Confronting the Limits of Symbolic Actions: How Entrepreneurs Narrow the Presentation-Performance Gap

References

• Adler PA, Adler P (1987) Membership Roles in Field Research, vol. 6 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony C, Bechky BA, Fayard A-L (2023) “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a system view to explore the future of work. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1672–1694.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ (1986) Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Acad. Management J. 29(3):465–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Barley SR (2020) Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies. Inform. Organ. 30(2):100286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Faraj S, Hinds PJ, Leonardi PM, von Krogh G (2022) We are all theorists of technology now: A relational perspective on emerging technology and organizing. Organ. Sci. 33(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA, Garud R (2009) The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(1):107–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Casciaro T (2021) Power, for All: How It Really Works and Why It’s Everyone’s Business (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Beane MI (2020) In storage, yet on display: An empirical investigation of robots’ value as social signals. Proc. 2020 ACM/IEEE Internat. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 83–91.Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003a) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003b) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3):720–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA, O’Mahony S (2015) Leveraging comparative field data for theory generation. Elsbach KD, Kramer R, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research (Routledge, New York), 168–176.Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Burton MD (2008) Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. 19(1):3–24.Link, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Burton MD, O’Reilly C (2007) Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing 22(2):147–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boje DM (1991) Consulting and change in the storytelling organisation. J. Organizational Change Management 4(3):7–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourmault N, Anteby M (2020) Unpacking the managerial blues: How expectations formed in the past carry into new jobs. Organ. Sci. 31(6):1452–1474.Link, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR, Rebentisch ES (2003) Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. 49(9):1180–1195.Link, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Cloutier C, Ravasi D (2021) Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research. Strategic Organ. 19(1):113–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Bingham CB, Hallen BL (2018) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Administrative Sci. Quart. 64(4):810–854.Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Fehder DC, Hochberg YV, Murray F (2019) The design of startup accelerators. Res. Policy 48(7):1781–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbin JM, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociol. 13(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S, Gann DM (2016) One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals’ external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management J. 37(2):280–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Rindova VP, Ravasi D (2010) Where strategy meets culture: The neglected role of cultural and symbolic resources in strategy research. Baum JAC, Lampel J, eds. The Globalization of Strategy Research, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 27 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 175–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denoo L, Yli‐Renko H, Clarysse B (2022) The impact of customer ties and industry segment maturity on business model adaptation in an emerging industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 16(3):602–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5(2):121–147.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (2008) CMR classics: Speed and strategic choice: How managers accelerate decision making. Calif. Management Rev. 50(2):102–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR (2006) Internet companies’ growth strategies: Determinants of investment intensity and long‐term performance. Strategic Management J. 27(12):1183–1204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD (2003) Organizational perception management. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:297–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Kramer RM (2003) Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Acad. Management J. 46(3):283–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Sutton RI (1992) Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. 35(4):699–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (2011) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiol CM (1994) Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 5(3):403–420.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (1997) Social skill and institutional theory. Amer. Behavioral Scientist 40(4):397–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (2001) Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociol. Theory 19(2):105–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Schildt HA, Lant TK (2014) Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1479–1492.Link, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Snihur Y, Thomas LDW, Phillips N (2023) The dark side of entrepreneurial framing: A process model of deception and legitimacy loss. Acad. Management Rev. ja:amr-2022.Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Wry T (2022) Cultural entrepreneurship: Theorizing the dark sides. Lockwood C, Soublière J-F, eds. Advances in Cultural Entrepreneurship (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 97–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giorgi S (2017) The mind and heart of resonance: The role of cognition and emotions in frame effectiveness. J. Management Stud. 54(5):711–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine Pub. Co, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Social Behavior Publisher, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle K (2020) Discovery as an abductive mechanism for reorienting habits within organizational change. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1951–1975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granqvist N, Grodal S, Woolley JL (2013) Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organ. Sci. 24(2):395–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Grodal S (2018) Field expansion and contraction: How communities shape social and symbolic boundaries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):783–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, O’Mahony SÁN (2017) How does a grand challenge become displaced? Explaining the duality of field mobilization. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1801–1827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurses K, Ozcan P (2015) Entrepreneurship in regulated markets: Framing contests and collective action to introduce pay TV in the U.S. Acad. Management J. 58(6):1709–1739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Stern S (2015) Where is Silicon Valley? Science 347(6222):606–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallen BL (2008) The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments? Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):685–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Rouse ED (2015) An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Acad. Management J. 58(2):375–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Grodal S (2020) The double-edged sword of oppositional category positioning: A study of the U.S. E-cigarette category, 2007–2017. Administrative Sci. Quart. 66(1):86–132.Google Scholar
