Primer for Experimental Methods in Organization Theory

References

• Academy of Management Discoveries (2023) Registered reports. Retrieved January 16, https://aom.org/events/event-detail/2024/01/20/higher-logic-calendar/registered-reports.Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2022) Prediction Machines, Updated and Expanded: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Croson R, Mahoney JT (2010) The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: An experimental investigation. Strategic Management J. 31(4):413–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Bradley KJ (2014) Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organ. Res. Methods 17(4):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Solarino AM (2019) Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1291–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Archibold EE, Rice DB (2022) Let’s fix our own problem: Quelling the irresponsible research perfect storm. J. Management Stud. 59(6):1628–1642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiman-Smith L, Scullen SE, Barr SH (2002) Conducting studies of decision making in organizational contexts: A tutorial for policy-capturing and other regression-based techniques. Organ. Res. Methods. 5(4):388–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alan S, Corekcioglu G, Sutter M (2023) Improving workplace climate in large corporations: A clustered randomized intervention. Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):151–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alves MFR, Vastola V, Galina SVR, Zollo M (2023) When reflection hurts: The effect of cognitive processing types on organizational adaptation to discontinuous change. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2026–2042.Google Scholar
• Ameri M, Rogers SE, Schur L, Kruse D (2020) No room at the inn? Disability access in the new sharing economy. Acad. Management Discoveries 6(2):176–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonakis J (2017) On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications. Leadership Quart. 28(1):5–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonakis J, d’Adda G, Weber RA, Zehnder C (2022) “Just words? Just speeches?” on the economic value of charismatic leadership. Management Sci. 68(9):6355–6381.Link, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Norton MI (2007) Psychology and experimental economics—A gap in abstraction. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 16(6):336–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aronson E, Wilson TD, Brewer MB (1998) Experimentation in social psychology. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1 (McGraw-Hill, Boston), 99–142.Google Scholar
• Aronson E, Ellsworth P, Carlsmith J, Gonzales M (1990) Methods of Research in Social Psychology, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Athey S, Imbens G (2016) Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(27):7353–7360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Locke EA, Smith KG (2000) The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad. Management J. 43(5):837–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aviram H (2012) What would you do? Conducting web-based factorial vignette surveys. Gideon L, ed. Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences (Springer, New York), 463–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azrieli Y, Chambers CP, Healy PJ (2018) Incentives in experiments: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. 126(4):1472–1503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker TL (1994) Doing Social Research, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Baldassarri D, Abascal M (2017) Field experiments across the social sciences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 43(1):41–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldassarri D, Grossman G (2011) Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(27):11023–11027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberger PA (2019) On the replicability of abductive research in management and organizations: Internal replication and its alternatives. Acad. Management Discoveries 5(2):103–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2007) Incentives for managers and inequality among workers: Evidence from a firm-level experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 122(2):729–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Duflo E, Finkelstein A, Katz LF, Olken BA, Sautmann A (2020) In praise of moderation: Suggestions for the scope and use of pre-analysis plans for RCTs in economics. Working paper, NBER, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV, Duflo E (2009) The experimental approach to development economics. Annual Rev. Econom. 1(1):151–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardsley N, Cubitt R, Loomes G, Moffatt P, Starmer C, Sugden R (2010) Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Funder DC (2007) Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 2(4):396–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beamish PW, Hasse VC (2022) The importance of rare events and other outliers in global strategy research. Global Strategy J. 12(4):697–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Begg CB, Berlin JA (1988) Publication bias: A problem in interpreting medical data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 151(3):419–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergenholtz C, Vuculescu O, Amidi A (2023) Microfoundations of adaptive search in complex tasks: The role of cognitive abilities and styles. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2043–2063.Google Scholar
• Bergh DD, Sharp BM, Aguinis H, Li M (2017) Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings. Strategic Organ. 15(3):423–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES, Shore JC, Jang AJ (2023) Network centralization and collective adaptability to a shifting environment. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2064–2096.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E (2017) Field experiments on discrimination. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 309–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis RA (2012) The search for asterisks: Compromised statistical tests and flawed theories. Strategic Management J. 33(1):108–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis RA, Helfat CE, Shaver JM (2016) The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strategic Management J. 37(11):2193–2203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitektine A (2011) Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):151–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitektine A, Lucas J, Schilke O (2018) Institutions under a microscope: Experimental methods in institutional theory. Bryman A, Buchanan DA, eds. Unconventional Methodology in Organization and Management Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 147–167.Google Scholar
• Bitektine A, Lucas J, Schilke O, Aeon B (2022) Experiments in organization and management research. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management working paper.Google Scholar
• Blader S, Gartenberg C, Prat A (2019) The contingent effect of management practices. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(2):721–749.Google Scholar
