Scrutiny, Norms, and Selective Disclosure: A Global Study of Greenwashing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1039

References

  • Abrahamson E, Park C (1994) Concealment of negative organizational outcomes: An agency theory perspective. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1302–1334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aguilera RV, Jackson G (2010) Comparative and international corporate governance. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):485–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagnoli M, Watts S (2014) Voluntary assurance of voluntary CSR disclosure. Working paper, Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Management J. 47(1):93–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Management J. 43(4):717–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):794–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barth ME, McNichols MF, Wilson GP (1997) Factors influencing firms’ disclosures about environmental liabilities. Rev. Accounting Stud. 2(1):35–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartley T, Child C (2011) Movements, markets and fields: The effects of anti-sweatshop campaigns on U.S. firms, 1993–2000. Soc. Forces 90(2):425–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartley T, Child C (2014) Shaming the corporation: The social production of targets and the anti-sweatshop movement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(4):653–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowen F (2014) After Greenwashing: Symbolic Corporate Environmentalism and Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breast Cancer Action (2011) Think before you pink: Before you buy pink. Accessed February 1, 2011, http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?page_id=13.Google Scholar
  • Bridwell-Mitchell EN, Lant TK (2014) The effects of issue interpretation on social choices in professional networks. Organ. Sci. 25(2):401–419.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bromley P, Powell WW (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):483–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell JL (2005) Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research. In Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald MN, eds. Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York), 41–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterji AK, Toffel MW (2010) How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management J. 31(9):917–945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cho CH, Patten DM (2007) The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 32(7–8):639–647.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cho CH, Roberts RW (2010) Environmental reporting on the internet by America’s Toxic 100: Legitimacy and self-presentation? Internat. J. Accounting Inform. Systems 11(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dando N, Swift T (2003) Transparency and assurance: Minding the credibility gap. J. Bus. Ethics 44(2–3):195–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Marquis C (2005) Prospects for theory about organizations in the early 21st century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 16(4):332–343.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delmas MA, Burbano VC (2011) The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Rev. 54(1):64–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delmas MA, Montes-Sancho MJ (2010) Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation. Strategic Management J. 31(6):575–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delmas MA, Toffel MW (2008) Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management J. 29(10):1027–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl. Econom. 38(10):1091–1110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreher A, Gaston N, Martens P (2008) Measuring Globalisation: Gauging Its Consequences (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dye RA (2001) An evaluation of “essays on disclosure” and the disclosure literature in accounting. J. Accounting Econom. 32(1–3):181–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley C, Lenox MJ (2006) Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management J. 27(8):765–781.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (New Society, Stony Creek, CT).Google Scholar
  • Enders CK, Bandalos DL (2001) The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary J. 8(3):430–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esty DC, Levy M, Srebotnjak T, de Sherbinin A (2005) 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship (Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • European Environment Agency (2010) Tracking Progress Towards Kyoto and 2020 Targets in Europe (EEA Report No 7/2010) (Office for Official Publications of the European Union, Luxembourg).Google Scholar
  • Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer JAV (2008) Is competition good for trust? Cross-country evidence using micro-data. Econom. Lett. 100(1):56–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank DJ, Hironaka A, Schofer E (2000) The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(1):96–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glachant M (2007) Non-binding voluntary agreements. J. Environment. Econom. Management 54(1):32–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH (2007) Econometric Analysis, 6th ed. (Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guler I, Guillén MF, Macpherson JM (2002) Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):207–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heflin F, Subramanyam K, Zhang Y (2003) Regulation FD and the financial information environment: Early evidence. Accounting Rev. 78(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inglehart R (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jira CF, Toffel MW (2013) Engaging supply chains in climate change. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):559–577.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones Jr W, Keiser KR (1987) Issue visibility and the effects of PAC money. Soc. Sci. Quart. 68(1):170–176.Google Scholar
  • Karolyi GA (2006) The world of cross-listings and cross-listings of the world: Challenging conventional wisdom. Rev. Finance 10(1):99–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keohane RO, Nye Jr JS (2000) Introduction. Nye JS, Donahue JD, eds. Governance in a Globalizing World (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC), 1–44.Google Scholar
  • Khanna T, Palepu KG, Srinivasan S (2004) Disclosure practices of foreign companies interacting with U.S. markets. J. Accounting Res. 42(2):475–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim EH, Lyon TP (2011) Strategic environmental disclosure: Evidence from the DOE’s voluntary greenhouse gas registry. J. Environment. Econom. Management 61(3):311–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim EH, Lyon TP (2015) Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organ. Sci. 26(3):705–723.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • King BG (2008) A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King B, McDonnell MH (2015) Good firms, good targets: The relationship between corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting. Tsutsui K, Lim A, eds. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World: Toward Effective Global CSR Frameworks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 430–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King BG, Pearce NA (2010) The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36(August):249–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirk M, Vincent J (2014) Professional investor relations within the firm. Accounting Rev. 89(4):1421–1452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolk A (2004) A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance. Internat. J. Environment Sustainable Development 3(1):51–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • KPMG (2008) KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008 (KPMG International, Amstelveen, Netherlands).Google Scholar
