Reject or Protect? Corrective Action in Response to Women’s vs. Men’s Reports of Workplace Abuse

References

• Abraham M (2020) Gender-role incongruity and audience-based gender bias: An examination of networking among entrepreneurs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):151–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Affinito SJ, Hofmann DA, Keeney JE (2025) Out of sight, out of mind: How high-level construals can decrease the ethical framing of risk-mitigating behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 110(2):177–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allport GW, Clark K, Pettigrew T (1954) The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• AllVoices (2021) The state of workplace harassment 2021. (September 1), https://www.allvoices.co/blog/the-state-of-workplace-harassment-2021.Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Lamertz K (2004) A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1023–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong CL, McAdams MJ (2009) Blogs of information: How gender cues and individual motivations influence perceptions of credibility. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 14(3):435–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy NM, Nicholson GJ (2003) Climate of fear in organisational settings: Construct definition, measurement and a test of theory. Australian J. Psych. 55(1):24–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashmore RD, Del Boca FK (1981) Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. Hamilton DL, ed. Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior (Psychology Press, London), 37–57.Google Scholar
• Benoit WL, Czerwinski A (1997) A critical analysis of USAir’s image repair discourse. Bus. Comm. Quart. 60(3):38–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berdahl JL (2007) The sexual harassment of uppity women. J. Appl. Psych. 92(2):425.Google Scholar
• Bergman ME, Langhout RD, Palmieri PA, Cortina LM, Fitzgerald LF (2002) The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. J. Appl. Psych. 87(2):230–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biernat M (2003) Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. Amer. Psych. 58(12):1019–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blodorn A, O’Brien LT, Kordys J (2012) Responding to sex-based discrimination: Gender differences in perceived discrimination and implications for legal decision making. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 15(3):409–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowling NA, Beehr TA (2006) Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 91(5):998–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brigham JC (1971) Ethnic stereotypes. Psych. Bull. 76(1):15–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caulfield M (2023) Between markets, politics, and ethics: On vendor conscience and impersonal markets. J. Bus. Ethics 188(2):307–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen A, Treviño LK (2023) The consequences of ethical voice inside the organization: An integrative review. J. Appl. Psych. 108(8):1316–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortina L, Rabelo V, Holland K (2018) Beyond blaming the victim: Toward a more progressive understanding of workplace mistreatment. Indust. Organ. Psych. 11(1):81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crocker J, Voelkl K, Testa M, Major B (1991) Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 60(2):218–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosby JR, Monin B (2013) How the opinions of racial minorities influence judgments of discrimination. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 35(4):334–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curry TR, Lee G, Rodriguez SF (2004) Does victim gender increase sentence severity? Further explorations of gender dynamics and sentencing outcomes. Crime Delinquency 50(3):319–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czopp AM, Monteith MJ (2003) Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(4):532–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Kalev A (2019) The promise and peril of sexual harassment programs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(25):12255–12260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodson SJ, Goodwin RD, Graham J, Diekmann KA (2023) Moral foundations, himpathy, and punishment following organizational sexual misconduct allegations. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1938–1964.Link, Google Scholar
• Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL (2004) Aversive racism. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 36:1–52. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, Pearson AR (2017) Aversive racism and contemporary bias. Sibley CG, Barlow FK, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 267–294.Google Scholar
• Einarsen S, Mikkelsen EG (2003) Individual effects of exposure to bullying at work. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Cooper C, eds. Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace (CRC Press, London), 127–144.Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Sutton RI (1992) Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. 35(4):699–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein D, Goodman LA (2018) Discounting women: Doubting domestic violence survivors’ credibility and dismissing their experiences. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 167:399–461.Google Scholar
• Feess E, Feld J, Noy S (2021) People judge discrimination against women more harshly than discrimination against men—Does statistical fairness discrimination explain why? Frontiers Psych. 12:675–776.Google Scholar