• Blume A, Duffy J, Franco AM (2009) Decentralized organizational learning: An experimental investigation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1178–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolinger MT, Josefy MA, Stevenson R, Hitt MA (2022) Experiments in strategy research: A critical review and future research opportunities. J. Management 48(1):77–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen KA (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables (Wiley, Toronto).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A, Thonemann UW (2012) Managers and students as newsvendors. Management Sci. 58(12):2225–2233.Link, Google Scholar
• Boss V, Dahlander L, Ihl C, Jayaraman R (2023) Organizing entrepreneurial teams: A field experiment on autonomy over choosing teams and ideas. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2097–2118. Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Kaushik N (2023) Gender differences in responses to competitive organization? A field experiment on differences between STEM and non-STEM fields from an internet-of-things platform. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2119–2142. Google Scholar
• Bouter LM, Hendrix S (2017) Both whistleblowers and the scientists they accuse are vulnerable and deserve protection. Accounting Res. 24(6):359–366.Google Scholar
• Brandon DM, Long JH, Loraas TM, Mueller-Phillips J, Vansant B (2013) Online instrument delivery and participant recruitment services: Emerging opportunities for behavioral accounting research. Behav. Res. Accounting 26(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper DJ (2006) A change would do you good … an experimental study on how to overcome coordination failure in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):669–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper DJ, Weber RA (2015) Legitimacy, communication, and leadership in the turnaround game. Management Sci. 61(11):2627–2645.Link, Google Scholar
• Breitsohl H (2021) Experimental designs in business research. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management working paper, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
• Briker R, Gerpott FH (2023) Publishing registered reports in management and applied psychology: Common beliefs and best practices. Organ. Res. Methods, ePub ahead of print June 13, https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281231210309.Google Scholar
• Brodeur A, Cook N, Hartley JS, Heyes A (2022) Do pre-registration and pre-analysis plans reduce p-hacking and publication bias? Working paper, IZA Institute for Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Brutus S, Aguinis H, Wassmer U (2013) Self-reported limitations and future directions in scholarly reports: Analysis and recommendations. J. Management 39(1):48–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2021) The demotivating effects of communicating a social-political stance: Field experimental evidence from an online labor market platform. Management Sci. 67(2):1004–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, Munafo MR (2013) Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Rev. Neuroscience 14(5):365–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caffarelli RV (2009) Galileo Galilei and Motion: A Reconstruction of 50 Years of Experiments and Discoveries (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Weber R (2013) Experimental organizational economics. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 213–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Hogarth RM (1999) The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty 19(1):7–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Dreber A, Johannesson M (2019) Replication and other practices for improving scientific quality in experimental economics. Schram A, Ule A, eds. Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Experimental Economics (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 83–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Dreber A, Forsell E, Ho T-H, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, et al. (2016) Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science 351(6280):1433–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Dreber A, Holzmeister F, Ho T-H, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, et al. (2018) Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in nature and science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behav. 2(9):637–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Stanley JC (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Gage NL, ed. Handbook of Research on Teaching (Rand McNally, Chicago), 171–246.Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision-making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Matthews PH, Schirm J (2010) Tournaments and office politics: Evidence from a real effort experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):504–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter S (2012) Harvard psychology researcher committed fraud, U.S. investigation concludes. Science Insider (September), https://www.science.org/content/article/harvard-psychology-researcher-committed-fraud-us-investigation-concludes.Google Scholar
• Carsten M, Clapp-Smith R, Alexander Haslam S, Bastardoz N, Gooty J, Connelly S, Spain S (2023) Doing better leadership science via replications and registered reports. Leadership Quart. 34(4):101712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamberlin EH (1948) An experimental imperfect market. J. Political Econom. 56(2):95–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Samek A, van de Ven J (2022) What is considered deception in experimental economics? Experiment. Econom. 25:385–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Findley M, Jensen NM, Meier S, Nielson D (2016) Field experiments in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(1):116–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen R, Chen Y (2011) The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2562–2589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen R, Chen Y, Riyanto YE (2021) Best practices in replication: A case study of common information in coordination games. Experiment. Econom. 24(1):2–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen G, Freese J, Miguel E (2019) Transparent and Reproducible Social Science Research: How to Do Open Science (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Dahl CM, Knudsen T, Warglien M (2023) Context and aggregation: An experimental study of bias and discrimination in organizational decisions. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2163–2181.Google Scholar
• Clark CJ, Honeycutt N, Jussim L (2022) Replicability and the psychology of science. O’Donohue W, Masuda A, Lilienfeld S, eds. Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 45–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Co-founders of RRBM (2020) A vision for responsible research in business and management: Striving for useful and credible knowledge. www.rrbm.network.Google Scholar
• Cohen BP (1989) Developing Sociological Knowledge: Theory and Method, 2nd ed. (Nelson-Hall, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Cohen HF (1994) The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA (2008) Publishing laboratory research in AMJ: A question of when, not if. Acad. Management J. 51(4):616–620.Google Scholar
