The Effects of Competition and Scarcity on Interpersonal Communication in Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.18288

References

  • Aldrich HE, Pfeffer J (1976) Environments of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 2:79–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anaza NA, Nowlin EL (2017) What’s mine is mine: A study of salesperson knowledge withholding & hoarding behavior. Indust. Marketing Management 64:14–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arain GA, Hameed I, Umrani WA, Khan AK, Sheikh AZ (2021) Consequences of supervisor knowledge hiding in organizations: A multilevel mediation analysis. Appl. Psych. 70(3):1242–1266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Archer J, Rhodes V (1987) Bereavement and reactions to job loss: A comparative review. British J. Soc. Psych. 26(Part 3):211–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arora-Jonsson S, Brunsson N, Hasse R (2020) Where does competition come from? The role of organization. Organ. Theory, https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877198899.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnes CM, Hollenbeck JR, Jundt DK, DeRue DS, Harmon SJ (2011) Mixing individual incentives and group incentives: Best of both worlds or social dilemma? J. Management 37(6):1611–1635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beersma B, Homan AC, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW (2013) Outcome interdependence shapes the effects of prevention focus on team processes and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121(2):194–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beersma B, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, Moon H, Conlon DE, Ilgen DR (2003) Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Acad. Management J. 46:572–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger L, Fiolleau K, MacTavish C (2019) I know something you don’t know: The effect of relative performance information and individual performance incentives on knowledge sharing. J. Management Accounting Res. 31(2):19–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernard HR, Killworth PD, Sailer L (1980) Informant accuracy in social-network data. V. An experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data. Soc. Sci. Res. 11(1):30–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blocker C, Zhang JZ, Hill RP, Roux C, Corus C, Hutton M, Dorsey J, Minton E (2023) Rethinking scarcity and poverty: Building bridges for shared insight and impact. J. Consumer Psych. 33(3):489–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bono JE, McNamara G (2011) From the editors: Publishing in “AMJ”—Part 2: Research design. Acad. Management J. 54(4):657–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandts J, Riedl A, van Winden F (2009) Competitive rivalry, social disposition, and subjective well-being: An experiment. J. Public Econom. 93(11–12):1158–1167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannon C, Goldsmith K, Roux C (2019) A self‐regulatory model of resource scarcity. J. Consumer Psych. 29(1):104–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter J, Matthews PH, Schirm J (2010) Tournaments and office politics: Evidence from a real effort experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):504–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castrogiovanni GJ (1991) Environmental munificence; a theoretical assessment. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):542–565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Černe M, Nerstad CG, Dysvik A, Škerlavaj M (2014) What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Acad. Management J. 57(1):172–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Learning from peers: Knowledge transfer and sales force productivity growth. Marketing Sci. 33(4):463–484.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behavioral Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching K, Forti E, Rawley E (2024) Competitive familiarity: Learning to coordinate by competing. Organ. Sci. 35(4):1409–1426.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark PB, Wilson JQ (1961) Incentive systems: A theory of organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 6(2):129–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Connelly BL, Tihanyi L, Crook TR, Gangloff KA (2014) Tournament theory: Thirty years of contests and competitions. J. Management 40(1):16–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Connelly CE, Zweig D, Webster J, Trougakos JP (2012) Knowledge hiding in organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 33(1):64–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford JL, Haaland GA (1972) Predecisional information seeking and subsequent conformity in the social influence process. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 23(1):112–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crown J (2016) Flexco: “We are spoiled rotten.” Chicago Tribune (November 11), https://www.chicagotribune.com/2016/11/11/flexco-we-are-spoiled-rotten/.Google Scholar
  • Danilov A, Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2019) Helping under a combination of team and tournament incentives. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 162:120–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danowski JA, Edison-Swift P (1985) Crisis effects on intraorganizational computer-based communication. Comm. Res. 12(2):251–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CK (2006) When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. J. Management 32(1):83–107.Google Scholar
