Diversity and/or Inclusion? Evidence from Disability Quota and Inclusion Laws in Brazil

References

• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Autor D, Kostøl A, Mogstad M, Setzler B (2019) Disability benefits, consumption insurance, and household labor supply. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(7):2613–2654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baert S (2016) Wage subsidies and hiring chances for the disabled: Some causal evidence. Eur. J. Health Econom. 17(1):71–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagde S, Epple D, Taylor L (2016) Does affirmative action work? Caste, gender, college quality, and academic success in India. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(6):1495–1521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badgett MVL (2011) Social inclusion and the value of marriage equality in Massachusetts and the Netherlands. J. Soc. Issues 67(2):316–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin M, Johnson W (2006) A critical review of studies of discrimination against workers with disabilities. Rodgers WM III, ed. Handbook on the Economics of Discrimination (Edgar Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 119–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnay T, Duguet E, Le Clainche C, Videau Y (2019) An evaluation of the 1987 French Disabled Workers Act: Better paying than hiring. Eur. J. Health Econom. 20(4):597–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bassanini A, Batut C, Caroli E (2023) Labor market concentration and wages: Incumbents versus new hires. Labour Econom. 81:102338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaman L, Chattopadhyay R, Duflo R, Pande R, Topalova P (2009) Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1497–1540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. J. Political Econom. 76(2):169–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berlinski SG, Gagete-Miranda J (2025) Enforcement spillovers under different networks: The case of quotas for persons with disabilities in Brazil. J. Development Econom. 176:103516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Black SE, Jensen S, Lleras-Muney A (2019) Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labour market outcomes in Norway. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):191–239.Google Scholar
• Cairỏ I, Lipton A (2023) Labor Market Discrimination and the Racial Unemployment Gap: Can Monetary Policy Make a Difference? Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2023-065 (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Calonico S, Cattaneo MD, Titiunik R (2014a) Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82(6):2295–2326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calonico S, Cattaneo MD, Titiunik R (2014b) Robust data-driven inference in the regression-discontinuity design. Stata J. b14(4):909–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:591–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham S (2021) Causal Inference: The Mixtape (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Souza G (2023) Employment and welfare effects of the quota for disabled workers in Brazil. Working Paper No. 2023-11, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
• Deschamps P (2023) Gender quotas in hiring committees: A boon or a bane for women? Management Sci. 70(11):7486–7505.Link, Google Scholar
• Dezso CL, Ross DG, Uribe J (2016) Is there an implicit quota on women in top management? A large‐sample statistical analysis. Strategic Management J. 37(1):98–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diestre L, Santaló J (2020) Why do firms suffer differently from input stigmatization? The costs of removing stigmatized inputs. Organ. Sci. 31(1):47–66.Link, Google Scholar
• Dwertmann DJG, Boehm SA (2016) Status matters: The asymmetric effects of supervisor-subordinate disability incongruence and climate for inclusion. Acad. Management J. 59(1):44–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• EBRD (2020) Economic inclusion for people with disabilities: Challenges and responses. Technical Report, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, London, UK.Google Scholar
• Eckbo BE, Nygaard K, Thorburn KS (2022) Valuation effects of Norway’s board gender-quota law revisited. Management Sci. 68(6):4112–4134.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmans A, Flammer C, Glossner S (2023) Diversity, equity, and inclusion. NBER Working Paper No. 1-23, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Eisner L, Turner-Zwinkels F, Spini D (2021) The impact of laws on norms perceptions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 47(7):1071–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferrari G, Ferraro V, Profeta P, Pronzato C (2022) Do board gender quotas matter? Selection, performance, and stock market effects. Management Sci. 68(8):5618–5643.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Greve H (2019) Safe or profitable? The pursuit of conflicting goals. Organ. Sci. 30(4):647–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C (2023) The contingent relationship between purpose and profit. Strategy Sci. 8(2):256–269.Link, Google Scholar
• Gatignon A, Bode C (2023) When few give to many and many give to few: Corporate social responsibility strategies under India’s legal mandate. Strategic Management J. 44(9):2099–2127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausknecht JP, Holwerda JA (2013) When does employee turnover matter? Dynamic member configurations, productive capacity, and collective performance. Organ. Sci. 24(1):210–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoang T, Suh J, Sabharwal M (2022) Beyond a numbers game? Impact of diversity and inclusion on the perception of organizational justice. Public Admin. Rev. 82(3):537–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holtschlag C, Morales C, Masuda A, Reiche BS (2025) The diversity paradox: The unintended consequences of gender diversity on gender pay equity. Human Resources Management 64(5):1305–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch (2018) “They stay until they die”: A lifetime of isolation and neglect in institutions for people with disabilities in Brazil. Report, Human Rights Watch, New York.Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Lemieux T (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. J. Econom. 142(2):615–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ILO (2019) Promoting Employment Opportunities for People with Disabilities: Quota Schemes, vol. 1. Report, International Labour Organization, Geneva. Google Scholar
