Counter-Activism Against Ideological Opponents: Evidence Based on the Competitive Dynamics of Corporate Engagement in Advocacy Giving

References

• Abramowitz AI, Webster S (2016) The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of US elections in the 21st century. Electoral Stud. 41:12–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ballesteros L, Useem M, Wry T (2017) Masters of disasters? An empirical analysis of how societies benefit from corporate disaster aid. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1682–1708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML, Henriques I, Husted BW (2020) Beyond good intentions: Designing CSR initiatives for greater social impact. J. Management 46(6):937–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Fisman R, Trebbi F (2020) Tax-exempt lobbying: Corporate philanthropy as a tool for political influence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(7):2065–2102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Briscoe F (2010) The dynamics of interorganizational careers. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1034–1053.Link, Google Scholar
• Blee KM, Creasap KA (2010) Conservative and right-wing movements. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:269–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonardi JP, Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2005) The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):397–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonica A (2013) Database on ideology, money in politics, and elections: Public version 1.0 [computer file]. Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Bundy J, Vogel RM, Zachary MA (2018) Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders. Strategic Management J. 39(2):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2021) The demotivating effects of communicating a social-political stance: Field experimental evidence from an online labor market platform. Management Sci. 67(2):1004–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023) American time use survey—2022 results. Technical Report USDL-23-1364, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Toffel MW (2019) Assessing the impact of CEO activism. Organ. Environ. 32(2):159–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Children’s Defense Fund (2023) Keeping our covenant with children. Accessed November 5, 2024, https://www.childrensdefense.org/blog/keeping-our-covenant-with-children/.Google Scholar
• Chin MK, Hambrick DC, Treviño LK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(2):197–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook T (2015) Tim Cook: Pro-discrimination ‘religious freedom’ laws are dangerous. Washington Post (March 29), https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/pro-discrimination-religious-freedom-laws-are-dangerous-to-america/2015/03/29/bdb4ce9e-d66d-11e4-ba28-f2a685dc7f89_story.html.Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM (1991) Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Acad. Management J. 34(3):517–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J (2019) The growth of climate change misinformation in US philanthropy: Evidence from natural language processing. Environ. Res. Lett. 14(3):034013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkel EJ, Bail CA, Cikara M, Ditto PH, Iyengar S, Klar S, Mason L, et al. (2020) Political sectarianism in America. Science 370(6516):533–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2015) Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Sci. 61(11):2549–2568.Link, Google Scholar
• Foundation Center (2005) Social justice grantmaking I. Report, Foundation Center, New York.Google Scholar
• Foundation Center (2009) Social justice grantmaking II. Report, Foundation Center, New York.Google Scholar
• Frake J, Hurst R, Kagan M (2023) Office parties: Partisan sorting in the United States labor market. Preprint, submitted December 1, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4639165.Google Scholar
• Garriga E, Melé D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. J. Bus. Ethics 53:51–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldman D (2021) Burger King trolls Chick-fil-A with LGBTQ donations. CNN Business (June 7), https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/07/business/burger-king-chick-fil-a-lgbt/index.html.Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis (Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Briscoe F (2020) Organizational political ideology and corporate openness to social activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):524–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Briscoe F, Hambrick DC (2017) Red, blue, and purple firms: Organizational political ideology and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management J. 38(5):1018–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guynn J (2024) The impact of Trump and Vance on DEI initiatives in the workplace. USA Today (July 17), https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/07/17/dei-workplace-trump-vance-impact/74432633007/.Google Scholar
• Hall MA, Colombo JD (1991) The charitable status of nonprofit hospitals: Toward a donative theory of tax exemption. Washington Law Rev. 66:307.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Wowak AJ (2021) CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model. Acad. Management Rev. 46(1):33–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen WL, Mitchell NJ, Drope JM (2005) The logic of private and collective action. Amer. J. Pol. Sci. 49(1):150–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou Y, Poliquin CW (2023) The effects of CEO activism: Partisan consumer behavior and its duration. Strategic Management J. 44(3):672–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurst R (2023) Countervailing claims: Pro-diversity responses to stigma by association following the Unite the Right rally. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(4):1094–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irrera A, DiNapoli J, Moise I (2020) Take a stance or tiptoe away. Corporate America’s battle with social activism. Reuters (October 27), https://www.reuters.com/article/world/take-a-stance-or-tiptoe-away-corporate-america-s-battle-with-social-activism-idUSKBN27C1IQ/.Google Scholar
• Iyengar S, Lelkes Y, Levendusky M, Malhotra N, Westwood SJ (2019) The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 22:129–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacques PJ, Dunlap RE, Freeman M (2008) The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Env. Polit. 17(3):349–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost JT (2006) The end of the end of ideology. Amer. Psych. 61(7):651–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim IS (2018) LobbyView: Firm-level lobbying and congressional bills database. Unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J, Li W (2005) Applied Linear Statistical Models (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Lee MJ (2015) Walmart, Amazon, Sears, eBay to stop selling Confederate flag merchandise. CNN (June 24), https://www.cnn.com/2015/06/22/politics/confederate-flag-walmart-south-carolina/index.html.Google Scholar
