A Buddhist Mindfulness View of Paradox: Silence and Skepticism of Language to Dismantle Paradoxes

References

• Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(4):696–717.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Kreiner GE, Fugate M (2000) All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad. Management Rev. 25:472–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astley WG (1985) The two ecologies: Population and community perspectives on organizational evolution. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(2):224–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bednarek R, Paroutis S, Sillince J (2017) Transcendence through rhetorical practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organ. Stud. 38(1):77–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharov ML (2014) The relational ecology of identification: How organizational identification emerges when individuals hold divergent values. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1485–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen MJ (2002) Transcending paradox: The Chinese “middle way” perspective. Asia Pacific J. Management 19:179–199.Google Scholar
• Chia R, Nayak A (2017) Circumventing the logic and limits of representation: Otherness in East–West approaches to paradox. Smith WK, Lewis MW, Jarzabkowski P, Langley A, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 125–140.Google Scholar
• Choi E, Leroy H (2015) Methods of mindfulness: How mindfulness is studied in the workplace. Reb J, Atkins PWB, eds. Mindfulness in Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 67–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP (2020) Corporate Communication: A Guide to Theory and Practice (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP, Holt R, Zundel M (2011) The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimization of strategic change. Organ. Stud. 32(12):1701–1716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Creswell JD (2017) Mindfulness interventions. Annual Rev. Psych. 68:491–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunha MPE, Putnam LL (2019) Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organ. 17:95–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dameron S, Torset C (2014) The discursive construction of strategists’ subjectivities: Toward a paradox lens on strategy. J. Management Stud. 51(2):291–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deguchi Y, Garfield JL, Priest G, Sharf RH (2021) What Can’t Be Said: Paradox and Contradiction in East Asian Thought (Oxford University Press, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Saussure F (2011) Course in General Linguistics (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Dorjee D (2016) Defining contemplative science: The metacognitive self-regulatory capacity of the mind, context of meditation practice and modes of existential awareness. Front. Psych. 7:1788.Google Scholar
• Dunne J (2011) Toward an understanding of non-dual mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism 12(1):71–88.Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Rothbard NP (2000) Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Acad. Management Rev. 25:178–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El-Sawad A, Arnold J, Cohen L (2004) “Doublethink”: The prevalence and function of contradiction in accounts of organizational life. Human Relat. 57:1179–1203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elias N (1978) Mennell S, Morrissey G (trans.), What Is Sociology? (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS (2016) Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Amer. J. Theor. Appl. Statist. 5(1):1–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fairhurst GT, Putnam L (2004) Organizations as discursive constructions. Commun. Theory 14(1):5–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falzon M-A (2009) Introduction. Falzon M-A, ed. Multi-Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research (Ashgate, Surrey, UK), 1–23.Google Scholar
• Fang T (2012) Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management Organ. Rev. 8:25–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraro F, Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2005) Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):8–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiol CM, Pratt MG, O’Connor EJ (2009) Managing intractable identity conflicts. Acad. Management Rev. 34(1):32–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelles D (2015) Mindful Work: How Meditation Is Changing Business from the Inside Out (Eamon Dolan, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management J. 12(6):433–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Good DJ, Lyddy CJ, Glomb TM, Bono JE, Brown KW, Duffy MK, Baer RA, Brewer JA, Lazar SW (2016) Contemplating mindfulness at work: An integrative review. J. Management 42(1):114–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimmer J, Roberts ME, Stewart BM (2021) Machine learning for social science: An agnostic approach. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 24:395–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grint K (2010) The sacred in leadership: Separation, sacrifice and silence. Organ. Stud. 31(1):89–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Anteby M, Holm AL (2021) Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: The role of active categorization in theory building. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):591–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guba E, Lincoln Y (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sage, London), 105–117.Google Scholar
• Gümüsay AA, Smets M, Morris T (2020) “God at work”: Engaging central and incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity. Acad. Management J. 63:124–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunaratana BH (2002) Mindfulness in Plain English (Wisdom, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hahn T, Pinkse J, Preuss L, Figge F (2014) Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Acad. Management Rev. 39:463–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hällgren M, Rouleau L, De Rond M (2018) A matter of life or death: How extreme context research matters for management and organization studies. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):111–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanh TN (2015) Silence: The Power of Quiet in a World Full of Noise (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Harvey J, Crowley J, Woszidlo A (2019) Mindfulness, conflict strategy use, and relational satisfaction: A dyadic investigation. Mindfulness 10(4):749–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Winter SG (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (N) ever‐changing world. Strategic Management J. 32:1243–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herrigel E, Tausend H (1948) Zen in der Kunst des Bogenschießens, Jeong C-H (trans.). (Sam-Woo-Bhan, Seoul, Republic of Korea).Google Scholar
