labor markets. Acad. Management J. 49(5):918–941.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC (1994) Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems TOIS 12(2):174–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oshinsky DM (2005) Polio: An American Story (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Østerlund C, Carlile P (2005) Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. Inform. Soc. 21(2):91–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Owens DA, Sutton RI (2001) Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. Groups Work Theory Res. 14:299–316.Google Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J (2001) Managing laboratory work through skepticism: Processes of evaluation and control. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(3):427–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pachidi S, Berends H, Faraj S, Huysman M (2021) Make way for the algorithms: Symbolic actions and change in a regime of knowing. Organ. Sci. 32(1):18–41.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Stud. Sci. 14(3):399–441.Google Scholar
  • Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB (2006) Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad. Management J. 49(2):235–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J (2006) Limits to communities of practice. J. Management Stud. 43(3):623–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose M (1999) “Our hands will know”: The development of tactile diagnostic skill—Teaching, learning, and situated cognition in a physical therapy program. Anthropology Ed. Quart. 30(2):133–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandefur RL (2015) Elements of professional expertise: Understanding relational and substantive expertise through lawyers’ impact. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):909–933.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schlich T (2013) Farmer to industrialist: Lister’s antisepsis and the making of modern surgery in Germany. Notes Rec. Royal Soc. 67(3):245–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schlich T (2015) Why were surgical gloves not used earlier? Lancet 386(10000):1234–1235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small ML (2009) How many cases do I need? Ethnography 10(1):5–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Susskind R, Susskind D (2015) The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treem JW, Leonardi PM (2016) Expertise, Communication, and Organizing (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treem JW, Leonardi PM (2017) Recognizing expertise: Factors promoting congruity between individuals’ perceptions of their own expertise and the perceptions of their coworkers. Comm. Res. 44(2):198–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company”. Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (University of California Press).Google Scholar
  • Weick KE (1990) Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in New Technologies (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(4):628–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilmers N (2020) Job turf or variety: Task structure as a source of organizational inequality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(4):1018–1057.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter A (2000) Mesmerized: Powers of Mind in Victorian Britain (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Yin RK (2017) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  • Zetka JR (2001) Occupational divisions of labor and their technology politics: The case of surgical scopes and gastrointestinal medicine. Soc. Forces 79(4):1495–1520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zetka JR (2003) Surgeons and the Scope (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.