  • KPMG (2013) KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2013 (KPMG International, Amstelveen, Netherlands).Google Scholar
  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1998) Law and finance. J. Political Econom. 106(6):1113–1155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lenox MJ (2006) The role of private decentralized institutions in sustaining industry self-regulation. Organ. Sci. 17(6):677–690.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lenox MJ, Eesley CE (2009) Private environmental activism and the selection and response of firm targets. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(1):45–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis BW, Walls JL, Dowell GW (2014) Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure. Strategic Management J. 35(5):712–722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke R (2013) The Promise and Limits of Private Power Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Longhofer W, Schofer E (2010) National and global origins of environmental association. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(4):505–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luo J, Meier S, Oberholzer-Gee F (2012) No news is good news: CSR strategy and newspaper coverage of negative firm events. Working Paper 12–091, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2011) Greenwash: Environmental disclosure under threat of audit. J. Econom. Management Strategy 20(1):3–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyon TP, Montgomery AW (2015) The means and end of greenwash. Organ. Environment 28(2):223–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maddala GS (1977) Econometrics (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Majumdar SK, Bhattacharjee A (2014) Institutional change and manufacturing sector profitability variances in India. Organ. Sci. 25(2):509–528.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Qian C (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organ. Sci. 25(1):127–148.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maxwell JW, Lyon TP, Hackett SC (2000) Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. J. Law Econom. 43(2):583–618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1996) Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes—Toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN, eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (Cambridge University Press, New York), 1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonnell M-H, King BG (2013) Keeping up appearances: Reputation threat and prosocial responses to social movement boycotts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):387–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neu D, Warsame H, Pedwell K (1998) Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 23(3):265–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neustadl A (1990) Interest-group PACsmanship: An analysis of campaign contributions, issue visibility, and legislative impact. Soc. Forces 69(2):549–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhmatovskiy I, David RJ (2012) Setting your own standards: Internal corporate governance codes as a response to institutional pressure. Organ. Sci. 23(1):155–176.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oxelheim L, Randoy T (2005) The Anglo-American financial influence on CEO compensation in non-Anglo-American firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 36(4):470–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J (1981) Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 3 (JAI, Greenwich, CT), 1–52.Google Scholar
  • Power M (1994) The Audit Explosion, No. 7 (Demos, London).Google Scholar
  • Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A (2012) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, 3rd ed. (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
  • Rehbein K, Waddock S, Graves SB (2004) Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Bus. Soc. 43(3):239–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reid EM, Toffel MW (2009) Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1157–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reimann KD (2001) Building networks from the outside in: International movements, Japanese NGOs, and the Kyoto climate change conference. Mobilization: Internat. Quart. 6(1):69–82.Google Scholar
  • Risse-Kappen T, Ropp SC, Sikkink K (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Salo J (2012) Environmental metrics. Krosinsky C, Robins N, Viederman S, eds. Evolutions in Sustainable Investing: Strategies, Funds and Thought Leadership (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ),169–180.Google Scholar
  • Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Shi Y, Magnan M, Kim J-B (2012) Do countries matter for voluntary disclosure: Evidence from cross-listed firms in the U.S. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(2):143–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short JL, Toffel MW (2008) Coerced confessions: Self-policing in the shadow of the regulator. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 24(1):45–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short JL, Toffel MW (2010) Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):361–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steinberg PF (2002) Civic environmentalism in developing countries: Opportunities for innovation in state-society relations. World Development Report 2003 background paper, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  • Thomas S, Repetto R, Dias D (2007) Integrated environmental and financial performance metrics for investment analysis and portfolio management. Corporate Governance: Internat. Rev. 15(3):421–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trucost Plc. (2008) Trucost Methodology Overview: Measuring Company Environmental Impacts (Trucost Plc., London).Google Scholar
  • Tsutsui K, Wotipka CM (2004) Global civil society and the international human rights movement: Citizen participation in human rights international nongovernmental organizations. Soc. Forces 83(2):587–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaaler PM (2008) How do MNCs vote in developing country elections? Acad. Management J. 51(1):21–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams OF (2004) The UN global compact: The challenge and the promise. Bus. Ethics Quart. 14(4):755–774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolf SM (1996) Fear and loathing about the public right to know: The surprising success of the emergency planning and community right-to-know act. J. Land Use Environ. Law 11(2):217–234.Google Scholar
  • Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (2004) The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):433–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.