  • De Quidt J, Haushofer J, Roth C (2018) Measuring and bounding experimenter demand. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(11):3266–3302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dechenaux E, Kovenock D, Sheremeta RM (2015) A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments. Experiment. Econom. 18:609–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deutsch M (1949) A theory of co-operation and competition. Human Relations 2:129–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diesner J, Frantz TL, Carley KM (2005) Communication networks from the Enron email corpus: “It’s always about the people. Enron is no different.” Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 11:201–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio PJ (1995) Comments on what theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):391–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drago R, Garvey GT (1998) Incentives for helping on the job: Theory and evidence. J. Labor Econom. 16(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drago R, Turnbull GK (1991) Competition and cooperation in the workplace. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 15(3):347–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erkal N, Gangadharan L, Nikiforakis N (2011) Relative earnings and giving in a real-effort experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):3330–3348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Entwisle B, Faust K, Rindfuss RR, Kaneda T (2007) Networks and contexts: Variation in the structure of social ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5):1495–1533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Yan A (2009) Boundary work in knowledge teams. J. Appl. Psych. 94(3):604–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrin DL, Dirks KT (2003) The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organ. Sci. 14(1):18–31.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishbach A, Tu Y (2016) Pursuing goals with others. Soc. Personality Psych. 10(5):298–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garg K, Kello CT, Smaldino PE (2022) Individual exploration and selective social learning: Balancing exploration–exploitation trade-offs in collective foraging. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 19(189):20210915.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gershman SJ (2015) Do learning rates adapt to the distribution of rewards? Psychon. Bull. Rev. 22:1320–1327.Google Scholar
  • Gibbs MJ, Merchant KA, Van der Stede WA, Vargus ME (2009) Performance measure properties and incentive system design. Indust. Relations 48(2):237–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldsmith K, Griskevicius V, Hamilton R (2020) Scarcity and consumer decision making: Is scarcity a mindset, a threat, a reference point, or a journey? J. Assoc. Consumer Res. 5(4):358–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldsmith K, Roux C, Wilson AV (2019) Can thoughts of having less ever promote prosocial preferences? The relationship between scarcity, construal level, and sustainable product adoption. J. Assoc. Consumer Res. 5(1):70–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grosch K, Ibañez M, Viceisza A (2022) Competition and prosociality: A lab-in-the-field experiment in Ghana. J. Behavioral Experiment. Econom. 99:101887.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guthrie JP, Hollensbe EC (2004) Group incentives and performance: A study of spontaneous goal setting, goal choice and commitment. J. Management 30(2):263–284.Google Scholar
  • Han MS, Masood K, Cudjoe D, Wang Y (2021) Knowledge hiding as the dark side of competitive psychological climate. Leadership Organ. Development J. 42:195–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan RL, Krishnan R, Newman AH (2008) The effects of disseminating relative performance feedback in tournament and individual performance compensation plans. Accounting Rev. 83(4):893–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He H, Baruch Y, Lin CP (2014) Modeling team knowledge sharing and team flexibility: The role of within-team competition. Human Relations 67(8):947–978.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He P, Bell C, Li Y (2021) How and when intragroup relationship conflict leads to knowledge hiding: The roles of envy and trait competitiveness. Internat. J. Conflict Management 32:383–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He T, Derfler-Rozin R, Pitesa M (2020) Financial vulnerability and the reproduction of disadvantage in economic exchanges. J. Appl. Psych. 105(1):80–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heursen L (2023) Does relative performance information lower group morale? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 209:547–559.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill NS, Bartol KM, Tesluk PE, Langa GA (2009) Organizational context and face-to-face interaction: Influences on the development of trust and collaborative behaviors in computer-mediated groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):187–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homburg C, Schyma TR, Hohenberg S, Atefi Y, Ruhnau RCM (2024) “Coopetition” in the presence of team and individual incentives: Evidence from the advice network of a sales organization. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 52(2):306–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoppitt W, Laland KN (2013) Social Learning: An Introduction to Mechanisms, Methods, and Models (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Hossain L, Murshed ST, Uddin S (2013) Communication network dynamics during organizational crisis. J. Informetrics 7(1):16–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Yue LQ (2008) Structure, affect and identity as bases of organizational competition and cooperation. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):275–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin D, Noe T (2022) The golden mean: The risk‐mitigating effect of combining tournament rewards with high‐powered incentives. J. Finance 77(5):2907–2947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson MD, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, Ilgen DR, Jundt D, Meyer CJ (2006) Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Acad. Management J. 49:103–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kameda T, Nakanishi D (2002) Cost–benefit analysis of social/cultural learning in a nonstationary uncertain environment. Evolution Human Behav. 23:373–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kameda T, Takezawa M, Hastie R (2003) The logic of social sharing: An evolutionary game analysis of adaptive norm development. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 7(1):2–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Henderson R (2005) Inertia and incentives: Bridging organizational economics and organizational theory. Organ. Sci. 16(5):509–521.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kassab Y, Isemann SD, Halbeisen G, Walther E (2021) How relative deprivation increases aggressive behavior: Exploring the moderating roles of resource scarcity, deprivation intensity, and sanctions in a game task. Aggressive Behav. 47(2):215–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz D, Kahn RL (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kelly K (2010) The effects of incentives on information exchange and decision quality in groups. Behavioral Res. Accounting 22(1):43–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kendal RL, Coolen I, van Bergen Y, Laland KN (2005) Trade‐offs in the adaptive use of social and asocial learning. Adv. Study Behav. 35:333–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kesebir S, Lee SY, Elliot AJ, Pillutla MM (2019) Lay beliefs about competition: Scale development and gender differences. Motivation Emotion 43:719–739.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keum DD, Eggers JP (2018) Setting the bar: The evaluative and allocative roles of organizational aspirations. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1170–1186.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Khandwalla PN (1972) Environment and its impact on the organization. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 2(3):297–313.Google Scholar