• Lenway S, Schuler D, Marens R, Werner T, Green C (2022) The evolving political marketplace: Revisiting 60 years of theoretical dominance through a review of corporate political activity scholarship in Business and Society and major management journals. Bus. Soc. 61(5):1416–1470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liptak A (2014) Supreme court rejects contraceptives mandate for some corporations. New York Times (June 30), https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/01/us/hobby-lobby-case-supreme-court-contraception.html.Google Scholar
• Maks-Solomon C, Drewry JM (2021) Why do corporations engage in LGBT rights activism? LGBT employee groups as internal pressure groups. Bus. Polit. 23(1):124–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks G, Miller N (1987) Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psych. Bull. 102(1):72–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lee M (2013) Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large US firms. Strategic Management J. 34(4):483–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2016) Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1325–1341.Link, Google Scholar
• Marx M (2011) The firm strikes back: Non-compete agreements and the mobility of technical professionals. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(5):695–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mattingly JE, Berman SL (2006) Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Bus. Soc. 45(1):20–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Somaya D, Williamson IO (2012) Firm-specific, industry-specific, and occupational human capital and the sourcing of knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1311–1329.Link, Google Scholar
• McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(6):1212–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol. Quart. 52(2):155–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH (2016) Radical repertoires: The incidence and impact of corporate-sponsored social activism. Organ. Sci. 27(1):53–71.Link, Google Scholar
• McGregor J (2012) Chick-fil-A CEO Dan Cathy steps into gay-marriage debate. Washington Post (July 19), https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-leadership/post/chick-fil-a-president-dan-cathy-bites-into-gay-marriage-debate/2012/07/19/gJQACrvzvW_blog.html.Google Scholar
• McKean AE (2022) From covert action to overt activism: The evolution of corporate sociopolitical involvement. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• McKean AE, King BG (2024) When ideologies align: Progressive corporate activism and within‐firm ideological alignment. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print July 3, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melloni G, Patacconi A, Vikander N (2023) Cashing in on the culture wars? CEO activism, wokewashing, and firm value. Strategic Management J. 44(13):3098–3121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minefee I, McDonnell MH, Werner T (2021) Reexamining investor reaction to covert corporate political activity: A replication and extension of Werner (2017). Strategic Management J. 42(6):1139–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minkoff D, Agnone J (2010) Consolidating social change: The consequences of foundation funding for developing social movement infrastructures. Anheier H, Hammack D, eds. American Foundations: Roles and Contributions (Brookings Press, Washington, DC), 347–367.Google Scholar
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):853–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohliver A, Crilly D, Kaul A (2023) Corporate social counterpositioning: How attributes of social issues influence competitive response. Strategic Management J. 44(5):1199–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller AR, Pfarrer MD, Little LM (2014) A theory of collective empathy in corporate philanthropy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 39(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mutz DC, Mondak JJ (2006) The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. J. Polit. 68(1):140–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nalick M, Josefy M, Zardkoohi A, Bierman L (2016) Corporate sociopolitical involvement: A reflection of whose preferences? Acad. Management Perspect. 30(4):384–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nerkar S (2023) Some businesses make ‘woke free’ a selling point. New York Times (September 19), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/18/business/companies-conservative.html.Google Scholar
• O’brien RM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual. Quant. 41:673–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pamphile V (2022) Paradox peers: A relational approach to navigating a business–society paradox. Acad. Management J. 65(4):1274–1302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasirayi S, Fennell PB, Follmer KB (2023) # Activism: Investor reactions to corporate sociopolitical activism. Bus. Soc. 62(4):704–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2019) In a politically polarized era, sharp divides in both partisan coalitions. Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R, Glynn M (2014) Turnkey or tailored? Relational pluralism, institutional complexity, and the organizational adoption of more or less customized practices. Acad. Management J. 57(2):541–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider B (1987) The people make the place. Personnel Psych. 40(3):437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seifert B, Morris SA, Bartkus BR (2004) Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Bus. Soc. 43(2):135–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seo H, Luo J, Kaul A (2021) Giving a little to many or a lot to a few? The returns to variety in corporate philanthropy. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1734–1764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinmetz K (2017) How Lyft is capitalizing on Uber’s scandals. Time (March 28), https://time.com/4712746/lyft-interview-uber/.Google Scholar
• Surroca J, Tribó JA, Waddock S (2010) Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management J. 31(5):463–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Telford T, Mark J (2024) DEI’s evolution in the age of affirmative action. Washington Post (May 5), https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/05/05/dei-affirmative-action-rebrand-evolution/.Google Scholar
• Wilson JQ (1980) The Politics of Regulation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Wowak AJ, Busenbark JR (2024) Why do some conservative CEOs publicly support liberal causes? Organizational ideology, managerial discretion, and CEO sociopolitical activism. Organ. Sci. 35(4):1399–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Wowak AJ, Busenbark JR, Hambrick DC (2022) How do employees react when their CEO speaks out? Intra-and extra-firm implications of CEO sociopolitical activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(2):553–593.Crossref, Google Scholar