Cautious Exploitation: Learning and Search in Problems of Evaluation and Discovery

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17538

References

  • Axelrod R, Cohen MD (1999) Harnessing Complexity (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Berg JM (2022) One-hit wonders vs. hit makers: Sustaining success in creative industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(3):630–673.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown T (2009) Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation (HarperBusiness, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bush RR, Mosteller F (1955) Stochastic Models for Learning (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Ho TH (1999) Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67(4):827–874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar F (2013) An efficient frontier in organizational design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration/exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, Liu C, Maslach D (2023) Underdogs and one-hit wonders: When is overcoming adversity impressive? Management Sci. 69(9):5461–5481.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Estes W (1972) Research and theory on the learning of probabilities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 67(337):81–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth RM, Einhorn HJ (1992) Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psych. 24(1):1–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence (University of Michigan Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE, Thagard P (1989) Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keil T, Posen H, Workiewicz M (2023) Aspirations, beliefs and a new idea: Building on March’s other model of performance feedback. Academy Management Rev. 48(4):749–771.Google Scholar
  • Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (2014) Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koning R, Hasan S, Chatterji A (2022) Experimentation and start-up performance: Evidence from a/b testing. Management Sci. 68(9):6434–6453.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D, Rosenkopf L (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):797–818.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D, Kang J, Rosenkopf L (2011) Balance within and across domains: The performance implications of exploration and exploitation in alliances. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1517–1538.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee E, Puranam P (2016) The implementation imperative: Why one should implement even imperfect strategies perfectly. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1529–1546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luce RD (1959) On the possible psychophysical laws. Psych. Rev. 66(2):81–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (2003) Understanding organizational adaptation. Soc. Econom. 25(1):1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osborn AF (1953) Applied Imagination (Scribner’s, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Piezunka H, Aggarwal VA, Posen HE (2022) The aggregation–learning trade-off. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1094–1115.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
  • Simon HA (1990) Invariants of human behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. 41(1):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stieglitz N, Knudsen T, Becker MC (2016) Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environments. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1854–1864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tranchero M (2023) Finding diamonds in the rough: Data-driven opportunities and pharmaceutical innovation. Working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.