• Cook KS, Yamagishi T (2008) A defense of deception on scientific grounds. Soc. Psych. Quart. 71(3):215–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook KS, Emerson RM, Gillmore MR, Yamagishi T (1983) The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. Amer. J. Sociol. 89(2):275–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper DJ, Hamman JR, Weber RA (2020) Fool me once: An experiment on credibility and leadership. Econom. J. 130(631):2105–2133.Google Scholar
• Cooper DJ, Kagel JH, Lo W, Gu QL (1999) Gaming against managers in incentive systems: Experimental results with Chinese students and Chinese managers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(4):781–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowen AP, Rink F, Cuypers IRP, Grégoire DA, Weller I (2022) Applying Coleman’s boat in management research: Opportunities and challenges in bridging macro and micro theory. Acad. Management J. 65(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crano WD, Brewer MB, Lac A (2014) Principles and Methods of Social Research, 3rd ed. (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Alexy O, Sharapov D, Salter A (2019) Lifting the veil: Using a quasi-replication approach to assess sample selection bias in patent-based studies. Strategic Management J. 40(2):230–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Dahlander L, Grohsjean T, Salter A (2017) Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Acad. Management J. 60(2):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crockett S, Smith VL, Wilson BJ (2009) Exchange and specialisation as a discovery process. Econom. J. 119(539):1162–1188.Google Scholar
• Croson R, Anand J, Agarwal R (2007) Using experiments in corporate strategy research. Eur. Management Rev. 4(3):173–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, Feigenbaum EA, March JG (1959) Models in a behavioral theory of the firm. Behav. Sci. 4(2):81–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG, Starbuck WH (1961) Two experiments on bias and conflict in organizational estimation. Management Sci. 7(3):254–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Thomas A, Wallin MW, Ångström RC (2023) Blinded by the person? Experimental evidence from idea evaluation. Strategic Management J. 44(10):2443–2459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Flicker B, Hyndman K, Katok E, Keppler S, Leider S, Long X, Tong JD (2023) A replication study of operations management experiments in management science. Management Sci. 69(9):4977–4991.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Marquis C (2005) Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 16(4):332–343.Link, Google Scholar
• De Vaus DA (1993) Surveys in Social Research, 3rd ed. (UCL Press, London).Google Scholar
• Delecourt S, Ng O (2021) Does gender matter for small business performance? Experimental evidence from India. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
• Delios A, Clemente EG, Wu T, Tan H, Wang Y, Gordon M, Viganola D, et al. (2022) Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(30):e2120377119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Kovács B (2015) The effect of selection bias in studies of fads and fashions. PLoS One 10(4):e0123471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denzin NK (1978) The Research Act (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, Gutierrez C (2019) Under a magnifying glass: On the use of experiments in strategy research. Strategic Organ. 17(4):497–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, Micheli MR (2023) To stem the tide: Organizational climate and the locus of knowledge transfer. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2436–2463.Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer HM (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):269–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis S, Koning R (2022) Social skills improve business performance: Evidence from a randomized control trial with entrepreneurs in Togo. Management Sci. 68(12):8635–8657.Link, Google Scholar
• Dipboye RL (1990) Laboratory vs. field research in industrial and organizational psychology. Internat. Rev. Indust. Organ. Psych. 5:1–34.Google Scholar
• Ebersole CR, Atherton OE, Belanger AL, Skulborstad HM, Allen JM, Banks JB, Baranski E, et al. (2016) Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 67:68–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards AL (1957) The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research (Dryden Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Bagozzi RP (2000) On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psych. Methods 5(2):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einstein A (1934) On the method of theoretical physics. Philo. Sci. 1(2):163–169.Google Scholar
• Ertug G, Maoret M (2020) Do coaches in the national basketball association actually display racial bias? A replication and extension. Acad. Management Discoveries 6(2):206–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JB, Schilke O (2023) The power to reward vs. the power to punish: The influence of power framing on individual-level exploration. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print April 10, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1672.Link, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Heckman JJ (2009) Laboratory experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326(5952):535–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang C (2012) Organizational learning as credit assignment: A model and two experiments. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1717–1732.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Ployhart RE (2015) The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):575–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine GA, Elsbach KD (2000) Ethnography and experiment in social psychological theory building: Tactics for integrating qualitative field data with quantitative laboratory data. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 36(1):51–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forstmeier W, Wagenmakers EJ, Parker TH (2017) Detecting and avoiding likely false‐positive findings: A practical guide. Biology Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 92(4):1941–1968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Pedersen T (2016) Microfoundations in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(13):E22–E34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fréchette GR (2015) Laboratory experiments: Professionals vs. students. Fréchette GR, Schotter A, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Methodology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 360–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fréchette GR (2016) Experimental economics across subject populations. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freese J, Peterson D (2017) Replication in social science. Annual Rev. Sociol. 43:147–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (2012) The future of organization design. J. Organ. Design 1(1):3–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Loken E (2013) The Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even When There Is No “Fishing Expedition” or “P-Hacking” and the Research Hypothesis Was Posited Ahead of Time (Columbia University, New York).Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Stern H (2006) The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. Amer. Statist. 60(4):328–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M, Kelly B, Taddy M (2019) Text as data. J. Econom. Literature 57(3):535–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh M, Wu A (2021) Iterative coordination and innovation: Prioritizing value over novelty. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2182–2206.Google Scholar