• Hölzel BK, Lazar SW, Gard T, Schuman-Olivier Z, Vago DR, Ott U (2011) How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(6):537–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hopkins J (1999) Emptiness in the Mind-only School of Buddhism (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Husgafvel V (2018) The “universal dharma foundation” of mindfulness-based stress reduction: Non-duality and Mahāyāna Buddhist influences in the work of Jon Kabat-Zinn. Contemp. Buddhism 19:275–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huszár O (2016) The role of silence at the retreats of a Buddhist community. KOME 4(2):59–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyun-Eung V (2017) Hong C-S, Yu S-K (trans.), Enlightenment and History: Theory and Praxis in Contemporary Buddhism (Bulkwang Publishing, Seoul, Korea).Google Scholar
• Inamori K (1995) A Passion for Success: Practical, Inspirational, and Spiritual Insight from Japan’s Leading Entrepreneur (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Inamori K (2010) A Compass to Fulfillment: Passion and Spirituality in Life and Business (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Jankowski T, Holas P (2014) Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Conscious. Cogn. 28:64–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Lê JK (2017) We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organ. Stud. 38:433–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Sillince J (2007) A rhetoric-in-context approach to building commitment to multiple strategic goals. Organ. Stud. 28:1639–1665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management J. 56(1):137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson DC, Thom NJ, Stanley EA, Haase L, Simmons AN, Shih PA, Thompson WK, Potterat EG, Minor TR, Paulus MP (2014) Modifying resilience mechanisms in at-risk individuals: A controlled study of mindfulness training in Marines preparing for deployment. Amer. J. Psychiatry 171(8):844–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabat-Zinn J (1982) An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 4(1):33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabat-Zinn J (2003) Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Constr. Human Sci. 8(2):73–83.Google Scholar
• Kay AA, Skarlicki DP (2020) Cultivating a conflict-positive workplace: How mindfulness facilitates constructive conflict management. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 159:8–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller J, Chen EW (2017) A road map of the paradoxical mind. Smith WK, Lewis MW, Jarzabkowski P, Langley A, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 66–86.Google Scholar
• Keller J, Sadler‐Smith E (2019) Paradoxes and dual processes: A review and synthesis. Internat. J. Management Rev. 21(2):162–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller J, Loewenstein J, Yan J (2017) Culture, conditions and paradoxical frames. Organ. Stud. 38(3–4):539–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keown D (1991) The Nature of Buddhist Ethics (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Kudesia RS, Nyima VT (2015) Mindfulness contextualized: An integration of Buddhist and neuropsychological approaches to cognition. Mindfulness 6(4):910–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer EJ (1989) Mindfulness (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Langer EJ (2014) Mindfulness forward and back. Le A, Ngnoumen CT, Langer EJ, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Mindfulness (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 7–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer EJ, Moldoveanu M (2000) The construct of mindfulness. J. Soc. Issues 56(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer EJ, Blank A, Chanowitz B (1978) The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36(6):635–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24:691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lant TK, Shapira Z (2001) Organizational Cognition: Computation and Interpretation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Laureiro‐Martínez D, Brusoni S, Canessa N, Zollo M (2015) Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision‐making performance. Strategic Management J. 36(3):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung AKY, Liou S, Miron-Spektor E, Koh B, Chan D, Eisenberg R, Schneider I (2018) Middle ground approach to paradox: Within- and between-culture examination of the creative benefits of paradoxical frames. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 114(3):443–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis MW (2000) Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad. Management Rev. 25:760–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis MW, Smith WK (2014) Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 50:127–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li L (2020) Teaching beyond words: “silence” and its pedagogical implications discoursed in the early classical texts of Confucianism, Daoism and Zen Buddhism. Educ. Philos. Theory 52(7):759–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li PP (1998) Toward a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organ. Stud. 19:829–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li PP (2016) Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: How to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management. Cross Cult. Strategic Management 23(1):42–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Xu S, Zhang B (2020) Thriving at work: How a paradox mindset influences innovative work behavior. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 56(3):347–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lüscher LS, Lewis MW (2008) Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Acad. Management J. 51:221–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcus GE (2011) Multi-sited ethnography: Five or six things I know about it now. Coleman S, von Hellermann P, eds. Multi-Sited Ethnography: Problems and Possibilities in the Translocation of Research Methods (Routledge, Abingdon), 16–32.Google Scholar
• Mees-Buss J, Welch C, Piekkari R (2022) From templates to heuristics: How and why to move beyond the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 25(2):405–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Gino F, Argote L (2011) Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(2):229–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Emich KJ, Argote L, Smith WK (2022) Conceiving opposites together: Cultivating paradoxical frames and epistemic motivation fosters team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 171:104153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Ingram A, Keller J, Smith W, Lewis M (2018) Microfoundations of Organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Acad. Management J. 61(1):26–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2011) Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):373–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):706–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A (2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psych. Rev. 108(2):291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18:187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pagis M (2010) Producing intersubjectivity in silence: An ethnographic study of meditation practice. Ethnography 11:309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pamphile VD (2022) Paradox peers: A relational approach to navigating a business–society paradox. Acad. Management J. 65(4):1274–1302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park SB (1983) Buddhist Faith and Sudden Enlightenment (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).Google Scholar
