Working Around the Clock: Temporal Distance, Intrafirm Communication, and Time Shifting of the Employee Workday

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17558

References

  • Acemoglu D, Autor D (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, New York), 1043–1171.Google Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Goldfarb A (2008) Restructuring research: Communication costs and the democratization of university innovation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1578–1590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alcácer J, Zhao M (2012) Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: The role of internal linkages. Management Sci. 58(4):734–753.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Aronow PM, Samii C, Assenova VA (2015) Cluster–robust variance estimation for dyadic data. Political Anal. 23(4):564–577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bahar D (2020) The hardships of long distance relationships: Time zone proximity and the location of MNC’s knowledge-intensive activities. J. Internat. Econom. 125:103311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bahar D, Choudhury P, Kim DY, Koo WW (2023) Innovation on wings: Nonstop flights and firm innovation in the global context. Management Sci. 69(10):6202–6223.Google Scholar
  • Bai J, Jin W, Zhou S (2023) Proximity and knowledge spillovers: Evidence from the introduction of new airline routes. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print December 28, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.01717.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balachandran S, Hernandez E (2018) Networks and innovation: Accounting for structural and institutional sources of recombination in brokerage triads. Organ. Sci. 29(1):80–99.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barrero JM, Bloom N, Davis SJ (2021) Why Working from Home Will Stick (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barry B, Fulmer IS (2004) The medium and the message: The adaptive use of communication media in dyadic influence. Acad. Management Rev. 29(2):272–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econom. J. 75(299):493–517.Google Scholar
  • Bick A, Fuchs-Schündeln N, Lagakos D (2018) How do hours worked vary with income? Cross-country evidence and implications. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(1):170–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikard M, Marx M (2020) Bridging academia and industry: How geographic hubs connect university science and corporate technology. Management Sci. 66(8):3425–3443.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bikard M, Murray F, Gans JS (2015) Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management Sci. 61(7):1473–1495.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bøler EA, Javorcik B, Ulltveit-Moe KH (2018) Working across time zones: Exporters and the gender wage gap. J. Internat. Econom. 111:122–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borusyak K, Jaravel X, Spiess J (2024) Revisiting event-study designs: Robust and efficient estimation. The Rev. Econom. Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Brady T, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Hollenberg A, Lakhani KR (2017) A field experiment on search costs and the formation of scientific collaborations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(4):565–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branstetter LG, Glennon B, Jensen JB (2019) The IT revolution and the globalization of R&D. Innovative Policy Econom. 19(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briscoe F (2006) Temporal flexibility and careers: The role of large-scale organizations for physicians. Industry Labor Related Rev. 60(1):88–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briscoe F (2007) From iron cage to iron shield? How bureaucracy enables temporal flexibility for professional service workers. Organ. Sci. 18(2):297–314.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bünnings C, Schiele V (2021) Spring forward, don’t fall back: The effect of daylight saving time on road safety. Rev. Econom. Statist. 103(1):165–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calonico S, Cattaneo MD, Farrell MH, Titiunik R (2017) Rdrobust: Software for regression-discontinuity designs. Stata J. 17(2):372–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmel E, Espinosa JA, Dubinsky Y (2010) “Follow the sun” workflow in global software development. J. Management Inform. Stud. 27(1):17–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Catalini C (2018) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Catalini C, Fons-Rosen C, Gaulé P (2020) How do travel costs shape collaboration? Management Sci. 66(8):3340–3360.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chai S, Freeman RB (2019) Temporary colocation and collaborative discovery: Who confers at conferences. Strategic Management J. 40(13):2138–2164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P (2017) Innovation outcomes in a distributed organization: Intrafirm mobility and access to resources. Organ. Sci. 28(2):339–354.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P, Foroughi C, Larson B (2021) Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management J. 42(4):655–683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chown J, Liu CC (2015) Geography and power in an organizational forum: Evidence from the U.S. Senate Chamber. Strategic Management J. 36:177–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correia S, Guimarães P, Zylkin T (2020) Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata J. 20(1):95–115.Google Scholar
  • Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cristea IC, Leonardi PM (2019) Get noticed and die trying: Signals, sacrifice, and the production of face time in distributed work. Organ. Sci. 30(3):552–572.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings JN, Espinosa JA, Pickering CK (2009) Crossing spatial and temporal boundaries in globally distributed projects: A relational model of coordination delay. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):420–439.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeFilippis E, Impink SM, Singell M, Polzer JT, Sadun R (2022) The impact of Covid-19 on digital communication patterns. Humanities Soc. Sci. Comm. 9(1):1–11.Google Scholar
  • Dennis A, Fuller R, Valacich J (2008) Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 32(3):575–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dimitriadis S, Koning R (2023) Won’t you be my neighbor? Events, knowledge spillovers, and entrepreneur performance in Togo. Preprint, submitted February 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4024700.Google Scholar
  • Dingel JI, Neiman B (2020) How many jobs can be done at home? J. Public Econom. 189:104235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doleac JL, Sanders NJ (2015) Under the cover of darkness: How ambient light influences criminal activity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 97(5):1093–1103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A (2012) Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy, 1st ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Espinosa JA, Carmel E (2003) The impact of time separation on coordination in global software teams: A conceptual foundation. Software Process Improvement Practice 8(4):249–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espinosa JA, Nan N, Carmel E (2015) Temporal distance, communication patterns, and task performance in teams. J. Management Inform. Stud. 32(1):151–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forman C, van Zeebroeck N (2012) From wires to partners: How the Internet has fostered R&D collaborations within firms. Management Sci. 58(8):1549–1568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman RB, Ganguli I, Murciano-Goroff R (2014) Why and wherefore of increased scientific collaboration. The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 17–48.Google Scholar