• Gibbons R (1999) Taking coase seriously. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):145–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Grieder M, Herz H, Zehnder C (2021) Building an equilibrium: Rules vs. principles in relational contracts. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2231–2249.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA (2013) The Why Axis: Hidden Motives and the Undiscovered Economics of Everyday Life (Public Affairs, New York).Google Scholar
• Goldenring JR (2010) Innocence and due diligence: Managing unfounded allegations of scientific misconduct. Acad. Medicine 85(3):527–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb B, King A (2016) Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: Significance tests & mistaken inference. Strategic Management J. 37(1):167–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb B, Yan L (2021) Revisiting Zuckerman’s (1999) categorical imperative: An application of epistemic maps for replication. Strategic Management J. 42(11):1963–1992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb B, Zavyalova A, Pillai S (2018) Did victories in certification contests affect the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry during 1895‐1912? A replication study. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2335–2361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorbatai A, Younkin P, Burtch G (2023) Collateral damage: The relationship between high-salience events and variation in racial discrimination. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2250–2271.Google Scholar
• Gould SJ (1988) The streak of streaks. New York Rev. (August 18), https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1988/08/18/the-streak-of-streaks/.Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Wall TD (2009) The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organ. Res. Methods 12(4):653–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grégoire DA, Binder JK, Rauch A (2019) Navigating the validity tradeoffs of entrepreneurship research experiments: A systematic review and best-practice suggestions. J. Bus. Venturing 34(2):284–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2018) Show me the data! Improving evidence presentation for publication. Management Organ. Rev. 14(2):423–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guarnaschelli S, McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR (2000) An experimental study of jury decision rules. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 94(02):407–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guetzkow H, Bowes AE (1957) The development of organizations in a laboratory. Management Sci. 3(4):380–402.Link, Google Scholar
• Gunst RF, Mason RL (2009) Fractional factorial design. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev. Computational Statist. 1(2):234–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Kacperczyk AO (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7):1666–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haack P, Schilke O, Zucker LG (2021) Legitimacy revisited: Disentangling propriety, validity, and consensus. J. Management Stud. 58(3):749–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haack P, Sieweke J, Wessel L (2019) Microfoundations and multi-level research on institutions. Res. Sociol. Organ. 65A:11–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamman J, Rick S, Weber RA (2007) Solving coordination failure with “all-or-none” group-level incentives. Experiment. Econom. 10(3):285–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamman JR, Martínez-Carrasco MA (2023) Managing uncertainty: An experiment on delegation and team selection. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2272–2295.Google Scholar
• Hannan MT (2022) Rethinking organizational ecology in light of developments in cognitive science and natural-language processing. Retrieved September 11, https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/vmuan.Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haslam SA, McGarty C (2004) Experimental design and causality in social psychological research. Sansone C, Morf CC, Panter AT, eds. The Sage Handbook of Methods in Social Psychology (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 237–264.Google Scholar
• Heath C, Sitkin SB (2001) Big-B vs. big-O: What is organizational about organizational behavior? J. Organ. Behav. 22(1):43–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedström P, Swedberg R (1998) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hegelmaier CF (1852) Über Das Gedächtnis Für Linearanschauungen. Archiv Physiologische Heilkunde 11:844–853.Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Boyd RT, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, McElreath R (2001) In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):73–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A, Ensminger J, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, Cardenas JC, et al. (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312(5781):1767–1770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hergueux J, Henry E, Benkler Y, Algan Y (2023) Social exchange and the reciprocity roller coaster: Evidence from the life and death of virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2296–2314.Google Scholar
• Heugens PPMAR (2008) Organization Theory: Bright Prospects for a Permanently Failing Field ERIM Inaugural Address Series (Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Hill AD, Johnson SG, Greco LM, O’Boyle EH, Walter SL (2021) Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. J. Management 47(1):105–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillygus DS (2018) Navigating scholarly exchange in today’s media environment. J. Politics 80(3):1064–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2005) Risk aversion and incentive effects: New data without order effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(3):902–912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville J, Davis GF, Dyllick T, Miller CC, Thau S, Tsui AS (2019) Sustainable development for a better world: Contributions of leadership, management, and organizations. Acad. Management Discoveries 5(4):355–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyman SI (1970) Management: An experimental science? Management Internat. Rev. 10(6):51–59.Google Scholar