• FeldmanHall O, Dalgleish T, Evans D, Navrady L, Tedeschi E, Mobbs D (2016) Moral chivalry: Gender and harm sensitivity predict costly altruism. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 7(6):542–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, King Z (2011) Anticipatory sorting and gender segregation in temporary employment. Management Sci. 57(6):989–1008.Link, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Cuddy AJ, Glick P (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11(2):77–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Cuddy AJ, Glick PS, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82:878–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald LF, Swan S, Magley VJ (1997) But was it really sexual harassment?: Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. O’Donohue W, ed. Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment (Allyn & Bacon, Boston), 5–28.Google Scholar
• Fragale AR, Rosen B, Xu C, Merideth I (2009) The higher they are, the harder they fall: The effects of wrongdoer status on observer punishment recommendations and intentionality attributions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(1):53–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey E, Adams GS, Pfeffer J, Belmi P (2023) What we (do not) know about punishment across organizational boundaries. J. Management 49(1):196–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frieder RE, Hochwarter WA, DeOrtentiis PS (2015) Attenuating the negative effects of abusive supervision: The role of proactive voice behavior and resource management ability. Leadership Quart. 26(5):821–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (2005) Understanding and addressing contemporary racism: From aversive racism to the common ingroup identity model. J. Soc. Issues 61(3):615–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganegoda DB, Shukla J, Shapiro DL (2024) Garnering support for social justice: When and why is “yes” likelier for “allies” versus “disadvantaged group advocates”? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 182:104332.Google Scholar
• Gao L, Brink AG (2017) Whistleblowing studies in accounting research: A review of experimental studies on the determinants of whistleblowing. J. Accounting Literature 38(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graso M, Reynolds T, Grover SL (2020) Allegations of mistreatment in an era of harm avoidance: Taboos, challenges, and implications for management. Acad. Management Perspect. 34(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graso M, Aquino K, Chen FX, Camps J, Strah N (2023) When do observers deprioritize due process for the perpetrator and prioritize safety for the victim in response to information-poor allegations of harm? Psych. Sci. 34(2):186–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutek BA, O’Connor M (1995) The empirical basis for the reasonable woman standard. J. Soc. Issues 51(1):151–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackney KJ, Perrewé PL (2018) A review of abusive behaviors at work: The development of a process model for studying abuse. Organ. Psych. Rev. 8(1):70–92.Google Scholar
• Herman S (2010) The role of corroborative evidence in child sexual abuse evaluations. J. Investigative Psych. 7(3):189–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hershcovis MS, Vranjes I, Berdahl JL, Cortina LM (2021) See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: Theorizing network silence around sexual harassment. J. Appl. Psych. 106(12):1834–1847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertzog JL, Wright D, Beat D (2008) There’s a policy for that: A comparison of the organizational culture of workplaces reporting incidents of sexual harassment. Behav. Soc. Issues 17:169–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoel H, Cooper CL, Einarsen SV (2020) Organizational effects of workplace bullying. Einarsen SV, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL, eds. Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Practice (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 209–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, Tingley D, Yamamoto T (2013) Experimental designs for identifying causal mechanisms. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A Statist. Soc. 176(1):5–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jagatic K, Keashly L (2000) Negative interactions with faculty: Graduate student experiences. Conflict Management Higher Ed. Report 1(3):1–6.Google Scholar
• Khalid M, Bashir S, Khan AK, Abbas N (2018) When and how abusive supervision leads to knowledge hiding behaviors: An Islamic work ethics perspective. Leadership Organ. Development J. 39(6):794–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiewitz C, Restubog SLD, Shoss MK, Garcia PRJM, Tang RL (2016) Suffering in silence: Investigating the role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence. J. Appl. Psych. 101(5):731–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleck G (1981) Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing: A critical evaluation of the evidence with additional evidence on the death penalty. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 46(6):783–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kundro TG, Nurmohamed S (2021) Understanding when and why cover-ups are punished less severely. Acad. Management J. 64(3):873–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kundro TG, Rothbard NP (2023) Does power protect female moral objectors? How and when moral objectors’ gender, power, and use of organizational frames influence perceived self-control and experienced retaliation. Acad. Management J. 66(1):306–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Statist. Software 82(13).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lapierre LM, Spector PE, Leck JD (2005) Sexual versus nonsexual workplace aggression and victims’ overall job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Occupational Health Psych. 10(2):155–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lonsway KA, Cortina LM, Magley VJ (2008) Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex Roles 58:599–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lount RB Jr, Sheldon OJ, Rink F, Phillips KW (2015) Biased perceptions of racially diverse teams and their consequences for resource support. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1351–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Lutgen-Sandvik P (2003) The communicative cycle of employee emotional abuse: Generation and regeneration of workplace mistreatment. Management Comm. Quart. 