  • Khandwalla PN (1977) The Design of Organizations (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kistruck GM, Lount RB Jr, Smith BR, Bergman BJ Jr, Moss TW (2016) Cooperation vs. competition: Alternative goal structures for motivating groups in a resource scarce environment. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1174–1198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klauss R, Bass BM (1982) Interpersonal Communication in Organizations (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kosfeld M (2004) Economic networks in the laboratory: A survey. Rev. Network Econom. 3(1):20–42.Google Scholar
  • Krackhardt D, Stern RN (1988) Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 51(2):123–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kristofferson K, McFerran B, Morales AC, Dahl DW (2017) The dark side of scarcity promotions: How exposure to limited-quantity promotions can induce aggression. J. Consumer Res. 43(5):683–706.Google Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2018) Compensation and incentives in the workplace. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(3):195–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luft J (2016) Cooperation and competition among employees: Experimental evidence on the role of management control systems. Management Accounting Res. 31:75–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1993) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • McElreath R, Lubell M, Richerson PJ, Waring TM, Baum W, Edsten E, Efferson C, Paciotti B (2005) Applying evolutionary models to the laboratory study of social learning. Evolution Human Behav. 26(6):483–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFarland DA, Moody J, Diehl D, Smith JA, Thomas RJ (2014) Network ecology and adolescent social structure. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(6):1088–1121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinley W (1993) Organizational decline and adaptation: Theoretical controversies. Organ. Sci. 4(1):1–9.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McMillan CJ, Overall JS (2017) Crossing the chasm and over the abyss: Perspectives on organizational failure. Acad. Management Perspect. 31(4):271–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mero J, Haapio H (2022) An effectual approach to executing dynamic capabilities under unexpected uncertainty. Indust. Marketing Management 107:82–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mesoudi A (2008) An experimental simulation of the “copy-successful-individuals” cultural learning strategy: Adaptive landscapes, producer–scrounger dynamics, and informational access costs. Evolution Human Behav. 29(5):350–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milburn TW, Schuler RS, Watman KH (1983) Organizational crisis. Part II: Strategies and responses. Human Relations 36(12):1161–1179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitsuhashi H, Nakamura A (2022) Pay and networks in organizations: Incentive redesign as a driver of network change. Strategic Management J. 43(2):295–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moh’d SS, Černe M, Zhang P (2021) An exploratory configurational analysis of knowledge hiding antecedents in project teams. Project Management J. 52(1):31–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan TJ, Rendell LE, Ehn M, Hoppitt W, Laland KN (2012) The evolutionary basis of human social learning. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279(1729):653–662.Google Scholar
  • Murayama K, Elliot AJ (2012) The competition–performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psych. Bull. 138(6):1035–1070.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muthukrishna M, Henrich J (2019) A problem in theory. Nature Human Behav. 3(3):221–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nebel S, Schneider S, Rey GD (2016) From duels to classroom competition: Social competition and learning in educational videogames within different group sizes. Comput. Human Behav. 55:384–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nguyen TM, Malik A, Budhwar P (2022) Knowledge hiding in organizational crisis: The moderating role of leadership. J. Bus. Res. 139:161–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nguyen NP, Ngo LV, Bucic T, Phong ND (2018) Cross-functional knowledge sharing, coordination and firm performance: The role of cross-functional competition. Indust. Marketing Management 71:123–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park S, Sturman MC (2022) When perception is reality, there is more than one reality: The formation and effects of pay‐for‐performance perceptions. Personnel Psych. 75(3):529–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik P (1978) The External Control of Organizations (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Prediger S, Vollan B, Herrmann B (2014) Resource scarcity and antisocial behavior. J. Public Econom. 119:1–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Price D (2020) My employees took pay cuts instead of layoffs: We’re doing better than ever. Washington Post (August 12), https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/08/12/employees-pay-cuts-productivity/.Google Scholar
  • Raymond J (2015) Would you take less money to help coworkers stay? NBC kindness poll says … CNBC (December 15), https://www.cnbc.com/2015/12/15/would-you-take-less-money-to-help-co-workers-stay-nbc-kindness-poll-says.html.Google Scholar