• Imbens GW (2010) Better late than nothing: Some comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009). J. Econom. Literature 48(2):399–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Innocenti A (2017) Virtual reality experiments in economics. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 69:71–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson M, Cox DR (2013) The principles of experimental design and their application in sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 39(1):27–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost JT, Kruglanski AW (2002) The estrangement of social constructionism and experimental social psychology: History of the rift and prospects for reconciliation. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 6(3):168–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk AO, Younkin P (2022) A founding penalty: Evidence from an audit study on gender, entrepreneurship, and future employment. Organ. Sci. 33(2):716–745.Link, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk AO, Younkin P, Rocha V (2023) Do employees work less for female leaders? A multi-method study of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1111–1133.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaibel C, Biemann T (2021) Rethinking the gold standard with multi-armed bandits: Machine learning allocation algorithms for experiments. Organ. Res. Methods 24(1):78–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanazawa S (1999) Using laboratory experiments to test theories of corporate behavior. Rationality Soc. 11(4):443–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanze D, Huang L, Conley MA, Higgins ET (2018) We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Acad. Management J. 61(2):586–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2015) Mixing quantitative and qualitative research. Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research (Routledge, New York), 423–433.Google Scholar
• Kasy M (2021) Of forking paths and tied hands: Selective publication of findings, and what economists should do about it. J. Econom. Perspect. 35(3):175–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerlinger FN, Lee HB (2000) Foundations of Behavioral Research, 4th ed. (Harcourt, Fort Worth, TX).Google Scholar
• Kerr NL (1998) Harking: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 2(3):196–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim H (2020) The value of competitor information: Evidence from a field experiment. Working paper, INSEAD, Business school in Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• King A, Goldfarb B, Simcoe T (2021) Learning from testimony on quantitative research in management. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King EB, Hebl MR, Botsford Morgan W, Ahmad AS (2013) Field experiments on sensitive organizational topics. Organ. Res. Methods 16(4):501–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein RA, Vianello M, Hasselman F, Adams BG, Adams RB Jr, Alper S, Aveyard M, Axt JR, Babalola MT, Bahník Š (2018) Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Adv. Methods Practices Psych. Sci. 1(4):443–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klingebiel R (2018) Risk-type preference shifts in response to performance feedback. Strategic Organ. 16(2):141–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klingebiel R (2022) Motivating innovation: Tunnels vs. funnels. Strategy Sci. 7(4):300–316.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA, Puranam P (2019) A model is a model. Strategy Sci. 4(1):1–3.Link, Google Scholar
• Kotha R, Vissa B, Lin Y, Corboz A-V (2023) Do ambitious entrepreneurs benefit more from training? Strategic Management J. 44(2):549–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Zajac EJ (1996) Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(5):812–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna A (2021) The need for synergy in academic policies: An introduction to the dialogue on pre-registration. J. Consumer Psych. 31(1):146–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kriss PH, Weber RA (2013) Organizational formation and change: Lessons from economic laboratory experiments. Grandori A, ed. Handbook of Economic Organization (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA), 245–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampel J, Shamsie J, Shapira Z (2009) Experiencing the improbable: Rare events and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 20(5):835–845.Link, Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martinez D, Arrieta J, Brusoni S (2023) Microfoundations of problem solving: The role of attentional engagement in predicting problem-solving strategies. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2207–2230.Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martínez D, Brusoni S, Zollo M (2010) The neuroscientific foundations of the exploration−exploitation dilemma. J. Neuroscience Psych. Econom. 3(2):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martínez D, Brusoni S, Canessa N, Zollo M (2015) Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance. Strategic Management J. 36(3):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee A, Inceoglu I, Hauser O, Greene M (2022) Determining causal relationships in leadership research using machine learning: The powerful synergy of experiments and data science. Leadership Quart. 33(5):101426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG, Gilbert R, Griliches Z (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development; comments and discussion. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 3:783–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS (2018) Show us your data: Connect the dots, improve science. Management Organ. Rev. 14(2):433–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2012) How knowledge transfer impacts performance: A multilevel model of benefits and liabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1748–1766.Link, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Zajac EJ (2023) The other invisible hand: How markets—as institutions—propagate conformity and valuation errors. Strategy Sci. 8(3):323–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Bernard M, Nagel R (2017) Strategic intelligence: The cognitive capability to anticipate competitor behavior. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2390–2423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Reypens C, Stark D (2021a) Racial attention deficit. Sci. Adv. 7(38):abg9508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Reypens C, Riedl C, Mauersberger F (2021b) What directs search? Behavioral evidence on the role of performance stability. Acad. Management Proc. 2021.Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Apfelbaum EP, Bernard M, Bartelt VL, Zajac EJ, Stark D (2014) Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(52):18524–18529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA (2011) Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant? An analysis of the original illumination experiments. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 3(1):224–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Chiu C-Y, Fey CF, Levine SS, McDermott G, Murmann JP, Tsang E (2016) The critique of empirical social science. Management Organ. Rev. 12(4):649–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin H, Werner KM, Inzlicht M (2021) Promises and perils of experimentation: The mutual-internal-validity problem. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 16(4):854–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List J (2023) A summary of framed field experiments on fieldexperiments.com: The who’s, what’s, where’s, and when’s. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• List J, Sadoff S, Wagner M (2011) So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design. Experiment. Econom. 14:439–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2011) Why economists should conduct field experiments and 14 tips for pulling one off. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(3):3–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Lucking-Reiley D (2002) The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. J. Political Econom. 110(1):215–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lonati S, Quiroga BF, Zehnder C, Antonakis J (2018) On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations. J. Oper. Management 64:19–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas JW (2003a) Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(3):464–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas JW (2003b) Theory-testing, generalization, and the problem of external validity. Sociol. Theory 21(3):236–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lude M, Prügl R (2021) Experimental studies in family business research. J. Family Bus. Strategy 12(1):100361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lykken DT (1968) Statistical significance in psychological research. Psych. Bull. 70(3):151–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynch JG (1982) On the external validity of experiments in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 9(3):225–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS (2007) Mediation analysis. Annual Rev. Psych. 58:593–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (2004) Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management Organ. Rev. 1(1):5–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1993) Introduction to the second edition. March JG, Simon HA, eds. Organizations, 2nd ed. (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA), 1–19.Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, DeShon RP, Bergh DD (2008) Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now, and beyond. Organ. Res. Methods 11(2):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maxwell SE, Lau MY, Howard GS (2015) Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? Amer. Psych. 70(6):487–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayo E (1933) The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134(3489):1501–1506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDermott R (2011) Internal and external validity. Lupia A, Greene DP, Kuklinski JH, Druckman JN, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 27–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1981) Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. Amer. Behav. Sci. 25(2):154–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Gromet D, Ho H, Kay JS, Lee TW, Pandiloski P, Park Y, et al. (2021) Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science. Nature 600(7889):478–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mill JS (1874) A System of Logic (Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation), 8th ed. (Harper Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Mitchell G (2012) Revisiting truth or triviality: The external validity of research in the psychological laboratory. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 7(2):109–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitzkewitz M, Nagel R (2020) Reinhard Selten. Frantz R, ed. The Beginnings of Behavioral Economics (Academic Press, New York), 57–59.Google Scholar
• Moffitt TE, Arseneault L, Belsky D, Dickson N, Hancox RJ, Harrington H, Houts R, et al. (2011) A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(7):2693–2698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molina M, Nee V, Holm H (2023) Cooperation with strangers: Spillover of community norms. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2315–2331.Google Scholar
• Mook DG (1983) In defense of external invalidity. Amer. Psych. 38:379–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA (2016) Preregister if you want to. Amer. Psych. 71(3):238–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moszkowski A (1970) Conversations with Einstein (Horizon Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DVM, Button KS, Chambers CD, Percie du Sert N, Simonsohn U, et al. (2017) A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behav. 1:0021.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy KR, Aguinis H (2019) Harking: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results. J. Bus. Psych. 34:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel R, Bayona A, Kheirandish R, Mousavi S (2016) Reinhard Selten, the dualist. Frantz R, Chen S-H, Dopfer K, Heukelom F, Mousavi S, eds. Routledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics (Routledge, New York), 66–87.Google Scholar
• Nai J, Lin Y, Kotha R, Vissa B (2022) A foot in the door: Field experiments on entrepreneurs’ network activation strategies for investor referrals. Strategic Management J. 43(2):323–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naumovska I, Gaba V, Greve HR (2021) The diffusion of differences: A review and reorientation of 20 years of diffusion research. Acad. Management Ann. 15(2):377–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human Problem Solving (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Newton I (1999) Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, General Scholium, 2nd ed. (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Nobel Prize (1994) Reinhard Selten—Biographical. Retrieved September 27, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1994/selten/lecture/.Google Scholar
• Nobel Prize (2002) Vernon L. Smith—Facts. Retrieved January 16, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/smith/facts/.Google Scholar
• Nosek B (2023) A commitment to transparency by researchers, journals, funders, and institutions will not prevent fraud. but, it will make fraud more inconvenient and easier to detect. Twitter. Accessed, https://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/1670148230082953216.Google Scholar
• Nosek BA, Ebersole CR, DeHaven AC, Mellor DT (2018) The preregistration revolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(11):2600–2606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, Buck S, et al. (2015) Promoting an open research culture. Science 348(6242):1422–1425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251):aac4716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orne MT (1962) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Amer. Psych. 17(11):776–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ortmann A, Hertwig R (2002) The costs of deception: Evidence from psychology. Experiment. Econom. 5(2):111–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J (1994) Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palan S, Schitter C (2018) Prolific.Ac—A subject pool for online experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 17:22–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pamphile VD, Ruttan RL (2023) The (bounded) role of stated-lived value congruence and authenticity in employee evaluations of organizations. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2332–2352.Google Scholar