• Kahl SJ, Grodal S (2016) Discursive strategies and radical technological change: Multilevel discourse analysis of the early computer (1947–1958). Strategic Management J. 37(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) The double‐edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karp R (2023) Gaining organizational adoption: Strategically pacing the position of digital innovations. Acad. Management J. 66(3):773–796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2014) Entrepreneurship as experimentation. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(3):25–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Phillips N (2019) Constructing Organizational Life: How Social-Symbolic Work Shapes Selves, Organizations, and Institutions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lebovitz S, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Levina N (2022) To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis. Organ. Sci. 33(1):126–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2007) Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organ. Sci. 18(5):813–831.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2008) Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Inform. Organ. 18(3):159–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf H (2018) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):746–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lofland J, Lofland LH (1995) Developing analysis. Analyzing Social Setting, 183–203.Google Scholar
• Locke K, Golden-Biddle K, Feldman MS (2008) Perspective—Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organ. Sci. 19(6):907–918.Link, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2019) Cultural Entrepreneurship: A New Agenda for the Study of Entrepreneurial Processes and Possibilities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Gehman J, Glynn MA (2019) Beyond homo entrepreneurus: Judgment and the theory of cultural entrepreneurship. J. Management Stud. 56(6):1214–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Gao C (2019) Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1289–1318.Link, Google Scholar
• McKnight B, Zietsma C (2018) Finding the threshold: A configurational approach to optimal distinctiveness. J. Bus. Venturing 33(4):493–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (2018) Twenty-five years later … The illusive strategy. Bedeian AG, ed. Management Laureates (Routledge, London), 321–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore GA (1991) Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Goods to Mainstream Customers (HarperBusiness).Google Scholar
• Murray A, Fisher G (2023) When more is less: Explaining the curse of too much capital for early-stage ventures. Organ. Sci. 34(1):246–282.Link, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) 10 coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2016) Digital work: A research agenda. Czarniawska B, ed. A Research Agenda for Management and Organization Studies (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 88–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pahnke EC, Katila R, Eisenhardt KM (2015) Who takes you to the dance? How partners’ institutional logics influence innovation in young firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):596–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1981) Understanding the role of power in decision making. Power Organ. 404:423.Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial Analysts J. 36(4):30–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Chen JS (2013) An advantage of newness: Vicarious learning despite limited absorptive capacity. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1701–1716.Link, Google Scholar
• Rao H (1994) The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravasi D, Rindova V (2008) Symbolic value creation. Barry D, Hansen H, eds. The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 270–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Barry D, Ketchen DJ Jr (2009) Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):477–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Dalpiaz E, Ravasi D (2011) A cultural quest: A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation. Organ. Sci. 22(2):413–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy SD (2009) Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA).Google Scholar
• Schlenker BR, Weigold MF (1992) Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Rev. Psych. 43(1):133–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schnackenberg AK, Bundy J, Coen CA, Westphal JD (2019) Capitalizing on categories of social construction: A review and integration of organizational research on symbolic management strategies. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):375–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seidel VP, O’Mahony S (2014) Managing the repertoire: Stories, metaphors, prototypes, and concept coherence in product innovation. Organ. Sci. 25(3):691–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Seidel VP, Hannigan TR, Phillips N (2020) Rumor communities, social media, and forthcoming innovations: The shaping of technological frames in product market evolution. Acad. Management Rev. 45(2):304–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2008) Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):266–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A (1965) Organization-creating organizations. Trans-action 2(2):34–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tedeschi JT, Riess M (1981) Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. Tedeschi JT, ed. Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A, Bechara JP, Sun K (2019) How outcome agreement and power balance among parties influence processes of organizational learning and nonlearning. J. Management 45(3):1252–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman V (2017) The Digital Matrix: New Rules for Business Transformation Through Technology (LifeTree Media, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1976) The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Res. Policy 5(3):212–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32(7):791–805.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. J. Betriebswirtschaft 55(2005):63–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Graebner ME (2010) A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Acad. Management J. 53(1):15–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.Link, Google Scholar
• Zander RS, Zander B (2002) The Art of Possibility: Transforming Professional and Personal Life (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Zott C, Huy QN (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):70–105.Crossref, Google Scholar