  • Romero DM, Uzzi B, Kleinberg J (2019) Social networks under stress: Specialized team roles and their communication structure. ACM Trans. Web 13(1):6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samnani AK, Singh P (2014) Performance-enhancing compensation practices and employee productivity: The role of workplace bullying. Human Resource Management Rev. 24(1):5–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandvik JJ, Saouma RE, Seegert NT, Stanton CT (2020) Workplace knowledge flows. Quart. J. Econom. 135(3):1635–1680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sapegina A, Weibel A (2017) The good, the not so bad, and the ugly of competitive human resource practices: A multidisciplinary conceptual framework. Group Organ. Management 42(5):707–747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarkar S, Osiyevskyy O (2018) Organizational change and rigidity during crisis: A review of the paradox. Eur. Management J. 36(1):47–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Semerci A (2019) Examination of knowledge hiding with conflict, competition and personal values. Internat. J. Conflict Management 30(1):111–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siemsen E, Balasubramanian S, Roth AV (2007) Incentives that induce task-related effort, helping, and knowledge sharing in workgroups. Management Sci. 53(10):1533–1550.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Skinner N, Brewer N (2002) The dynamics of threat and challenge appraisals prior to stressful achievement events. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(3):678–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith CA, Ellsworth PC (1985) Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(4):813–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith EB, Menon T, Thompson L (2012) Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23(1):67–82.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith EB, Brands RA, Brashears ME, Kleinbaum AM (2020) Social networks and cognition. Annual Rev. Sociol. 46(1):159–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sofyan Y, De Clercq D, Shang Y (2023) Does intraorganizational competition prompt or hinder performance? The risks for proactive employees who hide knowledge. Personnel Rev. 52(3):777–798.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonenshein S, Nault K, Obodaru O (2017) Competition of a different flavor: How a strategic group identity shapes competition and cooperation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):626–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srivastava SB (2015a) Intraorganizational network dynamics in times of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1365–1380.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Srivastava SB (2015b) Threat, opportunity, and network interaction in organizations. Soc. Psych. Quart. 78(3):246–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steinel W, De Dreu CK (2004) Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(3):419–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steinel W, Utz S, Koning L (2010) The good, the bad and the ugly thing to do when sharing information: Revealing, concealing and lying depend on social motivation, distribution and importance of information. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 113(2):85–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suleiman R, Aharonov‐Majar E, Luzon P (2015) The sharing dilemma: Joining cooperative groups and sharing resources as a means of coping with environmental risk. Behavioral Decision Making 28(2):130–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swab RG, Johnson PD (2018) Steel sharpens steel: A review of multilevel competition and competitiveness in organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 40(2):147–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tesser A, Smith J (1980) Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping: You don’t always help the one you like. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 16:582–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tjosvold D, Poon M (1998) Dealing with scarce resources: Open-minded interaction for resolving budget conflicts. Group Organ. Management 23(3):237–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tjosvold D, Zhang X, Li WD, Wong ASH, Yu K (2022) Open-minded discussion in organizations: A meta-analytic evaluation of cooperation and competition theory. J. Bus. Psych. 37(5):897–921.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • To C, Kilduff GJ, Rosikiewicz BL (2020) When interpersonal competition helps and when it harms: An integration via challenge and threat. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):849–875.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toelch U, van Delft MJ, Bruce MJ, Donders R, Meeus MT, Reader SM (2009) Decreased environmental variability induces a bias for social information use in humans. Evolution Human Behav. 30(1):32–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W (2002) Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ. Sci. 13:179–190.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wageman R (1995) Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):145–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weng Q, Latif K, Khan AK, Tariq H, Butt HP, Obaid A, Sarwar N (2020) Loaded with knowledge, yet green with envy: Leader–member exchange comparison and coworkers-directed knowledge hiding behavior. J. Knowledge Management 24(7):1653–1680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wisdom TN, Song X, Goldstone RL (2013) Social learning strategies in networked groups. Cognitive Sci. 37(8):1383–1425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woike JK, Hafenbrädl S (2020) Rivals without a cause? Relative performance feedback creates destructive competition despite aligned incentives. Behavioral Decision Making 33(4):523–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wrosch C, Scheier MF, Miller GE, Schulz R, Carver CS (2003) Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(12):1494–1508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yasai-Ardekani M (1986) Structural adaptations to environments. Acad. Management Rev. 11(1):9–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu S, Greer LL (2023) The role of resources in the success or failure of diverse teams: Resource scarcity activates negative performance-detracting resource dynamics in social category diverse teams. Organ. Sci. 34(1):24–50.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.