16(4):471–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer DM, Nurmohamed S, Treviño LK, Shapiro DL, Schminke M (2013) Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121(1):89–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCauley C, Stitt CL, Segal M (1980) Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psych. Bull. 87(1):195–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H, Nurmohamed S (2021) When are organizations punished for organizational misconduct? A review and research agenda. Res. Organ. Behav. 41:100150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miceli MP, Near JP (1994) Whistleblowing: Reaping the benefits. Acad. Management Perspect. 8(3):65–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Kray LJ (2022) The mitigating effect of desiring status on social backlash against ambitious women. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 102:104355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):706–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munson LJ, Hulin C, Drasgow F (2000) Longitudinal analysis of dispositional influences and sexual harassment: Effects on job and psychological outcomes. Personnel Psych. 53(1):21–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy-Oikonen J, McQueen K, Miller A, Chambers L, Hiebert A (2022) Unfounded sexual assault: Women’s experiences of not being believed by the police. J. Interpersonal Violence 37(11–12):NP8916–NP8940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nalepa M (2008) To punish the guilty and protect the innocent: Comparing truth revelation procedures. J. Theoret. Politics 20(2):221–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navarick DJ, Moreno KM (2022) Moral dilemmas in hospitals: Which shooting victim should be saved? Frontiers Psych. 13:770020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Near JP, Miceli MP (1985) Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. J. Bus. Ethics 4(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Near JP, Miceli MP (1995) Effective-whistle blowing. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):679–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Connor M, Gutek BA, Stockdale M, Geer TM, Melancon R (2004) Explaining sexual harassment judgments: Looking beyond gender of the rater. Law Human Behav. 28:69–95.Google Scholar
• O’Reilly J, Aquino K (2011) A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):526–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne DL, Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF (1999) Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. J. Res. Personality 33(1):27–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinder CC, Harlos KP (2001) Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Buckley M, Halbesleben J, Wheeler AR, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 20 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 331–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ponce de Leon RP, Rosette AS (2022) “Invisible” discrimination: Divergent outcomes for the nonprototypicality of black women. Acad. Management J. 65(3):784–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preston MC, Boyd TL, Leigh A, Burgess R, Marsh V (2024) An ally by any other name: Examining the effects of racial minority leaders as allies for advancing racial justice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 181:104321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayner C (2012) Reforming abusive organizations. Bowie V, Fisher BS, Cooper C, eds. Workplace Violence (Willan, London), 80–94.Google Scholar
• Reynolds T, Howard C, Sjåstad H, Zhu L, Okimoto TG, Baumeister RF, Aquino K, Kim J (2020) Man up and take it: Gender bias in moral typecasting. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 161:120–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodin MJ, Price JM, Bryson JB, Sanchez FJ (1990) Asymmetry in prejudice attribution. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 26(6):481–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharrow EA, Rhodes JH, Nteta TM, Greenlee JS (2018) The first-daughter effect: The impact of fathering daughters on men’s preferences for gender-equality policies. Public Opinion Quart. 82(3):493–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw S (2001) Prevention and response: What works, what doesn’t? Griffith BE, ed. Sexual Harassment in the Public Workplace (American Bar Association, Chicago), 137–200.Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Zanna MP, Fong GT (2005) Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):845–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM (2016) Stumbling toward a social psychology of organizations: An autobiographical look at the direction of organizational research. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor N, Joudo J (2005) The impact of pre-recorded video and closed circuit television testimony by adult sexual assault complainants on jury decision-making: An experimental study. Research and Public Policy Series No. 68, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. Acad. Management J. 43(2):178–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toribio-Flórez D, Saβe J, Baumert A (2023) “Proof under reasonable doubt”: Ambiguity of the norm violation as boundary condition of third-party punishment. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 49(3):429–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trevino LK, Victor B (1992) Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Acad. Management J. 35(1):38–64.Google Scholar
• Vargas EA, Cortina LM, Settles IH, Brassel ST, Perumalswami CR, Johnson TR, Jagsi R (2022) Formal reporting of identity-based harassment at an academic medical center: Incidence, barriers, and institutional responses. Acad. Medicine 97(7):1029–1037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman N, Mayer DM, Ong M, DeRue DS (2016) When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 101(6):793–814.Crossref, Google Scholar