  • Gagliardi L, Mariani M, Breschi S (2024) Temporal availability and women career progression: Evidence from cross-time-zone acquisitions. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Ghoshal S, Korine H, Szulanski G (1994) Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Sci. 40(1):96–110.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson CB, Gibbs JL (2006) Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):451–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grinter RE, Herbsleb JD, Perry DE (1999) The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. Hayne SC, ed. Proc. 1999 ACM Internat. Conf. Supporting Group Work (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 306–315.Google Scholar
  • Gronau R (1977) Leisure, home production, and work: The theory of the allocation of time revisited. J. Political Econom. 85(6):1099–1123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamermesh DS (1999) The timing of work over time. Econom. J. 109(452):37–66.Google Scholar
  • Hasan S, Koning R (2019) Prior ties and the limits of peer effects on startup team performance. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1394–1416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14(6):615–632.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P, Kiesler S (1995) Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organ. Sci. 6(4):373–393.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P, Kiesler S (2002) Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Imbens GW, Lemieux T (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. J. Econometrics 142(2):615–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Impink SM, Prat A, Sadun R (2020) Measuring collaboration in modern organizations. AEA Papers Proc. 110:181–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamstra MJ, Kramer LA, Levi MD (2000) Losing sleep at the market: The daylight saving anomaly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1005–1011.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr SP, Kerr WR (2018) Global collaborative patents. Econom. J. 128(612):F235–F272.Google Scholar
  • Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kraut RE, Fussell SR, Brennan SE, Siegel J (2002) Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Hinds PJ, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehndorff S (2014) It’s a long way from norms to normality: The 35-hour week in France. Industry Labor Related Rev. 67(3):838–863.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Letablier MT, Jönsson I (2005) Caring for children: The logics of public action. Working Mothers in Europe. A Comparison of Policies and Practices (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 41–57.Google Scholar
  • Mazmanian M, Orlikowski WJ, Yates JA (2013) The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1337–1357.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mell JN, Jang S, Chai S (2021) Bridging temporal divides: Temporal brokerage in global teams and its impact on individual performance. Organ. Sci. 32(3):731–751.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H (1971) Managerial work: Analysis from observation. Management Sci. 18(2):B97–B110.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nurmi N, Hinds PJ (2020) Work design for global professionals: Connectivity demands, connectivity behaviors, and their effects on psychological and behavioral outcomes. Organ. Stud. 41(12):1697–1724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Leary MB, Cummings JN (2007) The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31(3):433–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly C, Pondy L (1979) Organizational communication. Kerr S, ed. Organizational Behavior (Grid, Columbia, OH), 119–150.Google Scholar
  • Ollier-Malaterre A, Foucreault A (2017) Cross-national work-life research: Cultural and structural impacts for individuals and organizations. J. Management 43(1):111–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson GM, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Human Comput. Interaction 15(2–3):139–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow LA (1998) Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):328–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow LA (1999) The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):57–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow LA, Kelly EL (2014) Toward a model of work redesign for better work and better life. Work Occupation 41(1):111–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C (1967) A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32(2):194–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phene A, Almeida P (2008) Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(5):901–919.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porac JF, Wade JB, Fischer HM, Brown J, Kanfer A, Bowker G (2004) Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: A comparative case study of two scientific teams. Res. Policy 33(4):661–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell GN, Francesco AM, Ling Y (2009) Toward culture-sensitive theories of the work–family interface. J. Organ. Behav. 30(5):597–616.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schieman S, Glavin P, Milkie MA (2009) When work interferes with life: Work-nonwork interference and the influence of work-related demands and resources. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(6):966–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silva JMCS, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):641–658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. 51(5):756–770.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J, Marx M (2013) Geographic constraints on knowledge spillovers: Political borders vs. spatial proximity. Management Sci. 59(9):2056–2078.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sivunen A, Nurmi N, Koroma J (2016) When a one-hour time difference is too much: Temporal boundaries in global virtual work. Proc. Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 511–520.Google Scholar
  • Smith AC (2016) Spring forward at your own risk: Daylight saving time and fatal vehicle crashes. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 8(2):65–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srikanth K, Puranam P (2011) Integrating distributed work: Comparing task design, communication, and tacit coordination mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 32(8):849–875.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C, Moenaert RK (1998) The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11-part-2):S1–S18.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2021) Two-way fixed effects, the two-way mundlak regression, and difference-in-differences estimators. Preprint, submitted August 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3906345.Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2023) Simple approaches to nonlinear difference-in-differences with panel data. Econom. J. 26(3):C31–C66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang L, Holtz D, Jaffe S, Suri S, Sinha S, Weston J, Joyce C, et al. (2022) The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behav. 6(1):43–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.