• Pedulla DS (2016) Penalized or protected? Gender and the consequences of nonstandard and mismatched employment histories. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(2):262–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perdue BC, Summers JO (1986) Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. J. Marketing Res. 23(4):317–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1993) Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Management Rev. 18(4):599–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Schilke O (2023) The dual function of organizational structure: Aggregating and shaping individuals’ votes. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print February 16, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1653.Link, Google Scholar
• Pittnauer S, Hohnisch M, Ostermaier A, Pfingsten A (2023) Effects of social information on risk taking and performance: Understanding others’ decisions vs. comparing oneself with others in short-term performance. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2352–2372.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Klinger RL (2013) Are we really measuring what we say we’re measuring? Using video techniques to supplement traditional construct validation procedures. J. Appl. Psych. 98:99–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2019) Experimental designs in management and leadership research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability. Leadership Quart. 30(1):11–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT (2001) Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal, and Utilization (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Lashley K, Rindova VP, Han J-H (2019) Which of these things are not like the others? Comparing the rational, emotional, and moral aspects of reputation, status, celebrity, and stigma. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):444–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Sarah K, Richard W (2020) The tumult over transparency: Decoupling transparency from replication in establishing trustworthy qualitative research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P (2018) The Microstructure of Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P (2023) How to rapidly test new organisation designs. Retrieved May 30, 2023, https://knowledge.insead.edu/leadership-organisations/how-rapidly-test-new-organisation-designs.Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radoynovska N, Ruttan R (2021) A matter of transition: Authenticity judgments and attracting employees to hybridized organizations. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2373–2391.Google Scholar
• Rahmandad H, Gary MS (2020) Delays impair learning and can drive convergence to inefficient strategies. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2392–2414.Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Srikanth K, Ungureanu T, Zheng G (2023) How do performance goals influence exploration-exploitation choices? Organ. Sci. 34(6):2464–2486.Google Scholar
• Reiff JS, Zhang JC, Gallus J, Dai H, Pedley NM, Vangala S, Leuchter RK, et al. (2022) When peer comparison information harms physician well-being. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(29):e2121730119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reypens C, Levine SS (2017) To grasp cognition in action, combine behavioral experiments with protocol analysis. Sund KJ, Hodgkinson GP, Galavan RJ, eds. Methodological Challenges and Advances in Managerial and Organizational Cognition (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 123–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reypens C, Levine SS (2018) Behavior in behavioral strategy: Capturing, measuring, analyzing. Augier M, Fang C, Rindova V, eds. Behavioral Strategy in Perspective (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 221–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA, Tilcsik A (2016) Class advantage, commitment penalty: The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1097–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ (1939) Management and the Worker (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1986) Laboratory experimentation in economics. Econom. Philos. 2(2):245–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2001) A theorist’s view of experiments. Eur. Econom. Rev. 45(4):615–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan JC, Tipu SA (2022) Business and management research: Low instances of replication studies and a lack of author independence in replications. Res. Policy 51(1):104408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Selten R (1959) Ein Oligopolexperiment. Zeitschrift gesamte Staatswissenschaft 3:427–471.Google Scholar
• Schilke O (2018) A micro-institutional inquiry into resistance to environmental pressures. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1431–1466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilke O, Powell A, Schweitzer ME (2023) A review of experimental research on organizational trust. J. Trust Res. 13(2):102–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schram A (2005) Artificiality: The tension between internal and external validity in economic experiments. J. Econom. Methodology 12(2):225–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwab A, Starbuck W (2017) A call for openness in research reporting: How to turn covert practices into helpful tools. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 16(1):125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwenk CR (1982) Why sacrifice rigour for relevance? A proposal for combining laboratory and field research in strategic management. Strategic Management J. 3(3):213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah R (2023) Field experiments rap. Retrieved September 27, 2023, https://youtu.be/Z7feq-zl9SI.Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (1998) Accounting forendogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. 44(4):571–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Shen X(S), Li H(J), Tolbert PS (2023) Converging tides lift all boats: Consensus in evaluation criteria boosts investments in firms in nascent technology sectors. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2415–2435.Google Scholar
• Shrestha YR, He VF, Puranam P, von Krogh G (2020) Algorithm supported induction for building theory: How can we use prediction models to theorize? Organ. Sci. 32(3):856–880.Link, Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Rodgers JL (2018) Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Rev. Psych. 69:487–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegfried T (2022) Louis Pasteur’s devotion to truth transformed what we know about health and disease. Sci. News. 202(9):22–26.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1989) The scientist as problem solver. Klahr D, Kotovsky K, eds. Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 375–398.Google Scholar
• Simon HA, Guetzkow H (1952) Research into behavior in organizations—Proposed program. Graduate School of Industrial Administration working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U, Simmons JP, Nelson LD (2015) Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015). J. Experiment. Psych. General 144(6):1146–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Rand W (2018) Simulating macro-level effects from micro-level observations. Management Sci. 64(11):5405–5421.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith VL (1962) An experimental study of competitive market behavior. J. Political Econom. 70(2):111–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith VL (1976) Experimental economics: Induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(2):274–279.Google Scholar