• ILO-ONCE (2021) An inclusive digital economy for people with disabilities (International Labour Organization, Geneva, CH).Google Scholar
• Jones M (2016) Disability and perceptions of work and management. British J. Industry Relations 54(1):83–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kensbock JM, Alkærsig L, Lomberg C (2022) Authors’ response: If anything, we should stigmatize unhealthy organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(1):70–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keum DD, Meier S (2024) License to layoff? Unemployment insurance and the moral cost of layoffs. Organ. Sci. 35(3):994–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Colomer J, Belinky M (2014) Structural equality at the top of the corporation: Mandated quotas for women directors. Strategic Management J. 35(6):891–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreiner G, Mihelcic CA, Mikolon S (2022) Stigmatized work and stigmatized workers. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 21(9):95–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krentz M, Dean J, Novacek G (2019) Diversity is just the first step. Inclusion comes next. Boston Consulting Group (April 24), https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/diversity-first-step-inclusion-comes-next.Google Scholar
• Kruse D, Schur L, Rogers S, Ameri M (2018) Why do workers with disabilities earn less? Occupational job requirements and disability discrimination. British J. Indust. Relations 56(4):798–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lalive R, Wuellrich JP, Zweimüller J (2013) Do financial incentives affect firms’ demand for disabled workers? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(1):25–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mateos de Cabo R, Terjesen S, Escot L, Gimeno R (2019) Do ‘soft law’ board gender quotas work? Evidence from a natural experiment. Eur. Management J. 37(5):611–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McConnell B (2024) Can’t see the forest for the logs: On the perils of using difference-in-differences with a log-dependent variable. Accessed August 2, 2026, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.00167.Google Scholar
• Mori Y, Sakamoto N (2018) Economic consequences of employment quota system for disabled people: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design in Japan. J. Japanese Internat. Econom. 48:1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nardi L, Huysentruyt M (2022) Corporate social responsibility, financial materiality, and the challenges of forced migration. Acad. Management Proc. (July 6), https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.11023abstract.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nardi L, Zenger TR, Lazzarini SG, Cabral S (2022) Doing well by doing good, uniquely: Materiality and the market value of unique CSR strategies. Strategy Sci. 7(1):10–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson A, Piatak J (2021) Intersectionality, leadership, and inclusion: How do racially underrepresented women fare in the federal government? Rev. Public Personality Admin. 41(2):294–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Sengul M (2020) What do multiple objectives really mean for performance? Empirical evidence from the French manufacturing sector. Strategic Management J. 41(13):2518–2547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pande R (2003) Can mandated political representation increase policy influence for disadvantaged minorities? Theory and evidence from India. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(4):1132–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paxton P, Hughes MM, Painter MA II (2010) Growth in women’s political representation: A longitudinal exploration of democracy, electoral system, and gender quotas. Eur. J. Political Res. 49(1):25–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peck J (2017) Can hiring quotas work? The effect of the Nitaqat Program on the Saudi private sector. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 8(1):316–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Rider CI (2022) Supporting mental health at work (Comment on “The epidemic of mental disorders in business”). Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(1):56–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pongeluppe LS (2024) The allegory of the favela: The multifaceted effects of socieconomic mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(3):619–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera L, Tilcsik A (2022) Not in my schoolyard: Disability discrimination in educational access. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 88(2):284–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvato C, Rerup C (2017) Routine regulation: Balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):70–209.Google Scholar
• Schildberg-Horisch H, Strassmair C (2012) An experimental test of the deterrence hypothesis. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 28(3):447–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt MT, Branscombe NR, Postmes T, Garcia A (2014) The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 140(4):921–948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szerman C (2026) The labor market effects of disability hiring quotas. Working Paper, London School of Economics, London, UK.Google Scholar
• Teodorovicz T, Lazzarini S, Cabral S, McGahan AM (2023) Investing in general human capital as a relational strategy: Evidence on flexible arrangements with contract workers. Strategic Management J. 45(5):902–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tribunal de Contas da União (2016) Relatório de Levantamento: Avaliaçào da Efetividade da Sistemática de Fiscalizacào das Cotas de Pessoas com Deficiencias Empregadas nas Empresas. Technical Report No. T001.182/2016-1.Google Scholar
• Welch F (1976) Employment quotas for minorities. J. Political Econom. 84(4):S105–S141.Crossref, Google Scholar