• Peng K, Nisbett RE (1999) Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. Amer. Psych. 54(9):741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Picard M (1961) The World of Silence (Gateway, South Bend, IN).Google Scholar
• Poole MS, Van de Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organizational theories. Acad. Management Rev. 14:562–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pradies C (2023) With head and heart: How emotions shape paradox navigation in veterinary work. Acad. Management J. 66(2):521–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purser RE, Milillo J (2015) Mindfulness revisited: A Buddhist-based conceptualization. J. Management Inquiry 24(1):3–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam LL, Fairhurst GT, Banghart S (2016) Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Acad. Management Ann. 10:65–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray JL, Baker LT, Plowman DA (2011) Organizational mindfulness in business schools. Acad. Management Learn. Educ. 10(2):188–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reb J, Choi E (2014) Mindfulness in Organizations Psychology of Meditation (Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY), 279–309.Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP, Phillips KW, Dumas TL (2005) Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organ. Sci. 16:243–258.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothman N, Pratt M, Rees L, Vogus T (2016) Understanding the dual nature of ambivalence: Why and when ambivalence leads to good and bad outcomes. Acad. Management Ann. 11:33–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson M, Carmody J, Kabat-Zinn J, Bratt MA (2007) Mindfulness-based stress reduction in Massachusetts correctional facilities. Prison J. 87(2):254–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schad J, Bansal P (2018) Seeing the forest and the trees: How a systems perspective informs paradox research. J. Management Stud. 55(8):1490–1506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schad J, Lewis M, Raisch S, Smith WK (2016) Paradox research in Management Sci.: Looking back to move forward. Acad. Management Ann. 10:5–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenberg PL, Vago DR (2019) Mapping meditative states and stages with electrophysiology: Concepts, classifications, and methods. Curr. Opin. Psych. 28:211–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shōji Y (2001) The myth of Zen in the art of archery. Jpn. J. Relig. Stud. 28:1–30.Google Scholar
• Silk JA (2008) Managing Monks: Administrators and Administrative Roles in Indian Buddhist Monasticism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sillince J, Jarzabkowski P, Shaw D (2012) Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 23(3):630–650.Link, Google Scholar
• Smets M, Jarzabkowski P, Burke GT, Spee P (2015) Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Acad. Management J. 58(3):932–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK (2014) Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Acad. Management J. 57:1592–1623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MK (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36:381–403.Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16:522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Gonin M, Besharov ML (2013) Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Bus. Ethics Quart. 23(3):407–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song HC (2021) How do Buddhist monks frame conflict? A Buddhist approach to paradox. Negotiation Confl. Management Res. 15(2):148–165.Google Scholar
• Song HC (2023) Identity conflict amidst environmental change: An ethnography of a Korean Buddhist Temple. J. Management Stud. 60(4):889–923.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl B, Goldstein E (2019) A Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Workbook (New Harbinger Publications, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Stern DG (1995) Wittgenstein on Mind and Language (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suddaby R (2010) Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):346–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takahashi T, Murata T, Hamada T, Omori M, Kosaka H, Kikuchi M, Yoshida H, Wada Y (2005) Changes in EEG and autonomic nervous activity during meditation and their association with personality traits. Internat. J. Psychophysiol. 55(2):199–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan CM (2012) Search Inside Yourself: Increase Productivity, Creativity and Happiness (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Tang YY, Hölzel BK, Posner MI (2015) The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16(4):213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (2011) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaara E, Tienar J (2008) A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Acad. Management Rev. 33(4):985–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vince R, Broussine M (1996) Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organ. Stud. 17(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Visnjic I, Jovanovic M, Raisch S (2022) Managing the transition to a dual business model: Tradeoff, paradox, and routinized practices. Organ. Sci. 33(5):1964–1989.Link, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6:280–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Putnam T (2006) Organizing for mindfulness: Eastern wisdom and Western knowledge. J. Management Inquiry 15(3):275–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. 17(4):514–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein L (1994) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (e-artnow ebooks).Google Scholar
• Yu L, Zellmer-Bruhn M (2018) Introducing team mindfulness and considering its safeguard role against conflict transformation and social undermining. Acad. Management J. 61(1):324–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zerubavel E (1993) The Fine Line (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Waldman DA, Han YL, Li XB (2015) Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Acad. Management J. 58:538–566.Crossref, Google Scholar