• Smith VL (1982) Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(5):923–955.Google Scholar
• Smith VL (1991) Experimental economics at Purdue. Smith VL, ed. Papers in Experimental Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 154–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Zanna MP, Fong GT (2005) Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):845–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck WH (2016) 60th anniversary essay: How journals could improve research practices in social science. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(2):165–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starr E, Goldfarb B (2020) Binned scatterplots: A simple tool to make research easier and better. Strategic Management J. 41(12):2261–2274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinmetz J, Bennett C, Håkonsson DD (2012) A practitioner’s view of the future of organization design: Future trends and implications for Royal Dutch Shell. J. Organ. Design 1(1):7–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens ST, Jussim L, Honeycutt N (2020) Scholarship suppression: Theoretical perspectives and emerging trends. Societies 10(4):82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevenson RM, Josefy M (2019) Knocking at the gate: The path to publication for entrepreneurship experiments through the lens of gatekeeping theory. J. Bus. Venturing 34(2):242–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stolte JF, Fine GA, Cook KS (2001) Sociological miniaturism: Seeing the big through the small in social psychology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):387–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Staw BM (1995) What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):371–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tavory I, Timmermans S (2014) Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2010) Gender and entrepreneurship as a career choice: Do self-assessments of ability matter? Soc. Psych. Quart. 73(3):288–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A (2010) From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post-communist government agency. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1474–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triplett N (1898) The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. Amer. J. Psych. 9(4):507–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui AS (2021) Responsible research and responsible leadership studies. Acad. Management Discoveries 7(2):166–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind LIX(236):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1982) Judgments of and by representativeness. Tversky A, Kahneman D, Slovic P, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 84–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1983) Extensional vs. intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psych. Rev. 90:293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainity 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van ‘t Veer AE, Giner-Sorolla R (2016) Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 67:2–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van den Broek T, Langley DJ, Ehrenhard ML, Groen A (2023) When do evaluators publicly express their legitimacy judgments? An inquiry into the role of peer endorsement and evaluative mode. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2143–2162.Google Scholar
• Vanhove AJ, Harms PD (2015) Reconciling the two disciplines of organisational science: A comparison of findings from laboratory and field research. Appl. Psych. 64(4):637–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhaal JC, Hahl O, Fandl KJ (2023) Authenticity-based connections as organizational constraints and the paradox of authenticity in the market for Cuban cigars. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2487–2507.Google Scholar
• Wager S, Athey S (2018) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 113(523):1228–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang CL, Whitson JA, King BG, Ramirez RL (2023) Social movements, collective identity, and workplace allies: The labeling of gender equity policy changes. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2508–2525.Google Scholar
• Wang W, Lumineau F, Schilke O (2022) Blockchains: Strategic Implications for Contracting, Trust, and Organizational Design (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserstein RL, Schirm AL, Lazar NA (2019) Moving to a world beyond “P < 0.05.” Amer. Statist. 73(Suppl 1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber J (1992) Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Bus. Ethics Quart. 2(2):137–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber R, Camerer C, Rottenstreich Y, Knez M (2001) The illusion of leadership: Misattribution of cause in coordination games. Organ. Sci. 12(5):582–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber RA, Camerer CF (2003) Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. 49(4):400–415.Link, Google Scholar
• Webster M Jr, Sell J (2014) Why do experiments? Webster M Jr, Sell J, eds. Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, New York), 5–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1965) Laboratory experimentation with organizations. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago), 194–260.Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1969) Laboratory organizations and unnoticed causes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 14(2):294–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberg JD, Freese J, McElhattan D (2014) Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowdsource-recruited sample. Sociol. Sci. 1(19):292–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilde LL (1981) On the use of laboratory experiments in economics. Philos. Econom. Papers Deriving Related Workshop Testability Explanation Econom. Held Virginia Polytechnic Institute State Univ. 1979 (Springer), 137–148.Google Scholar
• Wilson BJ (2017) How we think about economics. Southern Econom. J. 83(3):655–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson TD, Aronson E, Carlsmith K (2010) The art of laboratory experimentation. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, Boston), 51–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Aldrich HE (2012) Out of sight but not out of mind: Why failure to account for left truncation biases research on failure rates. J. Bus. Venturing 27(4):477–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelditch M Jr (1969) Can you really study an army in a laboratory? Etzioni A, Lehman EW, eds. A Sociological Reader on Complex Organizations (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York), 528–539.Google Scholar
• Zelditch M Jr (2014) Laboratory experiments in sociology. Webster M Jr, Sell J, eds. Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, New York), 183–197.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG (1977) The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 42(5):726–743.Crossref, Google Scholar